Ursula M. Gehling
University of Hamburg
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ursula M. Gehling.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005
Sonja Loges; Gerhard Heil; Melanie Bruweleit; Volker Schoder; Martin Butzal; Uta Fischer; Ursula M. Gehling; Gunter Schuch; Dieter K. Hossfeld; Walter Fiedler
PURPOSE Bone marrow neoangiogenesis plays an important pathogenetic and possible prognostic role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin family represent the most specific inducers of angiogenesis secreted by AML blasts. We therefore correlated expression of angiogenic factors with clinical variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS We investigated the expression of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, angiopoietin-1 (Ang1), angiopoietin-2 (Ang2), and the receptor Tie2 by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in a cohort of 90 patients younger than 61 years with de novo AML entered into the German AML Süddeutsche Hämoblastose Gruppe Hannover 95 trial. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed using clinical and gene expression variables. RESULTS Univariate analysis of overall survival indicated the following variables as prognostic factors: good response on a day-15 bone marrow examination after initiation of induction chemotherapy, karyotype, and high Ang2 expression. In multivariate analysis, only bad response and log Ang2 expression remained of statistical significance, with a hazard ratio of 3.51 (95% CI, 1.91 to 6.47) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.91), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that the prognostic impact of Ang2 expression was especially evident in cohorts with low VEGF-C and Ang1 mRNA levels. CONCLUSION These results show that expression of Ang2 represents an independent prognostic factor in AML. Additional research into interactions of angiogenic cytokines in the pathogenesis of bone marrow angiogenesis in AML is warranted.
Stem Cells and Development | 2004
Sonja Loges; Boris Fehse; Marc A. Brockmann; Katrin Lamszus; Martin Butzal; Markus Guckenbiehl; Gunter Schuch; Süleyman Ergün; Uta Fischer; Axel R. Zander; Dieter K. Hossfeld; Walter Fiedler; Ursula M. Gehling
Recent studies show that human CD133(+) (previously known as AC133(+)) cells from mobilized peripheral blood consist of stem cells with either hematopoietic or endothelial potential. To test whether this population also contains individual precursors with both capacities, the defining characteristics of the elusive adult hemangioblast, we developed a culture system that allows single-cell analyses of differentiation. In the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stem cell growth factor (SCGF), and FLT-3 ligand, CD133(+)-enriched cells were first expanded and the amplified cells were transduced with a vector encoding an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) marker gene. Single EGFP(+) cells were then cocultured with corresponding non-transduced cells from the same experiment, yielding 50-100 marked cells in 8% of the wells after 2 weeks. The resultant cells were divided and differentiated with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or with SCGF and VEGF. These culture conditions resulted in the formation of neutrophil or endothelial cells, respectively, as identified morphologically and by phenotypic staining. Dual differentiation of EGFP(+) cells could be observed in one-quarter of clones from single-seeded cells, suggesting that 2% of EGFP(+) cells were in fact human hemangioblasts. These cells could be expanded for at least 28 days without losing this dual capacity. Hence, this culture system may be of clinical relevance in the development of cellular therapies for disorders involving hematopoiesis and the vascular system. In addition, our results provide important information related to the development of the vasculature and the potential role of hemangioblasts in vasculogenesis in adult humans.
PLOS ONE | 2011
Claudia Lange; Bärbel Brunswig-Spickenheier; Heike Cappallo-Obermann; Katharina Eggert; Ursula M. Gehling; Cornelia Rudolph; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Kerstin Cornils; Jozef Zustin; Andrej Spiess; Axel R. Zander
Background Successful treatment of acute radiation syndromes relies on immediate supportive care. In patients with limited hematopoietic recovery potential, hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation is the only curative treatment option. Because of time consuming donor search and uncertain outcome we propose MSC treatment as an alternative treatment for severely radiation-affected individuals. Methods and Findings Mouse mesenchymal stromal cells (mMSCs) were expanded from bone marrow, retrovirally labeled with eGFP (bulk cultures) and cloned. Bulk and five selected clonal mMSCs populations were characterized in vitro for their multilineage differentiation potential and phenotype showing no contamination with hematopoietic cells. Lethally irradiated recipients were i.v. transplanted with bulk or clonal mMSCs. We found a long-term survival of recipients with fast hematopoietic recovery after the transplantation of MSCs exclusively without support by HSCs. Quantitative PCR based chimerism analysis detected eGFP-positive donor cells in peripheral blood immediately after injection and in lungs within 24 hours. However, no donor cells in any investigated tissue remained long-term. Despite the rapidly disappearing donor cells, microarray and quantitative RT-PCR gene expression analysis in the bone marrow of MSC-transplanted animals displayed enhanced regenerative features characterized by (i) decreased proinflammatory, ECM formation and adhesion properties and (ii) boosted anti-inflammation, detoxification, cell cycle and anti-oxidative stress control as compared to HSC-transplanted animals. Conclusions Our data revealed that systemically administered MSCs provoke a protective mechanism counteracting the inflammatory events and also supporting detoxification and stress management after radiation exposure. Further our results suggest that MSCs, their release of trophic factors and their HSC-niche modulating activity rescue endogenous hematopoiesis thereby serving as fast and effective first-line treatment to combat radiation-induced hematopoietic failure.
Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2007
Süleyman Ergün; Derya Tilki; Hans-Peter Hohn; Ursula M. Gehling; Nerbil Kilic
A rapidly increasing body of data suggests an essential role of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in vascular regeneration, formation of new vessels in cardiovascular diseases and also in tumor vasculogenesis. Moreover, recent data obtained from clinical studies with anti-angiogenic drugs in tumor therapy or with pro-angiogenic stimuli in ischemic disorders implicate a predictive role of the number of EPCs circulating in the peripheral blood in monitoring of these diseases. However, there is still some controversial data regarding the relevance of the EPCs in vascular formation depending on models used and diseases studied. One of the essential prerequisites for a better understanding of the whole contribution of EPCs to vascular formation in adult, a process called postnatal vasculogenesis, is to identify their exact sources. We could recently discover the existence of EPCs in a distinct zone of the vascular wall of large and middle sized adult blood vessels and showed that these cells are capable to differentiate into mature endothelial cells, to form capillary sprouts in arterial ring assay and to build vasa vasorum-like structures within the vascular wall. They also can be mobilized very rapidly from the vascular wall by tumor cells. This review will discuss the functional implications of these vascular wall resident endothelial progenitor cells (VW-EPCs) in relation to those of EPCs circulating in peripheral blood or derived from the bone marrow in cardiovascular and neoplastic diseases.
Melanoma Research | 2011
Michelle Thill; Marc J. Berna; Rebecca Grierson; Inna Reinhart; Tobias Voelkel; Christoph Piechaczek; P. Galambos; Martine J. Jager; Gisbert Richard; Claudia Lange; Ursula M. Gehling
‘Cancer stem cells’ (CSCs) are tumor cells with stem cell properties hypothesized to be responsible for tumorigenesis, metastatis, and resistance to treatment, and have been identified in different tumors including cutaneous melanoma, using stem cell markers such as CD133. This study explored expression of CD133 and other putative stem cell markers in uveal melanoma. Eight uveal melanoma cell lines were subjected to flow-cytometric (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) analysis of CD133 and other stem cell markers. Eight paraffin-embedded tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for CD133, Pax6, Musashi, nestin, Sox2, ABCB5, and CD68 expressions. Ocular, uveal melanoma, and hematopoietic stem cell distributions of C-terminal and N-terminal CD133 mRNA splice variants were compared by reverse-transcription PCR. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed a population of CD133-positive/nestin-positive cells in cell lines Mel270, OMM 2.3, and OMM2.5. All cell lines studied were positive for nestin, CXCR-4, CD44, and c-kit. Immunohistochemistry identified cells positive for CD133, Pax6, Musashi, nestin, Sox2, ABCB5, and CD68 predominantly at the invading tumor front. C-terminal primers interacting with CD133 splice variant s2 detected a novel variant lacking exon 27. Differential expression of CD133 splice variants was found in iris, ciliary body, retina, and retinal pigment epithelium/choroid as well as in uveal melanoma cell lines. mRNA for nestin, Sox2, and Musashi was present in all studied cell lines. Uveal melanoma such as cutaneous melanoma may therefore contain CSCs. Further experiments are needed to isolate stem cell marker-positive cells, to evaluate their functional properties and to explore therapeutical approaches to these putative CSCs in uveal melanoma.
Blood | 2000
Ursula M. Gehling; Süleyman Ergün; Udo Schumacher; Christoph Wagener; Klaus Pantel; Marcus Otte; Gunter Schuch; Philippe Schafhausen; Thorsten Mende; Nerbil Kilic; Katrin Kluge; Birgit Schäfer; Dieter K. Hossfeld; Walter Fiedler
Development | 2006
Elvin Zengin; Fariba Chalajour; Ursula M. Gehling; Wulf D. Ito; Hendrik Treede; Heidrun Lauke; Joachim Weil; Hermann Reichenspurner; Nerbil Kilic; Süleyman Ergün
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2005
Denise Lau; Hanke Mollnau; Jason P. Eiserich; Bruce A. Freeman; Andreas Daiber; Ursula M. Gehling; Jens Brümmer; Volker Rudolph; Thomas Münzel; Thomas Heitzer; Thomas Meinertz; Stephan Baldus
American Journal of Pathology | 2007
Lars Mueller; Freya A. Goumas; Marianne Affeldt; Susanne Sandtner; Ursula M. Gehling; Silke Brilloff; Jessica Walter; Nadia Karnatz; Katrin Lamszus; Xavier Rogiers; Dieter C. Broering
Experimental Cell Research | 2004
Martin Butzal; Sonja Loges; Michaela Schweizer; Uta Fischer; Ursula M. Gehling; Dieter K. Hossfeld; Walter Fiedler