V. K. Arora
Santosh University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by V. K. Arora.
Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2006
Katherine Floyd; V. K. Arora; K. J. R. Murthy; Knut Lönnroth; Neeta Singla; Y. Akbar; Matteo Zignol; Mukund Uplekar
OBJECTIVEnTo assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India.nnnMETHODSnWe collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US
The Indian journal of tuberculosis | 2018
Ajoy Kumar Verma; Rohit Sarin; V. K. Arora; Gavish Kumar; Jyoti Arora; Paras Singh; Vithal Prasad Myneedu
were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated.nnnFINDINGSnThe average cost per patient treated was US
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine | 2012
V. K. Arora; Vaibhav Chachra
111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US
The Indian journal of tuberculosis | 2018
Kalpana Chandra; V. K. Arora
111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sectors perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US
The Indian journal of tuberculosis | 2016
Sonisha Gupta; V. K. Arora; Op Sharma; L. Satyanarayana; Atul Kumar Gupta
24-33 versus US
The Indian journal of tuberculosis | 2015
V. K. Arora; Narendra Singh
63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US
The Indian journal of chest diseases & allied sciences | 2007
V. K. Arora; Rohit Sarin; Rupak Singla; U. K. Khalid; K. Mathuria; Neeta Singla; Vithal Prasad Myneedu
50-60 for DOTS compared to over US
The Indian journal of chest diseases & allied sciences | 2005
Rupak Singla; Neeta Singla; Rohit Sarin; V. K. Arora
100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US
The Indian journal of chest diseases & allied sciences | 2007
Rupak Singla; Amitabh Kumar; Devesh Chauhan; Deven Juneja; V. N. Tyagi; V. K. Arora
120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US
Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2006
Katherine Floyd; V. K. Arora; K. J. R. Murthy; Knut Lönnroth; Neeta Singla; Y. Akbar; Matteo Zignol; Mukund Uplekar
218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs.nnnCONCLUSIONnPPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.