Turkan Kara
Kırıkkale University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Turkan Kara.
Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology | 2005
Ayse Fusun Kalpaklioglu; Turkan Kara; Ercan Kurtipek; Pinar Kocyigit; Aydanur Ekici; Mehmet Ekici
BACKGROUND Chronic cough is a common condition that has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). OBJECTIVE To investigate whether chronic cough is associated with adverse psychological and physical effects on quality of life (QoL) using different HRQoL questionnaires. METHODS Forty patients were recruited for the study. The diagnostic workup was mainly based on the pathogenic triad in chronic cough: postnasal drip syndrome, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The HRQoL was evaluated with the cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (CQLQ), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS Symptom scores were significantly correlated with the CQLQ and LCQ (beta = .415 and beta = -.272, respectively) but not with the SF-36. A statistically significant difference was found in all questionnaires, except the physical component summary domain of the SF-36, after specific therapy. Correlation between the 2 specific HRQoL questionnaires was moderate to high when pretreatment and posttreatment scores were compared (r = -0.42 and r = -0.60). Concurrent validity of the LCQ was higher than the CQLQ when compared with the SF-36 domains. The effect size of each specific QoL questionnaire was 1 or higher after treatment, whereas it was much less in the SF-36. There was no change in depression with treatment despite anxiety. Posttreatment symptom scores were related with anxiety (r > 0.40) CONCLUSIONS Because HRQoL is important to patients, a cough-specific HRQoL instrument, either the CQLQ or LCQ, should be routinely used to optimally evaluate the impact of cough on patients and to evaluate the efficacy of cough-modifying agents.
Quality of Life Research | 2006
Aydanur Ekici; Mehmet Ekici; Turkan Kara; Hatice Keles; Pinar Kocyigit
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of negative mood states at the moment of questionnaire, and other patient and disease characteristics on quality of life (QoL) in patients with asthma. The study groups were composed of 116 stable adult asthmatic patients and 116 age and sex matched healthy subjects. We used Short-Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) for the assessment of general QoL in all participants, and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) for the assessment of disease specific QoL in patients with asthma. We evaluated negative mood in all subjects with a questionnaire including six mood subscales in three categories (nervous-anxious, hostile-angry and fearful-panicky). Negative mood scores were not different between asthmatic and comparison groups (p=0.4), but both SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores were significantly lower in asthmatic group (p=0.003 and p=0.001, respectively). Multiple linear regression analysis in all study population indicated that both reduced PCS and MCS scores of SF-36 were associated with negative mood score (β=−0.28, p<0.001 and β=−0.37, p<0.001, respectively) and with FEV1% (β=0.19, p=0.001 and β=0.25, p<0.001, respectively) after adjusting for age, female sex, and the presence of asthma. On the other hand, multiple linear regression analysis in patients with asthma revealed that negative mood score and disease severity score were significant predictors for overall score of AQLQ after adjusting for other patient and disease characteristics (β=−0.17, p=0.008 and β=−0.64, p<0.001, respectively). The level of negative mood and disease severity in asthmatics significantly impair QoL. Thus, considering that one of the main objectives of health care should be preserving a satisfactory QoL in asthmatics, the presence and seriousness of negative mood and their effects on QoL should be taken into account as part of the clinical evaluation in asthmatics.
Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology | 2006
Mehmet Ekici; Aydanur Ekici; Turkan Kara; Hatice Keles; Ali Karlidag; Volkan Altunkaya; Emel Bulcun
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have been performed concerning the perception of dyspnea during changes in airway caliber provoked in the laboratory setting, but studies of asthma exacerbation are scarce. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the perception of dyspnea during histamine-induced bronchoconstriction might be used to identify patients with asthma who sense dyspnea poorly during exacerbation. METHODS The perception of dyspnea in 50 patients (45 female, 5 male) with asthma was evaluated at admission with exacerbation and during a stable period. Perceived intensity of dyspnea was estimated using a modified Borg scale. The perception of dyspnea in the stable period 4 to 6 weeks after exacerbation was measured with the histamine challenge test. Perception parameters were defined as the change in Borg score divided by the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) as a percentage of the baseline FEV1 (deltaBorg/deltaFEV1) and as the Borg score at 20% decrease (PS20Histamine) or increase (PS20Exacerbation) in FEV1. RESULTS The perception of dyspnea during asthma exacerbation was unrelated to the perception of dyspnea during histamine-induced bronchoconstriction (for deltaBorg/deltaFEV1, beta = .08, P = .50; for PS20, beta = -.11, P = .40). The kappa value for the agreement of poor perceivers at exacerbation and during the stable period was -0.21 (P = .10). However, the intensity of dyspnea caused by histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was lower than that caused by asthma exacerbation (PS20: 1.6 +/- 1.1 vs 2.8 +/- 2.5, respectively, P = .004; deltaBorg/deltaFEV1: 0.08 +/- 0.05 vs 0.21 +/- 0.28, respectively, P = .001). CONCLUSION The perception of dyspnea during asthma exacerbation is not correlated with the perception of dyspnea during histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. Therefore, the perception of dyspnea during histamine-induced bronchoconstriction cannot be used to identify the asthmatic patients who perceive dyspnea poorly.
Clinical Science | 2003
Aydanur Ekici; Sevda Yilmaz; Mehmet Ekici; Fusun Kalpaklioglu; Yasemin Karadeniz; Mesut Arslan; Ahmet Iteginli; Turkan Kara; Ercan Kurtipek
The perception of dyspnoea differs between subjects with obstructive pulmonary diseases, partly because the underlying mechanisms for bronchoconstriction are different. We investigated the perception of bronchoconstriction in subjects with bronchiectasis, asthma and chronic bronchitis and possible contributing factors. Forty-seven non-smoking subjects with bronchiectasis, 50 subjects with asthma and 31 with chronic bronchitis were challenged with histamine. The Borg score was assessed before and after each challenge. The perception score corresponding to a fall in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) by 20% (PS(20)) was calculated. The mean values of DeltaBorg/DeltaFEV(1) (the Borg score change divided by the change in FEV(1) as a percentage of the baseline FEV(1)) and PS(20) of subjects with bronchiectasis and chronic bronchitis were significantly lower than in subjects with asthma after histamine challenge. The ratio of non-perceivers was higher in bronchiectasis (25.5%) and in chronic bronchitis (32.3%) than in asthma (4.0%). When all subjects were considered, DeltaBorg/DeltaFEV(1) values were significantly related to female sex ( r (2)=11.5%, P =0.0001), but not to age, duration of the disease, PD(20) or baseline FEV(1)%. The present study indicates that perception of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction is lower in patients with bronchiectasis and chronic bronchitis than in asthmatic patients, and that sex partially contributes to this difference.
Environmental Research | 2005
Aydanur Ekici; Mehmet Ekici; Ercan Kurtipek; Ahmet Akin; Mesut Arslan; Turkan Kara; Zeliha Apaydin; Selma Demir
Chest | 2005
Aijdanur Ekici; Mehmet Ekici; Ercan Kurtipek; Hatice Keles; Turkan Kara; Muge Tunckol; Pinar Kocyigit
Respiratory Medicine | 2004
Aytül Çakmak; Aydanur Ekici; Mehmet Ekici; Mesut Arslan; Ahmet Iteginli; Ercan Kurtipek; Turkan Kara
Psychosomatics | 2005
Ömer Oğuztürk; Aydanur Ekici; Murat Kara; Mehmet Ekici; Mesut Arslan; Ahmet Iteginli; Turkan Kara; Ercan Kurtipek
Digestive and Liver Disease | 2005
Aydanur Ekici; S. Guliter; Mehmet Ekici; F. Kalpaklioglu; Turkan Kara; Hatice Keles; Muge Tunckol; Ahmet Akin; Pinar Kocyigit
Allergy and Asthma Proceedings | 2006
A. Füsun Kalpaklioglu; Turkan Kara; Ercan Kurtipek; Meral Saygun