Uma Kher

Combined modality therapy for primary CNS lymphoma.

PURPOSE Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), formerly rare, is being seen with increased frequency among apparently immunocompetent patients. Conventional treatment has consisted of whole-brain radiotherapy (RT) and corticosteroids, with a median survival of 15 to 18 months and a 3% to 4% 5-year survival. Chemotherapy has been useful in the treatment of recurrent PCNSL. In 1985 we began a treatment protocol using chemotherapy and cranial irradiation for the initial therapy of non-AIDS PCNSL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-one patients (group A) completed the combined modality regimen. All had placement of an Ommaya reservoir and received pre-RT systemic methotrexate, 1 g/m2, plus six doses of intra-Ommaya methotrexate at 12 mg per dose. A full course of cranial RT (4,000-cGy whole-brain RT plus a 1,440-cGy boost) was followed by two cycles of high-dose cytarabine (ara-C), with each course consisting of two doses of 3 g/m2 ara-C separated by 24 hours and infused over 3 hours. During this period, 16 additional patients (group R) were treated with RT alone, either because patients refused chemotherapy or RT was initiated before our consultation; all would have been eligible to participate in the protocol. Follow-up extended through April 1, 1991. RESULTS Group A had a significantly prolonged time to recurrence (median, 41 months) compared with group R (median, 10 months; P = .003). Although median survival was doubled from 21.7 months for group R to 42.5 months for group A, this was not statistically significant because of small sample size. More importantly, group R patients received systemic chemotherapy for recurrent PCNSL, which improved survival. CONCLUSION The addition of chemotherapy to cranial RT for initial treatment of PCNSL significantly improved disease-free survival and contributed to overall survival; all non-AIDS patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL should be considered for combined modality therapy.

Alendronate treatment of the postmenopausal osteoporotic woman: Effect of multiple dosages on bone mass and bone remodeling

BACKGROUND The effects of the aminobisphosphonate alendronate sodium on bone mass and markers of bone remodeling were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year study, 188 postmenopausal women, aged 42 to 75 years, with low bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 daily treatment groups: placebo for 2 years, alendronate 5 or 10 mg for 2 years, alendronate 20 or 40 mg for 1 year followed by placebo for 1 year, or alendronate 40 mg for 3 months followed by 2.5 mg for 21 months. All subjects were given 500 mg/d of elemental calcium as calcium carbonate. RESULTS At each dose, alendronate produced significant reductions in markers of bone resorption and formation, and significantly increased bone mass at the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, as compared with decreases (significant at lumbar spine) in subjects receiving placebo. In the 10-mg group, mean urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine had declined by 47% at 3 months, and mean serum osteocalcin by 53% at 6 months. Mean changes in BMD over 24 months with 10 mg alendronate were +7.21% +/- 0.49% for the lumbar spine, +5.27% +/- 0.70% for total hip, and +2.53% +/- 0.68% for total body (each P < 0.01) compared to changes of -1.35% +/- 0.61%, -1.20% +/- 0.64% and -0.31% +/- 0.44% at these sites, respectively, with placebo treatment. Progressive increases in BMD of both lumbar spine and total hip were observed in the second year of treatment with 10 mg alendronate (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Alendronate, a potent inhibitor of bone resorption, reduces markers of bone remodeling and significantly increases BMD at the lumbar spine, hip, and total body, and is well tolerated at therapeutic doses (5 or 10 mg daily) in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Effect of Three Years of Oral Alendronate Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE Oral alendronate sodium is a potent, specific inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. To assess its efficacy and safety, a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 478 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS Subjects received either placebo, alendronate 5 or 10 mg/day for 3 years, or 20 mg/day for 2 years followed by 5 mg/day for 1 year (20/5 mg). All subjects received 500 mg/day of supplemental calcium. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS After 3 years, alendronate 10 mg induced marked increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (9.6 +/- 0.4%), femoral neck (4.7 +/- 0.7%) and trochanter (7.4 +/- 0.6%) (mean +/- SE; each P < or = 0.001) versus decreases of 0.8 to 1.6% with placebo. Progressive increases at these sites in the alendoronate 10 mg group were significant during both the second and third years. Alendronate 10 mg increased total body BMD (1.6 +/- 0.3%, P < or = 0.001), and prevented loss but did not increase BMD at the 1/3 forearm site. Alendronate 20/5 mg was no more effective, whereas alendronate 5 mg was significantly less effective than 10 mg at all sites. Bone turnover decreased to a stable nadir over 3 months for resorption markers (urine deoxypyridinoline) and over 6 months for formation markers (alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin). Mean loss of stature was reduced by 41% in alendronate treated subjects (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION The safety profile of alendronate was similar to that of placebo. At 10 mg, there were no trends toward increased frequency of any adverse experience except for abdominal pain, which was usually mild, transient, and resolved with continued treatment. Thus, alendronate appears to be an important advance in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Effects of Laropiprant on Nicotinic Acid-Induced Flushing in Patients With Dyslipidemia

Niacin (nicotinic acid) is not optimally used mainly because of flushing, a process mediated primarily by prostaglandin D(2), which leads to poor patient compliance and suboptimal dosing. This phase II dose-ranging study was designed to assess whether the prostaglandin D(2) receptor 1 antagonist laropiprant (LRPT; MK-0524) would (1) reduce extended-release niacin (ERN)-induced flushing in dyslipidemic patients and (2) support a novel accelerated ERN dosing paradigm: initiating ERN at 1 g and advancing rapidly to 2 g. In part A of the study, 154 dyslipidemic patients were randomized to LRPT 150 mg/day or placebo in a 9-week, 2-period crossover study. Patients who completed part A (n = 122) entered part B (after a 2-week washout), together with additional patients who entered part B directly (n = 290). Part B patients were randomized to placebo, ERN 1 g (Niaspan, no previous titration), or ERN 1 g coadministered with LRPT 18.75, 37.5, 75, or 150 mg for 4 weeks, with doubling of the respective doses for the remaining 4 weeks. Patients treated with LRPT plus ERN experienced significantly less ERN-induced flushing than those treated with ERN alone during the initiation of treatment (ERN 1 g, week 1) and the maintenance treatment (ERN 1 to 2 g, weeks 2 to 8). All doses of LRPT were maximally effective in inhibiting niacin-induced flushing. LRPT did not alter the beneficial lipid effects of ERN. LRPT plus ERN was well tolerated. In conclusion, the significant reduction in ERN-induced flushing provided by LRPT plus ERN supports an accelerated ERN dose-advancement paradigm to achieve rapidly a 2-g dose in dyslipidemic patients.

Evaluation of lipids, drug concentration, and safety parameters following cessation of treatment with the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease.

The aim of this study was to assess the effects on lipids and safety during a 12-week reversal period after 18 months of treatment with anacetrapib. The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib was previously shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 39.8% (estimated using the Friedewald equation) and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 138.1%, with an acceptable side-effect profile, in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease in the Determining the Efficacy and Tolerability of CETP Inhibition With Anacetrapib (DEFINE) trial. A total of 1,398 patients entered the 12-week reversal-phase study, either after completion of the active-treatment phase or after early discontinuation of the study medication. In patients allocated to anacetrapib, placebo-adjusted mean percentage decreases from baseline were observed at 12 weeks off the study drug for Friedewald-calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (18.6%), non-HDL cholesterol (17.6%), and apolipoprotein B (10.2%); placebo-adjusted mean percentage increases were observed for HDL cholesterol (73.0%) and apolipoprotein A-I (24.5%). Residual plasma anacetrapib levels (about 40% of on-treatment apparent steady-state trough levels) were also detected 12 weeks after cessation of anacetrapib. No clinically important elevations in liver enzymes, blood pressure, electrolytes, or adverse experiences were observed during the reversal phase. Preliminary data from a small cohort (n = 30) revealed the presence of low concentrations of anacetrapib in plasma 2.5 to 4 years after the last anacetrapib dose. In conclusion, after the cessation of active treatment, anacetrapib plasma lipid changes and drug levels decreased to approximately 40% of on-treatment trough levels at 12 weeks after dosing, but modest HDL cholesterol elevations and low drug concentrations were still detectable 2 to 4 years after the last dosing.

Lipids, safety parameters, and drug concentrations after an additional 2 years of treatment with Anacetrapib in the DEFINE study

Anacetrapib is a cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor that has previously been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in patients with or at high risk of coronary heart disease in the 76-week, placebo-controlled, Determining the Efficacy and Tolerability of CETP Inhibition with Anacetrapib (DEFINE) trial. Here, we report the results of the 2-year extension to the DEFINE study where patients (n = 803) continued on the same assigned treatment as in the original 76-week study. Treatment with anacetrapib during the 2-year extension was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to patients on placebo. No clinically important abnormalities in liver enzymes, blood pressure, electrolytes, or adverse experiences were observed during the extension. At the end of the extension study, relative to the original baseline value, anacetrapib reduced Friedewald-calculated LDL-C by 39.9% and increased HDL-C by 153.3%, compared to placebo. The apparent steady state mean plasma trough concentration of anacetrapib was ∼640 nmol/L. Geometric mean plasma concentrations of anacetrapib did not appear to increase beyond week 40 of the 2-year extension of the 76-week DEFINE base study. In conclusion, an additional 2 years of treatment with anacetrapib were well tolerated with durable lipid-modifying effects on LDL-C and HDL-C.

Effectiveness and Safety of Laropiprant on Niacin-Induced Flushing

Extended-release niacin (ERN) improves multiple lipid parameters but is underused owing to niacin-induced flushing (NIF). Laropiprant (LRPT) reduces NIF; however, its effects on chronic flushing (>6 months) have not been studied. We examined whether after 20 weeks of treatment with ERN/LRPT, patients who continued ERN/LRPT would experience less NIF than patients who stopped LRPT and continued ERN alone. A total of 1,152 dyslipidemic patients were randomized 2:2:1 to group 1, ERN/LRPT 1 g/20 mg/day from 0 to 4 weeks and then ERN/LRPT 2 g/40 mg/day from 5 to 32 weeks; group 2, ERN/LRPT 1 g/20 mg/day from 0 to 4 weeks, ERN/LRPT 2 g/40 mg/day from 5 to 20 weeks, and then ERN 2 g/day without LRPT from 21 to 32 weeks; or group 3, placebo for the entire study. The end points included the number of days each week with a moderate or greater Global Flushing Severity Score (GFSS) ≥4 (primary end point) and the percentage of patients with a maximum GFSS of ≥4 (secondary end point) during the postwithdrawal period (weeks 21 to 32). ERN/LRPT produced significantly less NIF than ERN alone during the postwithdrawal period, as measured by the number of days each week with a GFSS of ≥4 (p <0.001) and the percentage of patients with a maximum GFSS of ≥4 (p <0.001; ERN/LRPT 19.6%; ERN 48.9%; placebo 9.2%). Compared with ERN alone, ERN/LRPT produced fewer drug-related adverse experiences during the postwithdrawal period. After 20 weeks of stable maintenance therapy, dyslipidemic patients treated continuously with ERN/LRPT experienced less NIF than did patients who had had LRPT withdrawn and had continued with ERN alone. In conclusion, the results of our study support the long-term efficacy of ERN/LRPT in reducing NIF symptoms.

The impact of measurement error on the comparison of two treatments using a responder analysis

Investigators often report results of studies comparing the proportions of subjects who have clinically meaningful responses to various therapeutic regimens. When the outcome variable is a continuous measure this involves dichotomizing the observed response based on a predefined threshold value. The effect of this strategy is examined, paying particular attention to the impact of measurement error on the resulting estimates of treatment effect (difference in the proportion responding). Expressions are obtained for quantifying the magnitude and direction of the resulting bias, and these are illustrated in a study evaluating a pharmaceutical treatment for osteoporosis.

Lack of effect of antacids on single-dose pharmacokinetics of etoricoxib.

N anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most widely prescribed classes of therapeutic agents. Although NSAIDs are highly effective for the relief of pain and inflammation associated with arthritic conditions, the use of traditional NSAIDs, which inhibit both cyclooxygenase isoenzymes (COX-1 and COX-2), is often limited by their gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. In addition to an elevated risk of serious GI clinical events such as upper GI perforations, ulcers, and bleeds, up to 60% of patients on traditional NSAID therapy often complain of nuisance symptoms such as dyspepsia that are often not related to GI mucosal damage. This can lead to a significant number of patients being prescribed gastroprotective agents (GPAs) or switching from their current NSAID therapy. Etoricoxib and other COX-2 selective NSAIDs were specifically developed to provide anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy with a reduced risk of GI toxicity and nuisance symptoms. However, gastric adverse effects may still occur. Antacids containing calcium, magnesium, or aluminum salts are frequently used for symptomatic relief of dyspepsia and other gastric disorders, and their widespread use supports a rationale to evaluate effects on the systemic exposure of etoricoxib. Here we report the results of a 4-period, 2part, open-label study designed to assess the intrasubject variability of etoricoxib pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects treated concomitantly with antacids containing salts of calcium, magnesium, and aluminum.

Pooled analysis of two randomized, open-label studies comparing the effects of nomegestrol acetate/17β-estradiol and drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol on bleeding patterns in healthy women

OBJECTIVES To obtain more precise and detailed information regarding the bleeding patterns of nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC)/17β-estradiol (E2) and drospirenone/ethinyl estradiol (DRSP/EE) and to identify whether baseline demographic characteristics were associated with unscheduled bleeding, absent scheduled bleeding, or amenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN This analysis pooled results from two pivotal open-label, randomized trials that compared bleeding patterns of NOMAC/E2 and DRSP/EE. In the two studies 4317 women aged 18-50 years from 24 countries across the Americas, Europe, and Asia underwent treatment. RESULTS 2835 women taking NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) in a 24/4-day regimen and 938 women taking DRSP/EE (3 mg/30 μg) in a 21/7-day regimen had at least 1 evaluable cycle for vaginal bleeding analyses. The frequency of absent scheduled bleeding was higher (p<.0001) for women using NOMAC/E2 than DRSP/EE across all 11 cycles (cycles 2-12), ranging between 17.6% and 31.6% and between 3.4% and 5.8%, respectively. For women who had absent scheduled bleeding in cycles 2, 3, or 4 the incidence of absent scheduled bleeding in subsequent cycles was high and ranged between approximately 50%-60% for NOMAC/E2 and approximately 40%-50% for DRSP/EE. Amenorrhea increased over time with both regimens, being higher with NOMAC/E2. Both absent scheduled bleeding and amenorrhea with NOMAC/E2 were more common in older women, overweight women, switchers, and smokers; unscheduled bleeding was more common in starters, but had no association with age, body mass index, and smoking. CONCLUSIONS NOMAC/E2 is associated with a higher prevalence of absent scheduled bleeding compared with DRSP/EE. Absent scheduled bleeding and amenorrhea were associated with age, body weight, switching and smoking. Unscheduled bleeding was more common in starters. IMPLICATIONS Information about the factors associated with bleeding patterns may help clinicians provide guidance to women considering use of the NOMAC/E2 oral contraceptive.