Ulla Derhaschnig

Morphine Decreases Clopidogrel Concentrations and Effects A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES This study sought to examine the possible drug-drug interactions between clopidogrel and morphine. BACKGROUND Because morphine-the recommended treatment for pain of myocardial infarction-is associated with poor clinical outcome, we hypothesized that morphine lowers the plasma levels of clopidogrel active metabolite as well as its effects on platelets. METHODS Twenty-four healthy subjects received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel together with placebo or 5 mg morphine intravenously in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Pharmacokinetics was determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and clopidogrel effects were measured by platelet function tests. RESULTS Morphine injection delayed clopidogrel absorption (p = 0.025) and reduced the area under the curve levels of its active metabolite by 34% (p = 0.001). Morphine delayed the maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation on average by 2 h (n = 24; p < 0.001). Residual platelet aggregation was higher 1 to 4 h after morphine injection (n = 24; p < 0.005). Furthermore, morphine delayed the inhibition of platelet plug formation under high shear rates (P2Y-Innovance; n = 21; p < 0.004) and abolished the 3-fold prolongation in collagen adenosine diphosphate-induced closure times seen in extensive and rapid metabolizers (n = 16; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Morphine delays clopidogrel absorption, decreases plasma levels of clopidogrel active metabolite, and retards and diminishes its effects, which can lead to treatment failure in susceptible individuals. (Drug/Drug Interactions of Aspirin and P2Y12-inhibitors; NCT01369186).

Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.

ObjectiveComparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurement with two different devices (M3000A using a new algorithm and M1008A using an established algorithm, both Hewlett Packard) and evaluation of current recommendations concerning the relation between cuff size and upper arm circumference in critically ill patients. DesignProspective data collection. SettingEmergency department in a 2000-bed inner-city hospital. PatientsA total of 30 patients categorized into three groups according to their upper arm circumference (I, 18–25 cm; II, 25.1–33 cm; III, 33.1–47.5 cm) were enrolled in the study protocol. InterventionsIn each patient, two noninvasive blood pressure devices with three different cuff sizes were used to perform oscillometric blood pressure measurement. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure measurement was done by cannulation of the radial artery. Measurement and Main ResultsOverall, 1,011 pairs of simultaneous oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements were collected in 30 patients (group I, n = 10; group II, n = 10; group III, n = 10). The overall discrepancy between both methods with the M3000A was −2.4 ± 11.8 mm Hg (p < .0001) and, with the M1008A, −5.3 ± 11.6 mm Hg (p < .0001) if the recommended cuff size according to the upper arm circumference was used (352 measurements). If smaller cuff sizes than recommended were used (308 measurements performed in group II and III), the overall discrepancy between both methods with the M3000A was 1.3 ± 13.4 mm Hg (p < .024) and, with the M1008A, −2.3 ± 11.5 mm Hg (p < .0001). ConclusionThe new algorithm reduced the overall bias of the oscillometric method but still showed a significant discrepancy between both methods of blood pressure measurement, primarily due to the mismatch between upper arm circumference and cuff size. The improvement of the algorithm alone could not result in a sufficient improvement of oscillometric blood pressure measurement. A reevaluation of the recommendations concerning the relation between upper arm circumference and cuff size are urgently required if oscillometric blood pressure measurement should become a reasonable alternative to intra-arterial blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.

Clinical ResearchAntithrombotic TherapyMorphine Decreases Clopidogrel Concentrations and Effects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES This study sought to examine the possible drug-drug interactions between clopidogrel and morphine. BACKGROUND Because morphine-the recommended treatment for pain of myocardial infarction-is associated with poor clinical outcome, we hypothesized that morphine lowers the plasma levels of clopidogrel active metabolite as well as its effects on platelets. METHODS Twenty-four healthy subjects received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel together with placebo or 5 mg morphine intravenously in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Pharmacokinetics was determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and clopidogrel effects were measured by platelet function tests. RESULTS Morphine injection delayed clopidogrel absorption (p = 0.025) and reduced the area under the curve levels of its active metabolite by 34% (p = 0.001). Morphine delayed the maximal inhibition of platelet aggregation on average by 2 h (n = 24; p < 0.001). Residual platelet aggregation was higher 1 to 4 h after morphine injection (n = 24; p < 0.005). Furthermore, morphine delayed the inhibition of platelet plug formation under high shear rates (P2Y-Innovance; n = 21; p < 0.004) and abolished the 3-fold prolongation in collagen adenosine diphosphate-induced closure times seen in extensive and rapid metabolizers (n = 16; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Morphine delays clopidogrel absorption, decreases plasma levels of clopidogrel active metabolite, and retards and diminishes its effects, which can lead to treatment failure in susceptible individuals. (Drug/Drug Interactions of Aspirin and P2Y12-inhibitors; NCT01369186).

Evaluation of antiinflammatory and antiadhesive effects of heparins in human endotoxemia.

ObjectiveCytokines and adhesion molecules have a decisive role in the development of early inflammatory response as well as the late sequelae of sepsis. Because L-selectin-deficient mice are protected from lethal endotoxemia, blockade of L-selectin may provide a useful therapeutic option in human sepsis. Heparin has immunomodulatory properties and effectively inhibits L- and P-selectin binding in vitro. We therefore investigated whether clinically applied doses of unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin affect early inflammatory response in human endotoxemia. DesignThe study was randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, in three parallel groups consisting of 30 healthy male volunteers. SettingUniversity medical center. InterventionsAll subjects received a 2-ng/kg intravenous bolus of lipopolysaccharide and 10 mins later unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or placebo as bolus primed continuous infusion for 6 hrs. Measurements and Main ResultsLipopolysaccharide infusion induced similar increases of tumor necrosis factor-&agr;, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, C-reactive protein, and soluble E-selectin levels in all treatment groups. CD11b expression increased by approximately 400%, but L-selectin decreased by 41% in the placebo arm 6 hrs after lipopolysaccharide infusion. Interestingly, both heparins (in particular unfractionated heparin) decreased L-selectin down-regulation as compared with placebo. Similarly, the decrease in lymphocyte counts was significantly less in the unfractionated heparin group during the first 24 hrs (p < .05 vs. placebo) ConclusionsHeparins displayed little effects on cytokine production and endothelial cell activation in endotoxemia. Of note, however, unfractionated heparin reduced L-selectin down-regulation and lymphocytopenia. These could present novel mechanisms of action of unfractionated heparin.

Regulation of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) on platelets and responsiveness to thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) during systemic inflammation in humans

Thrombin is a coagulation protease that activates platelets, endothelial cells, leukocytes and mesenchymal cells. Thrombin signaling is mediated at least in part by protease-activated receptors (PARs). As little is known about the in vivo regulation of PAR1, this study aimed to characterize the effects of systemic thrombin formation during human endotoxemia on the regulation of PAR1 and the associated responsiveness of human platelets to thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP). Endotoxin (2 ng/kg) was infused into 40 healthy men to study the regulation of PAR1 in systemic human inflammation. The SPAN12 antibody was used to determine the in vivo regulation of PAR1. To measure whether modulation of the PAR1 receptor may be associated with altered platelet reactivity, whole blood was stimulated with TRAP ex vivo. Thrombin generation was determined by prothrombin (F(1+2)) fragment. F(1+2) levels increased almost 9-fold from 0.5+/-0.1 nmol/L to 4.5+/-1.9 nmol/L at 4 h (p<0.001). PAR1 decreased by approximately 8% (p<0.001) within 2 h after endotoxin infusion and stayed at those levels until 6 h. Concomitantly, TRAP induced P-selectin expression maximally decreased by 18% (p<0.001) at 6 h. In conclusion, PAR1 expression is down-regulated on platelets during systemic thrombin formation induced by inflammation in humans which results in decreased responsiveness to subsequent stimulation of the PAR1 receptor.

Effects of aspirin and NO-aspirin (NCX 4016) on platelet function and coagulation in human endotoxemia

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) prevents thromboembolic events by inhibiting platelet function through blocking of cyclooxygenase type 1 (COX-1). A nitroderivate of ASA, 2-(acetyloxy)benzoic acid 3-(nitrooxymethyl)-phenyl ester (NCX 4016) was synthesized, which additionally acts through nitric oxide release. In various in vitro and animal studies NCX 4016 exhibited antithrombotic and anti-platelet properties. We used the standardized model of endotoxin infusion into human volunteers to compare the effects of NCX 4016 and ASA on platelet function and TF-induced coagulation activation. The trial consisted of two parts. In the first part, 10 healthy male volunteers were included in a randomized, open cross-over trial to find a NCX formulation with optimal tolerability and pharmacokinetic data were obtained. The second part was a randomized, double blind placebo controlled clinical trial consisting of 30 healthy male volunteers in three parallel groups (n = 10 per group). Volunteers received either NCX 4016 (800 mg b.i.d.), ASA (425 mg b.i.d.) or placebo for 7 days, before infusion of 2 ng/kg endotoxin on day 8. ASA attenuated the endotoxin-induced platelet plug formation (measured by PFA-100) significantly better than NCX 4016 and placebo (p < 0.004), while there was no difference in soluble P-selectin or VWF-levels. Urine 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 levels were significantly lower in the ASA and NCX 4016 groups as compared to placebo (p < 0.05). Neither ASA nor NCX 4016 significantly changed prothrombin fragment1 + 2, D-Dimer or tissue factor (TF)-mRNA levels. In summary, NCX 4016 had no effect on VWF release, platelet activation as measured by soluble P-selectin or TF gene expression. NCX 4016, at the dose tested, unlike ASA, had no effect on platelet collagen/epinephrine induced plug formation under high shear rates.

Morphine decreases ticagrelor concentrations but not its antiplatelet effects: a randomized trial in healthy volunteers

Our recent drug interaction trial with clopidogrel shows that morphine decreases the concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects of clopidogrel, which could lead to treatment failure in susceptible individuals.

Effects of prasugrel on platelet inhibition during systemic endotoxaemia: a randomized controlled trial

P2Y(12) receptor antagonists have become a mainstay for the treatment of CVD (cardiovascular diseases). However, they have rarely been evaluated under pathophysiological conditions apart from arterial diseases. We hypothesized interactions between prasugrel and enhanced vWF (von Willebrand Factor) release in a model of systemic inflammation, and compared the pharmacodynamic effects of prasugrel against placebo on agonist-induced platelet aggregation and shear-induced platelet plug formation. A total of 20 healthy male volunteers were enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled two-way crossover trial. Each volunteer received either placebo or a 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel 2 h before endotoxin or placebo infusion. Platelet inhibition was measured with MEA (multiple electrode aggregometry), the PFA-100 system and the VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) phosphorylation assay. Prasugrel blunted various platelet aggregation pathways, including those induced by ADP (-81%), AA (arachidonic acid) (-60%), ristocetin (-75%; P<0.001 for all) and, to a lesser degree, collagen or TRAP (thrombin-receptor-activating peptide). Prasugrel decreased shear-induced platelet plug formation, but vWF release during endotoxaemia partly antagonized the inhibitory effect of prasugrel as measured with the PFA-100 system. Endotoxaemia acutely decreased ristocetin and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation, and enhanced ristocetin-induced aggregation after 24 h. Strong in vivo blockade of P2Y(12) inhibits a broad spectrum of platelet aggregation pathways. However, vWF release may reduce prasugrels effects under high-shear conditions.

Blockade of GPIIb/IIIa by eptifibatide and tirofiban does not alter tissue factor induced thrombin generation in human endotoxemia.

Activated platelets facilitate thrombin generation by providing a catalytic surface on which coagulation activation occurs. The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor might play a major role in this process as shown by in vitro and animal experiments. However, it is controversial whether the GPIIb/IIIa receptor facilitates tissue factor-induced thrombin generation in humans as well. We therefore investigated whether two clinically used GPIIb/IIIa antagonists (tirofiban and eptifibatide) may blunt TF-induced coagulation in humans. Thirty male volunteers received 2 ng/kg endotoxin and standard doses of eptifibatide, tirofiban or placebo over 5 hours in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy parallel-group trial. Markers of thrombin generation (prothrombin fragment 1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes), fibrinolysis (D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin complexes) as well as inflammatory markers (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha) were measured by enzyme linked immunoasssays, TF-mRNA expression was quantified by RT-PCR. Neither eptifibatide nor tirofiban influenced LPS-induced coagulation activation or fibrinolytic activity. Additionally, the increase of TNF-alpha and IL-6 was similar in all groups. In conclusion, GPIIb/IIIa blockade with eptifibatide or tirofiban did not influence TF-induced coagulation activation in human low grade endotoxemia.

Reversal strategy in antagonizing the P2Y12 -inhibitor ticagrelor.

Patients on antiplatelet therapy have a higher incidence of bleeding complications. Reversal of antiplatelet drug effects is an important issue at trauma or emergency departments. For old and conventional anticoagulants, reversal strategies are established. While the effects of ticagrelor are reversible, developing a method to restore platelet function in patients is of importance due to its longer half‐life (approximately 8 h), compared with other P2Y12‐inhibitors.