V Huang

The Toronto Consensus Statements for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pregnancy

BACKGROUND & AIMS The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses a particular challenge during pregnancy because the health of both the mother and the fetus must be considered. METHODS A systematic literature search identified studies on the management of IBD during pregnancy. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were rated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 29 of the 30 recommendations considered. Preconception counseling and access to specialist care are paramount in optimizing disease management. In general, women on 5-ASA, thiopurine, or anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monotherapy for maintenance should continue therapy throughout pregnancy. Discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy or switching from combination therapy to monotherapy may be considered in very select low-risk patients. Women who have a mild to moderate disease flare while on optimized 5-ASA or thiopurine therapy should be managed with systemic corticosteroid or anti-TNF therapy, and those with a corticosteroid-resistant flare should start anti-TNF therapy. Endoscopy or urgent surgery should not be delayed during pregnancy if indicated. Decisions regarding cesarean delivery should be based on obstetric considerations and not the diagnosis of IBD alone, with the exception of women with active perianal Crohns disease. With the exception of methotrexate, the use of medications for IBD should not influence the decision to breast-feed and vice versa. Live vaccinations are not recommended within the first 6 months of life in the offspring of women who were on anti-TNF therapy during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Optimal management of IBD before and during pregnancy is essential to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Clinical, endoscopic and radiographic outcomes with ustekinumab in medically‐refractory Crohn's disease: real world experience from a multicentre cohort

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukins‐12 and ‐23, with efficacy in Crohns disease (CD) demonstrated in clinical trials.

Crohn's disease outpatients treated with adalimumab have an earlier secondary loss of response and requirement for dose escalation compared to infliximab: A real life cohort study☆

BACKGROUND The efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents in maintaining remission in Crohns disease may wane over time, leading to secondary loss of response that can often be overcome with dose escalation. Comparison of secondary loss of response of adalimumab and infliximab during long-term treatment of CD in a real-life IBD clinic has not been previously evaluated. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating outpatients with CD on a maintenance regimen with adalimumab or infliximab from 200 to 2013 and who experienced a secondary loss of response. All infliximab-treated patients were anti-TNF naïve. Adalimumab-treated patients were stratified by prior anti-TNF exposure. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to compare time to loss of response. RESULTS 218 CD patients met inclusion criteria (117 infliximab, 101 adalimumab). Median follow-up duration was 170.0weeks for infliximab and 122.0weeks for adalimumab (p=0.61). The proportion of patients with secondary loss of response was similar for infliximab-treated - 51.3% (60/117) compared to adalimumab patients naïve to anti-TNF therapy - 60.5% (23/38) (p=0.32), and adalimumab patients with prior anti-TNF exposure - 65.1% (41/63) (p=0.08). Median time to secondary loss of response was longer for infliximab patients (99.3wk, IQR 55.7-168.5) compared to both adalimumab patients naïve to anti-TNF therapy (58.9wk, IQR 29.0-85.7) (p=0.03), and adalimumab patients with prior anti-TNF exposure (52.7wk, IQR 20.1-85.0) (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Over 50% of CD patients treated with infliximab and adalimumab develop secondary loss of response. Time to loss of response was shorter in patients treated with adalimumab compared to those treated with infliximab. Prior anti-TNF exposure further accelerated time to loss of response.

Anti-TNF Therapy Within 2 Years of Crohn's Disease Diagnosis Improves Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background:Although biological agents targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha are effective in the management of Crohns disease (CD), use of anti-TNF agents is often delayed until after failure of other treatment modalities, resulting in potentially long delays between diagnosis and initiation of infliximab or adalimumab. We aim to determine if early treatment with anti-TNF agents reduces the rate of surgical resection and clinical secondary loss of response in CD patients. Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted evaluating CD outpatients who were primary responders to anti-TNF therapy, on a maintenance regimen with infliximab or adalimumab from 2003 to 2014. Patients were stratified by time to first dose of anti-TNF therapy; early initiation was defined as starting anti-TNF therapy within 2 years of diagnosis. The primary outcome was occurrence of surgical resection or clinical secondary loss of response requiring dose escalation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess time to the primary outcomes. Results:One hundred ninety CD patients met inclusion criteria (100 infliximab, 90 adalimumab). Median follow-up duration was 154.4 weeks (inter quartile range, 106.4–227.8). Fifty-three patients (27.9%) had early initiation of anti-TNF therapy. Fewer patients in the early initiation group required surgery (5.7% versus 30.7%, P < 0.001) or experienced clinical secondary loss of response (45.3% versus 67.2%, P = 0.006). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, early initiation of anti-TNF therapy prolonged time to surgery (P = 0.001) and secondary loss of response (P = 0.006). Conclusions:In CD patients, early initiation of infliximab or adalimumab within the first 2 years of diagnosis reduces the rate of surgery and secondary loss of response requiring dose escalation.

Knowledge of Fecal Calprotectin and Infliximab Trough Levels Alters Clinical Decision-making for IBD Outpatients on Maintenance Infliximab Therapy

Background:Infliximab is an effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, more than 50% of patients lose response. Empiric dose intensification is not effective for all patients because not all patients have objective disease activity or subtherapeutic drug level. The aim was to determine how an objective marker of disease activity or therapeutic drug monitoring affects clinical decisions regarding maintenance infliximab therapy in outpatients with IBD. Methods:Consecutive patients with IBD on maintenance infliximab therapy were invited to participate by providing preinfusion stool and blood samples. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) and infliximab trough levels (ITLs) were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Three decisions were compared: (1) actual clinical decision, (2) algorithmic FCP or ITL decisions, and (3) expert panel decision based on (a) clinical data, (b) clinical data plus FCP, and (c) clinical data plus FCP plus ITL. In secondary analysis, Receiver-operating curves were used to assess the ability of FCP and ITL in predicting clinical disease activity or remission. Results:A total of 36 sets of blood and stool were available for analysis; median FCP 191.5 &mgr;g/g, median ITLs 7.3 &mgr;g/mL. The actual clinical decision differed from the hypothetical decision in 47.2% (FCP algorithm); 69.4% (ITL algorithm); 25.0% (expert panel clinical decision); 44.4% (expert panel clinical plus FCP); 58.3% (expert panel clinical plus FCP plus ITL) cases. FCP predicted clinical relapse (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.417; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.197–0.641) and subtherapeutic ITL (AUC = 0.774; 95% CI, 0.536–1.000). ITL predicted clinical remission (AUC = 0.498; 95% CI, 0.254–0.742) and objective remission (AUC = 0.773; 95% CI, 0.622–0.924). Conclusions:Using FCP and ITLs in addition to clinical data results in an increased number of decisions to optimize management in outpatients with IBD on stable maintenance infliximab therapy.

Long-term Maintenance of Clinical, Endoscopic, and Radiographic Response to Ustekinumab in Moderate-to-Severe Crohn's Disease: Real-world Experience from a Multicenter Cohort Study

Background: Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukins 12 and 23. While effective in clinical trials for Crohns disease (CD), long-term maintenance of response in the real-world setting is unclear. We aim to assess the efficacy of ustekinumab for maintaining clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic response in CD. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed on patients with CD achieving steroid-free clinical response to ustekinumab induction, and advanced onto a regularly scheduled maintenance ustekinumab regimen between 2011 and 2016. The primary outcome was loss of response, defined by an increase in Harvey Bradshaw Index of >3 points from baseline requiring ustekinumab dose escalation, reinduction, rescue corticosteroids, immunomodulators, surgery, or ustekinumab discontinuation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify clinical factors associated with loss of response. Results: One hundred four patients with CD achieving steroid-free response with ustekinumab induction were included; 92.3% (96/104) had previously failed antitumor necrosis factor therapy. Median follow-up was 57.2 weeks (interquartile range (IQR): 36.7–103.4). Cumulative probability of maintained response at 52 weeks was 71.8%. Sixty-seven patients (64.4%) maintained endoscopic or radiographic response. Thirty-five patients (33.7%) lost response at a median time of 47.4 weeks (IQR: 35.3–68.4). Dose escalation was required in 17 patients (16.3%); response was recaptured in 9/17 (52.9%). Nine patients (8.7%) required surgery. In Cox multivariate regression, concurrent immunomodulation was associated with reduced risk of loss of response (hazards ratio 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17–0.92)). Conclusions: Subcutaneous ustekinumab is an effective treatment option for maintaining long-term clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic response in patients with moderate-to-severe CD failing antitumor necrosis factor therapy.

Does the Level of Reproductive Knowledge Specific to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Predict Childlessness among Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND Women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may choose to remain childless due to a lack of IBD-specific reproductive knowledge. OBJECTIVES To examine the effects of IBD-specific reproductive knowledge and discussion of family planning with a physician on childlessness among women with IBD. METHODS Female IBD patients 18 to 45 years of age completed the Crohns and Colitis Pregnancy Knowledge questionnaire (CCPKnow), and answered questions regarding reproductive history, plans to have children and discussion of family planning with a physician. CCPKnow scores were grouped according to poor (0 to 7), adequate (8 to 10), good (11 to 13) and very good (14 to 17). RESULTS Of 434 eligible women, 248 (57.1%) completed the questionnaires. Of these 248 women, 51.6% were childless and, among these, 12.9% were voluntarily childless and 12.1% were trying to become pregnant. Childless women had a lower median CCPKnow score than women with children (6.0 versus 8.0; P=0.001). After adjusting for current age and marital status, each one point increase in the CCPKnow score corresponded to 8% lower odds of childlessness (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.86 to 0.99]), 9% lower odds of voluntary childlessness (OR 0.91 [95% CI 0.79 to 1.0]) and 20% higher odds of trying to become pregnant (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.0 to 1.4]). Discussion of family planning with a gastroenterologist corresponded to 72% lower odds of a poor CCPKnow score (OR 0.28 [95% CI 0.15 to 0.53]) and of voluntary childlessness (OR 0.28 [95% CI 0.057 to 1.3]). CONCLUSION In the present study, higher IBD-specific reproductive knowledge lowered the odds of childlessness among women with IBD. Discussion of family planning with a physician was associated with higher CCPKnow scores and lower odds of voluntary childlessness.

Noninvasive Fecal Immunochemical Testing and Fecal Calprotectin Predict Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The noninvasive biomarkers fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (FCP) are sensitive for prediction of mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. However, neither test has yet been shown to independently and accurately predict mucosal healing (MH). We aimed to assess the specificity of noninvasive FIT and FCP for MH prediction. Methods: In this prospective cohort study of adult inflammatory bowel disease outpatients presenting for colonoscopy, stool samples for FIT and FCP were collected 48 hours before endoscopy. Using MH defined by Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohns disease (SES-CD = 0), Rutgeerts score (i0), and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS = 3), receiver operator characteristic curves were plotted, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and areas under the curve were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a clinical model for noninvasively predicting MH. Results: Eighty patients (40 Crohns disease and 40 ulcerative colitis) were enrolled. The specificities of FIT <100 ng/mL and FCP <250 &mgr;g/g for MH were 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.38–0.74) and 0.77 (0.57–0.89), respectively. Positive predictive values for MH for FIT <100 ng/mL and FCP <250 &mgr;g/g were 0.78 (0.64–0.87) and 0.77 (0.58–0.90), respectively. In multivariate modeling, combining FIT, FCP, and clinical symptomatic remission improved specificity for MH to 0.90 (0.72–0.97) with positive predictive values of 0.84 (0.60–0.96). Areas under the curve for FIT was higher for patients with ulcerative colitis (0.88) than for patients with Crohns disease (0.69, P = 0.05). Conclusions: FIT and FCP have similar performance characteristics for identifying MH. Combined, low FIT, low FCP, and clinical remission are specific for MH.

Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding Varies Widely: A Need for Further Education

Background. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects patients in their young reproductive years. Women with IBD require maintenance therapies during pregnancy and breastfeeding. However, physician management of IBD during pregnancy and breastfeeding has not been well characterized. Objective. To characterize physician perceptions and management of IBD during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Methods. A cross-sectional survey of Canadian physicians who are involved in the care of women with IBD was conducted. The survey included multiple-choice and Likert scale questions about perceptions and practice patterns regarding the management of IBD during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Results. 183 practicing physicians completed the questionnaire: 97/183 (53.0%) gastroenterologists; 75/183 (41.0%) general practitioners; and 11/183 (6.0%) other physicians. Almost half (87/183, 47.5%) of the physicians felt comfortable managing pregnant IBD patients. For specified IBD medications, proportions of physicians who indicated they would continue them during pregnancy were as follows: sulfasalazine, 47.4%; oral mesalamine, 67.0%; topical mesalamine, 70.3%; oral prednisone, 68.0%; topical prednisone, 78.0%; oral budesonide, 61.6%; topical budesonide, 75.0%; ciprofloxacin, 15.3%; metronidazole, 31.4%; azathioprine, 57.1%; methotrexate, 2.8%; infliximab, 55.6%; adalimumab, 78.1%. Similar proportions of physicians would continue these medications during breastfeeding. A higher proportion of gastroenterologists than nongastroenterologists indicated appropriate use of these IBD medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Conclusions. Physician management of IBD during pregnancy and breastfeeding varies widely. Relative to other physicians, responses of gastroenterologists more frequently reflected best practices pertaining to medications for control of IBD during pregnancy and breastfeeding. There is a need for further education regarding the management of IBD during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Within-Stool and Within-Day Sample Variability of Fecal Calprotectin in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background and Goals: The use of fecal calprotectin (FC) as a stool biomarker for differentiating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from IBS has been well validated, and there is a strong correlation between FC and the presence of endoscopic inflammatory lesions. However, recent studies have demonstrated intraindividual sample variability in patients with IBD, possibly limiting the reliability of using a single sample for monitoring disease activity. Our aim was to assess the within-stool and within-day sample variability of FC concentrations in patients with IBD. Study: We examined a cross-sectional cohort of 50 adult IBD patients. Eligible patients were instructed to collect 3 samples from different parts of the stool from their first bowel movement of the day and 3 samples from each of up to 2 additional bowel movements within 24 hours. FC concentrations were measured by a rapid, quantitative point-of-care test using lateral flow technology (Quantum Blue). Descriptive statistics were used to assess FC variability within a single bowel movement and between different movements at different FC positivity cutoffs. Results: Within a single bowel movement, there was clinically significant sample variability ranging from 8% to 23% depending on the time of the day or on the FC positivity cutoff value. Between bowel movements, there was clinically significant sample variability ranging from 13% to 26% depending on the FC positivity cutoff. Conclusions: Considering a single FC sample, the first sample of the day with an FC positivity cutoff of 250 &mgr;g/g provided the most reliable indication of disease activity.