Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Valentina Ivanova.
Lancet Oncology | 2013
Jesús F. San Miguel; Katja Weisel; Philippe Moreau; Martha Q. Lacy; Kijoung Song; Michel Delforge; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Adrian Alegre; Christopher Chen; Michele Cavo; Laurent Garderet; Valentina Ivanova; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Andrew R. Belch; Antonio Palumbo; Steve Schey; Pieter Sonneveld; Xiaoyan Yu; Lars Sternas; Christian Jacques; Mohamed H. Zaki; Meletios A. Dimopoulos
BACKGROUND Few effective treatments exist for patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma not responding to treatment with bortezomib and lenalidomide. Pomalidomide alone has shown limited efficacy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, but synergistic effects have been noted when combined with dexamethasone. We compared the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone with high-dose dexamethasone alone in these patients. METHODS This multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial was undertaken in Australia, Canada, Europe, Russia, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they had been diagnosed with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, and had failed at least two previous treatments of bortezomib and lenalidomide. They were assigned in a 2:1 ratio with a validated interactive voice and internet response system to either 28 day cycles of pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, orally) plus low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, orally) or high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20, orally) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were age (≤75 years vs >75 years), disease population (refractory vs relapsed and refractory vs bortezomib intolerant), and number of previous treatments (two vs more than two). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01311687, and with EudraCT, number 2010-019820-30. FINDINGS The accrual for the study has been completed and the analyses are presented. 302 patients were randomly assigned to receive pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and 153 high-dose dexamethasone. After a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 7·2-13·2), median PFS with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was 4·0 months (95% CI 3·6-4·7) versus 1·9 months (1·9-2·2) with high-dose dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·48 [95% CI 0·39-0·60]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and high-dose dexamethasone groups were neutropenia (143 [48%] of 300 vs 24 [16%] of 150, respectively), anaemia (99 [33%] vs 55 [37%], respectively), and thrombocytopenia (67 [22%] vs 39 [26%], respectively). Grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone and high-dose dexamethasone groups included pneumonia (38 [13%] vs 12 [8%], respectively), bone pain (21 [7%] vs seven [5%], respectively), and fatigue (16 [5%] vs nine [6%], respectively). There were 11 (4%) treatment-related adverse events leading to death in the pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone group and seven (5%) in the high-dose dexamethasone group. INTERPRETATION Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, an oral regimen, could be considered a new treatment option in patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. FUNDING Celgene Corporation.
Haematologica | 2015
Meletios A. Dimopoulos; Katja Weisel; Kevin W. Song; Michel Delforge; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Laurent Garderet; Michele Cavo; Valentina Ivanova; Adrian Alegre; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Christine Chen; Andrew Spencer; Stefan Knop; Nizar J. Bahlis; Christoph Renner; Xin Yu; Kevin Hong; Lars Sternas; Christian Jacques; Mohamed H. Zaki; Jesús F. San Miguel
Patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who no longer receive benefit from novel agents have limited treatment options and short expected survival. del(17p) and t(4;14) are correlated with shortened survival. The phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated significant progression-free and overall survival benefits from treatment with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone compared to high-dose dexamethasone among patients in whom bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment had failed. At an updated median follow-up of 15.4 months, the progression-free survival was 4.0 versus 1.9 months (HR, 0.50; P<0.001), and median overall survival was 13.1 versus 8.1 months (HR, 0.72; P=0.009). Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, compared with high-dose dexamethasone, improved progression-free survival in patients with del(17p) (4.6 versus 1.1 months; HR, 0.34; P <0.001), t(4;14) (2.8 versus 1.9 months; HR, 0.49; P=0.028), and in standard-risk patients (4.2 versus 2.3 months; HR, 0.55; P<0.001). Although the majority of patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone took pomalidomide after discontinuation, the overall survival of patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone or high-dose dexamethasone was 12.6 versus 7.7 months (HR, 0.45; P=0.008) in patients with del(17p), 7.5 versus 4.9 months (HR, 1.12; P=0.761) in those with t(4;14), and 14.0 versus 9.0 months (HR, 0.85; P=0.380) in standard-risk subjects. The overall response rate was higher in patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone than in those treated with high-dose dexamethasone both among standard-risk patients (35.2% versus 9.7%) and those with del(17p) (31.8% versus 4.3%), whereas it was similar in patients with t(4;14) (15.9% versus 13.3%). The safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was consistent with initial reports. In conclusion, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and del(17p) and/or t(4;14). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01311687 and with EudraCT as 2010-019820-30.
Haematologica | 2015
Jesús F. San Miguel; Katja Weisel; Kevin W. Song; Michel Delforge; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Laurent Garderet; Michele Cavo; Valentina Ivanova; Adrian Alegre; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Christine Chen; Christoph Renner; Nizar J. Bahlis; Xin Yu; Terri Teasdale; Lars Sternas; Christian Jacques; Mohamed H. Zaki; Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Pomalidomide is a distinct oral IMiD® immunomodulatory agent with direct antimyeloma, stromal-support inhibitory, and immunomodulatory effects. The pivotal, multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 trial MM-003 compared pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone vs high-dose dexamethasone in 455 patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after failure of bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment. Initial results demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival with an acceptable tolerability profile for pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone vs high-dose dexamethasone. This secondary analysis describes patient outcomes by treatment history and depth of response. Pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone significantly prolonged progression-free survival and favored overall survival vs high-dose dexamethasone for all subgroups analyzed, regardless of prior treatments or refractory status. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that no variable relating to either the number (≤ or > 3) or type of prior treatment was a significant predictor of progression-free survival or overall survival. No cross-resistance with prior lenalidomide or thalidomide treatment was observed. Patients achieving a minimal response or better to pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone treatment experienced a survival benefit, which was even higher in those achieving at least a partial response (17.2 and 19.9 months, respectively, as compared with 7.5 months for patients with less than minimal response). These data suggest that pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone should be considered a standard of care in patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma regardless of prior treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01311687; EudraCT: 2010-019820-30.
Haematologica | 2016
Katja Weisel; Meletios A. Dimopoulos; Philippe Moreau; Martha Q. Lacy; Kevin W. Song; Michel Delforge; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Adrian Alegre; Christine Chen; Michele Cavo; Laurent Garderet; Valentina Ivanova; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Stefan Knop; Xin Yu; Kevin Hong; Lars Sternas; Christian Jacques; Mohamed H. Zaki; Jesús F. San Miguel
Pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated for refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after bortezomib and lenalidomide failure. The phase III trial MM-003 compared pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone with high-dose dexamethasone. This subanalysis grouped patients by baseline creatinine clearance ≥ 30 − < 60 mL/min (n=93, pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone; n=56, high-dose dexamethasone) or ≥ 60 mL/min (n=205, pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone; n=93, high-dose dexamethasone). Median progression-free survival was similar for both subgroups and favored pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone: 4.0 versus 1.9 months in the group with baseline creatinine clearance ≥ 30 − < 60 mL/min (P<0.001) and 4.0 versus 2.0 months in the group with baseline creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min (P<0.001). Median overall survival for pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone was 10.4 versus 4.9 months (P=0.030) and 15.5 versus 9.2 months (P=0.133), respectively. Improved renal function, defined as an increase in creatinine clearance from < 60 to ≥ 60 mL/min, was similar in pomalidomide + low-dose dexamethasone and high-dose dexamethasone patients (42% and 47%, respectively). Improvement in progression-free and overall survival in these patients was comparable with that in patients without renal impairment. There was no increase in discontinuations of therapy, dose modifications, and adverse events in patients with moderate renal impairment. Pomalidomide at a starting dose of 4 mg + low-dose dexamethasone is well tolerated in patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, and of comparable efficacy if moderate renal impairment is present. This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov identifier 01311687 and EudraCT identifier 2010-019820-30.
Blood | 2013
Katja Weisel; Kevin W. Song; Michel Delforge; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Laurent Garderet; Michele Cavo; Valentina Ivanova; Adrian Alegre; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Christine Chen; Andrew Spencer; Stefan Knop; Nizar J. Bahlis; Christoph Renner; Xin Yu; Kevin Hong; Lars Sternas; Christian Jacques; Mohamed H. Zaki; Jesús F. San Miguel
Blood | 2013
Katja Weisel; Kevin W. Song; Michel Delforge; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Laurent Garderet; Michele Cavo; Valentina Ivanova; Adrian Alegre; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Christine Chen; Christoph Renner; Nizar J. Bahlis; Xin Yu; Terri Teasdale; Lars Sternas; Christian Jacques; Mohamed H. Zaki; Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Blood | 2013
Jesús F. San Miguel; Kevin W. Song; Michel Delforge; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Laurent Garderet; Michele Cavo; Valentina Ivanova; Adrian Alegre; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Christine Chen; Stefan Knop; Xin Yu; Latisha Watkins; Lars Sternas; Christian Jacques; Mohamed H. Zaki; Meletios A. Dimopoulos
Blood | 2013
Paul G. Richardson; Meletios A. Dimopoulos; Christine Chen; Kevin W. Song; Ravi Vij; Nizar J. Bahlis; Rachid Baz; Craig C. Hofmeister; Katja Weisel; Sundar Jagannath; Sagar Lonial; Michel Delforge; Moshe Talpaz; Philippe Moreau; Jesús F. San Miguel; Lionel Karlin; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Anne Banos; Albert Oriol; Adrian Alegre; Laurent Garderet; Michele Cavo; Valentina Ivanova; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Martha Q. Lacy; Min Chen; Philomena Casey; Lars Sternas; Mohamed H. Zaki; Christian Jacques
Blood | 2017
Anastasia Ignatova; Elena V. Suntsova; Pavel Zharkov; Valentina Ivanova; Irina A. Demina; Aleksandr Poletaev; Elena A. Seregina; Dmitrii Polokhov; Natalia Smetanina; Alexey Maschan; Mikhail Maschan; Galina Novichkova; Mikhail A. Panteleev
Blood | 2016
Anait L. Melikyan; Elena I Pustovaya; Elena Volodicheva; Tamara I Kolosheinova; Marina V Kalinina; Ekaterina Zotina; Ilya N Kontievskiy; Irina Zotova; Valentina Ivanova; Yulia V Gubina; Olga M Bekker; Nadezhda V Kurkina; Irina Sokolova; Tatiana N Babaeva; Tatiana M Sycheva; Marina Savinova; Yulia A Sedlova; Naida D Baigisheva; Varvara S Bogova; Elena Borisenkova; Ekaterina I Kuzub; Ekaterina Yu Kalinovskaya; Michail Anastasovith Rusinov; Sergei M Kulikov; Valeriy Savchenko