Vamsee K. Pamula
Durham University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Vamsee K. Pamula.
Pediatrics | 2015
Vinod K. Bhutani; Michael Kaplan; Bertil Glader; Michael Cotten; Jairus Kleinert; Vamsee K. Pamula
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Widespread newborn screening on a point-of-care basis could prevent bilirubin neurotoxicity in newborns with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. We evaluated a quantitative G6PD assay on a digital microfluidic platform by comparing its performance with standard clinical methods. METHODS: G6PD activity was measured quantitatively by using digital microfluidic fluorescence and the gold standard fluorescence biochemical test on a convenience sample of 98 discarded blood samples. Twenty-four samples were designated as G6PD deficient. RESULTS: Mean ± SD G6PD activity for normal samples using the digital microfluidic method and the standard method, respectively, was 9.7 ± 2.8 and 11.1 ± 3.0 U/g hemoglobin (Hb), respectively; for G6PD-deficient samples, it was 0.8 ± 0.7 and 1.4 ± 0.9 U/g Hb. Bland-Altman analysis determined a mean difference of –0.96 ± 1.8 U/g Hb between the digital microfluidic fluorescence results and the standard biochemical test results. The lower and upper limits for the digital microfluidic platform were 4.5 to 19.5 U/g Hb for normal samples and 0.2 to 3.7 U/g Hb for G6PD-deficient samples. The lower and upper limits for the Stanford method were 5.5 to 20.7 U/g Hb for normal samples and 0.1 to 2.8 U/g Hb for G6PD-deficient samples. The measured activity discriminated between G6PD-deficient samples and normal samples with no overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Pending further validation, a digital microfluidics platform could be an accurate point-of-care screening tool for rapid newborn G6PD screening.
Labmedicine | 2018
Sirisha Emani; Lisa Nelson; Scott Norton; Rajendra Singh; Vamsee K. Pamula; Sitaram M. Emani
Current laboratory methods for comprehensive thrombophilia status require large blood volumes and long turn-around times. We demonstrate the feasibility of performing thrombophilia panel testing of enzymatic functional assays on a microfluidic cartridge using low sample volume.Functional assays for Antithrombin III, Protein C, Factor VIII, and plasminogen were adapted on the digital microfluidic platform by developing novel fluorogenic substrates and establishing on-cartridge fluorescence (360/460 nm) detection. Cartridge vs. microtiter plate results were compared using samples obtained from pediatric patients. Linear regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to establish correlations. Results were not significantly different when performed on-cartridge compared to microtiter plates. Importantly, the sample volume required is significantly lower for all on-cartridge compared to microtiter plate assays (25 μL vs. 2 ml).This study demonstrates the feasibility of thrombophilia panel testing with high-fidelity using small plasma volume. The efficacy of this near-patient technology in clinical settings needs further investigation.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics | 2018
David S. Millington; Scott Norton; Raj Singh; Rama Sista; Vijay Srinivasan; Vamsee K. Pamula
ABSTRACT Introduction: Digital microfluidics (DMF) is an emerging technology with the appropriate metrics for application to newborn and high-risk screening for inherited metabolic disease and other conditions that benefit from early treatment. Areas covered: This review traces the development of electrowetting-based DMF technology toward the fulfillment of its promise to provide an inexpensive platform to conduct enzymatic assays and targeted biomarker assays at the bedside. The high-throughput DMF platform, referred to as SEEKER®, was recently authorized by the United States Food and Drug Administration to screen newborns for four lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) and is deployed in newborn screening programs in the United States. The development of reagents and methods for LSD screening and results from screening centers are reviewed. Preliminary results from a more compact DMF device, to perform disease-specific test panels from small volumes of blood, are also reviewed. Literature for this review was sourced using principal author and subject searches in PubMed. Expert commentary: Newborn screening is a vital and highly successful public health program. DMF technology adds value to the current testing platforms that will benefit apparently healthy newborns with underlying genetic disorders and infants at-risk for conditions that present with symptoms in the newborn period.
Archive | 2006
Vamsee K. Pamula; Vijay Srinivasan; Michael G. Pollack; Allen E. Eckhardt; Philip Y. Paik
Archive | 2006
Michael G. Pollack; Vamsee K. Pamula; Vijay Srinivasan; Philip Y. Paik; Allen E. Eckhardt; Richard B. Fair
Archive | 2007
Michael G. Pollack; Vamsee K. Pamula; Allen E. Eckhardt; Vijay Srinivasan
Archive | 2010
Allen E. Eckhardt; Carrie Graham; Ramakrishna Sista; Vamsee K. Pamula; Theodore Winger; Tong Wang; Yalin Xiong; Ning Wu; Sanjay Saha; Gajendrasinh Balvantsinh Raolji; Raveendra Dayam
Archive | 2007
Vamsee K. Pamula; Vijay Srinivasan; Michael G. Pollack
Archive | 2007
Philip Y. Paik; Michael G. Pollack; Ryan A. Sturmer; Gregory F. Smith; Keith R. Brafford; Vamsee K. Pamula
Archive | 2007
Philip Y. Paik; Keith R. Brafford; Ryan A. Sturmer; Gregory F. Smith; Michael G. Pollack; Vamsee K. Pamula; Richard M. West; Vijay Srinivasan