V. Tringali
European Institute of Oncology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by V. Tringali.
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer | 2012
Deliu Victor Matei; Giuseppe Renne; Marcelo Pimentel; Maria Teresa Sandri; Laura Zorzino; Edoardo Botteri; Concetta De Cicco; Gennaro Musi; A. Brescia; Federica Mazzoleni; V. Tringali; S. Detti; Ottavio De Cobelli
BACKGROUND Assessing the neuroendocrine (NE) pattern in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) may prove useful in selecting potential responders to target therapies such as somatostatin analogues. The aim of this study was to define a panel of markers or examinations appropriate to characterize NE differentiation (NED). METHODS Forty-seven patients with CRPC underwent a systematic diagnostic attempt to characterize the NE phenotype using a plasma blood test for chromogranin A (CgA) and immunohistochemical staining of needle biopsy-obtained specimens (CgA, somatostatin receptor 2 [SSTR2], Ki-67, and androgen receptors). In a subgroup of 26 patients, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using (111)In-DTPA-d-Phe octreotide (octreotide scintigraphy; Octreoscan, Covidien, Hazelwood, MO) was also performed. RESULTS NED was found in 85.1% of patients (if serum CgA, tissular CgA, and tissular SSTR2 were considered separately: 54%, 67%, and 58%, respectively). Only 15% of the 26-patient subgroup had an abnormal octreotide scintigraphy result. Although p-CgA and t-CgA were associated with more aggressive disease with a worse prognosis, patients with positive tissular SSTR2 staining had longer overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION This systematic approach to explore the NED in a quite homogeneous group of patients with CRPC seems reproducible and appropriate. Further investigations are required to validate this panel and better characterize potential responders to targeted therapy.
European urology focus | 2017
Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Deliu Victor Matei; Giuseppe Renne; V. Tringali; Nicolae Crisan; Gennaro Musi; F.A. Mistretta; Andrea Russo; G. Cozzi; Giovani Cordima; Stefano Luzzago; Antonio Cioffi; Ettore Di Trapani; Michele Catellani; M. Delor; Danilo Bottero; Ciro Imbimbo; Vincenzo Mirone; Matteo Ferro; Ottavio De Cobelli
BACKGROUND Nowadays, there is a debate about which surgical treatment should be best for clinical T1 renal tumors. If the oncological outcomes are considered, there are many open and laparoscopic series published. As far as robotic series are concerned, only a few of them report 5-yr oncological outcomes. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to analyze robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) midterm oncological outcomes achieved in a tertiary robotic reference center. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between April 2009 and September 2013, 123 consecutive patients with clinical T1-stage renal masses underwent RAPN in our tertiary cancer center. Inclusion criteria were as follows: pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and follow-up for >12 mo. Eighteen patients were excluded due to follow-up of <12 mo and 15 due to benign final pathology. Median follow-up was 59 mo (interquartile range 44-73 mo). Patients were followed according to guideline recommendations and institutional protocol. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Outcomes were measured by time to disease progression, overall survival, or time to cancer-specific death. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival; log-rank tests were applied for pair-wise comparison of survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS From the 90 patients included, 66 (73.3%) had T1a, 12 (13.3%) T1b, three (3.3%) T2a, and nine (10%) T3a tumors. Predominant histological type was clear cell carcinoma: 67 (74.5%). Fuhrmann grade 1 and 2 was found in 73.3% of all malignant tumors. Two patients (2.2%) had positive surgical margins, and complication rate was 17.8%. Relapse rate was 7.7%, including two cases (2.2%) of local recurrences and five (5.5%) distant metastasis. Five-year disease-free survival was 90.9%, 5-yr cancer-specific survival was 97.5%, and 5-yr overall survival was 95.1%. CONCLUSIONS Midterm oncological outcomes after RAPN for localized RCCs (predominantly T1a tumors of low anatomic complexity) were shown to be good, adding significant evidence to support the oncological efficacy and safety of RAPN for the treatment of this type of tumors. PATIENT SUMMARY Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy seems to be the most promising minimally invasive approach in the treatment of renal masses suitable for organ-sparing surgery as midterm (5 yr) oncological outcomes are excellent.
Asian Journal of Urology | 2018
Luca Carmignani; Maria Chiara Clementi; Claudia Signorini; Gloria Motta; Sebastiano Nazzani; F. Palmisano; Elisa De Lorenzis; M. Catellani; Alessandro Mistretta Francesco; Andrea Conti; V. Tringali; Maria Costa Beatrice; Damiano Vizziello
Objective We aimed to determine safety and feasibility of thulium laser transurethral vapoenucleation of prostate (ThuVEP) for treatment of obese patients affected by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods We retrospectively analysed data of 452 patients with BPH who underwent ThuVEP from February 2012 to March 2016 in a single center. Patients were divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI, kg/m2): Normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25; Group A), overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30; Group B) and obese (BMI ≥ 30; Group C), for a total of 412 patients evaluable for this study. Preoperative total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination of the prostate, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), renal ultrasound, urine culture, uroflowmetry, International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), and Quality of Life (QoL) score were analyzed. Post-operative complications, hospital stay and days of catheterization, questionnaires and uroflowmetry at 1 and 3 months after surgery were evaluated. Preoperative data, surgical outcomes, complication rate and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results The median age of patients was 69 years (Interquartile Range [IQR 10]). The preoperative median IPSS among groups was 19 (IQR 8.75), 20 (IQR 10), and 18 (IQR 10) respectively. At 1 and 3 months of follow-up, this value was 8 (IQR 7), 8 (IQR 4), 7 (IQR 5) and 5 (IQR 6.25), 5 (IQR 6), 6 (IQR 5), respectively (all p between groups > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference among three groups as for hospital stay and days of catheterization (p > 0.05). Conclusion Our results showed that ThuVEP was safe and feasible even in overweight patients with substantially enlarged prostate.
European Urology Supplements | 2017
Gennaro Musi; A. Conti; Andrea Russo; F.A. Mistretta; A. Serino; V. Tringali; M. Catellani; G. Cozzi; R. Bianchi; M. Delor; Matteo Ferro; Victor Matei; O. De Cobelli
Introduction and Objectives Traditional surgical treatment of penile carcinoma was amputation of the glans, resulting in organ dysfunction and disfigurement, with a strong impact on patient’s quality of life. Several conservative treatment modalities have been introduced with the goal of achieving conservative treatment. We present the initial experience with thulium laser excision of early stage penile lesions.
European Urology Supplements | 2017
Gennaro Musi; G. Cozzi; R. Bianchi; F.A. Mistretta; V. Tringali; B.A. Jereczeck; Franco Nolè; O. De Cobelli
Introduction Since the introduction of platinum-based chemotherapy (ChT), long-term survival following testicular cancer (TC) is now the norm; thus, quality of life after radical orchiectomy became of paramount importance. Testicular prostheses have been used since 1941. The first model was composed of vitallium. Nowadays, silicon-gel filled, saline-filled and elastomer prostheses are available. The safety of the concurrent insertion of a prosthesis in course of radical orchiectomy in terms peri-operative complications has already been assessed. Aim of this study was to assess if the insertion of a testicular prosthesis at the time of radical orchiectomy was related to a higher incidence of complications in patients undergoing adjuvant treatments.
European Urology Supplements | 2018
F.A. Mistretta; D.V. Matei; R. Bianchi; E. Di Trapani; A. Conti; Sarah Alessi; V. Tringali; S. Luzzago; Andrea Russo; Matteo Ferro; Gennaro Musi; G. Petralia; Giuseppe Renne; O. De Cobelli
European Urology Supplements | 2017
Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; D.V. Matei; Giuseppe Renne; V. Tringali; Matteo Ferro; R. Bianchi; Andrea Russo; G. Cozzi; O. De Cobelli
European Urology Supplements | 2017
E. Di Trapani; V. Tringali; R. Bianchi; Andrea Russo; M. Catellani; F.A. Mistretta; Antonio Cioffi; A. Serino; G. Cozzi; M. Delor; Victor Matei; Gennaro Musi; O. De Cobelli
European Urology Supplements | 2017
G. Cozzi; Danilo Bottero; Gennaro Musi; R. Bianchi; F.A. Mistretta; V. Tringali; O. De Cobelli
European Urology Supplements | 2016
F.A. Mistretta; A. Serino; V. Tringali; Giovanni Cordima; Matteo Ferro; Danilo Bottero; Gennaro Musi; D.V. Matei; A. Brescia; G. Incarbone; Federica Mazzoleni; Antonio Cioffi; R. Bianchi; G. Cozzi; S. Detti; O. De Cobelli