Ulrich Klotz

Extrahepatic Metabolism of Drugs in Humans

SummaryAlthough the liver plays the major role in drug metabolism [e.g. by oxidative cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent phase I and conjugation or phase II reactions], drug metabolising enzymes are also present at other sites. Depending on the particular drug and enzymes involved, these extrahepatic organs and/or tissues can contribute to the elimination of drugs and, thus, should be considered in any discussion of drug disposition.By the use of relatively new techniques in molecular biology, e.g. immunoblotting with antibodies directed to various CYP isoenzymes, the tissue and organ distribution of these drug metabolising enzymes can be determined. In addition, microsomal and cytosolic enzyme activity and capacity can be directly assessed in vitro by incubation of the enzymes with the drugs of interest. Both approaches have demonstrated the presence of 3 CYP families at different extrahepatic sites, such as the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, kidney, lung, brain or skin. Enzymes including epoxide hydrolases, hydrolysing enzymes, glutathione S-transferases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, sulphotransferases, N-acetyltransferases, and methyltransferases are discussed.Indirect evidence of extrahepatic drug metabolism can be generated from pharmacokinetic studies whenever total body clearance exceeds liver blood flow, or when severe liver dysfunction or anhepatic conditions do not affect metabolic clearance. Indeed, extrahepatic metabolism has been demonstrated for numerous drugs. Therefore, the metabolic profile and sites of enzymatic reactions for each drug should be determined.

Telomere length in different tissues of elderly patients.

Telomeres are supposed to play a role in cellular aging and might contribute to the genetic background of human aging and longevity. During the past few years telomere length has been measured in various human tissues. However, very little is known about the individual telomere loss in different tissues from the same donor. Therefore we have measured telomere restriction fragment (TRF) length in three unrelated tissues (leukocytes, skin and synovial tissue) of nine elderly patients (age range 73-95 years old). Dependent on the tissue specific proliferation rate we have found significantly shorter telomeres (6546+/-519 bp, mean +/- S.D.) in leukocytes compared to skin (7792+/-596 bp, P<0.01) and synovial tissue (7910+/-420 bp, P<0.001). In general, we have observed an inverse relationship between donor age and TRF length which becomes significant in leukocytes (P=0.04, R(2)=0.49) and skin specimens (P=0.006, R(2)=0.81). Interestingly, linear correlations (P values between 0.017 and 0.038, R(2) values between 0.54 and 0.79) were also obtained on comparison of telomere length in each pair of two different tissues from the same donor without taking donor age into account. This suggests that genetic determination of the regulation of telomere length is tissue-independent. Furthermore, our results indicate that TRF measurement in easily accessible tissues such as blood could serve as a surrogate parameter for the relative telomere length in other tissues.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Sulfasalazine and Its Metabolites in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease

We studied the therapeutic efficacy of sulfasalazine and its metabolites sulfapyridine and 5-aminosalicylic acid in nine patients with Crohns disease and in 23 patients with ulcerative colitis. In a randomized, controlled trial, we treated 11 patients for six weeks with 1 g of sulfasalazine three times a day, seven patients with 0.5 g of sulfapyridine three times a day, and 14 patients with 0.5 g of 5-aminosalicylic acid suppositories three times a day. The clinical state of the disease was characterized by an activity index, quality of stool, and remission rate. In addition, we monitored plasma levels of sulfapyridine, 5-aminosalicylic acid, and their acetylated metabolites. The initial activity index (mean +/- S.D.) was significantly reduced by sulfasalazine (from 245 +/- 129 to 100 +/- 71; P < 0.001) and by 5-aminosalicylic acid (from 251 +/- 65 to 90 +/- 93; P < 0.0001), but sulfapyridine was without benefit. Stool quality was also improved by sulfasalazine (82 per cent of the cases) and by 5-aminosalicylic acid (79 per cent). The highest remission rate was achieved with 5-aminosalicylic acid (86 per cent), followed by sulfasalazine (64 per cent) and sulfapyridine (14 per cent). Our investigations show that 5-aminosalicylic acid is the active moiety of sulfasalazine and that this effective metabolite may be an alternative to sulfasalazine in inflammatory bowel disease.

Proton pump inhibitors: an update of their clinical use and pharmacokinetics

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent drugs of first choice for treating peptic ulcer, Helicobacter pylori infection, gastrooesophageal reflux disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal lesions (complications), and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.ResultsThe available agents (omeprazole/esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) differ somewhat in their pharmacokinetic properties (e.g., time-/dose-dependent bioavailability, metabolic pattern, interaction potential, genetic variability). For all PPIs, there is a clear relationship between drug exposure (area under the plasma concentration/time curve) and the pharmacodynamic response (inhibition of acid secretion). Furthermore, clinical outcome (e.g., healing and eradication rates) depends on maintaining intragastric pH values above certain threshold levels. Thus, any changes in drug disposition will subsequently be translated directly into clinical efficiency so that extensive metabolizers of CYP2C19 will demonstrate a higher rate of therapeutic nonresponse.ConclusionsThis update of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data will provide the necessary guide by which to select between the various PPIs that differ—based on pharmacodynamic assessments—in their relative potencies (e.g., higher doses are needed for pantoprazole and lansoprazole compared with rabeprazole). Despite their well-documented clinical efficacy and safety, there is still a certain number of patients who are refractory to treatment with PPIs (nonresponder), which will leave sufficient space for future drug development and clinical research.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Sulphasalazine, Its Metabolites and Other Prodrugs of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid

SummaryThere is accumulating clinical evidence that 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) represents the therapeulc moiety of sulphasalazine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.For more than 4 decades, the active metabolite, 5-ASA, has been administered in the form of the ‘prodrug’ sulphasalazine; however, in contrast to sulphasalazine, the pharmacokinetics of 5-ASA were unknown until recently. Sulphasalazine itself is poorly absorbed (3 to 12%) and its elimination half-life of about 5 to 10 hours is probably affected by the absorption process. The major part of sulphasalazine is split by bacterial azo-reduction in the colon into 5-ASA and sulphapyridine, the latter accounting for most of the adverse effects of sulphasalazine. The effective cleavage of sulphasalazine depends on an intact colon and transit time. It is markedly reduced in patients taking antibiotics and after removal of the large bowel. The formed sulphapyridine is almost completely absorbed and eliminated by hydroxylation, glucuronidation and polymorphic acetylation. Depending on the genetic phenotype, the elimination half-life and apparent oral clearance of sulphapyridine are approximately 14 hours and 40 ml/min (slow acetylators) or 6 hours and 150 ml/min (fast acetylators), respectively.Of the 5-ASA released from its ‘vehicle’ sulphapyridine in the colon, at least 25% is absorbed and after acetylation is subsequently excreted in the urine. At least 50% is eliminated in the faeces. Recently, 5-ASA has also been administered directly in the form of enemas, suppositories and oral slow-release preparations. While the elimination half-life of 5-ASA is short (0.5 to 1.5h), its major acetylated metabolite (which may be active) exhibits a half-life of 5 to 10 hours. During therapy with sulphasalazine or 5-ASA, steady-state plasma concentrations of 5-ASA are relatively low (≤ 2 μg/ml); thus its mode of action appears to be topically rather than systemically.Another approach to deliver the active 5-ASA to the gastrointestinal tract is accomplished with novel ‘prodrugs’ of 5-ASA, in which the carrier molecule sulphapyridine is replaced by 5-ASA itself (azodisalicylate) or other compounds.

Influence of Diet and Nutritional Status on Drug Metabolism

SummaryGenetic and environmental factors contribute to a wide inter- and intraindividual variability in drug metabolism. Among the environmental factors that may influence drug metabolism, the diet and nutritional status of the individuals are important determinants. As altered drug-metabolising enzyme activities can influence the intensity and duration of drug action, such factors should be considered in pharmacotherapy. For this reason the effects of dietary energy, protein deficiency, nutritional ingredients, special diet forms and nutrition regimens and malnutritional states must be differentiated.In various pharmacokinetic studies different model drugs metabolised either by oxidative phase I pathways [e.g. phenazone (antipyrine), aminopyrine, phenacetin, theophylline, propranolol, nifedipine] or phase II conjugation reactions [e.g. paracetamol (acetaminophen), oxazepam] were used and from the calculated pharmacokinetic data some information on the involved and affected drug-metabolising enzymes [e.g. cytochrome P450 (CYP) subspecies, glucuronosyltransferases] can be generated. It is well known that smoking, charcoal broiled food or cruciferous vegetables induce the metabolism of many xenobiotics, whereas grapefruit juice increases the oral bioavailability of the high clearance drugs nifedipine, nitrendipine or felodipine by inhibiting their presystemic (intestinal) elimination. Energy deficiency, and especially a low intake of protein, will cause a decrease of about 20 to 40% in phenazone and theophylline clearance and elimination of those drugs can be accelerated by a protein-rich diet. In the same way, protein deficiency induced by either vegetarian food or undernourishment will have the opposite pharmacokinetic consequences. On the basis of some more examples from the literature it is emphasised that the variable influence of the above factors should be taken into account in study participant selection and study design when the pharmacokinetic s of a drug must be determined in healthy individuals and/or patients.

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of sodium valproate.

The pharmacokinetics of the antiepileptic drug, sodium valproate (VPA), was investigated in 6 healthy volunteers after a single intravenous dose of 400 mg, as well as a solution and enteric‐coated tablets. The bioavailability of the enteric‐coated tablets was compared with that of normal tablets in 3 of these subjects. The bioavailability studies demonstrated that the solution was rapidly and almost completely (86% to 100%) absorbed. Peak plasma levels (66 to 196 µg/ml) were reached within 0.5 to 2 hr. Tablets had comparable bioavailabilities which varied in the different persons (68% to 100%). In some subjects VPA was found in plasma only after a lag time of 1 to 4 hr and the peak plasma concentrations of 46 to 88 µg/ml developed after 3 to 7 hr. After the intravenous dose, plasma levels declined biexponentially. The pharmacokinetic parameters were computed according to the two‐compartment open model. The half‐life of the initial phase, t½(α), could be calculated to 1.0 ± 0.86 hr (mean ± SD) and the terminal half‐life, t½(β), varied independently of the route of administration between 8.7 and 21.5 hr (12.2 ± 3.7 hr). The distribution space of the central compartment (V1) was 0.065 ± 0.010 Llkg, and both the apparent volume of distribution at steady‐state (VdSS) and Vdβ had similar values of 0.13 ± 0.04 L/kg and 0.14 ± 0.05 L/kg, respectively. These small volumes indicate that VPA distributes mainly into the extracellular space. The total plasma or blood clearance (Cl) ranged from 4.3 to 10.5 ml/min (7.8 ± 2.4 ml!min) and from 11.9 to 44.3 ml/min (30.1 ± 11.9), respectively. Therapeutic concentrations of VPA (80 µg/ml) revealed relatively strong plasma protein binding between 80% and 94%. The bloodlplasma concentration ratio ranged about 0.28 ± 0.06. Since the calculated hepatic extraction ratio of 0.02 is smaller than the free fraction, it is concluded that clearance of VPA is independent of liver blood flow and of the restrictive type. No measurable amounts of unchanged VPA were excreted during the 2 days of observation. Approximately 10% to 30% of a single dose was eliminated as VPA conjugates which could be hydrolyzed by 2 N HCl and β‐glucuronidase/aryl‐sulfatase.

Glucuronidation of drugs : a re-evaluation of the pharmacological significance of the conjugates and modulating factors

SummaryGlucuronides of drugs are considered to be generally inactive and rapidly eliminated. Therefore, these metabolites are often not taken into account in evaluating drug effects. The present review describes examples of both direct and indirect contributions of glucuronides to net drug effects. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that morphine-6-glucuronide has analgesic activity. This compound has a high affinity to the μ-receptor, is capable of penetrating the blood/brain barrier and is a potent analgesic after administration to patients. Indirect activity of glucuronides may consist of a systemic cycle in which an active parent compound is derived from the glucuronide by enzymatic action. Such systemic cycling has been demonstrated for clofibric acid. In addition, some acyl glucuronides are subject to intramolecular rearrangement and the resulting metabolites are resistant to β-glucuronidase. Covalent protein binding of glucuronides by different mechanisms may contribute to drug toxicity and immune responses. If glucuronides are accepted as potential modifiers of net drug action it is important to determine what factors modulate disposition of these compounds. Therefore, the later section of this review describes glucuronidation under different pathophysiological conditions. Examples for alterations of the rate and/or extent of glucuronidation by concurrent disease processes, age and coadministration of other drugs are provided.

Thiopurine Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This review summarises clinical pharmacological aspects of thiopurines in the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Current knowledge of pharmacogenetically guided dosing is discussed for individualisation of thiopurine therapy, particularly to avoid severe adverse effects.Both azathioprine and mercaptopurine are pro-drugs that undergo extensive metabolism. The catabolic enzyme thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is polymorphically expressed, and currently 23 genetic variants have been described. On the basis of an excellent phenotype-genotype correlation for TPMT, genotyping has become a safe and reliable tool for determination of a patient’s individual phenotype.Thiopurine-related adverse drug reactions are frequent, ranging from 5% up to 40%, in both a dose-dependent and -independent manner. IBD patients with low TPMT activity are at high risk of developing severe haematotoxicity if pharmacogenetically guided dosing is not performed. Based on several cost-benefit analyses, assessment of TPMT activity is recommended prior to thiopurine therapy in patients with IBD. The underlying mechanisms of azathioprine/mercaptopurine-related hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis and azathioprine intolerance are still unknown.Although the therapeutic response appears to be related to 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) concentrations above a threshold of 230–260 pmol per 8 × 108 red blood cells, at present therapeutic drug monitoring of 6-TGN can be recommended only to estimate patients’ compliance.Drug-drug interactions between azathioprine/mercaptopurine and aminosalicylates, diuretics, NSAIDs, warfarin and infliximab are discussed. The concomitant use of allopurinol without dosage adjustment of azathioprine/mercaptopurine leads to clinically relevant severe haematotoxicity due to elevated thiopurine levels.Several studies indicate that thiopurine therapy in IBD during pregnancy is safe. Thus, azathioprine/mercaptopurine should not be withdrawn in strictly indicated cases of pregnant IBD patients. However, breastfeeding is contraindicated during azathioprine/mercaptopurine therapy.Use of azathioprine/mercaptopurine for induction and maintenance of remission in corticosteroid-dependent or corticosteroid-refractory IBD, particularly Crohn’s disease, is evidence based. To improve response rates in thiopurine therapy of IBD, comprehensive analyses including metabolic patterns and genome-wide profiling in patients with azathioprine/mercaptopurine treatment are required to identify novel candidate genes.

Pharmacokinetics of the selective benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 in man

SummaryThe pharmacokinetics of the selective benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 has been studied in 6 healthy male volunteers following a single intravenous dose of 2.5 mg. The drug was only slightly bound to plasma proteins (40±8%, mean±SD). A negligible amount (<0.2% of the dose) of unchanged drug was recovered in urine. Hepatic elimination was rapid, as shown by a short t1/2 of 0.9±0.2 h, and high total plasma and blood clearances of 691±216 ml/min and 716±199 ml/min, respectively. The fast decline of plasma levels from about 60 to 2 ng/ml accounts for the short-lasting reversal of benzodiazepine-induced sedation by Ro 15-1788.