Valeria Bedogna

A Prospective Controlled Trial on Effect of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty on Functioning Arteriovenous Fistulae Survival

Balloon angioplasty (PTA) is an established treatment modality for stenosis in dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae (AVF), although most studies showing efficacy have been retrospective, uncontrolled, and nonrandomized. In addition, it is unknown whether correction of stenosis not associated with significant hemodynamic, functional, and clinical abnormality may improve survival in AVF. This study was a prospective controlled open trial to evaluate whether prophylactic PTA of stenosis not associated with access dysfunction improves survival in native, virgin, radiocephalic forearm AVF. Sixty-two stenotic, functioning AVF, i.e., able to provide adequate dialysis, were enrolled in the study: 30 were allocated to control and 32 to PTA. End points of the study were either AVF thrombosis or surgical revision due to reduction in delivered dialysis dose. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that PTA improved AVF functional failure-free survival rates (P = 0.012) with a fourfold increase in median survival and a 2.87-fold decrease in risk of failure. Cox proportional hazard model identified PTA as the only variable associated with outcome (P = 0.012). PTA induced an increase in access blood flow rate (Qa) by 323 (236 to 445) ml/min (P < 0.001), suggesting that improved AVF survival is the result of increased Qa. PTA was also associated with a significant decrease in access-related morbidity by approximately halving the risk of hospitalization, central venous catheterization, and thrombectomy (P < 0.05). This study shows that prophylactic PTA of stenosis in functioning forearm AVF improves access survival and decreases access-related morbidity, supporting the usefulness of preventive correction of stenosis before the development of access dysfunction. It also strongly supports surveillance program for early detection of stenosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurement in detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in native forearm arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis

BACKGROUND Vascular access surveillance by ultrasound dilution blood flow rate (Qa) measurement is widely recommended; however, optimal criteria for detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are still not clearly defined. METHODS In a blinded trial, we evaluated the accuracy of single Qa measurement, Qa adjusted for mean arterial pressure (Qa/MAP), and decrease in Qa over time (dQa) in detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in an unselected population of 120 hemodialysis subjects with native forearm AVFs (91 AVFs, located at the wrist; 29 AVFs, located at the midforearm). All AVFs underwent fistulography, which identified greater than 50% stenosis in 54 cases. RESULTS Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that dQa, Qa, and Qa/MAP have a high stenosis discriminative ability with similar areas under the curve (AUCs), ie, 0.961 +/- 0.025, 0.946 +/- 0.021, and 0.912 +/- 0.032, respectively. In the population as a whole, optimal thresholds for stenosis were Qa less than 750 mL/min alone and in combination with dQa greater than 25% (efficiency, 90%); however, the best threshold depended on anastomotic site; it was Qa less than 750 mL/min for an AVF at the wrist and Qa less than 1,000 mL/min for an AVF in the midforearm. Qa was the best predictor of incipient thrombosis (AUC, 0.981 +/- 0.013) with an optimal threshold at less than 300 mL/min (efficiency, 94%). Pooled intra-assay and interassay variation coefficients were 8.2% for MAP, 7.9% for Qa, and 11.2% for Qa/MAP. CONCLUSION Our study shows that ultrasound dilution Qa measurement is a reproducible and highly accurate tool for detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in forearm AVFs. Neither Qa/MAP nor dQa improve the diagnostic performance of Qa alone, although its combination with dQa increases the tests sensitivity for stenosis.

Hepcidin is not useful as a biomarker for iron needs in haemodialysis patients on maintenance erythropoiesis-stimulating agents

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that hepcidin may be useful as a tool for managing iron therapy in haemodialysis (HD) patients on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA). METHODS We used SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry assay to measure serum hepcidin-25 (Hep-25) and hepcidin-20 (Hep-20) in 56 adult HD patients on maintenance ESA to assess their ability to predict haemoglobin (Hb) response after 1 g intravenous iron (62.5 mg ferric gluconate at 16 consecutive dialysis sessions) and their relationship with markers of iron status, inflammation and erythropoietic activity. RESULTS At multivariate analysis (in a model that also included Hb, reticulocyte, ESA dose, HFE genotype, soluble transferrin receptor [sTfR] and C-reactive protein), Hep-25 independently correlated with ferritin (β = 0.03, P = 0.01) and the percentage of hypochromic red blood cells [%Hypo] (β = 1.84, P = 0.01), suggesting that Hep-25 may be a useful biomarker for iron stores and bone marrow iron availability. Hep-20 correlated independently with Hep-25 (β = 0.159, P < 0.001) and ferritin (β = 0.006, P = 0.05), suggesting that it may be a useful additional biomarker for iron stores. On receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, neither Hep-25 nor Hep-20 significantly predicted who will increase their Hb after iron loading (AUC = 0.52 ± 0.09 and 0.54 ± 0.08, P = 0.612), and the same applied to ferritin and transferrin saturation (AUC = 0.55 ± 0.08 and 0.59 ± 0.08, P = 0.250), whereas %Hypo and reticulocyte Hb content were significant predictors (AUC = 0.84 ± 0.05 and 0.70 ± 0.08, P < 0.01). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, %Hypo was the only biomarker independently associated with iron responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS Although our study suggests an important role for hepcidin in regulating iron homeostasis in HD patients on ESA, our findings do not support its utility as a predictor of iron needs, offering no advantage over established markers of iron status.

Adding access blood flow surveillance to clinical monitoring reduces thrombosis rates and costs, and improves fistula patency in the short term: a controlled cohort study

BACKGROUND Access blood flow (Qa) measurement is the recommended method for fistula (AVF) surveillance for stenosis, but whether it may be beneficial and cost-effective is controversial. METHODS We conducted a 5-year controlled cohort study to evaluate whether adding Qa surveillance to unsystematic clinical monitoring (combined with elective stenosis repair) reduces thrombosis and access loss rates, and costs in mature AVFs. We prospectively collected data in 159 haemodialysis patients with mature AVFs, 97 followed by unsystematic clinical monitoring (Control) and 62 by adding Qa surveillance to monitoring (Flow). Indications for imaging and stenosis repair were clinically evident access dysfunction in both groups and a Qa < 750 ml/min or dropping by >20% in Flow. RESULTS Adding Qa surveillance prompted an increase in access imaging (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.79-4.91, P < 0.001), stenosis detection (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.48-4.42, P = 0.001) and elective repair (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.16-4.43, P = 0.017), and a reduction in thromboses (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.79, P = 0.017), central venous catheter placements (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.42, P = 0.010) and access losses (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11-1.09, P = 0.071). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, adding Qa surveillance only extended short-term cumulative patency (P = 0.037 in the Breslow test). Mean access-related costs were 1213 Euro/AVF-year in Control and 743 in Flow (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our controlled cohort study shows that adding Qa surveillance to monitoring in mature AVFs is associated with a better detection and elective treatment of stenosis, and lower thrombosis rates and access-related costs, although the cumulative access patency was only extended in the first 3 years after fistula maturation. We are aware of the limitations of our study (non-randomization and the possible centre effect) and that further, better-designed trials are needed to arrive at a definitive answer concerning the role of Qa surveillance for fistulae.

Captopril in Patients with Type II Diabetes and Renal Insufficiency: Systemic and Renal Hemodynamic Alterations

PURPOSE To our knowledge, clinical studies on the long-term use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with type II diabetes mellitus and nephropathy with incipient renal failure are nonexistent. We therefore assessed the effects of long-term treatment with captopril on systemic and renal hemodynamics and urinary protein excretion in patients with type II diabetes mellitus and the clinical syndrome of diabetic nephropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twelve patients, 10 men and two women, with an average age of 52 years (range, 40 to 66), participated in the study. After the basal hemodynamic evaluation, the patients received captopril in two daily doses. The dosage was adjusted at weekly intervals in order to obtain normalization of blood pressure without exceeding the maximum allowable dosage. Four patients also received furosemide (20 to 40 mg/day). RESULTS After six months of treatment, the intra-arterial blood pressure fell (from 162 +/- 17/103 +/- 5 to 139 +/- 26/89 +/- 10 mm Hg) due to the reduction in total peripheral vascular resistance index (from 3,720 +/- 658 to 3,190 +/- 762 dynes/second/cm-5/m2), with no change in cardiac index (2.78 +/- 0.36 to 2.79 +/- 0.47 liters/minute/m2). No significant change was seen in renal vascular resistance (from 30,175 +/- 5,371 to 30,173 +/- 5,372 dynes/second/cm-5/1.73 m2) and in filtration fraction (from 26 +/- 8 to 27 +/- 10 percent). A slight, not significant, decrease in renal plasma flow (from 243 +/- 97 to 217 +/- 108 ml/minute/1.73 m2), in glomerular filtration rate (from 57 +/- 17 to 51 +/- 19 ml/minute/1.73 m2), and in proteinuria (from 4.50 +/- 3.10 to 3.40 +/- 2.31 g/day) was also observed. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that captopril is an effective antihypertensive agent in patients with diabetic nephropathy, but the renal beneficial effects seem to be limited when this syndrome is complicated by renal insufficiency.

Evaluation of hepcidin isoforms in hemodialysis patients by a proteomic approach based on SELDI-TOF MS.

The hepatic iron regulator hormone hepcidin consists, in its mature form, of 25 amino acids, but two other isoforms, hepcidin-20 and hepcidin-22, have been reported, whose biological meaning remains poorly understood. We evaluated hepcidin isoforms in sera from 57 control and 54 chronic haemodialysis patients using a quantitative proteomic approach based on SELDI-TOF-MS. Patients had elevated serum levels of both hepcidin-25 and hepcidin-20 as compared to controls (geometric means: 7.52 versus 4.69 nM, and 4.06 versus 1.76 nM, resp., P < .05 for both). The clearance effects of a single dialysis session by different dialysis techniques and membranes were also investigated, showing an average reduction by 51.3% ± 29.2% for hepcidin-25 and 34.2% ± 28.4% for hepcidin-20 but only minor differences among the different dialysis modalities. Measurement of hepcidin isoforms through MS-based techniques can be a useful tool for better understanding of their biological role in hemodialysis patients and other clinical conditions.

The Rise and Fall of Access Blood Flow Surveillance in Arteriovenous Fistulas

Vascular access blood flow (Qa) surveillance has been described as a typical false paradigm, an example of how new tests are sometimes adopted even without good‐quality evidence of their benefits. This may be true for grafts, but not necessarily for arteriovenous fistulas. We reviewed the literature on Qa surveillance in fistulas to see whether it complies with the World Health Organizations criteria for screening tests. Measuring Qa has a fairly good reproducibility. Qa shows an excellent‐to‐good accuracy for stenosis being the only bedside screening test that achieves a very high sensitivity while retaining a fair‐to‐good positive predictive value for Qa thresholds of 600 ml/minute or higher associated with a >25% drop in Qa, or findings suggesting stenosis on physical examination. The accuracy of Qa in predicting thrombosis is hard to establish because of the heterogeneity of published studies, though a Qa of 300 ml/minute seems the most reliable cutoff. Qa surveillance affords a significant 2‐ to 3‐fold reduction in the risk of thrombosis by comparison with clinical monitoring alone when Qa criteria highly sensitive to stenosis are considered, regardless of the study design (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies with concurrent or historic controls). Using highly sensitive Qa screening criteria also halves the risk of access loss, although this effect is not statistically significant. Our analysis strongly suggests that Qa surveillance is an effective method for screening mature fistulas, though further, appropriately designed studies are needed to fully elucidate its benefits and cost effectiveness.

Should current criteria for detecting and repairing arteriovenous fistula stenosis be reconsidered? Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND The vascular access guidelines recommend that arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) with access dysfunction and an access blood flow (Qa) <300-500 mL/min be referred for stenosis imaging and treatment. Significant (>50%) stenosis, however, may be detected in a well-functioning AVF with a Qa > 500 mL/min, too, but whether it is worth correcting or not remains to be seen. METHODS In October 2006, we began an open randomized controlled trial enrolling patients with an AVF with subclinical stenosis and Qa > 500 mL/min, to see how elective stenosis repair [treatment group (TX)] influenced access failure (thrombosis or impending thrombosis requiring access revision), or loss and the related cost compared with stenosis correction according to the guidelines, i.e. after the onset of access dysfunction or a Qa < 400 mL/min [control group (C)]. An interim analysis was performed in July 2012, by which time the trial had enrolled 58 patients (30 C and 28 TX). RESULTS TX led to a relative risk of 0.47 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17-1.15] for access failure (P = 0.090), 0.37 [95% CI: 0.12-0.97] for thrombosis (P = 0.033) and 0.36 [95% CI: 0.09-0.99] for access loss (P = 0.041). In the setting of our study (in which all surgery was performed as in patient procedure) no significant differences in costs emerged between the two strategies. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for TX was €282 or €321 to avoid one episode of thrombosis or access loss, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our interim analysis showed that elective repair of subclinical stenosis in AVFs with Qa > 500 mL/min cost-effectively reduces the risk of thrombosis and access loss in comparison with the approach of the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines, raising the question of whether the currently recommended criteria for assessing and treating stenosis should be reconsidered.

Bedside Screening for Fistula Stenosis Should Be Tailored to the Site of the Arteriovenous Anastomosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Given different sites of stenosis and access blood flow rates (Qa), the criteria for diagnosing fistula stenosis might vary according to anastomotic site. To test this, we analyzed the database of a prospective blinded study seeking an optimal bedside screening program for fistula stenosis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Several methods used during dialysis (physical examination [PE], dynamic and derived static venous pressure [VAPR], dialysis blood pump flow/arterial pressure ratio, and Qa measurement) to diagnose angiographically-proven >50% stenosis were assessed in an unselected population of hemodialysis patients with mature fistulae (43 at the wrist [distal fistulae], 76 at mid-forearm or the elbow [proximal fistulae]). RESULTS Prevalence of inflow stenosis was uninfluenced by anastomotic site, whereas outflow stenoses were more prevalent in proximal fistulae. The best test for inflow stenosis was Qa <650 ml/min in distal fistulae and a combination of a positive PE and Qa <900 ml/m in proximal fistulae. In proximal fistulae, PE and VAPR >0.5 were both equally highly diagnostic of outflow stenosis. Tailoring choice of test to site of the anastomosis may also contain the screening-associated workload, by reducing the need to perform PE and measure VAPR, compared with a screening approach regardless of the access location. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that an effective bedside screening program with ≥85% accuracy for fistula stenosis can be tailored to the site of the anastomosis, Qa being the tool of choice for the wrist, and PE alone or combined with Qa and VAPR measurements for more proximally-located accesses.

Systemic and renal effects of a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, benazepril, in essential hypertension.

Seventeen essential hypertensive patients with normal renal function were treated with a new non-sulphydryl orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, benazepril, 10 mg given once or twice daily, according to diastolic blood pressure levels, for 6 weeks. In all patients, changes in blood pressure, systemic and renal hemodynamics, plasma renin activity and urinary aldosterone and albumin excretions were assessed at the end of a 2-week placebo run-in period and at the end of the study. Benazepril monotherapy controlled blood pressure well. No changes in cardiac output, heart rate or stroke volume were observed, while peripheral vascular resistance was significantly decreased (-11%, P less than 0.05). Plasma volume was unaltered. The glomerular filtration rate was stable, but effective renal plasma flow was increased because of the marked reduction in renal vascular resistance (-35%) and, therefore, the filtration fraction was decreased. Urinary albumin excretion remained unchanged. A significant increase in plasma renin activity (P less than 0.001) and a decrease in urinary aldosterone excretion were seen. No side effects were observed during the treatment period. In conclusion, our results suggest that benazepril alone is an effective antihypertensive agent in patients with essential hypertension. The blood pressure lowering effect is due mainly to systemic vasodilation and is observed up to 24 h after administration of the drug. The vasodilation appears to be more consistent in the renal than in the systemic circulation.