Uyên Châu Nguyên

An in-silico analysis of the effect of heart position and orientation on the ECG morphology and vectorcardiogram parameters in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction defects

AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of geometrical factors on the ECG morphology and vectorcardiogram (VCG) parameters. METHODS Patient-tailored models based on five heart-failure patients with intraventricular conduction defects (IVCDs) were created. The heart was shifted up to 6 cm to the left, right, up, and down and rotated ±30° around the anteroposterior axis. Precordial electrodes were shifted 3 cm down. RESULTS Geometry modifications strongly altered ECG notching/slurring and intrinsicoid deflection time. Maximum VCG parameter changes were small for QRS duration (-6% to +10%) and QRS-T angle (-6% to +3%), but considerable for QRS amplitude (-36% to +59%), QRS area (-37% to +42%), T-wave amplitude (-41% to +36%), and T-wave area (-42% to +33%). CONCLUSION The position of the heart with respect to the electrodes is an important factor determining notching/slurring and voltage-dependent parameters and therefore must be considered for accurate diagnosis of IVCDs.

A novel approach for left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Intraprocedural integration of coronary venous electroanatomic mapping with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND Placing the left ventricular (LV) lead at a site of late electrical activation remote from scar is desired to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to integrate coronary venous electroanatomic mapping (EAM) with delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) enabling LV lead guidance to the latest activated vein remote from scar. METHODS Eighteen CRT candidates with focal scar on DE-CMR were prospectively included. DE-CMR images were semi-automatically analyzed. Coronary venous EAM was performed intraprocedurally and integrated with DE-CMR to guide LV lead placement in real time. Image integration accuracy and electrogram parameters were evaluated offline. RESULTS Integration of EAM and DE-CMR was achieved using 8.9 ± 2.8 anatomic landmarks and with accuracy of 4.7 ± 1.1 mm (mean ± SD). Maximal electrical delay ranged between 72 and 197ms (57%-113% of QRS duration) and was heterogeneously located among individuals. In 12 patients, the latest activated vein was located outside scar, and placing the LV lead in the latest activated vein remote from scar was accomplished in 10 patients and prohibited in 2 patients. In the other 6 patients, the latest activated vein was located in scar, and targeting alternative veins was considered. Unipolar voltages were on average lower in scar compared to nonscar (6.71 ± 3.45 mV vs 8.18 ± 4.02 mV [median ± interquartile range), P <.001) but correlated weakly with DE-CMR scar extent (R -0.161, P <.001) and varied widely among individual patients. CONCLUSION Integration of coronary venous EAM with DE-CMR can be used during CRT implantation to guide LV lead placement to the latest activated vein remote from scar, possibly improving CRT.

Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by intrinsic electrical substrate rather than by its modification

BACKGROUND Electrocardiographic mapping (ECM) expresses electrical substrate through magnitude and direction of the activation delay vector (ADV). We investigated to what extent the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is determined by baseline ADV and by ADV modification through CRT and optimization of left ventricular (LV) pacing site. METHODS ECM was performed in 79 heart failure patients (4 RBBB, 12 QRS < 120 ms, 23 non-specific conduction delay [NICD] and 40 left bundle branch block [LBBB]). 67 patients (QRS ≥ 120 ms) underwent CRT implantation and in 26 patients multiple LV pacing site optimization was performed. ADV was calculated from locations/depolarization times of 2000 virtual epicardial electrodes derived from ECM. Acute response was defined as ≥10% LVdP/dtmax increase, chronic response by composite clinical score at 6 months. RESULTS During intrinsic conduction, ADV direction was similar in patients with QRS < 120 ms, NICD and LBBB, pointing towards the LV free wall, while ADV magnitude was larger in LBBB (117 ± 25 ms) than in NICD (70 ± 29 ms, P < 0.05) and QRS < 120 ms (52 ± 14 ms, P < 0.05). Intrinsic ADV accurately predicted the acute (AUC = 0.93) and chronic (AUC = 0.90) response to CRT. ADV change by CRT only moderately predicted response (highest AUC = 0.76). LV pacing site optimization had limited effects: +3 ± 4% LVdP/dtmax when compared to conventional basolateral LV pacing. CONCLUSION The baseline electrical substrate, adequately measured by ADV amplitude, strongly determines acute and chronic CRT response, while the extent of its modification by conventional CRT or by varying LV pacing sites has limited effects.

Can We Use the Intrinsic Left Ventricular Delay (QLV) to Optimize the Pacing Configuration for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With a Quadripolar Left Ventricular Lead

Background: Previous studies indicated the importance of the intrinsic left ventricular (LV) electric delay (QLV) for optimal benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy. We investigated the use of QLV for achieving optimal acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a quadripolar LV lead. Methods and Results: Forty-eight heart failure patients with a left bundle branch block were prospectively enrolled (31 men; age, 66±10 years; LV ejection fraction, 28±8%; QRS duration, 176±14 ms). Immediately after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, invasive LV pressure–volume loops were recorded during biventricular pacing with each separate electrode at 4 atrioventricular delays. Acute cardiac resynchronization therapy response, measured as change in stroke work (&Dgr;%SW) compared with intrinsic conduction, was related to intrinsic interval between Q on the ECG and LV sensing delay (QLV), normalized for QRS duration (QLV/QRSd), and electrode position. QLV/QRSd was 84±9% and variation between the 4 electrodes 9±5%. &Dgr;%SW was 89±64% and varied by 39±36% between the electrodes. In univariate analysis, an anterolateral or lateral electrode position and a high QLV/QRSd had a significant association with a large &Dgr;%SW (all P <0.01). In a combined model, only QLV/QRSd remained significantly associated with &Dgr;%SW (P<0.05). However, a direct relation between QLV/QRSd and &Dgr;%SW was only seen in 24 patients, whereas 24 patients showed an inverse relation. Conclusions: The large variation in acute hemodynamic response indicates that the choice of the stimulated electrode on a quadripolar lead is important. Although QLV/QRSd was associated with acute hemodynamic response at group level, it cannot be used to select the optimal electrode in the individual patient.

Evaluation of the use of unipolar voltage amplitudes for detection of myocardial scar assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure patients

Background Validation of voltage-based scar delineation has been limited to small populations using mainly endocardial measurements. The aim of this study is to compare unipolar voltage amplitudes (UnipV) with scar on delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR). Methods Heart failure patients who underwent DE-CMR and electro-anatomic mapping were included. Thirty-three endocardial mapped patients and 27 epicardial mapped patients were investigated. UnipV were computed peak-to-peak. Electrograms were matched with scar extent of the corresponding DE-CMR segment using a 16-segment/slice model. Non-scar was defined as 0% scar, while scar was defined as 1–100% scar extent. Results UnipVs were moderately lower in scar than in non-scar (endocardial 7.1 [4.6–10.6] vs. 10.3 [7.4–14.2] mV; epicardial 6.7 [3.6–10.5] vs. 7.8 [4.2–12.3] mV; both p<0.001). The correlation between UnipV and scar extent was moderate for endocardial (R = -0.33, p<0.001), and poor for epicardial measurements (R = -0.07, p<0.001). Endocardial UnipV predicted segments with >25%, >50% and >75% scar extent with AUCs of 0.72, 0.73 and 0.76, respectively, while epicardial UnipV were poor scar predictors, independent of scar burden (AUC = 0.47–0.56). UnipV in non-scar varied widely between patients (p<0.001) and were lower in scar compared to non-scar in only 9/22 (41%) endocardial mapped patients and 4/19 (21%) epicardial mapped patients with scar. Conclusion UnipV are slightly lower in scar compared to non-scar. However, significant UnipV differences between and within patients and large overlap between non-scar and scar limits the reliability of accurate scar assessment, especially in epicardial measurements and in segments with less than 75% scar extent.

Late complications of an atrial septal occluder provoked by anticoagulant therapy

Late complications of an atrial septal occluder device (ASO) are rare but may be serious. We report a case with extensive hemopericardium five years after ASO implantation most likely triggered by anticoagulant therapy. Although not surgically confirmed, indirect clues for erosion of the atrial wall by the device were the exclusion of other etiologies, lack of recurrence after pericardial drainage and withdrawal of anticoagulants. In addition, multimodality imaging using echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were helpful to elucidate this unusual cause. Initiation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with an ASO should be carefully balanced and may warrant more frequent echocardiographic follow-up. <Learning objective: Late complications of an atrial septal occlude device (ASO) are rare. Initiation of anticoagulant therapy in patients with an ASO may lead to late hemopericardium, suggesting that more frequent echocardiographic follow-up is warranted.>.