Uday Bhatt
Aston University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Uday Bhatt.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | 2013
Amy L. Sheppard; Sunil Shah; Uday Bhatt; Gurpreet Bhogal; James S. Wolffsohn
Purpose To assess clinical outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Setting Midland Eye Institute, Solihull, United Kingdom. Design Cohort study. Methods Patients had bilateral implantation of Finevision trifocal IOLs. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction were measured 2 months postoperatively. Defocus curves were assessed under photopic and mesopic conditions over a range of +1.50 to −4.00 diopters (D) in 0.50 D steps. Contrast sensitivity function was assessed under photopic conditions. Halometry was used to measure the angular size of monocular and binocular photopic scotomas arising from a glare source. Patient satisfaction with uncorrected near vision was assessed using the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ). Results The mean monocular CDVA was 0.08 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and the mean binocular CDVA, 0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR. Defocus curve testing showed an extended range of clear vision from +1.00 to −2.50 D defocus, with a significant difference in acuity between photopic conditions and mesopic conditions at −1.50 D defocus only. Photopic contrast sensitivity was significantly better binocularly than monocularly at all spatial frequencies. Halometry showed a glare scotoma of a mean size similar to that in previous studies of multifocal and accommodating IOLs; there were no subjective complaints of dysphotopsia. The mean NAVQ Rasch score for satisfaction with near vision was 15.9 ± 10.7 logits. Conclusions The trifocal IOL implanted binocularly produced good distance visual acuity and near and intermediate visual function. Patients were very satisfied with their uncorrected near vision. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | 2013
Amy L. Sheppard; James S. Wolffsohn; Uday Bhatt; Peter Hoffmann; Andreas Scheider; Werner W. Hütz; Sunil Shah
Purpose To assess the clinical outcomes after implantation of a new hydrophobic acrylic toric intraocular lens (IOL) to correct preexisting corneal astigmatism in patients having routine cataract surgery. Setting Four hospital eye clinics throughout Europe. Design Cohort study. Methods This study included eyes with at least 0.75 diopter (D) of preexisting corneal astigmatism having routine cataract surgery. Phacoemulsification was performed followed by insertion and alignment of a Tecnis toric IOL. Patients were examined 4 to 8 weeks postoperatively; uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, and keratometry were measured. Individual patient satisfaction with uncorrected vision and the surgeon’s assessment of ease of handling and performance of the IOL were also documented. The cylinder axis of the toric IOL was determined by dilated slitlamp examination. Results The study enrolled 67 eyes of 60 patients. Four to 8 weeks postoperatively, the mean UDVA was 0.15 logMAR ± 0.17 (SD) and the UDVA was 20/40 or better in 88% of eyes. The mean refractive cylinder decreased significantly postoperatively, from −1.91 ± 1.07 D to −0.67 ± 0.54 D. No significant change in keratometric cylinder was observed. The mean absolute IOL misalignment from the intended axis was 3.4 degrees (range 0 to 12 degrees). The good UDVA resulted in high levels of patient satisfaction. Conclusion Implantation of the new toric IOL was an effective, safe, and predictable method to manage corneal astigmatism in patients having routine cataract surgery. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | 2005
Athanassius Tadros; Uday Bhatt; M.N. Abdul Karim; Asad Zaheer; Peter Thomas
PURPOSE: To assess the long‐term effects of lens epithelial cell (LEC) removal on capsulorhexis opening size. SETTING: Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, United Kingdom. METHODS: This prospective randomized control study included 39 eyes of 38 patients. Twenty eyes were selected randomly for removal of LECs from the anterior capsule as part of routine cataract operation comprising phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. The other 19 eyes were used as controls in which the LECs were not removed. All surgeries were performed by 1 surgeon (A.T.). All patients had silicone IOL (Allergan SI‐40) implantation. The capsulorhexis opening size was determined immediately after surgery and 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Data on treatment outcome of the cataract surgery were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, the size of the capsulorhexis had statistically significant increased in the study group that had LECs removed (mean increase 1.07 ± 1.70 mm2; paired Student t test P = .01), whereas the capsulorhexis size had statistically significant decreased in the control group (mean decrease −3.38 ± 2.37 mm2; paired Student t test, P<.0001). The difference in changes in the capsulorhexis areas between the 2 groups was also highly statistically significant (independent‐sample Student t test, P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Removal of anterior subcapsular LECs by aspiration helped maintain the size of the capsulorhexis opening and thus can help prevent capsule contraction syndrome.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery | 2013
Uday Bhatt; Amy L. Sheppard; Sunil Shah; Hs Dua; Toshifumi Mihashi; Tatsuo Yamaguchi; James S. Wolffsohn
Purpose To design and validate a new miniaturized open‐field wavefront device that can be attached to an ophthalmic surgical microscope or slitlamp. Setting Solihull Hospital and Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Design Comparative noninterventional study. Methods The dynamic range of the Aston aberrometer was assessed using a calibrated model eye. The validity was compared with that of a conventional desk‐mounted Hartmann‐Shack aberrometer (Topcon KR1W) in dilated eyes. The instruments were used in random order, with measurements repeated 5 times to assess intrasession repeatability. Results The open‐field aberrometer had a large dynamic range of at least +21.0 diopters (D) to −25.0 D. It gave similar measurements to the conventional aberrometer for mean spherical equivalent (SE) (mean difference 0.02 D ± 0.49 [95% confidence interval]; correlation r = 0.995; P<.001), astigmatic components (J0: 0.02 ± 0.15 D; r = 0.977, P<.001; J45: 0.03 ± 0.28, r = 0.666, P<.001), and higher‐order aberration (HOA) root mean square (RMS) (0.02 ± 0.20 D, r = 0.620, P<.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient assessments of intrasession repeatability were excellent (SE = 1.000, P<.001; J0 = 0.998, P<.001; J45 = 0.980, P<.01; HOA RMS = 0.961, P<.001). Conclusions The new aberrometer gave valid, repeatable measurements of refractive error and HOAs over a large range. It can measure continuously, thus providing direct feedback on the optical status of the visual system to surgeons during intraocular lens implantation and corneal surgery. Financial Disclosure The Aston aberrometer is jointly patented by Topcon Corp. and Prof. Wolffsohn. Drs. Mihashi and Yamaguchi are employees of Topcon Corp., Tokyo, Japan. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2016
Uday Bhatt; Mn Abdul Karim; Jeremy Prydal; Senthil Maharajan; Usama Fares
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2012
Emma J. Berrow; Sunil Shah; James S. Wolffsohn; Amy L. Sheppard; Uday Bhatt; Gurpreet Bhogal; Phillip J. Buckhurst
Archive | 2014
Uday Bhatt; Sunil Shah; Harminder S Dua; James S. Wolffsohn
Archive | 2014
Uday Bhatt; James S. Wolffsohn; Amy L. Sheppard; Sunil Shah
Archive | 2014
Uday Bhatt; Sunil Shah; Harminder S Dua; James S. Wolffsohn
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2012
Sunil Shah; Amy L. Sheppard; Uday Bhatt; James S. Wolffsohn