Ümit Yegen

A randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol dry powder inhaler with albuterol metered-dose inhaler

BACKGROUND Formoterol is a beta2-adrenergic agent which, when inhaled, produces rapid and long-lasting bronchodilatation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of formoterol powder for inhalation delivered via the Aerolizer device with placebo and with albuterol delivered via metered-dose inhaler in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. METHODS In a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, 541 patients were randomized at 26 trial sites to receive either formoterol, 12 microg twice daily; formoterol, 24 microg twice daily; albuterol, 180 microg four times daily; or a placebo for 12 weeks. The effects of each treatment on lung function, asthma symptoms, and frequency of rescue albuterol use were evaluated. Adverse effects and clinical laboratory parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS The bronchodilatory effects of formoterol were rapid in onset and persisted for 12 hours. Both formoterol doses were more effective than placebo and albuterol for objective measures of lung function. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates were more improved with formoterol, and formoterol provided significantly greater improvements in asthma symptom scores compared with both albuterol and placebo. Overall, patients taking formoterol used significantly less rescue medication than did those taking albuterol or placebo. Nocturnal awakenings occurred less often with formoterol than with placebo or albuterol. The therapeutic effects of formoterol were maintained over the entire 12 weeks of treatment. Adverse events were similar for all treatment groups, and clinical laboratory data were unremarkable. CONCLUSIONS Rapid-onset, long-acting formoterol, administered via the Aerolizer inhaler, is an effective and safe treatment for patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.

Inspiratory flow rates and volumes with the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler in asthmatic children and adults

Objective: To assess the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) and forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC) through the formoterol (Foradil*) Aerolizer* in patients with mild, moderate and severe asthma. * Foradil and Aerolizer are trade names of Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland Research design and methods: PIFR and FIVC were assessed in 33 adults and 32 children using a spirometer alone (baseline), a spirometer with an adaptor, and a spirometer with an adaptor and the Aerolizer inhaler (placebo loaded). Results: Of adult patients using the Aerolizer inhaler, 73% had PIFR values of >100l/min and 91% had values of >60l/min. PIFR in adults was reduced from a mean baseline of 283l/min to 118l/min through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler. Similarly, 75% of children using the Aerolizer inhaler had PIFR values >80l/min and 91% had values of >60l/min. The mean PIFR in children was reduced from a baseline of 154l/min to 100l/min through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler. Only small mean decreases from baseline were observed in FIVC through the loaded Aerolizer inhaler: 8.4% in adults and 3.8% in children. FIVC values of >2.0 litre were achieved in 82% of adults, and 81% of children achieved FIVC values of >1.5 litre. Conclusion: This study, albeit in a relatively small patient population, suggests that most children and adults with asthma can generate PIFRs of >60l/min and FIVCs of >1.5litre through the Aerolizer inhaler regardless of their disease severity. Such findings compare extremely favourably with other dry powder inhalers.

Formoterol provides long-lasting protection against exercise-induced bronchospasm

BACKGROUND Patients with exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) may benefit from a prophylactic beta2-adrenergic agonist that combines rapid onset with long duration of action. OBJECTIVE To compare the protective effect against EIB of a single inhaled dose of formoterol powder delivered via the Aerolizer inhaler (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) with the effect of placebo and albuterol. METHODS Eighteen patients with EIB were randomized to treatment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way, crossover study. Seventeen patients completed all four crossover periods. Each patient received in random sequence a single dose of formoterol (12 or 24 microg), albuterol (180 microg), or placebo at intervals of 5 +/- 2 days. Pulmonary function measurements were taken before and after exercise challenge tests (ECTs) at 15 minutes postdosing and at 4, 8, and 12 hours postdosing. RESULTS Both doses of formoterol produced significantly greater protection against EIB, compared with placebo, at all timepoints (P < or = 0.016). The two doses of formoterol were not significantly different from one another at any time. Protection against EIB with albuterol was clinically significant only for the 15-minute ECT and was statistically superior to placebo for the 15-minute and 4-hour ECTs. Although formoterol and albuterol exhibited a rapid onset of action, formoterol provided longer-lasting protection over the 12-hour observation period. Rescue medication was used substantially less with either dose of formoterol, compared with albuterol or placebo. All treatments were well tolerated. Two-hour postdosing electrocardiograms and vital signs were unremarkable for all study treatments. CONCLUSION A single dose of formoterol (12 or 24 microg) provides protection against EIB within 15 minutes of dosing and persists for up to 12 hours. Formoterol is safe and well tolerated.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, crossover clinical trial of the onset and duration of protection from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by formoterol and albuterol

BACKGROUND Inhaled short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists are the most commonly used treatment for the prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, has been demonstrated to provide protection from EIB, although the onset and duration of this protection have not been defined. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the onset and duration of the protective effect of a single dose of inhaled formoterol powder against EIB, comparing them with the effect of a single dose of placebo and albuterol administered via metered-dose inhaler (MDI). METHODS In this double-dummy, 4-way crossover study, patients received single doses of formoterol (12 and 24 microg) via a powder inhaler, albuterol by MDI (180 microg), and placebo. Exercise challenge tests (ECTs) were conducted at 15 minutes and at 4, 8, and 12 hours postdose. Pulmonary function studies (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)] and peak expiratory flow rate) were performed before and after each exercise challenge. RESULTS Twenty adolescent and adult patients (mean age, 23.8 years; range, 13-41 years; 9 male, 11 female) with asthma were enrolled in the study, and 17 completed all 4 treatment sequences. Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol produced significantly greater inhibition of FEV(1) decreases at all time points (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in efficacy measures between the 2 formoterol doses throughout the study. The exercise-induced decrease in FEV(1) after albuterol treatment was significantly reduced compared with placebo only at 15 minutes after dosing (P < 0.05). Formoterol and albuterol exhibited a similar rapid onset of action (<15 minutes), but formoterol continued to protect patients against EIB for at least 12 hours (P < 0.01), whereas albuterol was no longer clinically effective by the 4-hour ECT. CONCLUSIONS Formoterol and albuterol, given as single-dose inhalations, both provided protection from EIB within 15 minutes in this group of patients. The bronchoprotection afforded by formoterol lasted up to 12 hours, whereas that of albuterol was no longer significant by 4 hours.

Formoterol delivered via the dry powder Aerolizer inhaler versus albuterol MDI and placebo in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial.

The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of twice-daily formoterol dry powder 12 µg and 24 µg (Foradil) delivered via Aerolizer inhaler with four times daily albuterol (salbutamol) 180 µg delivered via metered dose inhaler (MDI) and placebo. A total of 554 adolescents and adults (ages 12–75 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma were randomized to this 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Twelve-hour spirometry measurements were taken at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. A total of 484 patients completed the study (122, 116, 127, and 119 given formoterol 12 µg, formoterol 24 µg, albuterol, and placebo, respectively). For the primary efficacy variable, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), both formoterol 12 µg and 24 µg were statistically superior to placebo at all time points on all test days (p ≤ 0.017) and to albuterol at most time points on all test days (p ≤ 0.001). The onset of improvement in FEV1 was rapid, with 15% increase within 5 min in 57%, 71%, and 65% of formoterol 12 µg, formoterol 24 µg, and albuterol patients, respectively. Formoterol was also superior to placebo and albuterol in terms of secondary efficacy variables: FEV1 area under the curve, percentage of predicted FEV1, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, and peak expiratory flows. In conclusion, both formoterol doses were superior to placebo in all lung function measurements. Overall, compared with albuterol, both formoterol doses produced superior bronchodilation. Formoterol and albuterol were safe and well-tolerated.