V. Delvart

Rescue Surgery for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Downstaged by Chemotherapy: A Model to Predict Long-term Survival

Objective:To evaluate the long-term survival of patients resected for primarily unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downstaged by systemic chemotherapy and to use prognostic factors of outcome for a model predictive of survival on a preoperative setting. Summary Background Data:Surgery of primarily unresectable CRLM after downstaging chemotherapy is still questioned, and prognostic factors of outcome are lacking. Methods:From a consecutive series of 1439 patients with CRLM managed in a single institution during an 11-year period (1988–1999), 1104 (77%) initially unresectable (NR) patients were treated by chemotherapy and 335 (23%) resectable were treated by primary liver resection. Chemotherapy mainly consisted of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combined to oxaliplatin (70%), irinotecan (7%), or both (4%) given as chronomodulated infusion (87%). NR patients were routinely reassessed every 4 courses. Surgery was reconsidered every time a documented response to chemotherapy was observed. Among 1104 NR patients, 138 “good responders” (12.5%) underwent secondary hepatic resection after an average of 10 courses of chemotherapy. At time of diagnosis, mean number of metastases was 4.4 (1–14) and mean maximum size was 5.2 cm (1–25). Extrahepatic tumor was present in 52 patients (38%). Multinodularity or extrahepatic tumor was the main cause of initial unresectability. All factors likely to be predictive of survival after liver resection were evaluated by uni- and multivariate analysis. Estimation of survival was adjusted on risk factors available preoperatively. Results:Seventy-five percent of procedures were major hepatectomies (≥3 segments) and 93% were potentially curative. Liver surgery was combined to portal embolization, to ablative treatment, or to a second-stage hepatectomy in 42 patients (30%) and to resection of extrahepatic tumor in 41 patients (30%). Operative mortality within 2 months was 0.7%, and postoperative morbidity was 28%. After a mean follow-up of 48.7 months, 111 of the 138 patients (80%) developed tumor recurrence, 40 of which were hepatic (29%), 12 extrahepatic (9%), and 59 both hepatic and extrahepatic (43%). Recurrence was treated in 52 patients by repeat hepatectomy (71 procedures) and in 42 patients by extrahepatic resection (77 procedures). Survival was 33% and 23% at 5 and 10 years with a disease-free survival of 22% and 17%, respectively. It was decreased as compared with that of patients primarily resected within the same period (48% and 30% respectively, P = 0.01). At the last follow-up, 99 patients had died (72%) and 39 (28%) were alive; 25 were disease free (18%) and 14 had recurrence (10%). At multivariate analysis, 4 preoperative factors were independently associated to decreased survival: rectal primary, ≥3 metastases, maximum tumor size >10 cm, and CA 19–9 >100 UI/L. Mean adjusted 5-year survival according to the presence of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 factors was 59%, 30%, 7%, 0%, and 0%. Conclusions:Modern chemotherapy allows 12.5% of patients with unresectable CRLM to be rescued by liver surgery. Despite a high rate of recurrence, 5-year survival is 33% overall, with a wide use of repeat hepatectomies and extrahepatic resections. Four preoperative risk factors could select the patients most likely to benefit from this strategy.

Tumor Progression While on Chemotherapy: A Contraindication to Liver Resection for Multiple Colorectal Metastases?

Objective:To evaluate the influence of the response to preoperative chemotherapy, especially tumor progression, on the outcome following resection of multiple colorectal liver metastases (CRM). Summary Background Data:Hepatic resection is the only treatment that currently offers a chance of long-term survival, although it is associated with a poor outcome in patients with multinodular CRM. Because of its better efficacy, chemotherapy is increasingly proposed as neoadjuvant treatment in such patients to allow or to facilitate the radicality of resection. However, little is known of the efficacy of such a strategy and the influence of the response to chemotherapy on the outcome of hepatic resection. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the course of 131 consecutive patients who underwent liver resection for multiple (≥4) CRM after systemic chemotherapy between 1993 and 2000, representing 30% of all liver resections performed for CRM in our institution during that period. Chemotherapy included mainly 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and either oxaliplatin or irinotecan for a mean of 9.8 courses (median, 9 courses). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of response obtained to preoperative chemotherapy. All liver resections were performed with curative intent. We analyzed patient outcome in relation to response to preoperative chemotherapy. Results:There were 58 patients (44%) who underwent hepatectomy after an objective tumor response (group 1), 39 (30%) after tumor stabilization (group 2), and 34 (26%) after tumor progression (group 3). At the time of diagnosis, mean tumor size and number of metastases were similar in the 3 groups. No differences were observed regarding patient demographics, characteristics of the primary tumor, type of liver resection, and postoperative course. First line treatments were different between groups with a higher proportion of oxaliplatin- and/or irinotecan-based treatments in group 1 (P < 0.01). A higher number of lines of chemotherapy were used in group 2 (P = 0.002). Overall survival was 86%, 41%, and 28% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Five-year survival was much lower in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2 (8% vs. 37% and 30%, respectively at 5 years, P < 0.0001). Disease-free survival was 3% compared with 21% and 20%, respectively (P = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, tumor progression on chemotherapy (P < 0.0001), elevated preoperative serum CA 19–9 (P < 0.0001), number of resected metastases (P < 0.001), and the number of lines of chemotherapy (P < 0.04), but not the type of first line treatment, were independently associated with decreased survival. Conclusions:Liver resection is able to offer long-term survival to patients with multiple colorectal metastases provided that the metastatic disease is controlled by chemotherapy prior to surgery. Tumor progression before surgery is associated with a poor outcome, even after potentially curative hepatectomy. Tumor control before surgery is crucial to offer a chance of prolonged remission in patients with multiple metastases.

Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR).

Royal Free Hospital, London, UKIntroductionBackground of the European Liver Transplant RegistrySince 1968 the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) collectsprospectively the data of liver transplantation (LT) in 145 centersall over Europe. It represents more than 95% of the overallEuropean data compared to the published official figures [1]. Thiscollectionismadeprospectivelythroughastandardizedquestion-naire. The first part of the questionnaire includes items regardingdate andindicationfor LT,donor andrecipientdata, surgical tech-niqueofLT,andtheimmediatepostoperativeimmunosuppressiontherapy. The second part concerns graft and patient outcome, andimmunosuppressive regimen follow-up. Participation in the ELTRis voluntary and a standard computerized database is provided tocontributing centers with detailed instructions for the collectionof accurate and uniform information [2].Along with reports concerning LT for specific hepatic diseases[3–12],ELTRhasallowedthedevelopmentofriskmodelsforliver-transplantation mortality according to the characteristics of thedonor and recipient, and of the transplant procedure [13,14].Qualityofthedataisassessedroutinely.Aregularauditingpro-cessisconductedeachyeartoensurethereliabilityofthescientificanalysis of the data, a control of the good adequacy between ELTRquestionnaire and patient charts is performed by randomly con-ductedauditvisits.ResultsoftheseauditvisitshaveindicatedthatELTR data were reliable and the scientific results of ELTR can beconsidered credible and representative of LT in Europe [15–18].In addition, a control quality program has been developed inter-nally. The data are subjected to checks for completeness, consis-tency, and range. Comprehensive logical intra- and inter-updatesare performed. Moreover, the ELTR has established agreementswith the European Organ Sharing Organizations (OSO): UnitedKingdom Transplant Service Support Authority (UKTransplant),Spanish Organizacion Nacional de Transplantes (ONT), Scandina-vian Scanditransplant (SKT), Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS),Eurotransplant (ET), French Agence de la Biomedecine (ABM) toexchangedatacollectedfromEuropeanCentersandtocrosscheckcommon data between OSO and ELTR.Patients and methodsWe have first considered all data since 1968 to show the evolu-tion of results of LT in Europe since its initial development. Therest of the analysis has been undertaken during two differentperiods: (a) from January 1988 to December 2009 (89,865 LT –80,347 patients), where the date from January 1988 was chosenJournal of Hepatology 2012 vol. 57

3-month and 12-month mortality after first liver transplant in adults in Europe: predictive models for outcome

BACKGROUND Mortality after liver transplantation depends on heterogeneous recipient and donor factors. Our aim was to assess risk of death and to develop models to help predict mortality after liver transplantation. METHODS We analysed data from 34,664 first adult liver transplants from the European Liver Transplant Registry to identify factors associated with mortality at 3-months (n=21,605 in training dataset) and 12-months (n=18,852 in training dataset) after transplantation. We used multivariable logistic regression models to generate mortality scores for each individual, and assessed model discrimination and calibration on an independent validation dataset (n=9489 for 3-month model and n=8313 for 12-month model). FINDINGS 2540 of 21,605 (12%) individuals in the 3-month training sample had died by 3 months. Compared with those transplanted in 2000-03, those transplanted earlier had a higher risk of death. Increased mortality at 3-months post-transplantation was associated with acute liver failure (adjusted odds ratio 1.61), donor age older than 60 years (1.16), compatible (1.22) or incompatible (2.07) donor-recipient blood group, older recipient age (1.12 per 5 years), split or reduced graft (1.96), total ischaemia time of longer than 13 h (1.38), and low United Network for Organ Sharing score (score 1: 2.43; score 2: 1.67). However, cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma, alcohol cirrhosis, hepatitis C or primary biliary cirrhosis, donor age 40 years or younger, or less, hepatitis B, and larger size of transplant centre (> or = 70 transplants per year) were associated with improved early outcomes. The 3-month mortality score discriminated well between those who did and did not die in the validation sample (C statistic=0.688). We noted similar findings for 12-month mortality, although deaths were generally underestimated at this timepoint. INTERPRETATION The 3-month and 12-month mortality models can be effectively used to assess outcomes both within and between centres. Furthermore, the models provide a means of assessing the risk of post-transplantation mortality, giving clinicians important data on which to base strategic decisions about transplant policy in particular individuals or groups.

Is liver resection justified for patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer

Objective:The purpose of this study was to examine our experience with hepatic resection (HR) in a relatively unselected group of patients with breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM). Background:Although medical therapies provide limited survival benefit (median survival, 3–15 months), inclusion of HR into the multimodality treatment of patients with BCLM remains controversial. Our approach has been to offer HR to all patients with BCLM, provided that curative hepatic resection was feasible and extrahepatic disease was controlled with medical and/or surgical therapy. Methods:Outcomes for 85 consecutive patients (all female, median age, 47 years) with BCLM treated with HR from 1984 to 2004 were reviewed. Extrahepatic metastases had been treated prior to HR or were synchronously present in 27 patients (32%). BCLM were solitary in 32 patients (38%) and numbered more than 3 in 26 patients (31%). The prognostic value of each study variable was assessed with log rank tests for univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazard models for multivariate analysis. Results:Within 60 days of major hepatectomy (≥3 segments, 54 patients) or minor hepatectomy (<3 segments, 31 patients), there was no mortality. The median hospital stay was 9 days with complications occurring in 26% of patients. Microscopically and macroscopically positive margins were present in 18% (R1) and 17% (R2) of patients. Following HR, 28 patients (33%) developed isolated hepatic recurrences, 12 of whom were treated with repeat hepatectomy. At a median follow-up interval of 38 months, 32 patients were alive, yielding median and 5-year overall survivals of 32 months and 37%. Median and 5-year disease-free survivals were 20 months and 21%. Study variables independently associated with poor survival were failure to respond to preoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.008), an R2 resection (P = 0.0001), and the absence of repeat hepatectomy (P = 0.01). Conclusions:For patients with BCLM, HR is safe and may provide a significant survival benefit over medical therapy alone. Response to preoperative chemotherapy, resection margin, and rehepatectomy for intrahepatic recurrence are key prognostic factors. Importantly, favorable outcomes can be achieved even in patients with medically controlled or surgically resectable extrahepatic disease, indicating that surgery should be considered more frequently in the multidisciplinary care of patients with BCLM.

Complete Pathologic Response After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Myth or Reality?

PURPOSE Complete clinical response (CCR) of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following chemotherapy is of limited predictive value for complete pathologic response (CPR) and cure of the disease. The objective of this study was to determine predictive factors of CPR as well as its impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 1985 to July 2006, 767 consecutive patients with CLM underwent liver resection after systemic chemotherapy. Patients with CPR were compared with patients without CPR. RESULTS Twenty-nine of 767 (4%) patients had CPR, and none of these 29 patients had CCR. Patients with CPR (mean age, 54 years) had a mean number of 3.3 metastases at diagnosis (mean size, 29.3 mm). Objective response and stable disease were observed in 79% and 21% of cases, respectively. Postoperative mortality rate was 0%. After a median follow-up of 52.2 months (range, 1.1 to 193.0 months), overall 5-year survival was 76% for patients with CPR compared with 45% for patients without CPR (P = .004). Independent predictive factors for CPR were: age <or= 60 years, size of metastases <or= 3 cm at diagnosis, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level at diagnosis <or= 30 ng/mL, and objective response following chemotherapy. The probability of CPR ranged from 0.2% when all factors were absent to 30.9% when all were present. CONCLUSION CPR was observed in 4% of patients with CLM treated with preoperative chemotherapy. However, CPR may occur in almost one-third of objective responders age <or= 60 years with metastases <or= 3 cm and low CEA values. CPR is associated with uncommon high survival rates.

Usefulness of corticosteroids for the treatment of severe and fulminant forms of autoimmune hepatitis

Immunosuppressive therapy, and particularly corticosteroids with or without azathioprine, can achieve a remission in more than 80% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). By contrast, the usefulness of corticosteroid therapy in severe forms of AIH remains a subject of debate. Between 1986 and 2005, 16 patients (14 females, 2 males; mean age: 36.6 ± 13.1 yr) presenting with acute, severe, or fulminant disease due to type 1 AIH (n = 13) or type 2 AIH (n = 3) were admitted to our liver intensive care unit. At admission, 10 of 16 (62.5%) patients presented with encephalopathy. Median international normalized ratio (INR), bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine values were 5.36 (range, 1.7‐12.2), 425 μmol/L (range, 278‐850), 678 IU/L (range, 60‐2867), and 72 μmol/L (range, 52‐133), respectively. A total of 12 patients received corticosteroid therapy: 8 had started in the referring center a median of 2.5 days (range, 1‐89) previously, and this therapy was initiated in 4 patients at their admission to our unit (median: 2 days; range: 0‐5). Four patients were not treated because of a rapid deterioration in their AIH. Before treatment, 4 of 12 patients had been suffering from encephalopathy. The median duration of corticosteroid therapy was 7 days (range: 2‐135). Of 16 patients, 13 underwent liver transplantation (LT) (81%), at which time all were encephalopathic. Median values for INR, total bilirubin, and ALT were 7.2 (range: 3.3‐15.9), 400 μmol/L (range: 301‐550), and 706 IU/L (range: 69‐1,932), respectively, at the time of transplantation. All patients treated with corticosteroids had experienced a clinical (encephalopathy) and biochemical (Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score) deterioration at the time of transplantation. Histological findings did not reveal any features of underlying chronic liver disease. Of the 13 patients undergoing transplantation, 10 had received prior corticosteroid therapy. Of the 2 nontransplanted patients treated with corticosteroids, a clinical improvement was observed in only 1 patient. Severe septic complications occurred in 3 patients under corticosteroid therapy (gram‐negative septicemia n = 2; disseminated aspergillus n = 1). Nine of the treated patients are still alive; 1 died after liver transplantation (LT) (recurrence of AIH, acute pancreatitis, sepsis), 1 survived without LT, and 1 died without LT. Among the untreated patients, 3 survived after LT and 1 died without LT. In conclusion, corticosteroid therapy is of little benefit in severe and fulminant forms of AIH; it may favor septic complications and should not delay LT. Liver Transpl, 2007.

Decision for Retransplantation of the Liver: An Experience- and Cost-Based Analysis

ObjectiveTo determine the patient factors affecting patient outcome of first liver retransplantation at a single center to help in the decision process for retransplantation. Summary Background DataGiven the critical organ shortage, one of the most controversial questions is whether hepatic retransplantation, the only chance of survival for patients with a failing first organ, should be offered liberally despite its greater cost, worse survival, and the inevitable denial of access to primary transplantation to other patients due to the depletion of an already-limited organ supply. The authors’ experience of 139 consecutive retransplantations was reviewed to evaluate the results of retransplantation and to identify the factors that could improve the results. MethodsFrom 1986 to 2000, 1,038 patients underwent only one liver transplant and 139 patients underwent a first retransplant at the authors’ center (first retransplantation rate = 12%). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables, excluding intraoperative and donor variables, associated with graft and patient long-term survival following first retransplantation. Lengths of hospital and intensive care unit stay and hospital charges incurred during the transplantation admissions were compared for retransplanted patients and primary-transplant patients. ResultsOne-year, 5-year, and 10-year graft and patient survival rates following retransplantation were 54.0%, 42.5%, 36.8% and 61.2%, 53.7%, and 50.1%, respectively. These percentages were significantly less than those following a single hepatic transplantation at the authors’ center during the same period (82.3%, 72.1%, and 66.9%, respectively). On multivariate analysis, three patient variables were significantly associated with a poorer patient outcome: urgency of retransplantation (excluding primary nonfunction), age, and creatinine. Primary nonfunction as an indication for retransplantation, total bilirubin, and factor II level were associated with a better prognosis. The final model was highly predictive of survival: according to the combination of the factors affecting outcome, 5-year patient survival rates varied from 15% to 83%. Retransplant patients had significantly longer hospital and intensive care unit stays and accumulated significantly higher total hospital charges than those receiving only one transplant. ConclusionsThese data confirm the utility of retransplantation in the elective situation. In the emergency setting, retransplantation should be used with discretion, and it should be avoided in subgroups of patients with little chance of success.

Split-liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients: Feasibility and Long-term Outcomes

ObjectiveTo identify the outcomes and risks of split-liver transplantation (SLT) for two adult recipients to determine the feasibility of more widespread use of this procedure to increase the graft pool for adults. Summary Background DataThe shortage of cadaver liver grafts for adults is increasing. Using livers from donors defined as optimal, the authors have been developing techniques for SLT for two adult recipients at their center. MethodsFrom July 1993 to December 1999, 34 adults have undergone SLT with grafts from optimal donors prepared by ex situ split (n = 30) or in situ split (n = 4), and 88 adults received optimal whole-liver grafts that were not split. Four split-grafts were transplanted at other centers. The outcomes of transplantation with right and left split-liver grafts were compared with those of whole-liver transplants. The main end points were patient and graft survival at 1 and 2 years and the incidence and types of complications. ResultsFor whole-liver, right and left split-liver grafts, respectively, patient survival rates were 88%, 74%, and 88% at 1 year and 85%, 74%, and 64% at 2 years. Graft survival rates were 88%, 74%, and 75% at 1 year and 85%, 74%, and 43% at 2 years. Patient survival was adversely affected by graft steatosis and recipients inpatient status before transplantation. Graft survival was adversely affected by steatosis and a graft-to-recipient body weight ratio of less than 1%. Primary nonfunction occurred in three left split-liver grafts. The rates of arterial (6%) and biliary (22%) complications were similar to published data from conventional transplantation for an adult and a child. SLT for two adults increased the number of recipients by 62% compared with whole-liver transplantation and was logistically possible in 16 of the 104 (15%) optimal cadaver donors. ConclusionsSplit-liver transplantation for two adults is technically feasible. Outcomes and complication rates can be improved by rigid selection criteria for donors and recipients, particularly for the smaller left graft, and possibly also by in situ splitting in cadaver donors. Wider use will require changes in the procedures for graft allocation and coordination between centers experienced in the techniques.

Hepatitis C virus therapy in liver transplant recipients: Response predictors, effect on fibrosis progression, and importance of the initial stage of fibrosis

Antiviral therapy after liver transplantation (LT) using interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) can achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) rate ranging from 20% to 45%. The aims of our study were to assess efficacy and tolerability of therapy, effect on fibrosis progression and the importance of the initial fibrosis stage to outcome. A total of 113 hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected LT patients received 133 courses of IFN (standard, n = 29, pegylated IFN [pegIFN], n = 104) and RBV (75% genotype 1). Early virological response (EVR), end‐of‐treatment (EOT), and SVR were obtained in 74%, 55%, and 38%, respectively. EVR, completion of treatment, viral load before therapy, genotype non‐1, and use of pegIFN were predictive of SVR, but only EVR remained in the multivariate analysis. SVR was obtained in 45% patients who received a second course of therapy. Paired biopsies at baseline, at EOT and at long‐term were available in 42 patients. The mean fibrosis stage remained stable in patients with SVR and increased in patients without response. Rejection episodes were observed in 6% of patients. Tolerability of therapy decrease in patients with fibrosis stage ≥3 on baseline liver biopsy. A total of 20% of them died or were retransplanted due to liver failure as opposed to 1% of patients who had fibrosis stage <3. In conclusion, IFN and RBV achieved SVR in 38% of patients. EVR is independently associated with SVR. Fibrosis stage remained stable in patients with SVR and increased in nonresponders. Fibrosis stage ≥3 was associated with a high rate of liver failure, arguing for an early introduction of antiviral therapy. Liver Transpl 14:1766–1777, 2008.