V. Casadó

Heterodimeric adenosine receptors: a device to regulate neurotransmitter release

Abstract.Since 1990 it has been known that dimers are the basic functional form of nearly all G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and that homo- and heterodimerization may play a key role in correct receptor maturation and trafficking to the plasma membrane. Nevertheless, homo- and heterodimerization of GPCR has become a matter of debate especially in the search for the precise physiological meaning of this phenomenon. This article focuses on how heterodimerization of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, which are coupled to apparently opposite signalling pathways, allows adenosine to exert a fine-tuning modulation of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission, providing a switch mechanism by which low and high concentrations of adenosine inhibit and stimulate, respectively, glutamate release.

Receptor–receptor interactions involving adenosine A1 or dopamine D1 receptors and accessory proteins

Summary.The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor–receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors (G protein coupled receptors, GPCR) was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype specific interactions between different types of homomers of GPCR. Adenosine and dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia have been fundamental to demonstrate the existence of receptor heteromers and the functional consequences of such molecular interactions. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist, assisting in the process of linking the GPCR and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for learning and memory. Heteromerization of D2 dopamine and A2A adenosine receptors is reviewed by Fuxe in another article in this special issue. Here, heteromerization between D1 dopamine and A1 adenosine receptors is reviewed. Heteromers formed by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors and by adenosine A1 and A2A receptors also occur in striatal cells and open new perspectives to understand why two receptors with apparently opposite effects are expressed in the same neuron and in the nerve terminals. The role of accessory proteins also capable of interacting with receptor–receptor heteromers in regulating the traffic and the molecular physiology of these receptors is also discussed. Overall, the knowledge of the reason why such complex networks of receptor–receptor and receptor–protein interactions occur in striatal cells is crucial to develop new strategies to combat neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases.

G‐protein‐coupled receptor heteromers: function and ligand pharmacology

Almost all existing models for G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are based on the occurrence of monomers. Recent studies show that many GPCRs are dimers. Therefore for some receptors dimers and not monomers are the main species interacting with hormones/neurotransmitters/drugs. There are reasons for equivocal interpretations of the data fitting to receptor dimers assuming they are monomers. Fitting data using a dimer‐based model gives not only the equilibrium dissociation constants for high and low affinity binding to receptor dimers but also a ‘cooperativity index’ that reflects the molecular communication between monomers within the dimer. The dimer cooperativity index (DC) is a valuable tool that enables to interpret and quantify, for instance, the effect of allosteric regulators. For different receptors heteromerization confers a specific functional property for the receptor heteromer that can be considered as a ‘dimer fingerprint’. The occurrence of heteromers with different pharmacological and signalling properties opens a complete new field to search for novel drug targets useful to combat a variety of diseases and potentially with fewer side effects. Antagonists, which are quite common marketed drugs targeting GPCRs, display variable affinities when a given receptor is expressed with different heteromeric partners. This fact should be taken into account in the development of new drugs.

The binding of [3H]R-PIA to A1 adenosine receptors produces a conversion of the high- to the low-affinity state

Kinetic evidence for negative cooperativity on the binding of [3H]R‐PIA to A1 adenosine receptors was obtained from dissociation experiments at different ligand concentrations and from the equilibrium isotherm. The dissociation curves indicate that there is an apparent ligand‐induced transformation of high‐ to low‐affinity states of the receptor. At concentrations of 18.2 nM R‐PIA or higher there was only found the low‐affinity state of the receptor. In view of these results equilibrium binding data were analyzed by the usual two‐state model (assuming that there is an interconversion between them) and by the negative cooperativity model employing the Hill equation.

Real-Time G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Imaging to Understand and Quantify Receptor Dynamics

Understanding the trafficking of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their regulation by agonists and antagonists is fundamental to develop more effective drugs. Optical methods using fluorescent-tagged receptors and spinning disk confocal microscopy are useful tools to investigate membrane receptor dynamics in living cells. The aim of this study was to develop a method to characterize receptor dynamics using this system which offers the advantage of very fast image acquisition with minimal cell perturbation. However, in short-term assays photobleaching was still a problem. Thus, we developed a procedure to perform a photobleaching-corrected image analysis. A study of short-term dynamics of the long isoform of the dopamine type 2 receptor revealed an agonist-induced increase in the mobile fraction of receptors with a rate of movement of 0.08 μm/s For long-term assays, the ratio between the relative fluorescence intensity at the cell surface versus that in the intracellular compartment indicated that receptor internalization only occurred in cells co-expressing G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. These results indicate that the lateral movement of receptors and receptor internalization are not directly coupled. Thus, we believe that live imaging of GPCRs using spinning disk confocal image analysis constitutes a powerful tool to study of receptor dynamics.