Tyler J. Moffit

Quadriceps Function and Knee Joint Ultrasonography following ACL Reconstruction

Purpose Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at greater risk for knee osteoarthritis, partially because of chronic quadriceps dysfunction. Articular cartilage is commonly assessed using magnetic resonance imaging and radiography, but these methods are expensive and lack portability. Ultrasound imaging may provide a cost-effective and portable alternative for imaging the femoral cartilage. The purpose of this study was to compare ultrasonography of the femoral cartilage between the injured and uninjured limbs of individuals with unilateral ACLR, and to examine the association between quadriceps function and ultrasonographic measures of femoral cartilage. Methods Bilateral femoral cartilage thickness and quadriceps function were assessed in 44 individuals with unilateral ACLR. Quadriceps function was assessed using peak isometric strength, and early (RTD100) and late (RTD200) rate of torque development. Results Cartilage thickness at the medial femoral condyle (P < 0.001) and femoral cartilage cross-sectional area (P = 0.007) were smaller in the injured compared with the uninjured limb. After accounting for time since ACLR, quadriceps peak isometric strength was associated with cartilage thickness at the medial femoral condyle (r = 0.35, P = 0.02) and femoral cartilage cross-sectional area (r = 0.28, P = 0.04). RTD100 and RTD200 were not associated with femoral cartilage thickness or cross-sectional area. Conclusions Individuals with ACLR have thinner cartilage in their injured limb compared with uninjured limb, and cartilage thickness is associated with quadriceps function. These results indicate that ultrasonography may be useful for monitoring cartilage health and osteoarthritis progression after ACLR.

Effect of Whole-Body Vibration on Sagittal Plane Running Mechanics in Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of whole-body vibration (WBV) on running biomechanics in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN Single-blind randomized crossover trial. SETTING Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Individuals (N=20) with unilateral ACLR (age [± SD]=22.3 [±3.3] years; mass=71.8 [±15.3] kg; time since ACLR=44.9 [±22.8] months; 15 females, 10 patellar tendon autograft, 7 hamstrings autograft, 3 allograft; International Knee Documentation Committee Score=83.5 [±9.3]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Participants performed isometric squats while being exposed to WBV or no vibration (control). WBV and control conditions were delivered in a randomized order during separate visits separated by 1-week washout periods. Running biomechanics of the injured and uninjured limbs were evaluated before and immediately after each intervention. Dependent variables included peak vertical ground reaction force (GRF) and loading rate (LR), peak knee flexion angle and external moment, and knee flexion excursion during the stance phase of running. RESULTS There was an increase in knee flexion excursion (+4.1°, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 7.5°) and a trend toward a reduction in instantaneous LR after WBV in the injured limb (-4.03 BW/sec-1, 95% CI -0.38, -7.69). No effect was observed on peak GRF, peak knee flexion angle, or peak external knee flexion moment, and no effect was observed in the uninjured limb. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that a single session of WBV acutely increases knee flexion excursion. WBV could be useful to improve running characteristics in individuals with knee pathology.

Bilateral Alterations in Running Mechanics and Quadriceps Function Following Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

• BACKGROUND: Following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), individuals have quadriceps muscle impairments that influence gait mechanics and may contribute to an elevated risk of knee osteoarthritis. • OBJECTIVES: To compare running mechanics and quadriceps function between individuals who have undergone ACLR and those in a control group, and to evaluate the association between quadriceps function and running mechanics. • METHODS: In this controlled, cross‐sectional laboratory study, 38 individuals who previously underwent primary unilateral ACLR (mean ± SD time since reconstruction, 48.0 ± 25.0 months) were matched to 38 control participants based on age, sex, and body mass index, and underwent assessments of quadriceps muscle performance and running biomechanics. Quadriceps muscle performance was assessed via isokinetic and isometric knee extension peak torque and rate of torque development (RTD) over 2 time frames: 0 to 100 milliseconds (RTD100) and 0 to 200 milliseconds (RTD200). Running evaluation included assessment of the knee flexion angle (KFA), knee extension moment (KEM), rate of knee extension moment (RKEM), vertical instantaneous loading rate, and vertical impact peak. • RESULTS: On average, there was a smaller KFA (P = .016) in the involved limb compared to the uninvolved limb in the ACLR group. Compared to limbs in the control group, involved limbs in the ACLR group had lower RTD100 (P = .015), lower peak torque at 60°/s (P = .007), lower peak torque at 180°/s (P = .016), smaller KFA (P<.001), lower KEM (P = .001), lower RKEM (P = .004), and higher vertical instantaneous loading rate (P = .016). Compared to limbs in the control group, uninvolved limbs in the ACLR group had lower RTD100 (P = .003), lower peak torque at 60°/s (P = .017), and smaller KFA (P = .01). For the involved limbs in the ACLR group, there was a low correlation between isokinetic peak torque at 180°/s and RKEM (r = 0.38, P = .01), and a negligible correlation between RTD100 and RKEM (r = 0.26, P<.05). No differences were found in isometric strength for any comparison. • CONCLUSION: Individuals who have undergone ACLR have bilateral alterations in running mechanics that are weakly associated with diminished quadriceps muscle performance.

Association between gait mechanics and ultrasonographic measures of femoral cartilage thickness in individuals with ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at greater risk for knee osteoarthritis, which may be in part due to altered gait biomechanics. Articular cartilage thickness is typically imaged using magnetic resonance imaging, which is costly and lacks portability. Ultrasonography may provide an alternative imaging method for articular cartilage. It is unclear if ultrasonographic measurements of cartilage thickness are associated with gait biomechanics in individuals with ACLR. RESEARCH QUESTION To evaluate the association between sagittal and frontal plane knee mechanics during gait and resting femoral cartilage thickness from ultrasonography. METHODS Twenty-five females with ACLR (age = 21.7 ± 2.6 years, time since ACLR = 60.6 ± 24.8 months) completed assessments of walking biomechanics and resting femoral cartilage thickness. Linear regression examined the association between gait biomechanics and cartilage thickness at the medial (MC) and lateral (LC) femoral condyles, and intercondylar notch (IC) after accounting for time since ACLR, meniscal injury, and gait speed. RESULTS In the ACLR limb, larger vertical ground reaction force (ΔR2 = 0.21, pΔ = 0.03), knee flexion angle (ΔR2 = 0.15, pΔ = 0.05), knee flexion excursion (KFE) (ΔR2 = 0.16, pΔ = 0.04), and knee flexion impulse (KFI) (ΔR2 = 0.23, pΔ = 0.02) were associated with thicker MC cartilage. A larger knee adduction angle (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) and knee adduction moment (KAM) (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) were associated with thinner MC thickness. Larger KFE (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) was associated with thicker LC cartilage. Gait biomechanics were not associated with IC cartilage thickness. After accounting for co-variates, the combination of KFI and KAM was predictive of MC thickness (ΔR2 = 0.37, pΔ = 0.01; Total R2 = 0.52, p = 0.02). Meniscal injury, KAM, and KFI were significant predictors in the model. In the contralateral limb, KFE was associated with thicker MC cartilage (ΔR2 = 0.16, pΔ = 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE Sagittal and frontal plane knee mechanics during gait are uniquely associated with ultrasonographic measurements of femoral cartilage thickness in individuals with ACLR. Furthermore, concomitant medial meniscal injury was associated with thinner MC cartilage.BACKGROUND Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at greater risk for knee osteoarthritis, which may be in part due to altered gait biomechanics. Articular cartilage thickness is typically imaged using magnetic resonance imaging, which is costly and lacks portability. Ultrasonography may provide an alternative imaging method for articular cartilage. It is unclear if ultrasonographic measurements of cartilage thickness are associated with gait biomechanics in individuals with ACLR. RESEARCH QUESTION To evaluate the association between sagittal and frontal plane knee mechanics during gait and resting femoral cartilage thickness from ultrasonography. METHODS Twenty-five females with ACLR (age = 21.7 ± 2.6 years, time since ACLR = 60.6 ± 24.8 months) completed assessments of walking biomechanics and resting femoral cartilage thickness. Linear regression examined the association between gait biomechanics and cartilage thickness at the medial (MC) and lateral (LC) femoral condyles, and intercondylar notch (IC) after accounting for time since ACLR, meniscal injury, and gait speed. RESULTS In the ACLR limb, larger vertical ground reaction force (ΔR2 = 0.21, pΔ = 0.03), knee flexion angle (ΔR2 = 0.15, pΔ = 0.05), knee flexion excursion (KFE) (ΔR2 = 0.16, pΔ = 0.04), and knee flexion impulse (KFI) (ΔR2 = 0.23, pΔ = 0.02) were associated with thicker MC cartilage. A larger knee adduction angle (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) and knee adduction moment (KAM) (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) were associated with thinner MC thickness. Larger KFE (ΔR2 = 0.20, pΔ = 0.03) was associated with thicker LC cartilage. Gait biomechanics were not associated with IC cartilage thickness. After accounting for co-variates, the combination of KFI and KAM was predictive of MC thickness (ΔR2 = 0.37, pΔ = 0.01; Total R2 = 0.52, p = 0.02). Meniscal injury, KAM, and KFI were significant predictors in the model. In the contralateral limb, KFE was associated with thicker MC cartilage (ΔR2 = 0.16, pΔ = 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE Sagittal and frontal plane knee mechanics during gait are uniquely associated with ultrasonographic measurements of femoral cartilage thickness in individuals with ACLR. Furthermore, concomitant medial meniscal injury was associated with thinner MC cartilage.