Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where U. Ahmed Ali is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by U. Ahmed Ali.


British Journal of Surgery | 2010

Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic Nissen (posterior total) versus Toupet (posterior partial) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

J. A. J. L. Broeders; F. A. Mauritz; U. Ahmed Ali; W. A. Draaisma; J. P. Ruurda; Hein G. Gooszen; André Smout; I. A. M. J. Broeders; E. J. Hazebroek

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is currently considered the surgical approach of choice for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) has been said to reduce troublesome dysphagia and gas‐related symptoms. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to compare LNF and LTF.


British Journal of Surgery | 2013

Altered central pain processing after pancreatic surgery for chronic pancreatitis

Stefan A.W. Bouwense; U. Ahmed Ali; R.P.G ten Broek; Y. Issa; C.H.J. van Eijck; Oliver H. G. Wilder-Smith; H. van Goor

Chronic abdominal pain is common in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and may involve altered central pain processing. This study evaluated the relationship between pain processing and pain outcome after pancreatic duct decompression and/or pancreatic resection in patients with CP.


Pancreatology | 2015

Dutch Chronic Pancreatitis Registry (CARE): Design and rationale of a nationwide prospective evaluation and follow-up

U. Ahmed Ali; Yama Issa; H. van Goor; C.H.J. van Eijck; Vincent B. Nieuwenhuijs; Y. Keulemans; P. Fockens; Olivier R. Busch; J.P.H. Drenth; Cornelis H.C. Dejong; H.M. van Dullemen; J.E. van Hooft; Peter D. Siersema; B.W.M. Spanier; Jan-Werner Poley; A.C. Poen; Robin Timmer; Tom Seerden; Adriaan C. Tan; Willem J. Thijs; B.J.M. Witteman; Tessa E. H. Römkens; A.J. Roeterdink; H. G. Gooszen; H.C. van Santvoort; Marco J. Bruno; Marja A. Boermeester

BACKGROUND Chronic pancreatitis is a complex disease with many unanswered questions regarding the natural history and therapy. Prospective longitudinal studies with long-term follow-up are warranted. METHODS The Dutch Chronic Pancreatitis Registry (CARE) is a nationwide registry aimed at prospective evaluation and follow-up of patients with chronic pancreatitis. All patients with (suspected) chronic or recurrent pancreatitis are eligible for CARE. Patients are followed-up by yearly questionnaires and review of medical records. Study outcomes are pain, disease complications, quality of life, and pancreatic function. The target sample size was set at 500 for the first year and 1000 patients within 3 years. RESULTS A total of 1218 patients were included from February 2010 until June 2013 by 76 participating surgeons and gastroenterologist from 33 hospitals. Participation rate was 90% of eligible patients. Eight academic centers included 761 (62%) patients, while 25 community hospitals included 457 (38%). Patient centered outcomes were assessed by yearly questionnaires, which had a response rate of 85 and 82% for year 1 and 2, respectively. The median age of patients was 58 years, 814 (67%) were male, and 38% had symptoms for less than 5 years. DISCUSSION The CARE registry has successfully recruited over 1200 patients with chronic and recurrent pancreatitis in about 3 years. The defined inclusion criteria ensure patients are included at an early disease stage. Participation and compliance rates are high. CARE offers a unique opportunity with sufficient power to investigate many clinical questions regarding natural course, complications, and efficacy and timing of treatment strategies.


Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica | 2008

Laparoscopic vs. small incision cholecystectomy: Implications for pulmonary function and pain. A randomized clinical trial.

Frederik Keus; U. Ahmed Ali; G. J. Noordergraaf; Jan A. Roukema; Hein G. Gooszen; C.J.H.M. van Laarhoven

Background: Upper abdominal surgery, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is associated with post‐operative pulmonary dysfunction. LC has, by consensus, become the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. The small‐incision cholecystectomy (SIC), a procedure which does not require a pneumoperitoneum threatens to be lost to clinical practice even though there is evidence of equality. We hypothesized that the SIC technique should be equal and might even be superior to the LC when considering post‐operative pulmonary function due to the short incision length.


Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica | 2007

Anaesthesiological considerations in small-incision and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: implications for pulmonary function. A randomized clinical trial

Frederik Keus; U. Ahmed Ali; G. J. Noordergraaf; Jan A. Roukema; H. G. Gooszen; C.J.H.M. van Laarhoven

Background:  Upper abdominal surgery, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is associated with post‐operative pulmonary dysfunction. LC has, by consensus, become the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Small‐incision cholecystectomy (SIC), a procedure that does not require a pneumoperitoneum, threatens to be lost to clinical practice, even though there is evidence of equality. We hypothesized that the SIC technique should be equal, and might even be superior, to LC when considering post‐operative pulmonary function because of the short incision length.


Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica | 2008

Laparoscopic vs. small incision cholecystectomy

Frederik Keus; U. Ahmed Ali; G. J. Noordergraaf; Jan A. Roukema; H. G. Gooszen; C.J.H.M. van Laarhoven

Background: Upper abdominal surgery, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is associated with post‐operative pulmonary dysfunction. LC has, by consensus, become the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. The small‐incision cholecystectomy (SIC), a procedure which does not require a pneumoperitoneum threatens to be lost to clinical practice even though there is evidence of equality. We hypothesized that the SIC technique should be equal and might even be superior to the LC when considering post‐operative pulmonary function due to the short incision length.


Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica | 2007

Laparoscopic vs. small incision cholecystectomy: Implications for pulmonary function and pain. A randomized clinical trial: Pulmonary aspects in cholecystectomy

Frederik Keus; U. Ahmed Ali; G. J. Noordergraaf; Jan A. Roukema; H. G. Gooszen; C.J.H.M. van Laarhoven

Background: Upper abdominal surgery, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is associated with post‐operative pulmonary dysfunction. LC has, by consensus, become the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. The small‐incision cholecystectomy (SIC), a procedure which does not require a pneumoperitoneum threatens to be lost to clinical practice even though there is evidence of equality. We hypothesized that the SIC technique should be equal and might even be superior to the LC when considering post‐operative pulmonary function due to the short incision length.


Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde | 2012

Better pain management in chronic pancreatitis through early surgery

U. Ahmed Ali; Marco J. Bruno; Y. Issa; H. G. Gooszen; P. Fockens; Boermeester; J.P.H. Drenth; E.J. Hesselink; H. van Goor


Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica | 2008

Laparoscopic vs. small incision cholecystectomy : Implications for pulmonary function and pain

Frederik Keus; U. Ahmed Ali; G. J. Noordergraaf; Jan A. Roukema; H. G. Gooszen; C.J.H.M. van Laarhoven


Hpb | 2018

Early surgery versus current step-up practice for chronic pancreatitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Y. Issa; R. Kempeneers; Miguel Bruno; P. Fockens; Jan-Werner Poley; U. Ahmed Ali; M.G. Besselink; H.C. van Santvoort; Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf; Marja A. Boermeester

Collaboration


Dive into the U. Ahmed Ali's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. G. Gooszen

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frederik Keus

University Medical Center Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. van Goor

University of Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Y. Issa

University of Amsterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C.H.J. van Eijck

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hein G. Gooszen

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.P.H. Drenth

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge