Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Urban Kjellén is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Urban Kjellén.


Safety Science | 1995

Integrating analyses of the risk of occupational accidents into the design process Part I: A review of types of acceptance criteria and risk analysis methods

Urban Kjellén; Snorre Sklet

Abstract The Norwegian Risk analysis regulations for the offshore industry require the development of risk acceptance criteria on the part of the oil companies and the use of risk analysis to prove that the acceptance criteria are met. These regulations are examples of a general trend among European legislators to specify the use of risk analysis as a basis for decisions which affect the level of safety. The paper focuses on analyses during the design phases of the risk of occupational accidents. In the first part of the paper, the consistency between available criteria based on measures of the risk of occupational accidents and risk analysis methods is examined. The aim is to evaluate the feasibility of meeting the requirements of the Risk analysis regulations in the area of occupational accidents by applying the present state of knowledge. It is concluded that there are no combinations of types of acceptance criteria and risk analysis methods that cover the full range of occupational accidents and which are unbiased in relation to the size of the installation. Needs of further developments of suitable risk analysis methods are identified. In part II, a new risk analysis method, Comparison analysis, is outlined together with results from the application of the method in a case study. The method fills a gap concerning theoretical estimations of the expected number of lost time injuries per one million hours of work.


Safety Science | 1997

Economic effects of implementing internal control of health, safety and environment: A retrospective case study of an aluminium plant

Urban Kjellén; Karsten Boe; Håvard Løge Hagen

Internal control (IC) is a key regulatory strategy in Norway to ensure, that companies comply with the safety, health and environment (SHE) legislation. According to the IC regulations, it is mandatory for the companies to establish formal SHE management systems. A retrospective case study of an aluminium plant, covering ten years, is presented. During this period, a restructuring program took effect. An upgrade of the plants SHE management system based on IC principles from the offshore industry, was an integrated part of this program. An evaluation of this program has focused on its economic effects. Results show that significant improvements in the SHE results have been accomplished. Managements priorities of IC have not paid back from a SHE perspective, due to the low costs to the company of SHE related losses. IC may be economically sound, only if its synergistic effects on the total restructuring program are considered. At the studied plant, a unique set of conditions existed when the restructuring program was implemented. Experiences from the case study point especially at the importance of two factors in implementing IC. One factor is plant managements motivation, where the corporate policy and the high consequences of severe accidents have played vital parts. The second is the need of integrating IC in a comprehensive management strategy.


Safety Science | 1995

Integrating analyses of the risk of occupational accidents into the design process — Part II: Method for prediction of the LTI-rate

Urban Kjellén

In part I of this paper, combinations of types of acceptance criteria and risk analysis methods applicable to the field of occupational accidents were reviewed. It was concluded that there is a general lack of risk analysis methods for use in combination with quantitative acceptance criteria based on standard risk measures such as the lost-time in jury frequency rate. Part II outlines a risk analysis method, Comparison analysis. The method has been developed for use in evaluations of design concepts of offshore installations and predicts the lost-time injury frequency rate during the operational phase. Results and experience from a comparison analysis that was performed during the design of a drilling rig are presented and evaluated in relation to the requirements of the Norwegian Risk analysis regulations for the offshore industry. The results are also compared to operational experience during the two first years of operation. It is concluded that comparison analysis meets the different formal requirements of the Risk analysis regulations. There are potentials of improvements through stricter definitions of decision rules and assumptions to be used in performing the analysis.


Reliability Engineering & System Safety | 1998

Adapting the application of risk analysis in offshore platform design to new framework conditions

Urban Kjellén

Abstract This paper reviews results and experiences from a problem driven method development process within an ongoing oil field development project. Primary driving forces have been the NORSOK initiative to reduce overall project costs and new legislation on health, safety and environment. Four cases are presented, where risk analysis methods and practices have been changed to meet new needs. These cover needs of input to the selection of one platform concept from alternative standard concepts, specification and qualification of cost-efficient safety measures and analysis of the risk of occupational accidents. It is concluded that research may support the development processes through systematic evaluation and documentation. Significant areas of interest are standardization of risk acceptance criteria, development of risk analysis methods for special applications and evaluations of safety management programmes.


Safety Science | 2007

Safe by design : where are we now?

Andrew Hale; Barry Kirwan; Urban Kjellén


Safety Science | 2009

The safety measurement problem revisited

Urban Kjellén


Safety Science | 2009

Decision on oil and gas exploration in an Arctic area: Case study from the Norwegian Barents Sea

Jon Rytter Hasle; Urban Kjellén; Ole Haugerud


Safety Science | 2007

Safety in the design of offshore platforms: Integrated safety versus safety as an add-on characteristic

Urban Kjellén


Safety Science | 2012

Managing safety in hydropower projects in emerging markets – Experiences in developing from a reactive to a proactive approach

Urban Kjellén


Safety Science | 2009

Resolving multiple criteria in decision-making involving risk of accidental loss

Urban Kjellén; Gilles Motet; Andrew Hale

Collaboration


Dive into the Urban Kjellén's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Hale

Delft University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Håvard Løge Hagen

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karsten Boe

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rikke Bramming Jørgensen

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Øystein Moen

Norwegian University of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge