V. O. Nesterenko
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by V. O. Nesterenko.
Physical Review C | 2008
W. Kleinig; V. O. Nesterenko; J. Kvasil; P.-G. Reinhard; P. Vesely
W. Kleinig, V.O. Nesterenko, J. Kvasil, P.-G. Reinhard and P. Vesely 1 Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow region, 141980, Russia∗ 2 Technische Universität Dresden, Inst. für Analysis, D-01062, Dresden, Germany 3 Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Charles University, CZ-18000, Praha 8, Czech Republic and 4 Institut für Theoretische Physik II, Universität Erlangen, D-91058, Erlangen, Germany (Dated: May 30, 2008)
Physical Review C | 2011
J. Kvasil; V. O. Nesterenko; P.-G. Reinhard
The multipole vortical, toroidal, and compression modes are analyzed. Following the vorticity concept of Ravenhall and Wambach, the vortical operator is derived and related in a simple way to the toroidal and compression operators. The strength functions and velocity fields of the modes are analyzed in {sup 208}Pb within the random-phase approximation using the Skyrme force SLy6. Both convection and magnetization nuclear currents are taken into account. It is shown that the isoscalar (isovector) vortical and toroidal modes are dominated by the convection (magnetization) nuclear current while the compression mode is fully convective. The relation between the above concept of the vorticity and the hydrodynamical vorticity is briefly discussed.
Journal of Physics G | 2010
V. O. Nesterenko; J. Kvasil; P. Vesely; W. Kleinig; P.-G. Reinhard; V. Yu. Ponomarev
Despite a great success of the Skyrme mean-field approach in the exploration of nuclear dynamics, it seems to fail in the description of the spin-flip M1 giant resonance. The results for different Skyrme parameterizations are contradictory and poorly agree with experiment. In particular, there is no parameterization which simultaneously describes the one-peak gross structure of M1 strength in doubly magic nuclei and two-peak structure in heavy deformed nuclei. The reason of this mismatch could lie in an unsatisfactory treatment of spin correlations and spin–orbit interaction. We discuss the present status of the problem and possible ways of its solution. In particular, we inspect (i) the interplay of the collective shift and spin–orbit splitting, (ii) the isovector M1 response versus isospin-mixed responses and (iii) the role of tensor and isovector spin–orbit interaction.
Laser Physics | 2009
V. O. Nesterenko; A. N. Novikov; F. F. de Souza Cruz; E. L. Lapolli
The irreversible transport of multi-component Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is investigated within the Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage (STIRAP) scheme. A general formalism for a single BEC in M-well trap is derived and analogy between multi-photon and tunneling processes is demonstrated. STIRAP transport of BEC in a cyclic triple-well trap is explored for various values of detuning and interaction between BEC atoms. It is shown that STIRAP provides a complete population transfer at zero detuning and interaction and persists at their modest values. The detuning is found not to be obligatory. The possibility of non-adiabatic transport with intuitive order of couplings is demonstrated. Evolution of the condensate phases and generation of dynamical and geometric phases are inspected. It is shown that STIRAP allows to generate the unconventional geometrical phase which is now of a keen interest in quantum computing.
European Physical Journal A | 2010
K. J. Pototzky; J. Erler; P.-G. Reinhard; V. O. Nesterenko
Abstract.We present a systematic analysis of the description of odd nuclei by the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock approach augmented with pairing in BCS approximation and blocking of the odd nucleon. Current and spin densities in the Skyrme functional produce time-odd mean fields (TOMF) for odd nuclei. Their effect on basic properties (binding energies, odd-even staggering, separation energies and spectra) is investigated for the three Skyrme parameterizations SkI3, SLy6, and SV-bas. About 1300 spherical and axially deformed odd nuclei with 16
International Journal of Modern Physics E-nuclear Physics | 2008
V. O. Nesterenko; W. Kleinig; J. Kvasil; P. Vesely; P.-G. Reinhard
\le
Physics Letters B | 1976
L.A. Malov; V. O. Nesterenko; V.G. Soloviev
Z
International Journal of Modern Physics E-nuclear Physics | 2007
V. O. Nesterenko; W. Kleinig; J. Kvasil; P. Vesely; P.-G. Reinhard
\le
Physical Review C | 2014
P.-G. Reinhard; V. O. Nesterenko; A. Repko; J. Kvasil
92 are considered. The calculations demonstrate that the TOMF effect is generally small, although not fully negligible. The influence of the Skyrme parameterization and the consistency of the calculations are much more important. With a proper choice of the parameterization, a good description of binding energies and their differences is obtained, comparable to that for even nuclei. The description of low-energy excitation spectra of odd nuclei is of varying quality depending on the nucleus.
European Physical Journal A | 1983
V. G. Soloviev; V. O. Nesterenko; S. I. Bastrukov
Time-odd densities and their effect on electric giant resonances are investigated within the self-consistent separable random-phase-approximation (SRPA) for a variety of Skyrme forces (SkT6, SkO, SkM*, SIII, SGII, SLy4, SLy6, SkI3). Time-odd densities are essential for maintaining the Galilean invariance of the Skyrme functional. Their contribution is determined by the values and signs of the isovector and isoscalar effective-mass parameters of the force. In even-even nuclei these densities are not active in the ground state but can affect the dynamics. As a particular case, we explore the role of the current density in the description of isovector E1 and isoscalar E2 giant resonances in a chain of spherical and deformed Nd isotopes with A=134-158. The relation of the current to the effective masses and relevant parameters of the Skyrme functional is analyzed. It is shown that the current contributes substantially to E1 and E2 and the contribution is the same for all the isotopes along the chain, i.e. for both standard and exotic nuclei.