Tuomas Multamaki
University of Turku
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Tuomas Multamaki.
Physical Review D | 2006
Tuomas Multamaki; Iiro Vilja
Spherically symmetric static empty space solutions are studied in
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2006
Morad Amarzguioui; Øystein Elgarøy; David F. Mota; Tuomas Multamaki
f(R)
Physical Review Letters | 2005
Kari Enqvist; Asko Jokinen; Anupam Mazumdar; Tuomas Multamaki; Antti Vaihkonen
theories of gravity. We reduce the set of modified Einsteins equations to a single equation and show how one can construct exact solutions in different
Physical Review D | 2007
Tuomas Multamaki; Iiro Vilja
f(R)
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2005
Kari Enqvist; Asko Jokinen; Anupam Mazumdar; Tuomas Multamaki; Antti Vaihkonen
models. In particular, we show that for a large class models, including e.g. the
Journal of High Energy Physics | 2005
C. P. Burgess; Richard Easther; Anupam Mazumdar; David F. Mota; Tuomas Multamaki
f(R)=R\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\mu}}^{4}/R
Classical and Quantum Gravity | 2008
Tuomas Multamaki; Antti Putaja; Iiro Vilja; Elias C. Vagenas
model, the Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric is an exact solution of the field equations. The significance of these solutions is discussed in light of solar system constraints on
Physical Review D | 2004
Tuomas Multamaki; E. Gaztanaga; Marc Manera
f(R)
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2007
Øystein Elgarøy; Tuomas Multamaki
theories of gravity.
Physical Review D | 2006
Tirthabir Biswas; Robert H. Brandenberger; Anupam Mazumdar; Tuomas Multamaki
We investigate f(R) theories of gravity within the Palatini approach and show how one can determine the expansion history, H(a), for an arbitrary choice of f(R). As an example, we consider cosmological constraints on such theories arising from the supernova type la, large-scale structure formation, and cosmic microwave background observations. We find that the best fit to the data is a non-null leading order correction to the Einstein gravity. However, the current data exhibits no significant trend toward such corrections compared to the concordance ACDM model. Our results show that the oft-considered I/R models are not compatible with the data. The results demonstrate that background expansion alone can act as a good discriminator between modified gravity models when multiple data sets are used.