Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where V. G. Simkin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by V. G. Simkin.


Crystallography Reports | 2013

Structural phase transition in CuFe2O4 spinel

A. M. Balagurov; I. A. Bobrikov; M. S. Maschenko; D. Sangaa; V. G. Simkin

A structural transition with a reduction in symmetry of the high temperature cubic phase (sp. gr. Fd3m) to the tetragonal phase (sp. gr. I41/amd) and the appearance of a ferrimagnetic structure occur in CuFe2O4 copper ferrite at T ≈ 440°C. It is established by an experiment on a high-resolution neutron diffractometer that the temperature at which long-range magnetic order occurs is higher than that of tetragonal phase formation. When cooling CuFe2O4 spinel from 500°C, the equilibrium coexistence of both phases is observed in a fairly wide temperature range (∼40°C). The composition studied is a completely inverse spinel in the cubic phase, and in the tetragonal phase the inversion parameter does not exceed few percent (x = 0.06 ± 0.04). At the same time, the phase formed upon cooling has a classical value of tetragonal distortion (γ ≈ 1.06). The character of temperature changes in the structural parameters during the transition from cubic to tetragonal phase indicates that this transition is based on the Jahn-Teller distortion of (Cu,Fe)O6 octahedra rather than the mutual migration of copper and iron atoms.


Crystallography Reports | 2013

Structural phase transition in CuFe{sub 2}O{sub 4} spinel

I. A. Bobrikov; M. S. Maschenko; D. Sangaa; V. G. Simkin

A structural transition with a reduction in symmetry of the high temperature cubic phase (sp. gr. Fd3m) to the tetragonal phase (sp. gr. I41/amd) and the appearance of a ferrimagnetic structure occur in CuFe2O4 copper ferrite at T ≈ 440°C. It is established by an experiment on a high-resolution neutron diffractometer that the temperature at which long-range magnetic order occurs is higher than that of tetragonal phase formation. When cooling CuFe2O4 spinel from 500°C, the equilibrium coexistence of both phases is observed in a fairly wide temperature range (∼40°C). The composition studied is a completely inverse spinel in the cubic phase, and in the tetragonal phase the inversion parameter does not exceed few percent (x = 0.06 ± 0.04). At the same time, the phase formed upon cooling has a classical value of tetragonal distortion (γ ≈ 1.06). The character of temperature changes in the structural parameters during the transition from cubic to tetragonal phase indicates that this transition is based on the Jahn-Teller distortion of (Cu,Fe)O6 octahedra rather than the mutual migration of copper and iron atoms.


Physics of Particles and Nuclei | 2015

Correlation Fourier diffractometry: 20 Years of experience at the IBR-2 reactor

A. M. Balagurov; I. A. Bobrikov; G. D. Bokuchava; V. V. Zhuravlev; V. G. Simkin

The high-resolution Fourier diffractometer (HRFD) was commissioned at the IBR-2 pulsed reactor at FLNP JINR in 1994. The specific feature of the HRFD design is the use of fast Fourier chopper for modulating the primary neutron beam intensity and the correlation method of diffraction data acquisition. This allowed to reach with HRFD extremely high resolution (Δd/d ≈ 0.001) over a wide range of inter-planar spacings at a relatively short flight path between chopper and sample (L = 20 m). Over time, a lot of diffraction experiments on crystalline materials, the main goal of which was to study their atomic and magnetic structures, were performed at HRFD. Successful implementation of the Fourier diffractometry technique at the IBR-2 reactor stimulated the construction of yet another Fourier diffractometer intended for internal mechanical stress studies in bulk materials (FSD, Fourier Stress Diffractometer). In this paper the experience of using this technique at the IBR-2, which is a long-pulse neutron source, is considered, the examples of HRFD studies are given, and possible solutions for existing technical problems of using correlation diffractometry and ways of increasing the intensity and resolution of HRFD are discussed.


Jetp Letters | 2006

Concentration-dependent structural transition in the La0.70Sr0.30MnO3−δ system

S. V. Trukhanov; I. O. Troyanchuk; A. V. Trukhanov; I. A. Bobrikov; V. G. Simkin; A. M. Balagurov

AbstractThe crystal structure of anion-deficient La0.70Sr0.30MnO3−δ manganites (δ = 0, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20) has been studied by powder neutron diffraction at room temperature. The crystal structures of the stoichiometric La0.70Sr0.30MnO3 and anion-deficient La0.70Sr0.30MnO2.90 samples are satisfactorily described by the rhombohedral R


Journal of Surface Investigation-x-ray Synchrotron and Neutron Techniques | 2007

Crystal structure phase separation in anion-deficient La0.70Sr0.30MnO3 − δ manganite system

S. V. Trukhanov; I. O. Troyanchuk; I. A. Bobrikov; V. G. Simkin; A. M. Balagurov


Crystallography Reports | 2007

Structural investigation of anion-deficient manganites La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 − δ

S. V. Trukhanov; I. O. Troyanchuk; I. A. Bobrikov; V. G. Simkin; A. M. Balagurov

\bar 3


Jetp Letters | 1996

Neutron diffraction investigation of phase separation in La2CuO4+y single crystals

A.M. Balagurov; V. Yu. Pomyakushin; V. G. Simkin; A. A. Zakharov


Technical Physics | 2015

Effect of BaTiO3 impurity on the NaNO2 structure in (0.9)NaNO2 + (0.1)BaTiO3 composite

A. A. Naberezhnov; O. A. Alekseeva; E. V. Stukova; S. A. Borisov; V. G. Simkin

c space group. The anion-deficient La0.70Sr0.30MnO2.85 sample separates into two perovskite phases with the R


Physics of the Solid State | 2017

Structure and dielectric response of (1–x)NaNO2 + xBaTiO3 composites at x = 0.05 and 0.1

O. A. Alekseeva; S. A. Borisov; E. Yu. Koroleva; A. A. Naberezhnov; E. V. Stukova; V. G. Simkin; J.-U. Hoffmann


Physics of the Solid State | 2017

Temperature evolution of the crystal structure of multiferroic solid solutions (1– x )Pb(Fe 2/3 W 1/3 O 3 )–( x )PbTiO 3

I. A. Dolgakov; A. A. Naberezhnov; O. A. Alekseeva; S. A. Borisov; V. G. Simkin; Michael Tovar

\bar 3

Collaboration


Dive into the V. G. Simkin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A.M. Balagurov

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

I. A. Bobrikov

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. M. Balagurov

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

I. O. Troyanchuk

National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. V. Trukhanov

National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. A. Borisov

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. A. Naberezhnov

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

V. Yu. Pomyakushin

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Sangaa

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge