Ulf G. Eriksson

The Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Melagatran and Its Oral Prodrug H 376/95: Intestinal Absorption Properties, Biochemical and Pharmacodynamic Effects

UNLABELLED Suboptimal gastrointestinal absorption is a problem for many direct thrombin inhibitors. The studies presented herein describe the new oral direct thrombin inhibitor H 376/95, a prodrug with two protecting residues added to the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran. Absorption properties in vitro: H 376/95 is uncharged at intestinal pH while melagatran is charged. H 376/95 is 170 times more lipophilic (octanol water partition coefficient) than melagatran. As a result, the permeability coefficient across cultured epithelial Caco-2 cells is 80 times higher for H 376/95 than for melagtran. Pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers: H 376/95 is converted to melagatran in man. Oral bioavailability, measured as melagatran in plasma, is about 20% after oral administration of H 376/95, which is 2.7-5.5 times higher than after oral administration of melagatran. The variability in the area under the drug plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC) is much smaller with oral H 376/95 (coefficient of variation 20%) than with oral melagatran (coefficient of variation 38%). Pharmacodynamic properties: H 376/95 is inactive towards human alpha-thrombin compared with melagatran [inhibition constant (K(i)) ratio, 185 times], a potential advantage for patients with silent gastrointestinal bleeding. In an experimental thrombosis model in the rat, oral H 376/95 was more effective than the subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin dalteparin in preventing thrombosis. CONCLUSION By the use of the prodrug principle, H 376/95 endows the direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran with pharmacokinetic properties required for oral administration without compromising the promising pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran.

Ximelagatran and melagatran compared with dalteparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: the METHRO II randomised trial

BACKGROUND Heparins substantially reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications after total hip or knee replacement. However, they can be given only by injection and have several other drawbacks. We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study to examine the dose-response relation of subcutaneous melagatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, followed by oral ximelagatran as thromboprophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety with that of dalteparin. METHODS Of 1900 patients, 1495 were assigned to four dose categories of subcutaneous melagatran from just before surgery (1.00 mg, 1.50 mg, 2.25 mg, or 3.00 mg twice daily) followed from the day after surgery by oral ximelagatran (8 mg, 12 mg, 18 mg, or 24 mg twice daily). 381 patients were assigned subcutaneous dalteparin 5000 IU once daily, from the evening before surgery. Bilateral venography was done at 7-10 days, and clinically suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE) was confirmed radiologically. The primary endpoint was the rate of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS 1876 patients underwent total replacement of hip (n=1270) or knee (n=606); evaluable venograms were obtained in 1473 (79%). Four patients without evaluable venograms had PE. Overall, a significant dose-dependent decrease in VTE was seen with melagatran/ximelagatran (lowest to highest group: 111 [37.8%], 70 [24.1%], 71 [23.7%], and 43 [15.1%]; p=0.0001); there were also significant relations for both total hip and total knee replacement individually. The frequency of VTE was significantly lower with the highest dose of melagatran/ximelagatran than with dalteparin (15.1% vs 28.2%, p<0.0001). There were no reoperations due to bleeding and no critical organ bleeding. Excessive surgical bleeding was uncommon but more frequent in the highest dose group. INTERPRETATION This sequential therapy was effective and safe in patients undergoing major joint replacement surgery. The findings should be confirmed in a large phase III trial.

A new oral anticoagulant: the 50-year challenge

It is rare for any drug introduced more than 50 years ago to remain unsurpassed today; yet the oral prevention and treatment of thrombosis are still achieved by the use of the vitamin K antagonists (coumarins), such as warfarin, which were introduced in the 1940s and 1950s. For these anticoagulants, careful monitoring of the effect is needed to avoid bleeding or loss of efficacy. On the basis of the need for improved oral anticoagulants, a goal was set in 1985 to develop a new oral anticoagulant that could replace the vitamin K antagonists. After providing some medical and historical context, this article discusses the challenges facing the multidisciplinary team of scientists who were involved in the project leading to the discovery of the anticoagulant ximelagatran (Exanta; AstraZeneca), the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor.

Effect of recombinant factor VIIa on melagatran-induced inhibition of thrombin generation and platelet activation in healthy volunteers

The objectives were to investigate whether activation of the extrinsic coagulation cascade by recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) reverses the inhibition of thrombin generation and platelet activation by melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. In a single-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, volunteers (20 per group) received a 5-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion to achieve steady-state melagatran plasma concentrations of approximately 0.5 micromol/L, with a single i.v. bolus of rFVIIa (90 microg/kg) or placebo at 60 minutes. Prothrombin fragment 1+2, thrombin-anti-thrombin complex, fibrinopeptide A, beta-thromboglobulin, and thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor were quantified for venous and shed blood. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), endogenous thrombin potential, thrombus precursor protein (TpP), and plasmin-alpha(2)-antiplasmin complex concentrations were determined in venous blood. Shed blood volume was measured. Melagatran reduced markers of thrombin generation and platelet activation in shed blood and prolonged APTT. rFVIIa increased FVIIa activity, PT, and TpP in venous blood. All other parameters were unaffected. In conclusion, rFVIIa did not reverse the anticoagulant effects of high constant concentrations of melagatran. However, the potential value of higher, continuous or repeated doses of rFVIIa or its use with lower melagatran concentrations has not been excluded.

Influence of Age on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ximelagatran, an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor

AbstractObjective: To investigate the influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ximelagatran. Study design: This was an open-label, randomised, 3 × 3 crossover study with 4 study days, separated by washout periods of 7 days. Subjects: Subjects comprised 6 healthy young men (aged 20–27 years) and 12 healthy older men and women (aged 56–70 years). Methods: All subjects received a 2mg intravenous infusion of melagatran over 10 minutes followed, in randomised sequence, by a 20mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran with breakfast, a 20mg immediate-release tablet of ximelagatran while fasting, and a 7.5mg subcutaneous injection of ximelagatran. The primary variables were the plasma concentration of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran, and the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin. Results: After oral and subcutaneous administration, ximelagatran was rapidly absorbed and biotransformed to melagatran, its active form and the dominant compound in plasma. The metabolite pattern in plasma and urine was similar in young and older subjects after both oral and subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran. Clearance of melagatran was correlated with renal function, resulting in about 40% (after intravenous melagatran) to 60% (after oral and subcutaneous ximelagatran) higher melagatran exposure in the older than in the young subjects. Renal clearance of melagatran, determined after intravenous administration of melagatran, was 7.7 L/h and 4.9 L/h in the young and older subjects, respectively. The interindividual variability in the area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve was low following all regimens (coefficient of variation 12–25%). The mean bioavailability of melagatran in young and older subjects was approximately 18 and 21%, respectively, following oral administration of ximelagatran, and 38 and 45%, respectively, following subcutaneous administration of ximelagatran. The bioavailability of melagatran following oral administration of ximelagatran was unaffected by whether subjects were fed or fasting, although the plasma concentration of melagatran peaked about 1 hour later under fed than fasting conditions, due to delayed gastric emptying of the immediate-release tablet formulation used. The APTT was prolonged with increasing melagatran plasma concentrations and the concentration-effect relationship was independent of age. Conclusion: There were no age-dependent differences in the absorption and biotransformation of ximelagatran, and the observed differences in exposure to melagatran can be explained by differences in renal function between the young and older subjects.

Ximelagatran, an Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Has a Low Potential for Cytochrome P450-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions

AbstractBackground: Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and extensively bioconverted, via two intermediates (ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran), to its active form, melagatran. In vitro studies have shown no evidence for involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in either the bioactivation or the elimination of melagatran. Objective: To investigate the potential of ximelagatran, the intermediates ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran, and melagatran to inhibit the CYP system in vitro and in vivo, and the influence of three CYP substrates on the pharmacokinetics of melagatran in vivo. Methods: The CYP inhibitory properties of ximelagatran, the intermediates and melagatran were tested in vitro by two different methods, using heterologously expressed enzymes or human liver microsomes. Diclofenac (CYP2C9), diazepam (CYP2C19) and nifedipine (CYP3A4) were chosen for coadministration with ximelagatran in healthy volunteers. Subjects received oral ximelagatran 24mg and/or diclofenac 50mg, a 10-minute intravenous infusion of diazepam 0.1 mg/kg, or nifedipine 60mg. The plasma pharmacokinetics of melagatran, diclofenac, diazepam, N-desmethyl-diazepam and nifedipine were determined when administered alone and in combination with ximelagatran. Results: No inhibition, or only minor inhibition, of CYP enzymes by ximelagatran, the intermediates or melagatran was shown in the in vitro studies, suggesting that ximelagatran would not cause CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions in vivo. This result was confirmed in the clinical studies. There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine on coadministration with ximelagatran. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of melagatran when ximelagatran was administered alone or in combination with diclofenac, diazepam or nifedipine. Conclusion: As ximelagatran did not exert a significant effect on the hepatic CYP isoenzymes responsible for the metabolism of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine, it is reasonable to expect that it would have no effect on the metabolism of other drugs metabolised by these isoenzymes. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran are not expected to be altered by inhibition or induction of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP3A4. Together, the in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that metabolic drug-drug interactions involving the major human CYP enzymes should not be expected with ximelagatran.

Oral direct thrombin inhibitor AZD0837 for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized dose-guiding, safety, and tolerability study of four doses of AZD0837 vs. vitamin K antagonists

Aims Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) is effective but has significant limitations. AZD0837, a new oral anticoagulant, is a prodrug converted to a selective and reversible direct thrombin inhibitor (AR-H067637). We report from a Phase II randomized, dose-guiding study (NCT00684307) to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of extended-release AZD0837 in patients with AF. Methods and results Atrial fibrillation patients (n = 955) with ≥1 additional risk factor for stroke were randomized to receive AZD0837 (150, 300, or 450 mg once daily or 200 mg twice daily) or VKA (international normalized ratio 2–3, target 2.5) for 3–9 months. Approximately 30% of patients were naïve to VKA treatment. Total bleeding events were similar or lower in all AZD0837 groups (5.3–14.7%, mean exposure 138–145 days) vs. VKA (14.5%, mean exposure 161 days), with fewer clinically relevant bleeding events on AZD0837 150 and 300 mg once daily. Adverse events were similar between treatment groups; with AZD0837, the most common were gastrointestinal disorders (e.g. diarrhoea, flatulence, or nausea). d-Dimer, used as a biomarker of thrombogenesis, decreased in all groups in VKA-naïve subjects with treatment, whereas in VKA pre-treated patients, d-dimer levels started low and remained low in all groups. As expected, only a few strokes or systemic embolic events occurred. In the AZD0837 groups, mean S-creatinine increased by ∼10% from baseline and returned to baseline following treatment cessation. The frequency of serum alanine aminotransferase ≥3× upper limit of normal was similar for AZD0837 and VKA. Conclusion AZD0837 was generally well tolerated at all doses tested. AZD0837 treatment at an exposure corresponding to the 300 mg od dose in this study provides similar suppression of thrombogenesis at a potentially lower bleeding risk compared with dose-adjusted VKA. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00684307.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical effects of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran in acute treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis

INTRODUCTION Ximelagatran is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor that is currently being investigated for the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical effects of melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran, in patients with both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this open-label study, 12 patients received a fixed dose of 48 mg oral ximelagatran twice daily for 6-9 days. Plasma samples were collected for determination of melagatran concentrations and scintigraphic changes and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS Peak plasma concentrations of melagatran were attained approximately 2 h after administration of ximelagatran. Melagatran plasma concentration profiles were similar on Days 1, 2, and 6-9. Plasma activated partial thromboplastin time increased following administration of ximelagatran and reached a peak that was approximately twofold higher than the predose activated partial thromboplastin time and correlated with melagatran plasma concentrations (R(2) = 0.69). All but one patient (with malignancy) showed regressed or unchanged lung scintigraphic findings, and six of these demonstrated no, or only minor, perfusion defects at central evaluation after 6-9 days of ximelagatran treatment. Clinical symptoms, including chest pain, dyspnoea, cough, and oedema, and pain in the affected leg, were improved. Ximelagatran was well tolerated with no deaths or severe bleeding events reported during treatment. CONCLUSION Treatment with a fixed dose of oral ximelagatran, used without routine coagulation monitoring, showed reproducible pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with a rapid onset of action and promising clinical results in patients with pulmonary embolism.

Effects of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, r-hirudin and enoxaparin on thrombin generation and platelet activation in healthy male subjects

OBJECTIVES The effects of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) and enoxaparin on thrombin generation and platelet activation were studied in humans. BACKGROUND Recombinant hirudin (parenteral DTI) and enoxaparin (low molecular weight heparin) have been demonstrated to be clinically effective in acute coronary syndromes. Ximelagatran is currently under investigation for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. The shed blood model allows for the study of thrombin generation and platelet activation in humans in vivo. METHODS This was an open-label, parallel-group study involving 120 healthy male volunteers randomized to receive one of three oral doses of ximelagatran (15, 30 or 60 mg), r-hirudin (intravenous) or enoxaparin (subcutaneous) at doses demonstrated to be clinically effective in acute coronary syndromes, or to serve as a control. Thrombin generation (prothrombin fragment 1+2 [F1+2] and thrombin-antithrombin complex [TAT]) and platelet activation (beta-thromboglobulin [beta-TG]) biomarkers were studied using a shed blood model involving blood collection from skin incisions made using standardized bleeding time devices. RESULTS Oral ximelagatran, intravenous r-hirudin and subcutaneous enoxaparin rapidly and significantly (p < 0.05) decreased F1+2, TAT and beta-TG levels in shed blood, indicating inhibition of thrombin generation and platelet activation. Statistically significant concentration (melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran)-response relationships for F1+2 (p = 0.005), TAT (p = 0.005) and beta-TG (p < 0.001) levels, with IC(50)s of 0.376 (F1+2), 0.163 (TAT) and 0.115 (beta-TG) micromol/l, were detected. Melagatran showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with low variability. All drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Oral administration of the DTI ximelagatran resulted in a rapid inhibition of both thrombin generation and platelet activation in a concentration-dependent manner using a human shed blood model. The inhibition of thrombin generation by 60 mg ximelagatran was comparable to that observed with doses of r-hirudin and enoxaparin demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes.

No Influence of Ethnic Origin on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Melagatran Following Oral Administration of Ximelagatran, a Novel Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, to Healthy Male Volunteers

ObjectiveTo determine the influence of ethnic origin on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran, a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor.Study designThis was an open-label, non-randomised study with a single study session.SubjectsThirty-six young healthy male subjects living in France were divided equally according to their ethnic origin (African, Asian and Caucasian).MethodsAll subjects received a single 50mg oral dose of ximelagatran in solution. Blood and urine samples for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected up to 12 and 24 hours after administration, respectively. Blood samples were also collected to determine the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), an ex vivo coagulation time measurement used to demonstrate inhibition of thrombin, up to 24 hours after administration.ResultsThe absorption of ximelagatran, and its bioconversion to melagatran, was rapid in all three ethnic groups. The metabolite pattern in plasma and urine was similar in all groups, with melagatran being the dominant compound. For ximelagatran, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was similar in the three groups, suggesting that there was no difference in the extent to which ximelagatran was absorbed. Melagatran AUC was higher in the Asian subjects, with a mean Asian/Caucasian ratio (95% CI) of 1.23 (1.04, 1.45). This was presumably because of their lower bodyweight, which is correlated to lower renal function. Following normalisation for bodyweight, there were no statistically significant differences between the three ethnic groups. This finding suggests that renal elimination was lower for Asian subjects, whereas there were no differences in the conversion of ximelagatran to melagatran. The interindividual variability of melagatran AUC was low (coefficient of variation 19–26%), and the mean bioavailability of melagatran, estimated using a mean value for melagatran clearance obtained from Caucasian subjects in a previous study, was approximately 20% in all groups (range of mean values 19–23%). APTT increased nonlinearly with increasing melagatran plasma concentration, and no difference in the concentration—response relationship was observed between the groups.ConclusionAfter oral administration of ximelagatran, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of melagatran are independent of ethnic origin. The elimination of melagatran is correlated with renal function.