Urs Giger-Pabst

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an experimental drug delivery method that applies chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity as an aerosol under pressure. We present the first results obtained with PIPAC in colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CPM).

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian cancer: A phase 2 study.

OBJECTIVE Recurrent ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (ROCPC) is resistant to systemic chemotherapy. We assessed the safety and activity of laparoscopic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in women with this cancer. METHODS In this open-label, single-arm phase 2 study, patients underwent 3 courses q 28-42 days of PIPAC with doxorubicin 1·5 mg/m(2) followed by cisplatin 7·5 mg/m(2). A pressure of 12 mm Hg and a temperature of 37 °C were applied for 30 min/course. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had an objective tumor response (OTR) according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. Analysis was by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were tumor regression on histology, PC Index improvement on repeated video-laparoscopy, and quality of life measured with the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were enrolled. Laparoscopic non-access rate was 11/64 (17%). 53 patients were eligible for analyses. 33/53 (62%) patients had an OTR - three had a partial response and 30 patients had stable disease. Tumor regression on histology and PC Index improvement were observed in 26/34 (76%) and in 26/34 (76%) patients who underwent all 3 PIPACs. There were no treatment-related deaths. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Grade 3 toxicities were trocar hernia (n=2), bowel obstruction (n=2), abdominal pain (n=2), hematoma (n=1), intraoperative bleeding (n=1), and cystitis with urosepsis (n=1). EORTC QLQ-30 global physical health scores, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, diarrhea, and constipation improved during therapy. CONCLUSION PIPAC is well tolerated and active in women with ROCPC and warrants further investigation in these patients.

Quality of life of patients with end-stage peritoneal metastasis treated with Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)

BACKGROUND Quality of Life (QoL) plays an important role in patients with peritoneal metastasis and is deteriorating continuously until death. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an innovative palliative treatment of peritoneal metastasis. We present the first QoL results under PIPAC therapy. METHODS Retrospective analysis of QLQ30 questionnaire results during repeated courses of PIPAC applications in palliative patients with pretreated peritoneal metastasis. RESULTS 91 patients (M:F = 40:51, median age 64 (34-77) years) with 158 PIPAC applications were analyzed. 86% patients had previously received systemic chemotherapy. Peritoneal metastasis was advanced (Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index I = 16 ± 10). At admission, only moderate impairment of functioning (62-83%) and symptom scores (17-47%) was observed. 48 patients received at least 2 PIPAC every 6 weeks. After PIPAC # 1, the global physical score deteriorated slightly (from 82% to 75%), but improved after PIPAC # 2 (up to 89%). Gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhoea, anorexia) remained stable under PIPAC therapy. CONCLUSIONS Quality of life was relatively high in this group of patients with advanced, pretreated peritoneal metastasis, explaining their wish for further therapy. Functioning scores and disease-related symptoms were not altered for at least 3 months in the patients able to receive repeated PIPAC. Except for a transient moderate increase of pain scores, PIPAC did not cause therapy-related QoL deterioration, especially no gastrointestinal symptoms.

Scintigraphic peritoneography reveals a non-uniform 99m Tc-Pertechnetat aerosol distribution pattern for Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a swine model

BackgroundAlthough recent data are contradictory, it is still claimed that Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) would deliver an aerosol which distributes homogeneously throughout the entire abdominal cavity.Methods99mTc-Pertechnetat was administered in four postmortem swine using either PIPAC or liquid intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (IPC). The animals were examined by planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT. Planar distribution images were divided into four regions of interest (ROIs: right/left upper and lower abdominal quadrant). SPECT/CT slices were scanned for areas of intense nuclide accumulation (“hot spots”). The percentage of relative distribution for planar scintigraphy was calculated by dividing the summed individual counts of each ROI by total counts measured in the entire abdominal cavity. The relative distribution of the “hot spots” was analyzed by dividing the counts of the local volume of interest (VOI) by the summed volume counts measured in the entire abdominal cavity.ResultsIn all four animals, planar scintigraphy showed inhomogeneous nuclide distribution. After PIPAC only 8–10% of the delivered nuclide was detected in one ROI with a mean deviation of 40% and 74% from a uniform nuclide distribution pattern. In all animals, SPECT/CT revealed “hot spots” beneath the PIPAC Micropump, catheter tip, and in the cul-de-sac region which comprise about 25% of the total amount of delivered nuclide in 2.5% of the volume of the entire abdominal cavity.ConclusionsOur present data indicate that the intra-abdominal aerosol distribution pattern of PIPAC therapy is non-homogeneous and that the currently applied technology has still not overcome the problem of inhomogeneous drug distribution of IPC.

Effect of Irradiation on Tissue Penetration Depth of Doxorubicin after Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a Novel Ex-Vivo Model.

Background: This study was performed to assess the impact of irradiation on the tissue penetration depth of doxorubicin delivered during Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC). Methods: Fresh post mortem swine peritoneum was cut into 10 proportional sections. Except for 2 control samples, all received irradiation with 1, 2, 7 and 14 Gy, respectively. Four samples received PIPAC 15 minutes after irradiation and 4 other after 24 hours. Doxorubicin was aerosolized in an ex-vivo PIPAC model at 12 mmHg/36°C. In-tissue doxorubicin penetration was measured using fluorescence microscopy on frozen thin sections. Results: Doxorubicin penetration after PIPAC (15 minutes after irradiation) was 476 ± 74 µm for the control sample, 450 ± 45µm after 1 Gy (p > 0.05), 438 ± 29 µm after 2 Gy (p > 0.05), 396 ± 32 µm after 7 Gy (p = 0.005) and 284 ± 57 after 14 Gy irradiation (p < 0.001). The doxorubicin penetration after PIPAC (24 hours after irradiation) was 428 ± 77 µm for the control sample, 393 ± 41 µm after 1 Gy (p > 0.05), 379 ± 56 µm after 2 Gy (p > 0.05), 352 ± 53 µm after 7 Gy (p = 0.008) and 345 ± 53 after 14 Gy irradiation (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Higher (fractional) radiation dose might reduce the tissue penetration depth of doxorubicin in our ex-vivo model. However, irradiation with lower (fractional) radiation dose does not affect the tissue penetration negatively. Further studies are warranted to investigate if irradiation can be used safely as chemopotenting agent for patients with peritoneal metastases treated with PIPAC.

Cytotoxic stress induces transfer of mitochondria-associated human endogenous retroviral RNA and proteins between cancer cells

About 8 % of the human genome consists of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs), which are relicts of ancient exogenous retroviral infections incurred during evolution. Although the majority of HERVs have functional gene defects or epigenetic modifications, many of them are still able to produce retroviral proteins that have been proposed to be involved in cellular transformation and cancer development. We found that, in chemo-resistant U87RETO glioblastoma cells, cytotoxic stress induced by etoposide promotes accumulation and large-scale fission of mitochondria, associated with the detection of HERV-WE1 (syncytin-1) and HERV-FRD1 (syncytin-2) in these organelles. In addition, mitochondrial preparations also contained the corresponding receptors, i.e. ASCT2 and MFSD2. We clearly demonstrated that mitochondria associated with HERV-proteins were shuttled between adjacent cancer cells not only via tunneling tubes, but also by direct cellular uptake across the cell membrane. Furthermore, anti-syncytin-1 and anti-syncytin-2 antibodies were able to specifically block this direct cellular uptake of mitochondria even more than antibodies targeting the cognate receptors. Here, we suggest that the association of mitochondria with syncytin-1/syncytin-2 together with their respective receptors could represent a novel mechanism of cell-to-cell transfer. In chemotherapy-refractory cancer cells, this might open up attractive avenues to novel mitochondria-targeting therapies.

Hyperthermic intracavitary nanoaerosol therapy (HINAT) as an improved approach for pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): Technical description, experimental validation and first proof of concept

Background: The delivery of aerosolised chemotherapeutic substances into pressurised capnoperitonea has been reported to be more effective than conventional liquid chemotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, recent reports reveal limitations of the currently available technology. Material and Methods: A novel approach for pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), called hyperthermic intracavitary nanoaerosol therapy (HINAT), based on extracavitary generation of hyperthermic and unipolar charged aerosols, was developed. The aerosol size distribution, the spatial drug distribution and in-tissue depth penetration of HINAT were studied by laser diffraction spectrometry, differential electrical mobility analysis, time of flight spectrometry, scintigraphic peritoneography and fluorescence microscopy. All experiments were performed contemporaneous with conventional PIPAC for the purpose of comparison. Furthermore, a first proof of concept was simulated in anesthetised German Landrace pigs. Results: HINAT provides a nanometre-sized (63 nm) unipolar-charged hyperthermic (41 °C) drug aerosol for quasi uniform drug deposition over the whole peritoneum with significantly deeper drug penetration than that offered by conventional PIPAC.

A phase I, single-arm, open-label, dose escalation study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis

OBJECTIVE We performed a phase I, single-arm, non-randomized, open-label, dose-escalation trial to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin applied as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS We used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2, cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2 q 4 to 6 weeks for 3 cycles and subsequent dose escalation steps (20% increment per step) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Toxicity and clinical efficacy were monitored. The primary endpoint was the maximum-tolerable dose. Secondary endpoints included histologic tumor regression and serum parameters. RESULTS 15 evaluable patients (3, 7, and 5 in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively) on average received 2.3 PIPAC cycles. No dose limiting toxicities were found. Adverse side effects were 1 grade 3 event (colon perforation) and 85 grade 1/2 events including fatigue (n = 19), abdominal pain (n = 18), nausea/vomiting (n = 14), sleep disorder (n = 8), diarrhea (n = 5), and fever (n = 2). Liver and renal toxicity was not observed in any of the 3 cohorts (AST 19.1 ± 3.2, 25.8 ± 6.5, and 22.1 ± 4.5 IU/L, respectively; ALT 14.7 ± 3.5, 18.5 ± 5.6, and 23.3 ± 13.0 IU/L, respectively; GGT 45.7 ± 35.1, 25.2 ± 10.3, and 43.9 ± 26.4 IU/L, respectively; serum creatinine 1.06 ± 0.23, 0.80 ± 0.17, and 0.89 ± 0.35 mg/dL, respectively). No systemic hematologic toxicity, alopecia, or neurotoxicity was noted. The maximum tolerable dose was not reached. Histologic tumor regression was observed in 7/11 (64%) patients who underwent ≥2 PIPAC cycles. CONCLUSIONS PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin may be safely used at an intraperitoneal dose of 10.5 mg/m2 and 2.1 mg/m2, respectively. Systemic toxicity of this therapy is low.

How to Perform Safe and Technically Optimized Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): Experience After a Consecutive Series of 1200 Procedures

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new approach to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol in patients with advanced peritoneal metastases (PM). Although this treatment has rapidly been adopted into clinical practice, most surgeons are not familiar with the basics and principles of this technology. The purpose of this article is to review patient selection criteria, as well as highlighting important operative and technical details regarding PIPAC technology with a focus on “how to do it.” To this end, safety and feasibility data from a series of 1200 consecutive PIPAC procedures performed by two pioneers of PIPAC treatment are presented.