Turgut Alkibay

Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Endourologic Alternatives

Aim of the Study: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of ESWL and ureteroscopic lithotripsy with pneumatic, ultrasonic and electrohydraulic modalities in patients with ureteral stones. Patients and Method: In this study, 1,970 patients with ureteral stones were evaluated. ESWL and ureteroscopic lithotripsies were performed in 1,580 and 484 patients, respectively. The ESWL group was treated with a Siemens Lithostar plus. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy was performed with pneumatic lithotripsy (PL), ultrasonic lithotripsy (USL) and electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in 140 (28.9%), 311 (64.3%) and 33 (6.8%) patients, respectively. 94 patients underwent both because of unsuccessful ESWL therapy. Results: In the ESWL group, the stone-free rate was 49.9% and the fragmentation rate 71.0%. These values were: 95.0 and 97.1% for PL; 88.1 and 89.4% for USL; 90.9 and 93.9% for EHL, respectively. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy has been found more effective than ESWL in the treatment of middle and lower ureteral calculi (p < 0.001) and PL has the greatest success rate within these endoscopic groups. Conclusion: ESWL therapy can be the first-line therapy in upper ureteral stones keeping the other modalities for unfragmented stones. However, ureteroscopic lithotripsy is the most effective treatment choice in lower ureteral stones no matter which kind of energy used and PL is the most effective and less complicated among the other types.

Comparison of the Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 with Voided Urine Cytology and BTA stat Test in the Diagnosis of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder

Objective: To assess sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP22) test, BTA stat test and cytology in the urine of patients with a spectrum of urologic conditions, including bladder cancer. Methods: A total of 140 patients (40 with bladder cancer) provided a urine sample which was divided into appropriate aliquots for each of the tests cited above. The endoscopist, pathologist, cytologist and the person performing BTA stat test and NMP22 test were blinded as to the results of the other tests. Results: Receiver-operating characteristics curve interpretation determined that 12.0 U/ml was an optimal reference value for NMP22 to detect transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in this patient group. Comparative results demonstrate a clear superiority of NMP22 and BTA stat tests in sensitivity in bladder cancer detection (p < 0.01), while cytology and NMP22 were better than BTA stat test in specificity (p < 0.05). Conclusions: NMP22 and BTA stat test results represented significant improvement over urinary cytology for detection of transitional cell carcinoma. The sensitivities of NMP22 and BTA stat tests for detection of transitional cell carcinoma in this group of patients were as much as twice that of cytology. When the cutoff value of urinary NMP22 was set at 12.0 U/ml, NMP22 was more accurate than the other tests (p < 0.05).

Management of Ureteral Stones with Pneumatic Lithotripsy: Report of 500 Patients

PURPOSE To evaluate the results of pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) with ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed, retrospectively, the records of 500 patients (366 male, 134 female) with ureteral calculi treated by PL with the Swiss Lithoclast. Of these patients, 124 (24.8%) were treated primarily and 376 (75.2%) were treated secondarily after unsuccessful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). The results were evaluated 3 months after treatment by excretory urography, ultrasonography, or both. RESULTS The over-all stone-free and fragmentation rates were 94.6% and 96.8%, respectively. These values were 97.1% and 98.5% for stones <or=10 mm and 83.7% and 89.1% for stones >10 mm, respectively. The main complications were stone migration (2.0%), urosepsis (3.0%), and ureteral perforation (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS While SWL is generally excepted as a first-line treatment option in ureteral stones because of its noninvasive nature, in situ lithotripsy, and especially PL, has higher success rates with minimal morbidity. Thus, PL seems to be a good alternative in patients in whom SWL was unsuccessful or not indicated and in patients who need early stone removal.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in anomalous kidneys

Traditionally, stones in anomalous kidneys have been removed by open or percutaneous surgery. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) with the Dornier MPL 9000 lithotripter was performed in seven patients with horseshoe kidneys, four with pelvic ectopic kidneys, and six with malrotated kidneys. Twelve patients (71%) needed repeated treatments. A total of 11 patients (65%) in all the groups were stone free, and four patients had asymptomatic residual fragments no more than 5 mm in diameter. In the remaining two patients, no sign of stone disintegration was observed, and they underwent open surgery. Extracorporeal lithotripsy is the treatment of choice for stones in horseshoe or malrotated kidneys but is not useful for stones in most pelvic kidneys.

What is the optimal treatment for lower ureteral stones larger than 1cm

Purpose : To compare the treatment options for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.

Comparison of 1998 WHO/ISUP and 1973 WHO Classifications for Interobserver Variability in Grading of Papillary Urothelial Neoplasms of the Bladder

Aim: Our aim was to compare the interobserver variability between the 1998 WHO/ISUP and 1973 WHO classifications. Methods: 258 consecutive papillary urothelial carcinomas were reviewed by two pathologists and assigned a tumor grade according to the 1973 WHO and 1998 WHO/ISUP without the knowledge of primary diagnosis and clinical follow-up. All cases were also histologically staged by the two pathologists separately as follows: pTa (noninvasive), pT1 (lamina propria invasion only), pT2 (muscularis propria invasion). Findings of both pathologists and degree of agreement were compared statistically by using Pearson’s χ2 test and ĸ statistics respectively. A ĸ value of 0.21–0.40 is accepted as fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate and 0.61–0.80 substantial agreement. Results: Regardless of the pathologist, tumor grades of two classifications correlated to each other and the pathological stage (p < 0.05). Overall degree of agreement between pathologists was higher in the 1998 WHO/ISUP (ĸ 0.59) than the 1973 WHO (ĸ 0.41), but both were still moderate. Papillary urothelial neoplasia with low malignant potential was the group of 1998 WHO/ISUP that showed the lowest degree of agreement and if excluded, interobserver variability of the 1998 WHO/ISUP decreased significantly (ĸ 0.84). Conclusion: The diagnosis of papillary urothelial neoplasia with low malignant potential and the criteria that differentiates it from low-grade carcinomas needs improvement in order to compare the different studies and therapies and to provide more accurate information for management.

Micropapillary Pattern in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Analysis

Objectives: Our aim was to review our pathological archive to find out the actual incidence of micropapillary pattern (MPP) in our urothelial carcinoma patient population and determine its correlation with clinical outcome. Patients and Methods: 14 out of 170 cases with complete clinical follow-up were clinicopathologically analyzed. The extent of MPP was determined as tumor percentage. Results: 12 further cases with MPP were defined in the review. The percentage of patients with positive MPP increased in parallel to the tumor stage. There was no considerable difference between MPP-positive and MPP-negative groups according to the progression rates in non-muscle-invasive and muscle-invasive groups. Progression-free survival was much shorter in MPP cases, but again without statistical significance. Also, there was no significant relation between percentage of MPP and progression-free survival. Conclusions: Awareness of pathologists about MPP and its highly possible relation with aggressive behavior must be raised, as it may be more common than reported. A multicentric review of a large number of cases with MPP is needed for a better definition of its biological behavior. Focal MPP cases may have a better prognosis but this needs to be confirmed.

POWER DOPPLER ULTRASOUND MAPPING IN NONOBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIC PATIENTS PRIOR TO TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION

This study was conducted to localize the testicular regions, which have better blood circulation by power Doppler ultrasonography in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia before testicular sperm extraction (TESE), and to investigate whether these vascularized areas have a high sperm retrieval rate or not. We evaluated 110 testes of 55 cases that were diagnosed as nonobstructive azoospermia. The mean age of the study group was 33 years (range 26 to 42). Patients with Y chromosome microdeletions, karyotype and hormonal abnormalities (except elevated FSH levels) were excluded from the study. In all cases, testes were evaluated by power Doppler ultrasonography before testicular sperm extraction. Testis was divided vertically into five equal parts and the area with maximum vascularity was determined subjectively. During testicular sperm extraction, starting from best-perfused areas, biopsies were done. If no motile or sufficient amount of sperm was found, TESE procedure was tried on the contralateral testis. TESE were performed from 82 testes and for the regions that show good and poor vascularity. The sperm finding rate was 38% and 14%, respectively (OR = 3.55)(p = 0.001). Power Doppler ultrasound mapping of the testis in nonobstructive azoospermic cases is a reliable and informative method to assess spermatogenic foci. It is a noninvasive technique that minimizes the unnecessary removal of hormone producing tissue and gives chance to end the TESE earlier than currently practiced procedures.

Nuclear p53 Overexpression in Bladder, Prostate, and Renal Carcinomas

Background:

An unusual complication of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Urinoma due to rupture of the renal pelvis

A case of a female patient with urinoma due to rupture of the renal pelvis after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is described. Although temporary perirenal fluid accumulations after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy have been reported previously, possibly this is the first case presenting with an abdominal mass due to retroperitoneal urine collection.