V. Vendrely

Comparison of Two Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Regimens for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Results of the Phase III Trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2

PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is considered a standard approach for T3-4 M0 rectal cancer. In this situation, we compared neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus capecitabine with dose-intensified radiotherapy plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS We randomly assigned patients to receive 5 weeks of treatment with radiotherapy 45 Gy/25 fractions with concurrent capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) twice daily 5 days per week (Cap 45) or radiotherapy 50 Gy/25 fractions with capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) twice daily 5 days per week and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) once weekly (Capox 50). The primary end point was complete sterilization of the operative specimen (ypCR). RESULTS Five hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive Cap 45 (n = 299) or Capox 50 (n = 299). More preoperative grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in the Capox 50 group (25 v 1%; P < .001). Surgery was performed in 98% of patients in both groups. There were no differences between groups in the rate of conservative surgery (75%) or postoperative deaths at 60 days (0.3%). The ypCR rate was 13.9% with Cap 45 and 19.2% with Capox 50 (P = .09). When ypCR was combined with yp few residual cells, the rate was respectively 28.9% with Cap 45 and 39.4% with Capox 50 (P = .008). The rate of positive circumferential rectal margins (between 0 and 2 mm) was 19.3% with Cap 45 and 9.9% with Capox 50 (P = .02). CONCLUSION The benefit of oxaliplatin was not demonstrated and this drug should not be used with concurrent irradiation. Cap 50 merits investigation for T3-4 rectal cancers.

Sphincter-Saving Resection for All Rectal Carcinomas: The End of the 2-cm Distal Rule

Objective:To assess oncologic outcome of patients treated by conservative radical surgery for tumors below 5 cm from the anal verge. Summary Background Data:Standard surgical treatment of low rectal cancer below 5 cm from the anal verge is abdominoperineal resection. Methods:From 1990 to 2003, patients with a nonfixed rectal carcinoma at 4.5 cm or less from the anal verge and without external sphincter infiltration underwent conservative surgery. Surgery included total mesorectal excision with intersphincteric resection, that is, removal of the internal sphincter, to achieve adequate distal margin. Patients with T3 disease or internal sphincter infiltration received preoperative radiotherapy. Results:Ninety-two patients with a tumor at 3 (range 1.5–4.5) cm from the anal verge underwent conservative surgery. There was no mortality and morbidity was 27%. The rate of complete microscopic resection (R0) was 89%, with 98% negative distal margin and 89% negative circumferential margin. In 58 patients with a follow-up of more than 24 months, the rate of local recurrence was 2% and the 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 81% and 70%, respectively. Conclusions:The technique of intersphincteric resection permits us to achieve conservative surgery in patients with a tumor close to or in the anal canal without compromising local control and survival. Tumor distance from the anal verge is no longer a limit for sphincter-saving resection.

Clinical Outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 Randomized Trial in Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE The ACCORD 12 trial investigated the value of two different preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) regimens in T3-4 Nx M0 resectable rectal cancer. Clinical results are reported after follow-up of 3 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between November 2005 and July 2008, a total of 598 patients were randomly assigned to preoperative CT-RT with CAP45 (45-Gy RT for 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine) or CAPOX50 (50-Gy RT for 5 weeks with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Total mesorectal excision was planned 6 weeks after CT-RT. The primary end point was sterilization of the operative specimen, which was achieved in 13.9% versus 19.2% of patients, respectively (P = .09). Clinical results were analyzed for all randomly assigned patients according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS At 3 years, there was no significant difference between CAP45 and CAPOX50 (cumulative incidence of local recurrence, 6.1% v 4.4%; overall survival, 87.6% v 88.3%; disease-free survival, 67.9% v 72.7%). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was reported in four patients in the CAP45 group and in two patients in the CAPOX50 group. Bowel continence, erectile dysfunction, and social life disturbance were not different between groups. In multivariate analysis, the sterilization rate (Dworak score) of the operative specimen was the main significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.50). CONCLUSION At 3 years, no significant difference in clinical outcome was achieved with the intensified CAPOX regimen. When compared with other recent randomized trials, these results indicate that concurrent administration of oxaliplatin and RT is not recommended.

Lymph nodes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal carcinoma: number, status, and impact on survival.

The number and status of lymph nodes examined is crucial for tumor staging. Impact of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on lymph nodes status and survival is still controversial in rectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was (i) to define the impact of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on the number of both retrieved and positive lymph nodes in rectal cancer specimen, (ii) to evaluate the influence of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on survival in patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy. From 1994 to 2004, 495 patients underwent rectal excision for cancer, of which 332 received long course preoperative radiotherapy. Surgery and pathologic assessment were standardized. Multivariate analysis evaluated the influence of clinical and pathologic variables on the number of both retrieved and positive lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test assessed the relation between survival and the number of lymph nodes retrieved in patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Compared with surgery alone, preoperative chemoradiotherapy decreased both the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved (17 vs. 13; P<0.001) and the mean number of positive lymph nodes (2.3 vs. 1.2; P=0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent impact of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on retrieved and positive lymph nodes. In patients treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy, the 5-year overall (71%) and disease-free (60%) survival was not associated with the number of lymph nodes retrieved. Although long course preoperative chemoradiotherapy decreases by 24%, the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved and by 48% the mean number of positive lymph nodes, survival was not influenced by the number of lymph nodes retrieved in irradiated rectal specimen.

Impact of colloid response on survival after preoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal carcinoma

Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal carcinoma modifies morphology and natural history of the tumor. Colloid response defined by predominant colloid changes with or without residual tumor cells is a form of tumor response whose impact on survival is unknown. This study evaluated influence of tumor histologic response, especially of colloid response, on survival in patients treated by long-course preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. In 200 patients with uT3-T4 or N1 rectal carcinomas, influence of type of surgery, dose of radiotherapy, residual tumor size, surface tumor aspect, tumor response (downstaging vs. colloid or no response), tumor grade, vascular and neural invasion, circumferential margin, and postoperative chemotherapy on 5-year overall and disease-free survival were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses. A colloid response was observed in 20% of the cases. Tumor response, circumferential margin, and vascular invasion were independently associated with the disease-free survival. Patients with downstaging had a better disease-free survival than patients without response (80% vs. 54%), whereas those with colloid response had an intermediate survival (64%). After colloid response, the rate of recurrence was similar to patients with downstaging for local recurrence (0%-3%) and to those with no response for distant recurrence (28%). After preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer, survival and type of recurrence are influenced by the tumor response. The intermediate natural history of patients with colloid response suggests taking colloid response into account in postoperative tumor staging to optimize adjuvant therapy.

Concomitant Administration of Weekly Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil Continuous Infusion, and Radiotherapy After 2 Months of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Induction in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Groupe Coordinateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie Phase II Study

BACKGROUND According to previously reported Groupe Coordinateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR) studies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) may be recommended for patients who do not experience disease progression after systemic induction chemotherapy (CT). To further improve patient outcome with classical fluorouracil (FU)-based CCRT, this study was designed to prospectively investigate a CCRT with FU infusion and weekly oxaliplatin after 2 months of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Nonpretreated patients with LAPC having WHO performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 received four induction cycles of GEMOX (gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 2; day 1 of a 15-day cycle). One month after cycle 4, patients who did not experience disease progression with PS 0 to 2 received 45 Gy over 5 weeks + 10 Gy (as a concomitant boost during the last 2 weeks) of radiotherapy (RT), with daily 250 mg/m(2) FU as a continuous infusion and 60 mg/m(2)of oxaliplatin weekly. RESULTS Of 59 patients, 50 patients (84.7%) received CCRT, whereas nine patients did not because of disease progression (seven patients), CT toxicity (one patient), or personal decision (one patient). Forty-four patients (74.5%) completed the fully planned CCRT. Median progression-free survival and overall survival durations were 7.6 and 12.2 months, respectively, for the whole population and 9.4 and 12.6 months, respectively, for patients who completed CCRT. CCRT grade 3 to 4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) were neutropenia (10.4%), thrombocytopenia (8.4%), nausea and vomiting (16.7%), and diarrhea (12.5%). CONCLUSION Concomitant administration of weekly oxaliplatin, continuous-infusion FU, and RT in patients with LAPC is feasible, with an acceptable acute and late safety profile. The encouraging results observed despite a nonoptimal patient selection (owing to the short induction time) indicates that further randomized evaluation to better define the specific role of oxaliplatin in CCRT is deserved.

Impact of tumor response on survival after radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

In locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, preoperative radiochemotherapy induces tumor response. The impact of pathologic tumor response on survival is still debated because of the numerous distinct tumor-response gradings available in the literature and the lack of standardized pathologic approach. The objective of this work was to study the impact of tumor response on survival, according to the 4 main tumor-response gradings available in the literature in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative radiochemotherapy. From 1995 to 2004, 292 consecutive patients with cT3-T4 and/or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Tumor response was evaluated according to ypTN-response gradings (downstaging: ypT0-2 N0 and complete pathologic response: ypT0 N0) and cellular-response gradings (ie, Mandard et als and Rodel et als gradings). The impact of tumor-response gradings and of different clinicopathologic variables on 5-year disease-free and overall survival were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses. We found that all tumor-response gradings were associated with survival. However, multivariate analysis showed that downstaging was the only tumor-response grading that influenced survival independently. In the subgroup of stage II patients (n=99), we also observed no difference on both 5-year disease-free and overall survival between low and high responders according to cellular response. In conclusion, in our experience, downstaging is the only tumor-response grading that influenced survival independently in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas. Cellular-response gradings had no impact on survival even in stage II patients.

An evaluation of the accuracy of CT when determining resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND To evaluate the accuracy of MDCT for determination of resectability R0 after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma locally advanced. METHODS From January 2005 to December 2010, 80 patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma underwent multidetector CT before surgery. Of these, 38 patients received neoadjuvant therapy because tumor was considered locally advanced on baseline CT scan. We retrospectively correlated imaging interpretations with operative and histological data and compared results in patients without (control group) or with (neoadjuvant group) preoperative treatment. RESULTS 41/42 patients in control group and 31/38 patients in neoadjuvant group finally had curative resection. While resection R0 is similar in both groups (83% and 81%), CT accuracy in determining resectability R0 was significantly decreased in neoadjuvant group (58% versus 83%; p=0.039). CT scan specificity was significantly lower after neoadjuvant therapy (52% versus 88% in control group) due to an overestimation of vascular invasion: 12/31 patients with complete resection in neoadjuvant group were evaluated at high risk of incomplete resection on CT scan. Tumor size tends to be underestimated in control group (-2mm) and overestimated in neoadjuvant group (+10mm). T-staging accuracy was decreased in neoadjuvant group (39% versus 78% in control group; p=0.002). CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant therapy significantly decreases the accuracy of CT scan in determining operability, T-staging, and resectability R0 of pancreatic head carcinoma. Overestimation of tumor size and vascular invasion significantly reduces CT scan specificity after preoperative treatment.

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Reassessment of Response with CT after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE To prospectively evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT) for determination of tumor response and prediction of resectability after neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study received institutional review board approval, and all participants provided written informed consent. Consecutive patients with cephalic locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical exploration and/or resection following neoadjuvant CRT were prospectively enrolled from June 2009 to May 2013. Two radiologists independently analyzed the baseline and post-CRT CT scans for the size, attenuation, and circumferential vascular contacts of the tumor. Associations between the postoperative histologic grade of the tumor response (pTNM) and the clinical, biologic, and CT criteria were assessed by using Spearman correlation coefficients. CT criteria related to the presence of complete (ie, R0) resection were assessed by using logistic regression. RESULTS Forty-seven patients were included, 33 with an R0 resection and 14 with positive margins (ie, R1) or no resection. Variables demonstrating a significant correlation with the histologic tumor classification of tumor response were post-CRT carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level (r = 0.46), post-CRT largest tumor axis (r = 0.44), post-CRT sum of the largest and smallest tumor axes (r = 0.46), change in the largest axis (r = -0.31), change in the sum of the largest and smallest axes (r = -0.39), change in superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and/or portal vein (hereafter, SMV/portal vein) contact (r = -0.38), and post-CRT superior mesenteric artery contact (r = 0.34). Partial regression of tumor contact with the SMV/portal vein was associated in all cases with R0 resection (10 of 10 patients, positive predictive value = 100%), and partial regression of tumor contact with any peripancreatic vascular axis was associated with R0 resection in 91% of cases (20 of 22 patients, positive predictive value = 91%). Persistence of SMV/portal vein stenosis after CRT was not predictive of R1 resection. CONCLUSION Partial regression of tumor-vessel contact indicates suitability for surgical exploration, irrespective of the degree of decrease in tumor size or the degree of residual vascular involvement.

Organ preservation for rectal cancer (GRECCAR 2): a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Organ preservation is a concept proposed for patients with rectal cancer after a good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to potentially avoid morbidity and side-effects of rectal excision. The objective of this study was to compare local excision and total mesorectal excision in patients with a good response after chemoradiotherapy for lower rectal cancer. METHODS We did a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial at 15 tertiary centres in France that were experts in the treatment of rectal cancer. Patients aged 18 years and older with stage T2T3 lower rectal carcinoma, of maximum size 4 cm, who had a good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (residual tumour ≤2 cm) were centrally randomly assigned by the surgeon before surgery to either local excision or total mesorectal excision surgery. Randomisation, which was done via the internet, was not stratified and used permuted blocks of size eight. In the local excision group, a completion total mesorectal excision was required if tumour stage was ypT2-3. The primary endpoint was a composite outcome of death, recurrence, morbidity, and side-effects at 2 years after surgery, to show superiority of local excision over total mesorectal excision in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population (expected proportions of patients having at least one event were 25% vs 60% for superiority). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00427375. FINDINGS From March 1, 2007, to Sept 24, 2012, 186 patients received chemoradiotherapy and were enrolled in the study. 148 good clinical responders were randomly assigned to treatment, three were excluded (because they had metastatic disease, tumour >8 cm from anal verge, and withdrew consent), and 145 were analysed: 74 in the local excision group and 71 in the total mesorectal excision group. In the local excision group, 26 patients had a completion total mesorectal excision. At 2 years in the modified ITT population, one or more events from the composite primary outcome occurred in 41 (56%) of 73 patients in the local excision group and 33 (48%) of 69 in the total mesorectal excision group (odds ratio 1·33, 95% CI 0·62-2·86; p=0·43). In the modified ITT analysis, there was no difference between the groups in all components of the composite outcome, and superiority was not shown for local excision over total mesorectal excision. INTERPRETATION We failed to show superiority of local excision over total mesorectal excision, because many patients in the local excision group received a completion total mesorectal excision that probably increased morbidity and side-effects, and compromised the potential advantages of local excision. Better patient selection to avoid unnecessary completion total mesorectal excision could improve the strategy. FUNDING National Cancer Institute of France, Sanofi, Roche Pharma.