Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Uri Weinberg is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Uri Weinberg.


JAMA | 2015

Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Roger Stupp; Sophie Taillibert; Andrew A. Kanner; Santosh Kesari; David M. Steinberg; Steven A. Toms; Lynne P. Taylor; Frank S. Lieberman; A. Silvani; Karen Fink; Gene H. Barnett; Jay Jiguang Zhu; John W. Henson; Herbert H. Engelhard; Thomas C. Chen; David D. Tran; Jan Sroubek; Nam D. Tran; Andreas F. Hottinger; Joseph Landolfi; Rajiv Desai; Manuela Caroli; Yvonne Kew; Jérôme Honnorat; Ahmed Idbaih; Eilon D. Kirson; Uri Weinberg; Yoram Palti; Monika E. Hegi; Zvi Ram

IMPORTANCEnGlioblastoma is the most devastating primary malignancy of the central nervous system in adults. Most patients die within 1 to 2 years of diagnosis. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are a locoregionally delivered antimitotic treatment that interferes with cell division and organelle assembly.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTFields used in combination with temozolomide maintenance treatment after chemoradiation therapy for patients with glioblastoma.nnnDESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSnAfter completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients with glioblastoma were randomized (2:1) to receive maintenance treatment with either TTFields plus temozolomide (nu2009=u2009466) or temozolomide alone (nu2009=u2009229) (median time from diagnosis to randomization, 3.8 months in both groups). The study enrolled 695 of the planned 700 patients between July 2009 and November 2014 at 83 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and South Korea. The trial was terminated based on the results of this planned interim analysis.nnnINTERVENTIONSnTreatment with TTFields was delivered continuously (>18 hours/day) via 4 transducer arrays placed on the shaved scalp and connected to a portable medical device. Temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2/d) was given for 5 days of each 28-day cycle.nnnMAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESnThe primary end point was progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population (significance threshold of .01) with overall survival in the per-protocol population (nu2009=u2009280) as a powered secondary end point (significance threshold of .006). This prespecified interim analysis was to be conducted on the first 315 patients after at least 18 months of follow-up.nnnRESULTSnThe interim analysis included 210 patients randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide and 105 randomized to temozolomide alone, and was conducted at a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 18-60 months). Median progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2 months) in the temozolomide alone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89]; Pu2009=u2009.001). Median overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (nu2009=u2009196) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1 months) in the temozolomide alone group (nu2009=u200984) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98]; Pu2009=u2009.004).nnnCONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEnIn this interim analysis of 315 patients with glioblastoma who had completed standard chemoradiation therapy, adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival.nnnTRIAL REGISTRATIONnclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.


European Journal of Cancer | 2012

NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality

Roger Stupp; Eric T. Wong; Andrew A. Kanner; David M. Steinberg; Herbert H. Engelhard; Volkmar Heidecke; Eilon D. Kirson; Sophie Taillibert; Frank Liebermann; Vladimír Dbalý; Zvi Ram; J. Lee Villano; Nikolai G. Rainov; Uri Weinberg; David Schiff; Lara Kunschner; Jeffrey Raizer; Jérôme Honnorat; Andrew E. Sloan; Mark G. Malkin; Joseph Landolfi; Franz Payer; Maximilian Mehdorn; Robert J. Weil; Susan Pannullo; Manfred Westphal; Martin Smrčka; Lawrence Chin; Herwig Kostron; Silvia Hofer

PURPOSEnNovoTTF-100A is a portable device delivering low-intensity, intermediate frequency electric fields via non-invasive, transducer arrays. Tumour Treatment Fields (TTF), a completely new therapeutic modality in cancer treatment, physically interfere with cell division.nnnMETHODSnPhase III trial of chemotherapy-free treatment of NovoTTF (20-24h/day) versus active chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Primary end-point was improvement of overall survival.nnnRESULTSnPatients (median age 54 years (range 23-80), Karnofsky performance status 80% (range 50-100) were randomised to TTF alone (n=120) or active chemotherapy control (n=117). Number of prior treatments was two (range 1-6). Median survival was 6.6 versus 6.0 months (hazard ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.66-1.12]; p=0.27), 1-year survival rate was 20% and 20%, progression-free survival rate at 6 months was 21.4% and 15.1% (p=0.13), respectively in TTF and active control patients. Responses were more common in the TTF arm (14% versus 9.6%, p=0.19). The TTF-related adverse events were mild (14%) to moderate (2%) skin rash beneath the transducer arrays. Severe adverse events occurred in 6% and 16% (p=0.022) of patients treated with TTF and chemotherapy, respectively. Quality of life analyses favoured TTF therapy in most domains.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThis is the first controlled trial evaluating an entirely novel cancer treatment modality delivering electric fields rather than chemotherapy. No improvement in overall survival was demonstrated, however efficacy and activity with this chemotherapy-free treatment device appears comparable to chemotherapy regimens that are commonly used for recurrent glioblastoma. Toxicity and quality of life clearly favoured TTF.


JAMA | 2017

Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial

Roger Stupp; Sophie Taillibert; Andrew A. Kanner; William L. Read; David M. Steinberg; Benoit Lhermitte; Steven A. Toms; Ahmed Idbaih; Manmeet S. Ahluwalia; Karen Fink; Francesco Di Meco; Frank S. Lieberman; Jay Jiguang Zhu; Giuseppe Stragliotto; David D. Tran; Steven Brem; Andreas F. Hottinger; Eilon D. Kirson; Gitit Lavy-Shahaf; Uri Weinberg; Chae Yong Kim; Sun Ha Paek; Garth Nicholas; Jordi Burna; Hal Hirte; Michael Weller; Yoram Palti; Monika E. Hegi; Zvi Ram

Importance Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) is an antimitotic treatment modality that interferes with glioblastoma cell division and organelle assembly by delivering low-intensity alternating electric fields to the tumor. Objective To investigate whether TTFields improves progression-free and overall survival of patients with glioblastoma, a fatal disease that commonly recurs at the initial tumor site or in the central nervous system. Design, Setting, and Participants In this randomized, open-label trial, 695 patients with glioblastoma whose tumor was resected or biopsied and had completed concomitant radiochemotherapy (median time from diagnosis to randomization, 3.8 months) were enrolled at 83 centers (July 2009-2014) and followed up through December 2016. A preliminary report from this trial was published in 2015; this report describes the final analysis. Interventions Patients were randomized 2:1 to TTFields plus maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy (nu2009=u2009466) or temozolomide alone (nu2009=u2009229). The TTFields, consisting of low-intensity, 200 kHz frequency, alternating electric fields, was delivered (≥ 18 hours/d) via 4 transducer arrays on the shaved scalp and connected to a portable device. Temozolomide was administered to both groups (150-200 mg/m2) for 5 days per 28-day cycle (6-12 cycles). Main Outcomes and Measures Progression-free survival (tested at &agr;u2009=u2009.046). The secondary end point was overall survival (tested hierarchically at &agr;u2009=u2009.048). Analyses were performed for the intent-to-treat population. Adverse events were compared by group. Results Of the 695 randomized patients (median age, 56 years; IQR, 48-63; 473 men [68%]), 637 (92%) completed the trial. Median progression-free survival from randomization was 6.7 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 4.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76; Pu2009<u2009.001). Median overall survival was 20.9 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group vs 16.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.76; Pu2009<u2009.001). Systemic adverse event frequency was 48% in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 44% in the temozolomide-alone group. Mild to moderate skin toxicity underneath the transducer arrays occurred in 52% of patients who received TTFields-temozolomide vs no patients who received temozolomide alone. Conclusions and Relevance In the final analysis of this randomized clinical trial of patients with glioblastoma who had received standard radiochemotherapy, the addition of TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy vs maintenance temozolomide alone, resulted in statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival. These results are consistent with the previous interim analysis. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 2013

Tumor treating fields: a new frontier in cancer therapy

Angela M. Davies; Uri Weinberg; Yoram Palti

Tumor treating fields (TTFields) is a noninvasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality that has been approved for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma by the U.S. FDA and has a CE mark in Europe. TTFields therapy delivers low‐intensity (1–3 V/cm), intermediate‐frequency (100–300 kHz), alternating electric fields to the tumor using transducer arrays placed on the skin around the region of the body containing the tumor. TTFields therapy affects metaphase, by disrupting mitotic spindle formation, and anaphase, by dielectrophoretic dislocation of intracellular constituents, resulting in apoptosis. TTFields therapy is frequency tuned to specific cancer cell types. The antimitotic effect of TTFields therapy has been demonstrated in multiple cell lines when the appropriate frequency was utilized. A phase III trial of TTFields monotherapy compared to active chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma patients established that TTFields therapy is associated with minimal toxicity, better quality of life, and comparable efficacy to chemotherapy. Ongoing and future trials will evaluate TTFields in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, solid tumor brain metastases, nonsmall cell lung cancer, and ovarian and pancreatic cancers.


Seminars in Oncology | 2014

Alternating Electric Fields (Tumor-Treating Fields Therapy) Can Improve Chemotherapy Treatment Efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Both In Vitro and In Vivo

Moshe Giladi; Uri Weinberg; Rosa S. Schneiderman; Yaara Porat; Michal Munster; Tali Voloshin; Roni Blatt; Shay Cahal; Aviran Itzhaki; Amir Onn; Eilon D. Kirson; Yoram Palti

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Common treatment modalities for NSCLC include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and, in recent years, the clinical management paradigm has evolved with the advent of targeted therapies. Despite such advances, the impact of systemic therapies for advanced disease remains modest, and as such, the prognosis for patients with NSCLC remains poor. Standard modalities are not without their respective toxicities and there is a clear need to improve both efficacy and safety for current management approaches. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are low-intensity, intermediate-frequency alternating electric fields that disrupt proper spindle microtubule arrangement, thereby leading to mitotic arrest and ultimately to cell death. We evaluated the effects of combining TTFields with standard chemotherapeutic agents on several NSCLC cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo. Frequency titration curves demonstrated that the inhibitory effects of TTFields were maximal at 150 kHz for all NSCLC cell lines tested, and that the addition of TTFields to chemotherapy resulted in enhanced treatment efficacy across all cell lines. We investigated the response of Lewis lung carcinoma and KLN205 squamous cell carcinoma in mice treated with TTFields in combination with pemetrexed, cisplatin, or paclitaxel and compared these to the efficacy observed in mice exposed only to the single agents. Combining TTFields with these therapeutic agents enhanced treatment efficacy in comparison with the respective single agents and control groups in all animal models. Together, these findings suggest that combining TTFields therapy with chemotherapy may provide an additive efficacy benefit in the management of NSCLC.


Pancreatology | 2014

Mitotic disruption and reduced clonogenicity of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by tumor treating fields

Moshe Giladi; Rosa S. Schneiderman; Yaara Porat; Mijal Munster; Aviran Itzhaki; Daniel Mordechovich; Shay Cahal; Eilon D. Kirson; Uri Weinberg; Yoram Palti

OBJECTIVESnTumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive cancer treatment modality approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The present study determined the efficacy and mechanism of action of TTFields in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer.nnnMETHODSnThe effect of TTFields in vitro was assessed using cell counts, clonogenic assays, cell cycle analysis and analysis of mitotic figures. The effect in vivo effect was studied in the PC1-0 hamster pancreatic cancer model.nnnRESULTSnApplication of TTFields in vitro showed a significant decrease in cell count, an increase in cell volume and reduced clonogenicity. Further analysis demonstrated significant increase in the number of abnormal mitotic figures, as well as a decrease in G2-M cell population. In hamsters with orthotopic pancreatic tumors, TTFields significantly reduced tumor volume accompanied by an increase in the frequency of abnormal mitotic events. TTFields efficacy was enhanced both in vitro and in vivo when combined with chemotherapy.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese results provide the first evidence that TTFields serve as an effective antimitotic treatment in preclinical pancreatic cancer models and have a long term negative effect on cancer cell survival. These results make TTFields an attractive candidate for testing in the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer.


World Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2015

NovoTTF™-100A System (Tumor Treating Fields) transducer array layout planning for glioblastoma: a NovoTAL™ system user study

Aafia Chaudhry; Laura Benson; Michael Varshaver; Ori Farber; Uri Weinberg; Eilon D. Kirson; Yoram Palti

BackgroundOptune™, previously known as the NovoTTF-100A System™, generates Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), an effective anti-mitotic therapy for glioblastoma. The system delivers intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields to the supratentorial brain. Patient therapy is personalized by configuring transducer array layout placement on the scalp to the tumor site using MRI measurements and the NovoTAL System. Transducer array layout mapping optimizes therapy by maximizing electric field intensity to the tumor site. This study evaluated physician performance in conducting transducer array layout mapping using the NovoTAL System compared with mapping performed by the Novocure in-house clinical team.MethodsFourteen physicians (7 neuro-oncologists, 4 medical oncologists, and 3 neurosurgeons) evaluated five blinded cases of recurrent glioblastoma and performed head size and tumor location measurements using a standard Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine reader. Concordance with Novocure measurement and intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using relevant correlation coefficients. The study criterion for success was a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) >0.80.ResultsCCC for each physician versus Novocure on 20 MRI measurements was 0.96 (standard deviation, SDu2009±u20090.03, range 0.90–1.00), indicating very high agreement between the two groups. Intra- and inter-rater reliability correlation coefficients were similarly high: 0.83 (SD ±0.15, range 0.54–1.00) and 0.80 (SD ±0.18, range 0.48–1.00), respectively.ConclusionsThis user study demonstrated an excellent level of concordance between prescribing physicians and Novocure in-house clinical teams in performing transducer array layout planning. Intra-rater reliability was very high, indicating reproducible performance. Physicians prescribing TTFields, when trained on the NovoTAL System, can independently perform transducer array layout mapping required for the initiation and maintenance of patients on TTFields therapy.


JAMA Oncology | 2018

Influence of Treatment With Tumor-Treating Fields on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Martin J. B. Taphoorn; Linda Dirven; Andrew A. Kanner; Gitit Lavy-Shahaf; Uri Weinberg; Sophie Taillibert; Steven A. Toms; Jérôme Honnorat; Thomas C. Chen; Jan Sroubek; Carlos A. David; Ahmed Idbaih; Jacob Easaw; Chae-Yong Kim; Jordi Bruna; Andreas F. Hottinger; Yvonne Kew; Patrick Roth; Rajiv Desai; John L. Villano; Eilon D. Kirson; Zvi Ram; Roger Stupp

Importance Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) therapy improves both progression-free and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma. There is a need to assess the influence of TTFields on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Objective To examine the association of TTFields therapy with progression-free survival and HRQoL among patients with glioblastoma. Design, Setting, and Participants This secondary analysis of EF-14, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, compares TTFields and temozolomide or temozolomide alone in 695 patients with glioblastoma after completion of radiochemotherapy. Patients with glioblastoma were randomized 2:1 to combined treatment with TTFields and temozolomide or temozolomide alone. The study was conducted from July 2009 until November 2014, and patients were followed up through December 2016. Interventions Temozolomide, 150 to 200 mg/m2/d, was given for 5 days during each 28-day cycle. TTFields were delivered continuously via 4 transducer arrays placed on the shaved scalp of patients and were connected to a portable medical device. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary study end point was progression-free survival; HRQoL was a predefined secondary end point, measured with questionnaires at baseline and every 3 months thereafter. Mean changes from baseline scores were evaluated, as well as scores over time. Deterioration-free survival and time to deterioration were assessed for each of 9 preselected scales and items. Results Of the 695 patients in the study, 639 (91.9%) completed the baseline HRQoL questionnaire. Of these patients, 437 (68.4%) were men; mean (SD) age, 54.8 (11.5) years. Health-related quality of life did not differ significantly between treatment arms except for itchy skin. Deterioration-free survival was significantly longer with TTFields for global health (4.8 vs 3.3 months; Pu2009<u2009.01); physical (5.1 vs 3.7 months; Pu2009<u2009.01) and emotional functioning (5.3 vs 3.9 months; Pu2009<u2009.01); pain (5.6 vs 3.6 months; Pu2009<u2009.01); and leg weakness (5.6 vs 3.9 months; Pu2009<u2009.01), likely related to improved progression-free survival. Time to deterioration, reflecting the influence of treatment, did not differ significantly except for itchy skin (TTFields worse; 8.2 vs 14.4 months; Pu2009<u2009.001) and pain (TTFields improved; 13.4 vs 12.1 months; Pu2009<u2009.01). Role, social, and physical functioning were not affected by TTFields. Conclusions and Relevance The addition of TTFields to standard treatment with temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma results in improved survival without a negative influence on HRQoL except for more itchy skin, an expected consequence from the transducer arrays. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409


Clinical Cancer Research | 2018

Tumor-Treating Fields: A Fourth Modality in Cancer Treatment

Elijah J. Mun; Hani M. Babiker; Uri Weinberg; Eilon D. Kirson; Daniel D. Von Hoff

Despite major advances in therapy, cancer continues to be a leading cause of mortality. In addition, toxicities of traditional therapies pose a significant challenge to tolerability and adherence. TTFields, a noninvasive anticancer treatment modality, utilizes alternating electric fields at specific frequencies and intensities to selectively disrupt mitosis in cancerous cells. TTFields target proteins crucial to the cell cycle, leading to mitotic arrest and apoptosis. TTFields also facilitate an antitumor immune response. Clinical trials of TTFields have proven safe and efficacious in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and are FDA approved for use in newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Trials in other localized solid tumors are ongoing. Clin Cancer Res; 24(2); 266–75. ©2017 AACR.


international conference of the ieee engineering in medicine and biology society | 2016

Using computational phantoms to improve delivery of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to patients

Zeev Bomzon; Hadas Sara Hershkovich; Noa Urman; Aafia Chaudhry; Dario Garcia-Carracedo; Anders Rosendal Korshoej; Uri Weinberg; Cornelia Wenger; Pedro M. A. Miranda; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D. Kirson; Yoram

This paper reviews the state-of-the-art in simulation-based studies of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) and highlights major aspects of TTFields in which simulation-based studies could affect clinical outcomes. A major challenge is how to simulate multiple scenarios rapidly for TTFields delivery. Overcoming this challenge will enable a better understanding of how TTFields distribution is correlated with disease progression, leading to better transducer array designs and field optimization procedures, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Uri Weinberg's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yoram Palti

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Moshe Giladi

University of Southern Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tali Voloshin

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger Stupp

Northwestern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zvi Ram

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven A. Toms

Geisinger Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge