V. Punjabi
Norfolk State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by V. Punjabi.
Physical Review Letters | 2005
I. A. Qattan; J. Arrington; R. E. Segel; X. Zheng; K. A. Aniol; Oliver Keith Baker; R. Beams; E. J. Brash; J. R. Calarco; A. Camsonne; J. P. Chen; M. E. Christy; D. Dutta; R. Ent; S. Frullani; D. Gaskell; O. Gayou; R. Gilman; C. Glashausser; K. Hafidi; J.-O. Hansen; D. W. Higinbotham; W. Hinton; R. J. Holt; Günter Huber; H. Ibrahim; L. Jisonna; M. K. Jones; C. Keppel; E. Kinney
We report the results of a new Rosenbluth measurement of the proton electromagnetic form factors at Q2 values of 2.64, 3.20, and 4.10 GeV2. Cross sections were determined by detecting the recoiling proton, in contrast to previous measurements which detected the scattered electron. Cross sections were determined to 3%, with relative uncertainties below 1%. The ratio mu(p)G(E)/G(M) was determined to 4%-8% and showed mu(p)G(E)/G(M) approximately 1. These results are consistent with, and much more precise than, previous Rosenbluth extractions. They are inconsistent with recent polarization transfer measurements of similar precision, implying a systematic difference between the techniques.
Science | 2008
R. Subedi; R. Shneor; P. Monaghan; B. D. Anderson; K. A. Aniol; J. R. M. Annand; J. Arrington; H. Benaoum; F. Benmokhtar; W. Boeglin; J. P. Chen; Seonho Choi; E. Cisbani; B. Craver; S. Frullani; F. Garibaldi; S. Gilad; R. Gilman; O. Glamazdin; J. O. Hansen; D. W. Higinbotham; T. Holmstrom; H. Ibrahim; R. Igarashi; C. W. de Jager; E. Jans; X. Jiang; L. J. Kaufman; A. Kelleher; A. Kolarkar
The protons and neutrons in a nucleus can form strongly correlated nucleon pairs. Scattering experiments, in which a proton is knocked out of the nucleus with high-momentum transfer and high missing momentum, show that in carbon-12 the neutron-proton pairs are nearly 20 times as prevalent as proton-proton pairs and, by inference, neutron-neutron pairs. This difference between the types of pairs is due to the nature of the strong force and has implications for understanding cold dense nuclear systems such as neutron stars.
Physical Review C | 2012
A. Puckett; E. Brash; O. Gayou; M. K. Jones; L. Pentchev; Charles F. Perdrisat; V. Punjabi; K. A. Aniol; T. Averett; F. Benmokhtar; W. Bertozzi; L. Bimbot; J. R. Calarco; C. Cavata; Z. Chai; C.C. Chang; T. H. Chang; J. P. Chen; E. Chudakov; R. De Leo; S Dieterich; R. Endres; M. B. Epstein; S. Escoffier; Kevin Fissum; H. Fonvieille; S. Frullani; J. Gao; F. Garibaldi; S. Gilad
Precise measurements of the proton electromagnetic form factor ratio R = mu(p)G(E)(p)/G(M)(p) using the polarization transfer method at Jefferson Lab have revolutionized the understanding of nucleon structure by revealing the strong decrease of R with momentum transfer Q(2) for Q(2) greater than or similar to 1 GeV2, in strong disagreement with previous extractions of R from cross-section measurements. In particular, the polarization transfer results have exposed the limits of applicability of the one-photon-exchange approximation and highlighted the role of quark orbital angular momentum in the nucleon structure. The GEp-II experiment in Jefferson Labs Hall A measured R at four Q(2) values in the range 3.5 GeV2 <= Q(2) <= 5.6 GeV2. A possible discrepancy between the originally published GEp-II results and more recent measurements at higher Q(2) motivated a new analysis of the GEp-II data. This article presents the final results of the GEp-II experiment, including details of the new analysis, an expanded description of the apparatus, and an overview of theoretical progress since the original publication. The key result of the final analysis is a systematic increase in the results for R, improving the consistency of the polarization transfer data in the high-Q(2) region. This increase is the result of an improved selection of elastic events which largely removes the systematic effect of the inelastic contamination, underestimated by the original analysis. (Less)
Physical Review Letters | 2009
J. Seely; A. Daniel; D. Gaskell; J. Arrington; N. Fomin; P. Solvignon; R. Asaturyan; F. Benmokhtar; W. Boeglin; B. Boillat; P. Bosted; A. Bruell; M. H. S. Bukhari; M. E. Christy; B. Clasie; Simon Henry Connell; M. M. Dalton; D. Day; J. Dunne; D. Dutta; L. El Fassi; R. Ent; H. Fenker; B. W. Filippone; H. Gao; C. Hill; R. J. Holt; T. Horn; Ed V. Hungerford; M. K. Jones
J. Seely, A. Daniel, D. Gaskell, J. Arrington, ∗ N. Fomin, P. Solvignon, R. Asaturyan, † F. Benmokhtar, W. Boeglin, B. Boillat, P. Bosted, A. Bruell, M.H.S. Bukhari, M.E. Christy, B. Clasie, S. Connell, ‡ M.M. Dalton, D. Day, J. Dunne, D. Dutta, 12 L. El Fassi, R. Ent, H. Fenker, B.W. Filippone, H. Gao, 12 C. Hill, R.J. Holt, T. Horn, 3 E. Hungerford, M.K. Jones, J. Jourdan, N. Kalantarians, C.E. Keppel, D. Kiselev, M. Kotulla, C. Lee, A.F. Lung, S. Malace, D.G. Meekins, T. Mertens, H. Mkrtchyan, T. Navasardyan, G. Niculescu, I. Niculescu, H. Nomura, Y. Okayasu, A.K. Opper, C. Perdrisat, D.H. Potterveld, V. Punjabi, X. Qian, P.E. Reimer, J. Roche, V.M. Rodriguez, O. Rondon, E. Schulte, E. Segbefia, K. Slifer, G.R. Smith, V. Tadevosyan, S. Tajima, L. Tang, G. Testa, R. Trojer, V. Tvaskis, W.F. Vulcan, F.R. Wesselmann, S.A. Wood, J. Wright, L. Yuan, and X. Zheng Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA Thomas Jefferson National Laboratory, Newport News, VA, USA Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA Yerevan Physics Institute, Armenia University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA Basel University, Basel, Switzerland Hampton University, Hampton, VA, USA Mississippi State University, Jackson, MS, USA Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA Kellogg Radiation Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA, USA (Dated: October 27, 2009)
Physical Review Letters | 2012
N. Fomin; J. Arrington; R. Asaturyan; F. Benmokhtar; W. Boeglin; P. Bosted; A. Bruell; M. H. S. Bukhari; M. E. Christy; E. Chudakov; B. Clasie; Simon Henry Connell; M. M. Dalton; A. Daniel; D. Day; D. Dutta; R. Ent; L. El Fassi; H. Fenker; B. W. Filippone; K. Garrow; D. Gaskell; C. Hill; R. J. Holt; T. Horn; M. K. Jones; J. Jourdan; N. Kalantarians; C. Keppel; D. Kiselev
We present new measurements of electron scattering from high-momentum nucleons in nuclei. These data allow an improved determination of the strength of two-nucleon correlations for several nuclei, including light nuclei where clustering effects can, for the first time, be examined. The data also include the kinematic region where three-nucleon correlations are expected to dominate.
Physics Letters B | 1995
V. Punjabi; R. Abegg; S. Belostotsky; M. Boivin; A. Boudard; E. Cheung; V. Ladygin; J. Oh; L. Penchev; N. Piskunov; C.F. Perdrisat; I. Sitnik; E.A. Strokovsky; E. Tomasi-Gustafsson; V. Vikhrov; Jean-Paul Yonnet; A. Zghiche
The polarization transfer κ0 and the tensor analyzing power T20 for the 1Hdp)d reaction have been measured up to an internal momentum of k = 0.58 GeV/c. Comparison of the same observables obtained in recent studies for 1Hdp)d reaction, as a function of k, show different behavior. However the data from these two reactions are almost identical when compared in T20 versus κ0 correlation plots. We discuss similarities and differences observed in the two reactions.
Physics Letters B | 1997
L.S. Azhgirey; E.V. Chernykh; A.P. Kobushkin; V.P. Ladygin; S. Nedev; L. Penchev; C.F. Perdrisat; N.M. Piskunov; V. Punjabi; I.M. Sitnik; G.D. Stoletov; E.A. Strokovsky; A.I. Syamtomov; V.V. Vikhrov; L. Vizireva; S.A. Zaporozhets
Abstract The tensor analyzing power T20 for the p(d,pd) and p(d,p)pn reactions θcmp = 180° have been measured at incident deuteron momenta from 3.5 to 6.5 GeV/c. For both reactions T20 remains negative up to internal momentum k ⋍ 0.85 GeV/c and show a rich structure beyond the region where T20 is expected to be determined by the S- and D-states of the deuteron. The T20 data for deuteron breakup without pion production, close to the backward elastic kinematics, were obtained simultaneously with the elastic data.
Physics Letters B | 1992
E. Cheung; C.F. Perdrisat; K. Beard; J. Yonnet; M. Boivin; R. Beurtey; F. Plouin; V. Punjabi; R. Siebert; R. Frascaria; E. Warde; R. Abegg; W. T. H. van Oers; W. W. Jacobs; S. Nanda; C. Lippert; P.C. Gugelot
Abstract The polarization of the proton from the inclusive breakup reaction 1 H( d , p )X at 2.1 GeV was measured at 0°. The results are expressed as the ratio of the proton polarization, P p , to the deuteron beam polarization, P d , κ 0 = P p / P d . The measured values of κ 0 range from +0.983 to -0.305 and are in general agreement with the expected behavior arising from the D state in the deuteron wave function.
Physical Review Letters | 1999
Brian D. Milbrath; J. McIntyre; C. S. Armstrong; D. Barkhuff; W. Bertozzi; J. P. Chen; D. Dale; G. Dodson; K. Dow; M. B. Epstein; M. Farkhondeh; John M. Finn; S. Gilad; M. K. Jones; K. S. Joo; J. J. Kelly; S. Kowalski; Robert W. Lourie; R. Madey; D. J. Margaziotis; P. Markowitz; C. Mertz; John C. Mitchell; C. F. Perdrisat; V. Punjabi; L. M. Qin; P. M. Rutt; A. J. Sarty; D. Tieger; C. Tschalaer
Recoil proton polarization observables were measured for both the p(
Physics Letters B | 1996
L.S. Azhgirey; S.V. Afanasyev; E.V. Chernykh; A.P. Kobushkin; V.P. Ladygin; S. Nedev; L. Penchev; C.F. Perdrisat; N.M. Piskunov; V. Punjabi; I.M. Sitnik; G.D. Stoletov; E.A. Strokovsky; A.I. Syamtomov; S.A. Zaporozhets
\vec {\rm e}