Valérie Bernard

Familial Multiplicity of Estrogen Insensitivity Associated With a Loss-of-Function ESR1 Mutation

Context Estrogens influence many physiological processes in mammals, including reproduction. Estrogen peripheral actions are mainly mediated through estrogen receptors (ERs) α and β, encoded by ESR1 and ESR2 genes, respectively. Objective The studys aim was to describe a family in which 3 members presented with estrogen insensitivity. Design and Setting Clinical evaluation and genetic and mutational analysis were performed in an academic medical center. Patients and Interventions An ESR1 mutation was identified in 2 sisters and 1 brother, originating from a consanguineous Algerian family, who did not enter puberty and presented with delayed bone maturation consistent with estrogen insensitivity. The 2 sisters had enlarged multicystic ovaries. Hormonal evaluation as well as genetic and mutational analysis were performed. Results Hormonal evaluation revealed extremely high plasma 17β-estradiol (>50-fold normal range) associated with elevated gonadotropin levels (greater than threefold normal range), highly suggestive of estrogen resistance. The 3 affected patients carried a homozygous mutation of a highly conserved arginine 394 for which histidine was substituted through an autosomal recessive mode of transmission. Structural and functional analysis of the mutant ERα revealed strongly reduced transcriptional activity and the inability to securely anchor the activating hormone, estradiol, compared with wild-type ERα. A group of other potential ER activating ligands were tested, but none overcame the estrogen insensitivity in these patients. Conclusion Description and analysis of this family of patients with mutant ERα provide additional clinical findings toward identification and characterization of what was previously thought to be a highly rare clinical condition.

Ovarian macrocysts and gonadotrope-ovarian axis disruption in premenopausal women receiving mitotane for adrenocortical carcinoma or Cushing's disease.

CONTEXT Mitotane is an adrenolytic and anticortisolic drug used in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), Cushings disease (CD), and ectopic ACTH syndrome. Its effects on the ovaries are unknown. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ovarian and gonadotrope effects of mitotane therapy in premenopausal women. PATIENTS We studied 21 premenopausal women (ACC: n=13; CD: n=8; median age 33 years, range 18-45 years) receiving mitotane at a median initial dose of 3 g/day (range 1.5-6 g/day). METHODS Gynecological history was collected and ovarian ultrasound was performed. Four women also underwent ovarian CT or magnetic resonance imaging. Serum gonadotropin, estradiol (E2), androgens, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and circulating mitotane levels were determined at diagnosis and during mitotane therapy. RESULTS In the women included, ovarian macrocysts (bilateral in 51%) were detected after a median 11 months (range: 3-36) of mitotane exposure. The median number of macrocysts per woman was two (range: 1-4) and the median diameter of the largest cysts was 50 mm (range: 26-90). Menstrual irregularities and/or pelvic pain were present in 15 out of 21 women at macrocyst diagnosis. In two women, the macrocysts were revealed by complications (ovarian torsion and hemorrhagic macrocyst rupture) that required surgery. Mitotane therapy was associated with a significant decrease in androstenedione and testosterone levels and a significant increase in LH levels. Serum FSH and E2 levels were also increased, and SHBG levels rose markedly. CONCLUSIONS Mitotane therapy causes significant morphological and ovarian/gonadotrope hormonal abnormalities in premenopausal women. Follicular thecal steroid synthesis appears to be specifically altered and the subsequent increase in gonadotropins might explain the development of macrocysts. The mechanisms underlying these adverse effects, whose exact prevalence in this population still needs to be determined, are discussed.

Germline Prolactin Receptor Mutation Is Not a Major Cause of Sporadic Prolactinoma in Humans

Background/Aims: No genetic anomalies specifically predisposing humans to prolactinomas have so far been identified. The prolactin receptor (PRLR) is a good candidate, however, as Prlr knockout mice develop prolactinomas, and a case of familial hyperprolactinemia has been linked to PRLR mutation. The main objective of this study was to detect germline PRLR mutations in patients with sporadic prolactinomas unrelated to AIP or MEN1 mutation. Methods: We sequenced all PRLR exons and intron-exon junctions on genomic DNA from 88 patients with a median age of 24 years. Results: We identified 4 PRLR variations (p.Ile76Val, p.Ile146Leu, p.Glu108Lys and p.Glu554Gln) in 16 patients. One patient had the rare variant p.Glu554Gln in the heterozygous state. Another patient had the extremely rare p.Glu108Lys variant described here for the first time. The other 2 variants (p.Ile76Val and p.Ile146Leu) are relatively common in the general population. All these 4 variants have been functionally tested in vitro and have no effect on PRLR expression, localization and signaling after prolactin stimulation. Conclusion: Inactivating germline variations of PRLR are not associated with sporadic prolactinoma in this series. Nevertheless, somatic disruption of PRLR has not been excluded in this subset of pituitary tumors.

A novel non genomic glucocorticoid signaling mediated by a membrane palmitoylated glucocorticoid receptor cross talks with GnRH in gonadotrope cells

Glucocorticoid hormones (GC) are the main stress mediators associated with reproductive disorders. GC exert their effects through activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) principally acting as a transcription factor. Beside well-established GR-mediated genomic actions, several lines of evidence suggest a role for rapid membrane-initiated GC signaling in gonadotrope cells triggered by a membrane-associated GR. Herein, we demonstrate the existence of a specific membrane-initiated GC signaling in LβT2 gonadotrope cells involving two related phosphoproteins: Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and synapsin-I. Within 5 min, LβT2 cells treated with stress range of 10−7 M Corticosterone or a membrane impermeable-GC, BSA-conjugated corticosterone, exhibited a 2-fold increase in levels of phospho-CaMKII and phospho-synapsin-I. Biochemical approaches revealed that this rapid signaling is promoted by a palmitoylated GR. Importantly, GC significantly alter GnRH-induced CaMKII phosphorylation, consistent with a novel cross-talk between the GnRH receptor and GC. This negative effect of GC on GnRH signaling was further observed on LH release by mouse pituitary explants. Altogether, our work provides new findings in GC field by bringing novel understanding on how GR integrates plasma membrane, allowing GC membrane-initiated signaling that differs in presence of GnRH to disrupt GnRH-dependent signaling and LH secretion.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib affects ovulation but not ovarian reserve in mouse: A preclinical study

The aim of the study was to evaluate ovarian toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib, since only scarce data are available on gonadal function after this treatment. Six-week-old female mice received orally, once daily, vehicle or sunitinib (50 mg/kg/d) during 5 weeks. Fertility parameters were analyzed from ovulation to litter assessment. Sunitinib exposure significantly reduced (i) corpora lutea number per ovary (1.1 ± 0.38 in sunitinib group versus 4 ± 0.79 in control group, p<0.01) and (ii) serum Anti Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in sunitinib treated mice (12.01 ± 1.16) compared to control mice (14.33 ± 0.87 ng/ml, p< 0.05). However, primordial and growing follicles numbers per ovary were not different in both groups. After treatment withdrawal, female mice in both groups were able to obtain litters. These data could be helpful to counsel clinicians and patients, when fertility preservation methods are discussed, before TKI treatment in girls and young women.

Autocrine actions of prolactin contribute to the regulation of lactotroph function in vivo

Prolactin (PRL), whose principal role is regulation of lactation, is mainly synthesized and secreted by lactotroph anterior pituitary cells. Its signaling is exerted via a transmembrane PRL receptor (PRLR) expressed in a wide variety of tissues, including the anterior pituitary. Dopamine, which is secreted by tuberoinfundibular hypothalamic neurons, is the major inhibitory regulator of prolactin secretion. Although PRL is well established to stimulate hypothalamic dopamine secretion, thereby exerting a negative feedback regulation on its own release, autocrine or paracrine actions of PRL on lactotroph cells have also been suggested. Within the pituitary, PRL may inhibit both lactotroph proliferation and secretion, but in vivo evaluation of these putative functions is limited. To determine whether the autocrine actions of prolactin have a significant role in the physiologic function of lactotrophs in vivo, we examined the consequences of conditional deletion of Prlr in lactotroph cells using a novel mouse line with loxP sites flanking the Prlr gene (Prlrloxl/lox) and Cre‐recombinase (Cre) expressed under the control of the pituitary‐specific Prl promoter. Prlrlox/lox/Prl‐Cre mice have normal PRL levels and did not develop any pituitary lactotroph adenoma, even at 20 mo of age. Nevertheless, Prlrloxl/loxlPrl‐Cre mice displayed an increased dopaminergic inhibitory tone compared with control Prlrlox/lox mice. These results elegantly confirm an autocrine/paracrine feedback of PRL on lactotroph cells in vivo, which can be fully compensated by an intact hypothalamic feedback system.—Bernard, V., Lamothe, S., Beau, I., Guillou, A., Martin, A., Le Tissier, P., Grattan, D., Young, J., Binart, N. Autocrine actions of prolactin contribute to the regulation of lactotroph function in vivo. FASEBJ. 32, 4791–4797 (2018). www.fasebj.org

Natural and molecular history of prolactinoma: insights from a Prlr –/– mouse model

Lactotroph adenoma, also called prolactinoma, is the most common pituitary tumor but little is known about its pathogenesis. Mouse models of prolactinoma can be useful to better understand molecular mechanisms involved in abnormal lactotroph cell proliferation and secretion. We have previously developed a prolactin receptor deficient (Prlr–/–) mouse, which develops prolactinoma. The present study aims to explore the natural history of prolactinoma formation in Prlr–/– mice, using hormonal, radiological, histological and molecular analyses to uncover mechanisms involved in lactotroph adenoma development. Prlr–/– females develop large secreting prolactinomas from 12 months of age, with a penetrance of 100%, mimicking human aggressive densely granulated macroprolactinoma, which is a highly secreting subtype. Mean blood PRL measurements reach 14 902 ng/mL at 24 months in Prlr–/– females while PRL levels were below 15 ng/mL in control mice (p < 0.01). By comparing pituitary microarray data of Prlr–/– mice and an estrogen-induced prolactinoma model in ACI rats, we pinpointed 218 concordantly differentially expressed (DE) genes involved in cell cycle, mitosis, cell adhesion molecules, dopaminergic synapse and estrogen signaling. Pathway/gene-set enrichment analyses suggest that the transcriptomic dysregulation in both models of prolactinoma might be mediated by a limited set of transcription factors (i.e., STAT5, STAT3, AhR, ESR1, BRD4, CEBPD, YAP, FOXO1) and kinases (i.e., JAK2, AKT1, BRAF, BMPR1A, CDK8, HUNK, ALK, FGFR1, ILK). Our experimental results and their bioinformatic analysis provide insights into early genomic changes in murine models of the most frequent human pituitary tumor.