Ulrich Budde
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ulrich Budde.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2006
J. E. Sadler; Ulrich Budde; Jeroen Eikenboom; Emmanuel J. Favaloro; F. G. H. Hill; Lars Holmberg; Jørgen Ingerslev; Christine Lee; David Lillicrap; P. M. Mannucci; C. Mazurier; Dominique Meyer; William L. Nichols; M. Nishino; Ian R. Peake; Francesco Rodeghiero; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Zaverio M. Ruggeri; A. Srivastava; Robert R. Montgomery; Augusto B. Federici
Summary. von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a bleeding disorder caused by inherited defects in the concentration, structure, or function of von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD is classified into three primary categories. Type 1 includes partial quantitative deficiency, type 2 includes qualitative defects, and type 3 includes virtually complete deficiency of VWF. VWD type 2 is divided into four secondary categories. Type 2A includes variants with decreased platelet adhesion caused by selective deficiency of high‐molecular‐weight VWF multimers. Type 2B includes variants with increased affinity for platelet glycoprotein Ib. Type 2M includes variants with markedly defective platelet adhesion despite a relatively normal size distribution of VWF multimers. Type 2N includes variants with markedly decreased affinity for factor VIII. These six categories of VWD correlate with important clinical features and therapeutic requirements. Some VWF gene mutations, alone or in combination, have complex effects and give rise to mixed VWD phenotypes. Certain VWD types, especially type 1 and type 2A, encompass several pathophysiologic mechanisms that sometimes can be distinguished by appropriate laboratory studies. The clinical significance of this heterogeneity is under investigation, which may support further subdivision of VWD type 1 or type 2A in the future.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2006
Alberto Tosetto; Francesco Rodeghiero; Giancarlo Castaman; Anne Goodeve; Augusto B. Federici; Javier Batlle; Dominique Meyer; Edith Fressinaud; C. Mazurier; Jenny Goudemand; Jeroen Eikenboom; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Ulrich Budde; Jørgen Ingerslev; Zdena Vorlova; David Habart; Lars Holmberg; Stefan Lethagen; John Pasi; F. G. H. Hill; I. R. Peake
Summary. Background: A quantitative description of bleeding symptoms in type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) has never been reported. Objectives: The aim was to quantitatively evaluate the severity of bleeding symptoms in type 1 VWD and its correlation with clinical and laboratory features. Patients and methods: Bleeding symptoms were retrospectively recorded in a European cohort of VWD type 1 families, and for each subject a quantitative bleeding score (BS) was obtained together with phenotypic tests. Results: A total of 712 subjects belonging to 144 families and 195 controls were available for analysis. The BS was higher in index cases than in affected family members (BS 9 vs. 5, P < 0.0001) and in unaffected family members than in controls (BS 0 vs. −1, P < 0.0001). There was no effect of ABO blood group. BS showed a strong significant inverse relation with either von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo), von Willebrand antigen (VWF:Ag) or factor VIII procoagulant activity (FVIII:C) measured at time of enrollment, even after adjustment for age, sex and blood group (P < 0.001 for all the four upper quintiles of BS vs. the first quintile, for either VWF:RCo, VWF:Ag or FVIII:C). Higher BS was related with increasing likelihood of VWD, and a mucocutaneous BS (computed from spontaneous, mucocutaneous symptoms) was strongly associated with bleeding after surgery or tooth extraction. Conclusions: Quantitative analysis of bleeding symptoms is potentially useful for a more accurate diagnosis of type 1 VWD and to develop guidelines for its optimal treatment.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery | 2008
Ulrich Geisen; Claudia Heilmann; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Christoph Benk; Michael Berchtold-Herz; Christian Schlensak; Ulrich Budde; Barbara Zieger
OBJECTIVE Outcomes after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation have significantly improved during the last decade. However, bleeding episodes remain a serious complication of VAD support. This cannot be explained by the individual anticoagulation regimen alone in several cases, but may be symptomatic of acquired von Willebrand disease (VWD). The leading finding in acquired VWD (AVWD) is the loss of large multimers which results in diminished binding to collagen and to the platelets. We, therefore, analysed patients with two VAD types for laboratory parameters of VWD and compared them with patients after heart transplantation (HTX). MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven patients with a HeartMate II left-ventricular assist device and five patients who received a Thoratec biventricular assist device were included in this study. Eight HTX recipients served as controls. Analysis included international normalized ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), platelet count, von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen, collagen binding capacity, ristocetin cofactor activity, the ratios of the latter two to the VWF antigen and presence of large VWF multimers. RESULTS The VAD and HTX groups did not differ with regard to age or time-point of analysis after surgery. INR and number of platelets were comparable in both groups, PTT was prolonged in VAD patients. Both VAD and HTX patients had elevated but comparable amounts of VWF antigen. However, large multimers were missing in all of 10 tested VAD patients. In contrast, five of six tested HTX recipients displayed normal multimer pattern. Indeed, collagen binding capacity and ristocetin cofactor activity (which measures binding of VWF to platelets) were lower in VAD patients compared to HTX recipients. Impaired coagulation associated with VADs was also reflected by the diminished ratios of collagen binding capacity and ristocetin cofactor activity to VWF antigen. A pathologic collagen binding ratio was found in all 10 tested VAD patients and one of the eight HTX patients, a reduced ristocetin cofactor activity ratio in 10 of 12 VAD and one of eight HTX patients. CONCLUSION Non-surgical postoperative bleeding after VAD implantation could be explained by an AVWD. Several pharmacologic treatment options (tranexamic acid, desmopressin, VWF-factor VIII concentrate, recombinant factor VIIa) may arise from our data. Improved VAD design could prevent this problem in the future.
Blood | 2011
Andreas Tiede; Jacob H. Rand; Ulrich Budde; Arnold Ganser; Augusto B. Federici
The acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a bleeding disorder that is frequently unrecognized or is misdiagnosed as von Willebrand disease. AVWS is characterized by structural or functional defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF) that are secondary to autoimmune, lymphoproliferative or myeloproliferative, malignant, cardiovascular, or other disorders. VWF abnormalities in these disorders can result from (1) antibody-mediated clearance or functional interference, (2) adsorption to surfaces of transformed cells or platelets, or (3) increased shear stress and subsequent proteolysis. Diagnosis can be challenging as no single test is usually sufficient to prove or exclude AVWS. Furthermore, there are no evidence-based guidelines for management. Treatments of the underlying medical condition, including chemo/radiotherapy, surgery, or immunosuppressants can result in remission of AVWS, but is not always feasible and successful. Because of the heterogeneous mechanisms of AVWS, more than one therapeutic approach is often required to treat acute bleeds and for prophylaxis during invasive procedures; the treatment options include, but are not limited to, desmopressin, VWF-containing concentrates, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis or recombinant factor VIIa. Here, we review the management of AVWS with an overview on the currently available evidence and additional considerations for typical treatment situations.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2008
Ulrich Budde; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Jeroen Eikenboom; Anne Goodeve; K. Will; E Drewke; Giancarlo Castaman; Francesco Rodeghiero; Augusto B. Federici; Javier Batlle; A Perez; Dominique Meyer; C. Mazurier; Jenny Goudemand; Jørgen Ingerslev; David Habart; Zdena Vorlova; Lars Holmberg; Stefan Lethagen; J Pasi; F. G. H. Hill; I. R. Peake
Summary. Background: Type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a congenital bleeding disorder characterized by a partial quantitative deficiency of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) in the absence of structural and/or functional VWF defects. Accurate assessment of the quantity and quality of plasma VWF is difficult but is a prerequisite for correct classification. Objective: To evaluate the proportion of misclassification of patients historically diagnosed with type 1 VWD using detailed analysis of the VWF multimer structure. Patients and methods: Previously diagnosed type 1 VWD families and healthy controls were recruited by 12 expert centers in nine European countries. Phenotypic characterization comprised plasma VWF parameters and multimer analysis using low‐ and intermediate‐resolution gels combined with an optimized visualization system. VWF genotyping was performed in all index cases (ICs). Results: Abnormal multimers were present in 57 out of 150 ICs; however, only 29 out of these 57 (51%) had VWF ristocetin cofactor to antigen ratio below 0.7. In most cases multimer abnormalities were subtle, and only two cases had a significant loss of the largest multimers. Conclusions: Of the cases previously diagnosed as type 1 VWD, 38% showed abnormal multimers. Depending on the classification criteria used, 22 out of these 57 cases (15% of the total cohort) may be reclassified as type 2, emphasizing the requirement for multimer analysis compared with a mere ratio of VWF functional parameters and VWF:Ag. This is further supported by the finding that even slightly aberrant multimers are highly predictive for the presence of VWF mutations.
Blood | 2008
Sandra L. Haberichter; Giancarlo Castaman; Ulrich Budde; Ian R. Peake; Anne Goodeve; Francesco Rodeghiero; Augusto B. Federici; Javier Batlle; Dominique Meyer; C. Mazurier; Jenny Goudemand; Jeroen Eikenboom; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Jørgen Ingerslev; Zdena Vorlova; David Habart; Lars Holmberg; Stefan Lethagen; John Pasi; F. G. H. Hill; Robert R. Montgomery
The decreased survival of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in plasma has been implicated as a mechanism in a subset of type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. We have previously reported that the ratio of plasma levels of VWF and its propeptide (VWFpp) can be used to identify patients with reduced VWF survival. In this study, we report the assay of VWFpp and VWF:Ag in 19 individuals recruited from 6 European centers within the MCMDM-1VWD study. Eight individuals had a VWF:Ag level less than 30 IU/dL. Seven of these patients had a robust desmopressin response and significantly reduced VWF half-life that was predicted by a markedly increased steady-state plasma VWFpp/VWF:Ag ratio. VWF mutations previously associated with reduced VWF survival were identified in each of the 7 individuals. Thus, a substantially increased ratio of steady-state VWFpp/VWF:Ag predicted a reduced VWF half-life in patients with markedly decreased VWF:Ag levels. These data indicate that a reduced VWF survival is found in a subpopulation of patients with type 1 VWD. The systematic assay of both plasma VWF and the VWF propeptide in moderately severe type 1 VWD patients may identify patients with a reduced VWF survival phenotype.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2008
Andreas Tiede; J. Priesack; Sonja Werwitzke; K. Bohlmann; B. Oortwijn; P. Lenting; R. Eisert; Arnold Ganser; Ulrich Budde
Summary. Background: Diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) remains challenging. Diagnostic algorithms suggest the use of factor VIII (FVIII:C), von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo), and collagen‐binding capacity (VWF:CB), but the sensitivity of these and other laboratory tests for the diagnosis of AVWS is unknown. Objectives: To analyze the capacity of laboratory tests, including point‐of‐care testing (POCT), for the identification of patients with AVWS. Patients/methods: Thirty‐five consecutive patients were enrolled with AVWS diagnosed because of a history of recent onset of bleeding, a negative family history of von Willebrand disease, and abnormal plasma VWF multimers. Results: According to our inclusion criteria, all patients had bleeding symptoms, and the VWF high molecular weight multimers were either decreased or absent. Regarding POCT, PFA‐100 was inconclusive, due to anemia or thrombocytopenia, in 29%; the sensitivity was 80% in the remaining patients. The sensitivity of VWF:Ag (23%), VWF:RCo/Ag ratio < 0.7 (26%), VWF:CB/Ag ratio < 0.7 (46%), anti‐VWF antibodies (15%) and VWF propeptide/Ag ratio (22%) was too low to rule out the disease. A combination of VWF:Ag < 50 IU dL−1, VWF:RCo/Ag ratio < 0.7 and VWF:CB/Ag ratio < 0.8 yielded a sensitivity of 86%. Patients diagnosed only because of abnormal VWF multimers showed similar clinical characteristics as other patients. Conclusions: Early diagnosis of AVWS is difficult, due to lack of sensitivity of the tests used. A substantial number of patients present with normal or increased test results, emphasizing the importance of multimer analysis in all patients with suspected AVWS.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2006
Jeroen Eikenboom; V. Van Marion; H Putter; Anne Goodeve; Francesco Rodeghiero; Giancarlo Castaman; Augusto B. Federici; Javier Batlle; Dominique Meyer; C. Mazurier; Jenny Goudemand; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Ulrich Budde; Jørgen Ingerslev; Zdena Vorlova; David Habart; Lars Holmberg; Stefan Lethagen; John Pasi; F Hill; I. R. Peake
Summary. Background: von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 1 is a congenital bleeding disorder caused by genetic defects in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene and characterized by a reduction of structurally normal VWF. The diagnosis of type 1 VWD is difficult because of clinical and laboratory variability. Furthermore, inconsistency of linkage between type 1 VWD and the VWF locus has been reported. Objectives: To estimate the proportion of type 1 VWD that is linked to the VWF gene. Patients and methods: Type 1 VWD families and healthy control individuals were recruited. An extensive questionnaire on bleeding symptoms was completed and phenotypic tests were performed. Linkage between VWF gene haplotypes and the diagnosis of type 1 VWD, the plasma levels of VWF and the severity of bleeding symptoms was analyzed. Results: Segregation analysis in 143 families diagnosed with type 1 VWD fitted a model of autosomal dominant inheritance. Linkage analysis under heterogeneity resulted in a summed lod score of 23.2 with an estimated proportion of linkage of 0.70. After exclusion of families with abnormal multimer patterns the linkage proportion was 0.46. LOD scores and linkage proportions were higher in families with more severe phenotypes and with phenotypes suggestive of qualitative VWF defects. About 40% of the total variation of VWF antigen could be attributed to the VWF gene. Conclusions: We conclude that the diagnosis of type 1 VWD is linked to the VWF gene in about 70% of families, however after exclusion of qualitative defects this is about 50%.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2009
Carsten Baldauf; Reinhard Schneppenheim; W. Stacklies; Tobias Obser; A. Pieconka; Sonja Schneppenheim; Ulrich Budde; J. Zhou; Frauke Gräter
Summary. Background: To avoid pathological platelet aggregation by von Willebrand factor (VWF), VWF multimers are regulated in size and reactivity for adhesion by ADAMTS13‐mediated proteolysis in a shear flow dependent manner. Objective and methods: We examined whether tensile stress in VWF under shear flow activates the VWF A2 domain for cleavage by ADAMTS13 using molecular dynamics simulations. We generated a full length mutant VWF featuring a homologous disulfide bond in A2 (N1493C and C1670S), in an attempt to lock A2 against unfolding. Results: We indeed observed stepwise unfolding of A2 and exposure of its deeply buried ADAMTS13 cleavage site. Interestingly, disulfide bonds in the adjacent and highly homologous VWF A1 and A3 domains obstruct their mechanical unfolding. We find this mutant A2 (N1493C and C1670S) to feature ADAMTS13‐resistant behavior in vitro. Conclusions: Our results yield molecular‐detail evidence for the force‐sensing function of VWF A2, by revealing how tension in VWF due to shear flow selectively exposes the A2 proteolysis site to ADAMTS13 for cleavage while keeping the folded remainder of A2 intact and functional. We find the unconventional ‘knotted’ Rossmann fold of A2 to be the key to this mechanical response, tailored for regulating VWF size and activity. Based on our model we discuss the pathomechanism of some natural mutations in the VWF A2 domain that significantly increase the cleavage by ADAMTS13 without shearing or chemical denaturation, and provide with the cleavage‐activated A2 conformation a structural basis for the design of inhibitors for VWF type 2 diseases.
Haematologica | 2008
Clemens L. Bockmeyer; Ralf A. Claus; Ulrich Budde; Karim Kentouche; Reinhard Schneppenheim; Wolfgang Lösche; Konrad Reinhart; Frank M. Brunkhorst
The findings of this study suggest that systemic inflammation results in ADAMTS13 deficiency, and thereby activates hemostasis. In a prospective, longitudinal study, we investigated the association between decreased ADAMTS13 activity and impaired hemostasis, as well as organ dysfunctions in patients with systemic inflammation due to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary circuit or with severe sepsis. Similar to negative acute phase proteins, ADAMTS13 activity declined stepwise according to the extent of inflammatory responses. A marked imbalance between ADAMTS13 activity and VWF antigen level was associated with the appearance of ultra-large VWF multimers in plasma, with organ dysfunction and lethality. Our data support the view that systemic inflammation results in an ADAMTS13 deficiency which activates hemostasis.