V. Omelchenko
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by V. Omelchenko.
Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2017
G. Sydorenko; Randell Stephenson; Tamara Yegorova; V. I. Starostenko; A. Tolkunov; T. Janik; M. Majdański; Z. Voitsitskiy; O. Rusakov; V. Omelchenko
Abstract The margin of the northeastern Black Sea is formed by the Crimea and Kerch peninsulas, which separate it from the Azov Sea to the north. The age and architecture of the sedimentary successions in this area are described from exploration reflection seismic profiling acquired in the area, in addition to the regional DOBRE-2 CDP profile acquired in 2007. The sediments range in age from Mesozoic to Quaternary and can be divided into five seismo-stratigraphic complexes linked to the tectono-sedimentological evolution of the area. The present regional basin architecture consists of a series of basement structural highs separating a series of sedimentary depocentres and is mainly a consequence of the compressional tectonic regime affecting the area since the Eocene. This has focused shortening deformation and uplift along the axis of the Crimea–Caucasus Inversion Zone on the Kerch Peninsula and Kerch Shelf of the Black Sea. Two major sedimentary basins that mainly formed during this time – the Sorokin Trough in the Black Sea and the Indolo-Kuban Trough to the north of the Kerch Peninsula in the Azov Sea – formed as marginal troughs to the main inversion zone.
Izvestiya-physics of The Solid Earth | 2017
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; Oleg Gintov; D. V. Lysynchuk; P. Środa; Wojciech Czuba; E. V. Kolomiyets; P. Aleksandrowski; V. Omelchenko; K. Komminaho; A. Guterch; Timo Tiira; D. Gryn; O. V. Legostaeva; G. Thybo; A. Tolkunov
This part of the paper addresses the geotectonic interpretation of the velocity model obtained from the results of seismic studies under the DOBRE-4 project in Ukraine. The velocity field does not show distinct lateral changes from the Precambrian platform towards the younger tectonic structures in the southwest. Hence, based on the seismic data alone, it is not possible to recognize the tectonic units that are known on the surface. The Moho has an undulating pattern over an interval with a length of ~150 km. The amplitude of the undulations reaches 8 to 17 km. The similar wavelike behavior, although on a shorter spatial scale and lower amplitude, is also typical of the upper crust and upper mantle. The presence of several separate horizons in the folded crust revealed by the velocity model is consistent with the presence of the folded systems which have different extensions on the different depth levels in the Earth’s crust. This situation is believed to be typical of folding on the lithospheric scale and to reflect the rheological stratification of the crust. The DOBRE-4 velocity section of the crust and adjacent part of the mantle promotes a clearer view of the geodynamical model describing the formation of the southwestern part of East European Platform in the Early Precambrian from the plate’s tectonic standpoint.
Izvestiya-physics of The Solid Earth | 2017
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; Oleg Gintov; D. V. Lysynchuk; P. Środa; Wojciech Czuba; E. V. Kolomiyets; P. Aleksandrowski; V. Omelchenko; K. Komminaho; A. Guterch; Timo Tiira; D. Gryn; O. V. Legostaeva; G. Thybo; A. Tolkunov
For studying the structure of the lithosphere in southern Ukraine, wide-angle seismic studies that recorded the reflected and refracted waves were carried out under the DOBRE-4 project. The field works were conducted in October 2009. Thirteen chemical shot points spaced 35–50 km apart from each other were implemented with a charge weight varying from 600 to 1000 kg. Overall 230 recording stations with an interval of 2.5 km between them were used. The high quality of the obtained data allowed us to model the velocity section along the profile for P- and S-waves. Seismic modeling was carried out by two methods. Initially, trial-and-error ray tracing using the arrival times of the main reflected and refracted P- and S-phases was conducted. Next, the amplitudes of the recorded phases were analyzed by the finite-difference full waveform method. The resulting velocity model demonstrates a fairly homogeneous structure from the middle to lower crust both in the vertical and horizontal directions. A drastically different situation is observed in the upper crust, where the Vp velocities decrease upwards along the section from 6.35 km/s at a depth of 15–20 km to 5.9–5.8 km/s on the surface of the crystalline basement; in the Neoproterozoic and Paleozoic deposits, it diminishes from 5.15 to 3.80 km/s, and in the Mesozoic layers, it decreases from 2.70 to 2.30 km/s. The subcrustal Vp gradually increases downwards from 6.50 to 6.7–6.8 km/s at the crustal base, which complicates the problem of separating the middle and lower crust. The Vp velocities above 6.80 km/s have not been revealed even in the lowermost part of the crust, in contrast to the similar profiles in the East European Platform. The Moho is clearly delineated by the velocity contrast of 1.3–1.7 km/s. The alternating pattern of the changes in the Moho depths corresponding to Moho undulations with a wavelength of about 150 km and the amplitude reaching 8 to 17 km is a peculiarity of the velocity model.
Tectonophysics | 2003
H. Thybo; T. Janik; V. Omelchenko; Marek Grad; R.G. Garetsky; Aa Belinsky; G.I. Karatayev; G. Zlotski; M.E. Knudsen; R. Sand; J. Yliniemi; Timo Tiira; U. Luosto; K. Komminaho; R. Giese; A. Guterch; C.-E. Lund; O.M. Kharitonov; T. Ilchenko; D. V. Lysynchuk; V.M. Skobelev; Jonathan J. Doody
Tectonophysics | 2013
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; K. Kolomiyets; Wojciech Czuba; P. Środa; Marek Grad; I. Kovács; Randell Stephenson; D. V. Lysynchuk; H. Thybo; Irina M. Artemieva; V. Omelchenko; Oleg Gintov; R.I. Kutas; D. Gryn; A. Guterch; Endre Hegedűs; K. Komminaho; O. V. Legostaeva; Timo Tiira; A. Tolkunov
Geophysical Journal International | 2015
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; Tamara Yegorova; L. Farfuliak; Wojciech Czuba; P. Środa; H. Thybo; Irina M. Artemieva; M. Sosson; Y. Volfman; K. Kolomiyets; D. V. Lysynchuk; V. Omelchenko; D. Gryn; A. Guterch; K. Komminaho; O. V. Legostaeva; Timo Tiira; A. Tolkunov
Geophysical Journal International | 2013
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; D. V. Lysynchuk; P. Środa; Wojciech Czuba; K. Kolomiyets; P. Aleksandrowski; O. Gintov; V. Omelchenko; K. Komminaho; A. Guterch; Timo Tiira; D. Gryn; O. V. Legostaeva; H. Thybo; A. Tolkunov
Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2017
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; Randell Stephenson; D. Gryn; O. Rusakov; Wojciech Czuba; P. Środa; Marek Grad; Aleksander Guterch; E. Flüh; H. Thybo; Irina M. Artemieva; A. Tolkunov; G. Sydorenko; D. V. Lysynchuk; V. Omelchenko; K. Kolomiyets; O. V. Legostaeva; Anke Dannowski; Alexey Shulgin
Archive | 2003
Marek Grad; Daniel Grin; Aleksander Guterch; Randall G. Keller; Robert E. Lang; Stig B. Lyngsie; D. V. Lysynchuk; E Lysynchuk; V. Omelchenko; V. I. Starostenko; Randell Stephenson; Sergiy Stovba; H. Thybo; A. Tolkunov; T. Janik
Geophysical Journal International | 2018
V. I. Starostenko; T. Janik; Tamara Yegorova; Wojciech Czuba; P. Środa; D. V. Lysynchuk; R Aizberg; R.G. Garetsky; G Karataev; Y Gribik; L. Farfuliak; K. Kolomiyets; V. Omelchenko; K. Komminaho; Timo Tiira; D. Gryn; A. Guterch; O. V. Legostaeva; H. Thybo; A. Tolkunov