Uma Suryadevara
University of Florida
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Uma Suryadevara.
Asian Journal of Psychiatry | 2015
Rajiv Tandon; Babu Rankupalli; Uma Suryadevara; Joseph E. Thornton
‘‘Men ought to know that from nothing else but the brain come joys, delights, laughter and sports, and sorrows, grief, despondency, and lamentations. And by this, in a special manner, we acquire wisdom and knowledge, and see and hear, and know what are foul and what are fair, what are bad and what are good, what are sweet and what are unsavory. And by the same organ we become mad and delirious, and fears and terrors assail us. All these things we endure from the brain when it is not healthy.’’
Psychiatric Annals | 2016
Sarah M. Szymkowicz; Molly E. McLaren; Uma Suryadevara; Adam J. Woods
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has grown in popularity over the past two decades as an alternative treatment option for various neuropsychiatric disorders. tDCS modulates cortical excitability through the application of a weak direct current to the scalp via electrodes placed over cortical regions of interest. It has been shown to be a promising and relatively safe treatment tool with few adverse events. In this article, we will briefly review the efficacy of tDCS in depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. We will also discuss biomarkers of tDCS efficacy in depression, as it is the most studied neuropsychiatric disorder using tDCS application. We will then offer suggestions for future directions. Although efficacy results show promise, more studies with larger samples and longer treatment periods are needed to better understand the benefits of using tDCS as an alternative treatment option for neuropsychiatric disorders.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | 2015
Dawn Bruijnzeel; Mehdi Yazdanpanah; Uma Suryadevara; Rajiv Tandon
Introduction: Antipsychotic medications are the foundation of the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia and lurasidone is the most recent of the 65 agents around the world to become available. In order to use it optimally, it is important to understand its pharmacological and clinical nature and its comparative effectiveness to other antipsychotic agents in the treatment of schizophrenia. Areas covered: Following a comprehensive review of the literature, this article summarizes current information about the pharmacology of lurasidone, data about its short- and long-term efficacy and safety/tolerability in the treatment of schizophrenia, its comparative effectiveness to other antipsychotic agents, and guidance about its optimal use in the treatment of individuals with schizophrenia. Expert opinion: Lurasidone is a benzoisothiazole with potent dopamine D2 and serotonin 5HT2A antagonist and serotonin 5HT1A partial agonist properties (like other second-generation antipsychotic agents) with additional potent 5HT7 and alpha2C noradrenergic antagonism. It has little or no activity at the alpha1 and alpha2A noradrenergic, 5HT2C serotonergic, histaminergic and cholinergic receptors. Available only in an oral formulation, it is effective in once-daily dosing (40 – 160 mg/day) and its absorption is affected by food. There is an extensive clinical trial database with short-term and long-term placebo- and antipsychotic-controlled clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety/tolerability of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. It has been found to be efficacious with comparable efficacy to other agents in the treatment of acute psychosis and prevention of relapse in individuals with schizophrenia. The greater antidepressant and cognitive benefits suggested by its receptor profile need substantiation in robust clinical trials. It is less likely to cause metabolic and cardiac adverse effects than most other second-generation agents and is associated with a modest risk of extrapyramidal side-effects, akathisia, and prolactin elevation.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy | 2017
Daniel P Witter; Richard C. Holbert; Uma Suryadevara
ABSTRACT Introduction: Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is an iatrogenic movement disorder most commonly observed in patients with psychotic disorders who are treated with dopamine blocking antipsychotic medications. Treatment options are limited, and recommendations for treatment are based on a relative scarcity of evidence. Areas covered: After briefly highlighting current mechanistic theories of TD, this review will discuss the evidence for a number of medications of several different classes that have been studied for the treatment of TD since the 1970s with an emphasis on placebo controlled trials when possible. We used a Pubmed search of primary studies, reviews, and metaanalyses on the topic of TD treatment in order to cover this topic. Expert opinion: Treatment of TD is difficult given limited data and incomplete understanding of the mechanism. Treatment of TD must be evaluated on an individual basis with careful weight given to severity of symptoms. We suggest the use of atypical versus conventional antipsychotics whenever possible and would recommend trials with one or more of a number of additional agents starting with valbenazine.
Current Neuropharmacology | 2017
Uma Suryadevara; Dawn Bruijnzeel; Meena Nuthi; Darin A. Jagnarine; Rajiv Tandon; Adriaan W. Bruijnzeel
Background: Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in the world and there is growing concern about the mental health effects of cannabis use. These concerns are at least partly due to the strong increase in recreational and medical cannabis use and the rise in tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels. Cannabis is widely used to self-medicate by older people and people with brain disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), multiple sclerosis (MS), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Objective: This review provides an overview of the perceived benefits and adverse mental health effects of cannabis use in people with ALS, MS, AD, PD, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Results: The reviewed studies indicate that cannabis use diminishes some symptoms associated with these disorders. Cannabis use decreases pain and spasticity in people with MS, decreases tremor, rigidity, and pain in people with PD, and improves the quality of life of ALS patients by improving appetite, and decreasing pain and spasticity. Cannabis use is more common among people with schizophrenia than healthy controls. Cannabis use is a risk factor for schizophrenia which increases positive symptoms in schizophrenia patients and diminishes negative symptoms. Cannabis use worsens bipolar disorder and there is no evidence that bipolar patients derive any benefit from cannabis. In late stage Alzheimer’s patients, cannabis products may improve food intake, sleep quality, and diminish agitation. Conclusion: Cannabis use diminishes some of the adverse effects of neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, chronic cannabis use may lead to cognitive impairments and dependence.
Asian Journal of Psychiatry | 2014
Dawn Bruijnzeel; Uma Suryadevara; Rajiv Tandon
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2015
Daniel P Witter; Matt McCord; Uma Suryadevara
Asian Journal of Psychiatry | 2018
Uma Suryadevara; Rajiv Tandon
Asian Journal of Psychiatry | 2017
Rajiv Tandon; Uma Suryadevara
American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2016
Andrew Pierce; Joseph E. Thornton; Uma Suryadevara