Valeria Sansone

Functional and clinical characterization of KCNJ2 mutations associated with LQT7 (Andersen syndrome)

Andersen syndrome (AS) is a rare, inherited disorder characterized by periodic paralysis, long QT (LQT) with ventricular arrhythmias, and skeletal developmental abnormalities. We recently established that AS is caused by mutations in KCNJ2, which encodes the inward rectifier K(+) channel Kir2.1. In this report, we characterized the functional consequences of three novel and seven previously described KCNJ2 mutations using a two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique and correlated the findings with the clinical phenotype. All mutations resulted in loss of function and dominant-negative suppression of Kir2.1 channel function. In mutation carriers, the frequency of periodic paralysis was 64% and dysmorphic features 78%. LQT was the primary cardiac manifestation, present in 71% of KCNJ2 mutation carriers, with ventricular arrhythmias present in 64%. While arrhythmias were common, none of our subjects suffered sudden cardiac death. To gain insight into the mechanism of arrhythmia susceptibility, we simulated the effect of reduced Kir2.1 using a ventricular myocyte model. A reduction in Kir2.1 prolonged the terminal phase of the cardiac action potential, and in the setting of reduced extracellular K(+), induced Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger-dependent delayed afterdepolarizations and spontaneous arrhythmias. These findings suggest that the substrate for arrhythmia susceptibility in AS is distinct from the other forms of inherited LQT syndrome.

Executive dysfunction and avoidant personality trait in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM-1) and in proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM/DM-2)

A previous study in proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM/DM-2) and myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM-1) using brain positron emission tomography demonstrated a reduced cerebral blood flow in the frontal and temporal regions associated with cognitive impairment. The objective was to investigate further cognitive and behavioural aspects in a new series of patients with DM-1 and PROMM/DM-2. Nineteen patients with genetically determined PROMM/DM-2 and 21 patients with moderately severe DM-1 underwent neuropsychological testing and neuropsychiatric interviews. DM-1 and PROMM/DM-2 patients had significantly lower scores on tests of frontal lobe function compared to controls. Neuropsychiatric interviews demonstrated an avoidant trait personality disorder in both patient groups. Brain single photon emission computed tomography showed frontal and parieto-occipital hypoperfusion. The results suggest that there is a specific cognitive and behavioural profile in PROMM/DM-2 and in DM-1, and that this profile is associated with hypoperfusion in frontal and parieto-occipital regions of the brain.

CEREBRAL INVOLVEMENT IN MYOTONIC DYSTROPHIES

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) are similar yet distinct autosomal‐dominant disorders characterized by muscle weakness, myotonia, cataracts, and multiple organ involvement, including the brain. One key difference between DM1 and DM2 is that a congenital form has been described for DM1 only. Expression of RNA transcripts containing pathogenic repeat lengths produces defects in alternative splicing of multiple RNAs, sequesters specific repeat‐binding proteins, and ultimately leads to developmentally inappropriate splice products for a particular tissue. Whether brain pathology in its entirety in adult DM1 and DM2 is caused by interference in RNA processing remains to be determined. This review focuses on the similarities and differences between DM1 and DM2 with respect to neuropsychological, neuropathological, and neuroimaging data relating to cerebral involvement, with special emphasis on the clinical relevance and social consequences of such involvement. Muscle Nerve, 2007

Reduced cerebral blood flow and impaired visual–spatial function in proximal myotonic myopathy

Objective: To compare brain involvement in myotonic dystrophy (DM) with that of proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM). Background: PROMM is a multisystem disease with many features in common with DM. Methods: Twenty patients with DM (CTG[500–700]), 20 patients with PROMM, and 20 normal control subjects were studied. Neuropsychological testing was performed in 12 patients with PROMM and in 18 patients with DM; brain MRI was performed in 17 of 20 PROMM patients and 15 of 20 DM patients. Ten patients with PROMM and 11 patients with DM were subjected to H215O PET. Results: Two-thirds of the patients with PROMM and one-half of those with DM were impaired on visual–spatial recall, whereas one-third of the patients with PROMM and less than half of those with DM showed an impairment in visual–spatial construction. Brain MRI was normal, or showed only nonspecific white matter abnormalities in both PROMM and DM patients. PET studies in PROMM patients showed a bilateral decrease in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of the orbitofrontal and medial frontal cortex, whereas DM patients had more widespread hypoperfusion that extended to the dorsolateral frontal cortex and subcortical regions. Conclusions: Impaired visual–spatial function may be present in proximal myotonic myopathy. This correlates best with a reduction in regional cerebral blood flow observed in H215O PET brain scans rather than with specific structural abnormalities observed on brain MRI.

Mexiletine for Symptoms and Signs of Myotonia in Nondystrophic Myotonia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Nondystrophic myotonias (NDMs) are rare diseases caused by mutations in skeletal muscle ion channels. Patients experience delayed muscle relaxation causing functionally limiting stiffness and pain. Mexiletine-induced sodium channel blockade reduced myotonia in small studies; however, as is common in rare diseases, larger studies of safety and efficacy have not previously been considered feasible. OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of mexiletine for symptoms and signs of myotonia in patients with NDMs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2-period crossover study at 7 neuromuscular referral centers in 4 countries of 59 patients with NDMs conducted between December 23, 2008, and March 30, 2011, as part of the National Institutes of Health-funded Rare Disease Clinical Research Network. INTERVENTION Oral 200-mg mexiletine or placebo capsules 3 times daily for 4 weeks, followed by the opposite intervention for 4 weeks, with 1-week washout in between. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-reported severity score of stiffness recorded on an interactive voice response (IVR) diary (scale of 1 = minimal to 9 = worst ever experienced). Secondary end points included IVR-reported changes in pain, weakness, and tiredness; clinical myotonia assessment; quantitative measure of handgrip myotonia; and Individualized Neuromuscular Quality of Life summary quality of life score (INQOL-QOL, percentage of maximal detrimental impact). RESULTS Mexiletine significantly improved patient-reported severity score stiffness on the IVR diary. Because of a statistically significant interaction between treatment and period for this outcome, primary end point is presented by period (period 1 means were 2.53 for mexiletine and 4.21 for placebo; difference, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.66 to -0.706; P < .001; period 2 means were 1.60 for mexiletine and 5.27 for placebo; difference, -3.68; 95% CI, -3.85 to -0.139; P = .04). Mexiletine improved the INQOL-QOL score (mexiletine, 14.0 vs placebo, 16.7; difference, -2.69; 95% CI, -4.07 to -1.30; P < .001) and decreased handgrip myotonia on clinical examination (mexiletine, 0.164 seconds vs placebo, 0.494 seconds; difference, -0.330; 95% CI, -0.633 to -0.142; P < .001). The most common adverse effect was gastrointestinal (9 mexiletine and 1 placebo). Two participants experienced transient cardiac effects that did not require stopping the study (1 in each group). One serious adverse event was determined to be not study related. CONCLUSION In this preliminary study of patients with NDMs, the use of mexiletine compared with placebo resulted in improved patient-reported stiffness over 4 weeks of treatment, despite some concern about the maintenance of blinding. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00832000.

Management and treatment of Andersen-Tawil syndrome (ATS).

SummaryAndersen-Tawil syndrome (ATS) is characterized by periodic paralysis, cardiac arrhythmias, and distinct facial and skeletal features. The majority of patients with ATS (ATS1) have point mutations in the KCNJ2 gene, which encodes the inward-rectifying potassium channel known as Kir2.1. The skeletal muscle and cardiac symptoms are accounted for, in most cases, by a dominant negative effect of the mutations on potassium channel current, resulting in prolonged depolarization of the action potential. Mechanisms of disruption of channel function include abnormal trafficking and assembly of second messengers such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, abnormal gating of the channel, and incorrect folding of the Kir2.1 protein. Less apparent is the mechanism by which these mutations account for the typical facial and skeletal abnormalities. The concomitant involvement of cardiac and skeletal muscle in ATS poses unique treatment and management challenges. Because of differences in cardiac and skeletal muscle physiology, drugs that may have a beneficial effect on cardiac function may have a detrimental effect on skeletal muscle and vice versa. We review the clinical, laboratory, and genetic features of this disorder with particular emphasis on treatment and management.

The hypocretin neurotransmission system in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Background: Patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) frequently have symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Some patients with DM1 show sleep-onset REM, similar to that observed in narcolepsy. Narcolepsy is characterized by impaired hypocretin (Hcrt) neurotransmission. Objective: To test for dysregulation of Hcrt neurotransmission in a prospective cohort of patients with DM1. Methods: Hcrt levels in CSF were measured by radioimmunoassay. Sleep physiology was assessed by overnight polysomnography (PSG) and a multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). Splicing of Hcrt receptor 1 and 2 (HcrtR1 and HcrtR2) mRNA was examined in postmortem samples of temporal cortex. Results: Seventeen of 38 patients with DM1 reported symptoms of EDS. Among patients with DM1 with EDS who underwent PSG/MSLT, 7 of 13 showed reduced sleep latency, sleep-onset REM, or both. However, CSF Hcrt levels in DM1 (mean 277 pg/mL, n = 38) were not different from controls (mean 277 pg/mL, n = 33). Also, splicing of HcrtR1 and HcrtR2 mRNA in patients with DM1 was similar to controls. Conclusions: Excessive daytime sleepiness and dysregulation of REM sleep occur frequently in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). However, the pathophysiologic basis is distinct from narcolepsy, as patients with DM1 do not have a consistent defect of Hcrt release or receptor splicing.

A family with an unusual myotonic and myopathic phenotype and no CTG expansion (proximal myotonic myopathy syndrome): a challenge for future molecular studies

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is a well-defined autosomal dominant disorder characterized by myotonia, muscle weakness, cardiac conduction defects, cataracts, and endocrine abnormalities. Recently a newly recognized disorder, similar to but distinct from DM, has been observed with multisystem findings including intermittent myotonia, proximal myopathy, and occasional cardiac conduction disturbances. This disorder has been called proximal myotonic myopathy (PROMM). No history of anticipation is present and there is no linkage to the gene locus for DM or to the loci for the muscle sodium or chloride channels. This report describes a family with a normal size of the CTG trinucleotide repeat expansion of the DM gene in which affected individuals have myotonia (intermittent, exacerbated by cold), bilateral cataracts, mild hypogonadism and mild temporal atrophy. Affected individuals also have proximal muscle weakness, facial involvement, nonspecific abnormalities on muscle biopsy, normal cardiac conduction, and no glucose intolerance. The absence of trinucleotide repeat expansion in the DM gene is consistent with this family being affected by a disorder distinct from DM, possibly a form of PROMM.

Muscleblind-like protein 1 nuclear sequestration is a molecular pathology marker of DM1 and DM2

Myotonic dystrophies (DM) are repeat expansion diseases in which expanded CTG (DM1) and CCTG (DM2) repeats cause the disease. Mutant transcripts containing CUG/CCUG repeats are retained in muscle nuclei producing ribonuclear inclusions, which can bind specific RNA-binding proteins, leading to a reduction in their activity. The sequestration of muscleblind-like proteins (MBNLs), a family of alternative splicing factors, appears to be involved in splicing defects characteristic of DM pathologies. To determine whether MBNL1 nuclear sequestration is a feature of DM pathologies, we have examined the in vivo distribution of MBNL1 in muscle sections from genetically confirmed DM1 (n=7) and DM2 (n=9) patients, patients with other myotonic disorders (n=11) and from patients with disorders caused by repeat expansions, but not DM1/DM2 (n=3). The results of our immunofluorescence study indicate that, among patients examined, MBNL1 nuclear sequestration in protein foci is a molecular pathology marker of DM1 and DM2 patients where ribonuclear inclusions of transcripts with expanded CUG/CCUG repeats are also present. These findings indicate that MBNLs might be important targets for therapeutic interventions to correct some of the specific features of DM pathology.

Cognitive impairment in adult myotonic dystrophies: a longitudinal study

The clinical relevance and extent of cognitive impairment in adult myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether previously reported cognitive abnormalities progress over time and if this occurs in DM2 as it does in DM1. Fifty-six patients with DM1 and 29 patients with DM2 were subjected to muscle strength assessment, and to a complete battery of neuropsychological tests. Repeated assessment was performed in 20 DM1 and 13 DM2 over time (DM1 mean follow-up: 7.3±2.7 years; DM2 mean follow- up: 9.5±2.4 years). Muscle strength and test scores for frontal lobe functions worsened significantly over time (p<0.01), in both DM1 and DM2. DM2 is a progressive muscle disorder, although less severe than DM1. In both DM1 and DM2 frontal cognitive impairment (attentional) worsens over time but does not extend to additional areas of cognition.