V.J. Verwaal

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: A consensus statement

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin : a consensus statement

Predicting the survival of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin treated by aggressive cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Peritoneal carcinomatosis in the absence of distant metastasis occurs in approximately 8 per cent of patients with colorectal cancer. Cytoreduction followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a new treatment option. Patient selection is crucial to outcome.

Learning curve of combined modality treatment in peritoneal surface disease.

Cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy has emerged as a new standard approach for peritoneal surface disease. This study investigated the learning curve of this combined modality treatment at a single institute.

Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of 62 cases

AIM Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare disease characterized by the abundance of mucus in the abdomen without extra-peritoneal growth. METHODS Our patients with PMP have been treated with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy since 1996. The clinical and histopathological features of PMP and the relation of these features with disease-free interval and survival were assessed. RESULTS Sixty-two patients with PMP (24 M/38 F) were studied. Adenomatous mucosal changes were present in 31 patients. In females, the ovaries were normal in 5 patients and pseudomyxoma ovarii was present in 20 patients. Patients with minimal atypia and with 1% focal proliferation or less (n=38) had a better survival (p=0.0008) than those with more focal proliferation (n=14). CONCLUSION In most patients with PMP the appendix is affected; in females the ovaries are usually also involved. Focal proliferation appears to be a prognostic factor.

Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for stage I malignant pleural mesothelioma.

AbstractBackground:Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a disease mostly confined to the thoracic cavity. Untreated, the median survival is <1 year. Cytoreductive surgery combined with intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy is used to kill residual tumor cells on the surface of the thoracic cavity while having limited systemic side effects. Methods:From August 1998 to August 2001, 22 patients with stage I MPM were included in this study. Two patients were irresectable at operation because of extrathoracic tumor growth. Twenty procedures were performed. After cytoreduction, a perfusion was performed with cisplatin and doxorubicin at 40°C to 41°C for 90 minutes. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to surgical scars and drainage tracts. Results:There was no perioperative mortality, but significant morbidity was seen in 13 patients (65%), including bronchopleural fistula, diaphragm rupture, wound dehiscence, persistent air leakage, and chylous effusion. No hair loss or leucopenia was noticed. The median follow-up was 14 months. The median survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 11 months, with a 1-year survival of 42%. A favorable pharmacokinetic ratio was observed for both cisplatin and doxorubicin. Conclusions:Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy for stage I MPM is feasible. However, this treatment is accompanied by considerable morbidity. Survival data were less encouraging.

Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal mitomycin C

The favorable pharmacokinetics of MMC, used during intraperitoneal chemotherapy, has been reported in several studies [11-19]. A major safety issue in studies using intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion is the resulting systemic drug exposure. The AUCplasma is determined by the dose, the clearance, and the fraction absorbed from the peritoneal cavity. The reported mean plasma peak concentrations are about one-third of the systemic exposure following a therapeutic dose of MMC given by intravenous administration [30]. The best method to quantify the exposure to MMC are the time concentration profiles (AUC). Because MMC can still be found in plasma the day after intraperitoneal administration, the AUC0-90 is an underestimate of the real AUC; extrapolation to infinity gives the most reliable AUCplasma value. In our series the AUCplasma is about half the AUCplasma when given a therapeutic dose MMC intravenously [30]. What is the best dose in intraperitoneal chemotherapy perfusion? The ideal amount of MMC should include a high AUCperfusate, a high AUCplasma and an acceptable systemic toxicity. In our series grade III/IV leucopenia was observed in 28% patients. We find this rather high percentage acceptable as the problem has proved to be transient, and we have experienced no toxic deaths in recent years. In a phase I study it was estimated that a dose of 25 mg/m2 would result in approximately 10% of grade III/IV leucopenia [20]. Our data indicate that dosing based on body surface area is rational and reliable. The variation between individuals is low. Dosing based on a fixed concentration per liter perfusion fluid is probably more liable to have unforeseen variations, given the fact that we deal with linear pharmacokinetics of MMC [20]. As represented in Fig. 3, the dose of MMC can best be administered in three divided doses, resulting in the more equal exposure of peritoneal structures to MMC during the perfusion. It must be emphasized that our findings only hold true for the perfusion system as used in The Netherlands Cancer Institute. This involves a semi-open abdomen, basic perfusate volume of 3 L, perfusion rate of 1 L/min, abdominal temperature of 40 degrees C, 90 minutes of perfusion, and three drug additions (50% at t = 0, 25% at t = 30 and t = 60 minutes). The differences in perfusion techniques make comparisons of published pharmacokinetics data difficult. Cautions comparison suggest that most groups are dosing far below the maximal tolerated dose. We assume that there is a dose-effect relation for MMC. This means that obtaining a maximal safe dose is important to get maximal results. It seems that better dosing of intraperitoneal MMC can still improve results. The pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal MMC can, however, be influenced by many details. Open or closed perfusion for instance may make some essential differences. It is therefore important that each treatment group performs its own pharmacokinetics studies on intraperitoneal MMC to achieve the optimal dose method for their chemotherapy perfusion setting. In conclusion, the major advantage of intraperitoneal chemotherapy is the regional dose intensity provided. Following intraperitoneal MMC administration, the affected peritoneal surface is exposed to high concentrations while the systemic toxicity is limited. Comparative analyses on MMC pharmacokinetics are difficult to perform because the diversity of treatment techniques. We recommend administration of MMC, divided in three drug additions, based on BSA.

Prognostic value of baseline and serial Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Carbohydrate Antigen 19.9 measurements in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BackgroundTumor markers are useful for diagnosis and follow-up. We studied the prognostic value of baseline and serial carcinembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA 19.9) measurements in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).MethodsSixty-three patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei were treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. The tumor markers CEA and CA19.9 were collected before therapy and at 3-month intervals during follow-up.ResultsPreoperative CEA and CA19.9 levels were increased in, respectively, 75% and 58% of the patients. Baseline tumor marker values were related to the extent of tumor. Immediately after HIPEC, both tumor markers decreased markedly (P<.0001). CA19.9 was shown to be a more useful tumor marker than CEA for follow-up. During follow-up, a high absolute CA19.9 level (P=.0005) was predictive for imminent recurrence. Patients who never attained a normal CA19.9 level showed a higher recurrence rate at 1 year (53%; SE, 15%), in comparison to patients with did so (6%; SE 4%). The median lead time of increased CA19.9 to recurrence was 9 months.ConclusionsThe measurement of the tumor marker CA19.9 is useful in evaluating therapy in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. CA19.9 is a prognostic factor for predicting recurrent disease.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced‐stage ovarian cancer typically involves cytoreductive surgery and systemic chemotherapy. We conducted a trial to investigate whether the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery would improve outcomes among patients who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS In a multicenter, open‐label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 245 patients who had at least stable disease after three cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 to 6 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body‐surface area) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery either with or without administration of HIPEC with cisplatin (100 mg per square meter). Randomization was performed at the time of surgery in cases in which surgery that would result in no visible disease (complete cytoreduction) or surgery after which one or more residual tumors measuring 10 mm or less in diameter remain (optimal cytoreduction) was deemed to be feasible. Three additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel were administered postoperatively. The primary end point was recurrence‐free survival. Overall survival and the side‐effect profile were key secondary end points. RESULTS In the intention‐to‐treat analysis, events of disease recurrence or death occurred in 110 of the 123 patients (89%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) and in 99 of the 122 patients (81%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (surgery‐plus‐HIPEC group) (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.87; P=0.003). The median recurrence‐free survival was 10.7 months in the surgery group and 14.2 months in the surgery‐plus‐HIPEC group. At a median follow‐up of 4.7 years, 76 patients (62%) in the surgery group and 61 patients (50%) in the surgery‐plus‐HIPEC group had died (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P=0.02). The median overall survival was 33.9 months in the surgery group and 45.7 months in the surgery‐plus‐HIPEC group. The percentage of patients who had adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was similar in the two groups (25% in the surgery group and 27% in the surgery‐plus‐HIPEC group, P=0.76). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in longer recurrence‐free survival and overall survival than surgery alone and did not result in higher rates of side effects. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00426257; EudraCT number, 2006‐003466‐34.)

Quantitative intra-operative assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis - a comparison of three prognostic tools.

AIMS Selecting patients for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains challenging. We compared the predictive power of three intra-operative assessment tools of peritoneal involvement of colorectal cancer. METHODS Ninety-two procedures (1999-2005) were prospectively scored using the Simplified Peritoneal Cancer Index (SPCI) and 7 Region Count. The Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was retrospectively scored using the SPCI tool, operative notes and pathological reports. Endpoints were completeness of cytoreduction and overall survival. Logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to compare the predictive value of the three scoring systems on completeness of cytoreduction. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 31 months, the median overall survival was 25.6 months. It decreased to 7.3 months, when cytoreduction was incomplete (p=0.001). An increased PCI, SPCI or number of regions were all associated with a decrease in probability of complete cytoreduction (p<0.05). With complete cytoreduction as outcome, the ROC areas for the PCI, SPCI and 7 Region Count were 0.92, 0.94 and 0.90, respectively (p=0.14). Using a cut-off value of 16 in the PCI system (p=0.03), 13 in the SPCI system (p=0.04) and 6 regions in the 7 Region Count (p=0.0002) the probability of complete cytoreduction decreased significantly. CONCLUSION The PCI, SPCI and 7 Region Count are useful and equally effective prognostic tools predicting completeness of cytoreduction and associated improved survival. The 7 Region Count may be preferred due to its practical simplicity.

The use of Oxaliplatin or Mitomycin C in HIPEC treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: A comparative study

Oxaliplatin and Mitomycin C (MMC) are both suitable as intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents in HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer (CRC).