Usoa E. Busto

A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions

The estimation of the probability that a drug caused an adverse clinical event is usually based on clinical judgment. Lack of a method for establishing causality generates large between‐raters and within‐raters variability in assessment. Using the conventional categories and definitions of definite, probable, possible, and doubtful adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the between‐raters agreement of two physicians and four pharmacists who independently assessed 63 randomly selected alleged ADRs was 38% to 63%, kappa (k, a chance‐corrected index of agreement) varied from 0.21 to 0.40, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of reliability (R[est]) was 0.49. Six (testing) and 22 wk (retesting) later the same observers independently reanalyzed the 63 cases by assigning a weighted score (ADR probability scale) to each of the components that must be considered in establishing causal associations between drug(s) and adverse events (e.g., temporal sequence). The cases were randomized to minimize the influence of learning. The event was assigned a probability category from the total score. The between‐raters reliability (range: percent agreement = 83% to 92%; κ = 0.69 to 0.86; r = 0.91 to 0.95; R(est) = 0.92) and within‐raters reliability (range: percent agreement = 80% to 97%; κ = 0.64 to 0.95; r = 0.91 to 0.98) improved (p < 0.001). The between‐raters reliability was maintained on retesting (range: r = 0.84 to 0.94; R(est) = 0.87). The between‐raters reliability of three attending physicians who independently assessed 28 other prospectively collected cases of alleged ADRs was very high (range: r = 0.76 to 0.87; R(est) = 0.80). It was also shown that the ADR probability scale has consensual, content, and concurrent validity. This systematic method offers a sensitive way to monitor ADRs and may be applicable to postmarketing drug surveillance.

Sedative hypnotics in older people with insomnia: meta-analysis of risks and benefits

Abstract Objectives To quantify and compare potential benefits (subjective reports of sleep variables) and risks (adverse events and morning-after psychomotor impairment) of short term treatment with sedative hypnotics in older people with insomnia. Data sources Medline, Embase, the Cochrane clinical trials database, PubMed, and PsychLit, 1966 to 2003; bibliographies of published reviews and meta-analyses; manufacturers of newer sedative hypnotics (zaleplon, zolpidem, zopiclone) regarding unpublished studies. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials of any pharmacological treatment for insomnia for at least five consecutive nights in people aged 60 or over with insomnia and otherwise free of psychiatric or psychological disorders. Results 24 studies (involving 2417 participants) with extractable data met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sleep quality improved (effect size 0.14, P < 0.05), total sleep time increased (mean 25.2 minutes, P < 0.001), and the number of night time awakenings decreased (0.63, P < 0.001) with sedative use compared with placebo. Adverse events were more common with sedatives than with placebo: adverse cognitive events were 4.78 times more common (95% confidence interval 1.47 to 15.47, P < 0.01); adverse psychomotor events were 2.61 times more common (1.12 to 6.09, P > 0.05), and reports of daytime fatigue were 3.82 times more common (1.88 to 7.80, P < 0.001) in people using any sedative compared with placebo. Conclusions Improvements in sleep with sedative use are statistically significant, but the magnitude of effect is small. The increased risk of adverse events is statistically significant and potentially clinically relevant in older people at risk of falls and cognitive impairment. In people over 60, the benefits of these drugs may not justify the increased risk, particularly if the patient has additional risk factors for cognitive or psychomotor adverse events.

Withdrawal reaction after long-term therapeutic use of benzodiazepines.

We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trail in which 40 patients who had undergone long-term therapy with benzodiazepines were switched to placebo or to diazepam in a dose approximately equivalent to their usual dose of the benzodiazepine; the dose of diazepam was then tapered during an eight-week period. Patients were assessed clinically and psychologically and had weekly sessions of behavioral therapy. The subjects who received placebo had more symptoms, assessed their symptoms as more severe, and stopped taking the study drug at a higher rate than those receiving the tapering doses of diazepam. The subjects in the placebo group also had symptoms shortly after being switched to placebo, whereas those in the diazepam group had symptoms much later. Some withdrawal symptoms were distinct from those of anxiety (e.g., tinnitus, involuntary movement, and perceptual changes). Withdrawal symptoms occurred earlier in patients who had received short-acting benzodiazepines than in those who had received long-acting benzodiazepines. Symptoms gradually disappeared over a four-week period in both the placebo and the diazepam groups. Serial determination of plasma benzodiazepine concentrations was a useful way to assess compliance, treatment outcome, and relapse during withdrawal. We conclude that a clinically important, mild, but distinct withdrawal syndrome occurs after discontinuation of long-term therapeutic use of benzodiazepines.

CYP2D6 phenotype determines the metabolic conversion of hydrocodone to hydromorphone

The contribution of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) to the formation of hydrocodones active metabolite, hydromorphone, was examined in vitro and in vivo. Human liver microsomes prepared from an individual homozygous for the D6‐B mutation of the CYP2D6 gene catalyzed this reaction at a negligible rate. Urinary metabolic ratios of hydrocodone/hydromorphone were highly correlated with O‐demethylation ratios for dextromethorphan, an established marker drug of CYP2D6 activity (rs = 0.85; n = 18). The kinetics of hydrocodone after a single oral dose and its partial metabolic clearance to hydromorphone were investigated in five extensive metabolizers of dextromethorphan, six poor metabolizers, and four extensive metabolizers after pretreatment with quinidine, a selective inhibitor of CYP2D6 activity. The mean values for partial metabolic clearance by O‐demethylation in the three groups were 28.1 ± 10.3, 3.4 ± 2.4, and 5.0 ± 3.6 ml/hr/kg, respectively. No statistically significant phenotypic differences in physiologic measures were observed. However, over the first hour after dosing, the extensive metabolizers reported more “good opiate effects” and fewer “bad opiate effects” than poor metabolizers and extensive metabolizers in whom CYP2D6 was inhibited by quinidine. These data establish the importance of CYP2D6 in the formation of hydromorphone from hydrocodone and suggest that the activity of this enzyme may limit the abuse liability of hydrocodone.

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in late life depression : a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND To determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in depressed elderly patients. METHODS Search for randomized controlled double-blind studies evaluating atypical antidepressants (ATYPs), reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-A, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants in moderate/severe depressed patients > or = 60 years for > or = four weeks. The random effects model (single-arm; comparative) was used to aggregate efficacy, safety and dropout. RESULTS No difference in single-arm aggregation of outcomes for four antidepressant classes. Comparative analyses showed no statistical difference between outcomes, except SSRIs had a higher response rate than ATYPs. CONCLUSION Elderly show no differences in antidepressant class outcomes. LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity and lack of power. CLINICAL RELEVANCE There is little advantage for antidepressant classes over another in the aged.

Pharmacokinetic determinants of drug abuse and dependence. A conceptual perspective.

SummaryDrugs that produce physical dependence or have similar pharmacological profiles to highly abused drugs are unlikely to be considered acceptable for marketing. Thus, the prediction of abuse and dependence becomes an important issue in the development of new psychotropic drugs.Both pharmacokinetic and non-pharmacokinetic factors play an important role in predicting dependence and abuse liability of drugs. Evidence for the importance of pharmacological factors includes: (a) the demonstration of drug binding to receptors of abused drugs; (b) tolerance; (c) ability to maintain self-administration; and (d) spontaneous or antagonist precipitated withdrawal. The pharmacokinetic properties that presumably contribute to persistent self-administration and abuse include rapid delivery of drug to the central nervous system (CNS), rapid absorption, low protein binding and high free drug clearance. The pharmacokinetic properties of a drug associated with dependence will include long half-life, low free drug clearance and presence of the drug in the body at high enough concentrations and for sufficient time to permit tolerance to develop.These properties have important clinical implications for treatment and research in the area of abuse and dependence liability of psychoactive drugs.

Methylphenidate for the treatment of apathy in Alzheimer disease: prediction of response using dextroamphetamine challenge.

Apathy is a common behavioral symptom of Alzheimers disease (AD), being present in up to 70% of patients. Apathy in AD and non-AD populations has been associated with dysfunction in the dopaminergic brain reward system, suggesting that pharmacotherapeutic targeting of this system may be an effective treatment for apathy in AD. We therefore performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of methylphenidate in a sample of 13 apathetic AD patients (6 men, 7 women; age mean 77.9 years [SD, 7.8 years]; Mini Mental Status Examination score, 19.9 [SD, 4.7]). Patients were treated with methylphenidate (10 mg PO twice a day) or an identical placebo in two 2-week phases separated by a 1-week placebo washout. All patients participated in a dextroamphetamine challenge test (one 10-mg oral dose) before treatment with methylphenidate to gauge the functional integrity of the dopamine brain reward system. Overall, patients demonstrated greater improvement with methylphenidate compared with placebo according to Apathy Evaluation Scale total change scores (end of treatment - baseline: Wilcoxon Z = −2.00; P = 0.047). However, a significantly greater proportion of patients experienced at least 1 adverse event with methylphenidate compared with placebo (3 vs 1; χ2 = 4.33, P = 0.038). Two patients experienced serious adverse events with methylphenidate, consisting of delusions, agitation, anger, irritability, and insomnia, which resolved upon discontinuation of the medication. Response to methylphenidate was associated with increases in inattention on a continuous performance task after dextroamphetamine challenge. Psychostimulants may be effective in treating features of apathy in AD, and dopaminergic changes may predict response.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Non-Opiate Abused Drugs

SummaryThe present review discusses the available data on the kinetic properties of non-opiate abused drugs including psychomotor stimulants, hallucinogens and CNS-depressants. Some of the drugs of abuse reviewed here are illicit drugs (e.g. cannabis, cocaine), while others are effective pharmacological agents but have the potential to be abused (e.g. benzodiazepines).Although some of the drugs mentioned in this review have been in use for centuries (e.g. caffeine, nicotine, cocaine, cannabis), knowledge of their kinetics and metabolism is very recent and in some cases still incomplete. This is partially due to the difficulties inherent in studying drugs of abuse in humans, and to the complex metabolism of some of these drugs (e.g. cannabis, caffeine) which has made it difficult to develop sensitive assays to determine biological pathways.Although drugs of abuse may have entirely different intrinsic pharmacological effects, the kinetic properties of such drugs are factors contributing to abuse and dependence. The pharmacokinetic properties that presumably contribute to self-administration and drug abuse include rapid delivery of the drug into the central nervous system and high free drug clearance.Kinetic characteristics also play an important role in the development of physical dependence and on the appearance of a withdrawal syndrome: the longer the half-life, the greater the likelihood of the development of physical dependence; the shorter the half-life, the earlier and more severe the withdrawal. The balance between these 2 factors, which has not yet been carefully studied, will also influence abuse patterns.The clinical significance of kinetic characteristics with respect to abuse is discussed where possible.

Characteristics of dependent and nondependent regular users of codeine.

Although codeine is a widely used medication, the problems of codeine abuse and dependence have not been well-studied. This study characterized regular codeine users (using at least 3 days per week for 6 months, excluding those using codeine for the treatment of cancer pain) through a self-completed questionnaire. Recruitment through newspaper advertisements resulted in a total of 339 eligible questionnaires. Thirty-seven percent of subjects met DSM-IV criteria for codeine dependence. Dependent subjects (mean age, 40 +/- 10 years) were using an average of 179 (+/-171) mg of codeine per day. Codeine was predominantly used in the form of combination products with acetaminophen. Dependent subjects identified specific problems causally related to their codeine use such as depression (23%), anxiety (21%), and gastrointestinal disturbances (13%). The dependent subjects reported problems with other drugs more than did nondependent users (alcohol, 57% vs. 26%; cannabis, 23% vs. 5%; sedative/hypnotics, 33% vs. 12%; and heroin, 11% vs. 2%, respectively). Most were taking codeine primarily for a chronic pain problem (81%), although the dependent subjects currently found codeine less effective for treating pain than did the nondependent subjects and were more likely to use codeine for pleasurable effects, to relax, or to prevent withdrawal symptoms. This study showed that dependence is associated with the regular use of codeine. Pain is a key issue with these users; however, they are probably not receiving optimal treatment. There is a need to identify individuals experiencing problems with their codeine use and to develop optimal prevention and treatment strategies.

A clinical scale to assess benzodiazepine withdrawal.

The objective, sensitive, and reliable quantitation of withdrawal symptoms is essential to assess physical dependence on drugs. Data collected from 23 patients abusing high doses of benzodiazepines (mean diazepam dose equivalents, 150 mg/day; range, 40–500) and from 40 long-term therapeutic users randomized to receive either placebo (N = 19) or diazepam (N = 21; mean diazepam dose equivalents, 15 mg/day; range, 5–40; mean duration of use, 72 months; range, 6–240) were analyzed. Information on the type and severity of symptoms was obtained from several assessment instruments. In the high-dose abuse group, plasma benzodiazepine concentrations were measured daily and the 3 consecutive days of greatest relative daily fall were considered the critical withdrawal period. Selection of the 22 items of the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment-Benzodiazepines (CIWA-B) was based on statistically significant differences between baseline and critical withdrawal periods in high-dose subjects and between symptoms associated with placebo and diazepam in low-dose subjects, using contingency tables and logistic regression analysis. Of the 104 symptoms measured by the assessment instruments, 22 symptoms were found to distinguish withdrawal from prewithdrawal. These symptoms were selected based on significant differences (t-test, p ranged between <0.05 and <0.001) on type and severity of symptoms between baseline and the clinical withdrawal period in high-dose subjects, and on differences (cH2: P ranged between <0.05 and <0.001) in type of symptoms in placebo and diazepam subjects during the first week of withdrawal among the longterm therapeutic users of benzodiazepines. From these 22 symptoms, we constructed the CIWA-B, a scale of 20 five-point items and two additional values. We propose the CIWA-B as an instrument to assess and monitor benzodiazepine-like withdrawal.