Ursina R. Teitelbaum

CD40 Agonists Alter Tumor Stroma and Show Efficacy Against Pancreatic Carcinoma in Mice and Humans

CD40 immunotherapy shows efficacy in treating pancreatic cancer in mice and humans by eliciting antitumor immunity. Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments can restrain antitumor immunity, particularly in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Because CD40 activation can reverse immune suppression and drive antitumor T cell responses, we tested the combination of an agonist CD40 antibody with gemcitabine chemotherapy in a small cohort of patients with surgically incurable PDA and observed tumor regressions in some patients. We reproduced this treatment effect in a genetically engineered mouse model of PDA and found unexpectedly that tumor regression required macrophages but not T cells or gemcitabine. CD40-activated macrophages rapidly infiltrated tumors, became tumoricidal, and facilitated the depletion of tumor stroma. Thus, cancer immune surveillance does not necessarily depend on therapy-induced T cells; rather, our findings demonstrate a CD40-dependent mechanism for targeting tumor stroma in the treatment of cancer.

A phase I study of an agonist CD40 monoclonal antibody (CP-870,893) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Purpose: This phase I study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacodynamics, immunologic correlatives, and antitumor activity of CP-870,893, an agonist CD40 antibody, when administered in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Experimental Design: Twenty-two patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced PDA were treated with 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine once weekly for three weeks with infusion of CP-870,893 at 0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg on day three of each 28-day cycle. Results: CP-870,893 was well-tolerated; one dose-limiting toxicity (grade 4, cerebrovascular accident) occurred at the 0.2 mg/kg dose level, which was estimated as the MTD. The most common adverse event was cytokine release syndrome (grade 1 to 2). CP-870,893 infusion triggered immune activation marked by an increase in inflammatory cytokines, an increase in B-cell expression of costimulatory molecules, and a transient depletion of B cells. Four patients achieved a partial response (PR). 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) showed more than 25% decrease in FDG uptake within primary pancreatic lesions in six of eight patients; however, responses observed in metastatic lesions were heterogeneous, with some lesions responding with complete loss of FDG uptake, whereas other lesions in the same patient failed to respond. Improved overall survival correlated with a decrease in FDG uptake in hepatic lesions (R = −0.929; P = 0.007). Conclusions: CP-870,893 in combination with gemcitabine was well-tolerated and associated with antitumor activity in patients with PDA. Changes in FDG uptake detected on PET/CT imaging provide insight into therapeutic benefit. Phase II studies are warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 19(22); 6286–95. ©2013 AACR.

Phase 2 trial of bevacizumab, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Anti‐angiogenesis agents have shown effectiveness in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is important to investigate more effective and safe systemic treatment options for patients with advanced HCC. This phase 2 study was designed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of bevacizumab, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced unresectable and untransplantable HCC.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine, irinotecan and panitumumab in advanced cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND Current data suggest that chemotherapy combinations may be superior to single agents in biliary tract cancer. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway appears to be associated with tumor stage, prognosis and response to therapy. This trial was designed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the combination of panitumumab, a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody, with gemcitabine and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) cholangiocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function were treated with panitumumab (9 mg/kg) on day 1, and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary objective was to evaluate the 5-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Mutational analyses of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF were carried out when feasible. RESULTS Thirty-five patients received a median of 7 (0-30) cycles. The most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (10 patients, 29%), thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 29%), skin rash (13 patients, 37%) and dehydration (9 patients, 26%). Two patients had CR, 9 had partial response (PR), and 15 had SD for a disease-control rate of 74% (by RECIST) in 28 assessable patients. Two patients went on to have surgical resection. The 5-month PFS was 69%. The median PFS was 9.7 months and the median OS was 12.9 months. In 17 testable samples, no EGFR or BRAF mutations were identified; there were 7 KRAS mutations, with no difference in OS by KRAS status. CONCLUSIONS This study showed encouraging efficacy of this regimen with good tolerability. Further study in this area is warranted. Clinical Trials Number: The trial was registered with the National Cancer Institute (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00948935).

The efficacy of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN).

The literature investigating pancreatic invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) has largely come from small institutional studies, preventing adequately powered comparisons of adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone (SA) within specific patient subgroups.

Fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiac toxicity: challenging the current paradigm

Background Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy [5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine] are commonly used agents in the treatment of various solid malignancies. However, their use has been limited by cardiac toxicity, presenting as a wide spectrum of asymptomatic (e.g., EKG changes) and symptomatic (e.g., chest pain) manifestations related to coronary vasospasm leading to myocardial ischemia. Historically, patients with suspected coronary vasospasm have been treated with traditional acute ischemic workup and various combinations of anti-anginal therapies. In addition, most patients typically are not rechallenged with fluoropyrimidine after experiencing initial cardiovascular side-effects with resulting interruption of planned chemotherapy regimens. Methods We report a case series of 11 consecutive patients in a single-center with suspected fluoropyrimidine-induced coronary vasospasm who were successfully rechallenged with the culprit drug to allow for planned chemotherapy completion. Our protocol utilized rechallenge with bolus infusional regimen of intravenous fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy and oral capecitabine with cardioprotective pretreatment with two calcium blockers and long-acting oral nitrate therapy. Results We were successfully able to continue and complete the previously planned first-line chemotherapy regimen for all 11 patients with minimal therapeutic interruption. There have been no cardiac events or evidence of recurrent coronary spasm after completion of therapy with discontinuation of prophylactic medications upon therapy completion. Conclusions We report a single-institution experience of successful rechallenge with fluoropyrimidines with careful cardiac monitoring and the combined use of calcium channel blockers and long-acting nitrates. With further study, this algorithm can be used to safely continue fluoropyrimidines, a potentially curative regimen in the treatment of many solid tumors.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy-Induced Hepatotoxicity in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Background Treatment of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is effective in retarding tumor growth. Renal dysfunction, anemia, and thrombocytopenia are well-described treatment-related toxicities. However, hepatotoxicity is not well recognized. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with GEP-NETs seen in a tertiary NET clinic from January 2010 to September 2013 (n = 211) with the primary study cohort being patients with metastatic disease to the liver (n = 93). The study exposure was PRRT, and the primary outcome of interest was hepatotoxicity. Hepatotoxicity was defined as a grade 2 or greater injury according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 of the National Cancer Institute. Results Seventeen (18%) of 93 patients with liver metastases received PRRT after radiographic confirmation of disease progression despite receipt of other traditional therapies. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy patients were similar to the unexposed patient population in terms of sex, age, baseline laboratory values, prior treatment exposure, and duration of disease. In the unexposed group, 23 (30%) of 76 patients had hepatotoxicity related to traditional GEP-NET therapy. In the exposed group, 10 (59%) of 17 patients had an episode of hepatotoxicity. Ascites developed in 59% of the PRRT group versus 6.6% in the unexposed group (P < 0.001). The calculated relative risk of hepatotoxicity related to PRRT exposure in metastatic GEP-NET patients was 1.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.15–3.28). Conclusions Hepatotoxicity after PRRT for metastatic GEP-NET is more common than previously reported.

Efficacy of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in a United States–Based Cohort of Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis

Objectives The aim of this study was to analyze in a retrospective cohort study the outcomes of a United States–based group of metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients who underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Methods Twenty-eight patients from a single US NET Center were treated with PRRT. Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Progression was determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify potential predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The median age at NET diagnosis was 56 years, 50% of the patients were male, 46% of NET primaries were located in the pancreas, 71% of tumors were nonfunctional, 25% were World Health Organization (WHO) grade III, and 20% had at least a 25% hepatic tumor burden. Anemia (36%) was the most common post-PRRT toxicity, followed by leukopenia (31%), nephrotoxicity (27%), and thrombocytopenia (24%). Median PFS was 18 months, and median OS was 38 months. Having a WHO grade III NET and receiving systemic chemotherapy prior to PRRT were found to be to independent predictors of shorter PFS and OS. Conclusions Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is an effective therapy in a US population. Progression-free survival and OS were better in WHO grade I/II NETs and when PRRT was sequenced prior to systemic chemotherapy.

Medical Oncology: Second-line XELOX or FOLFOX-4 for metastatic colorectal cancer.

In the movement towards individualized treatment regimens, Rothenberg et al. validate XELOX as another available systemic therapy for patients being treated with second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This paper adds to a growing body of data in the first-line and second-line setting that confirms the noninferiority of oral fluoropyrimidine-containing regimens.

E4206: AMG 706 and Octreotide in Patients with Low‐Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors

Abstract Lessons Learned. Rate of progression‐free survival at a particular point in time, i.e., a landmark analysis, is a difficult endpoint for a heterogenous malignancy such as neuroendocrine cancer. Landmark analyses can also be complicated by evolution in the standard of care during the conduct of a clinical trial. Improvements in biomarker development would be useful in developing future clinical trials in NET to better tailor individualized therapies and assess for possible efficacy endpoints. Background. Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare malignancies of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that are highly vascularized and overexpress vascular‐endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Sunitinib has demonstrated efficacy in the pancreatic subset of NET. This study explored the activity of another oral VEGF inhibitor, AMG 706 or motesanib, a multikinase inhibitor that targets receptor tyrosine kinases, including VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, KIT, RET, and PDGFR (IC50s = 2, 3, 6, 8, 59, and 84 nM, respectively). Methods. This was a single‐arm, first‐line, phase II study run through the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Patients with low‐grade NET (as defined by central confirmation of Ki‐67 of 0%–2%) were administered a flat dose of 125 mg per day orally combined with octreotide long acting‐repeatable (LAR) for patients who had been on a stable dose. The primary objective was to determine the 4‐month progression‐free survival (PFS). Results. Forty‐four patients were evaluated per protocol. The 4‐month PFS was 78.5%. The partial response rate was 13.6% (6/44), stable disease was 54.5% (24/44), 9.1% (4/44) had progressive disease, and 10/44 were not evaluable for response. Common toxicities included fatigue, hypertension, nausea, and headache, and most were grade 1–2. Median PFS was 8.7 months, and overall survival was 27.5 months. Conclusion. Motesanib (AMG 706) demonstrated a 4‐month PFS that met the per‐protocol definition of efficacy. Fatigue and hypertension were the most common toxicities, and few grade 3–4 toxicities were encountered. The progression‐free survival of 8.7 months in all NETs merits further study.