Vamsi Veeramachaneni
Strand Life Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Vamsi Veeramachaneni.
PLOS Computational Biology | 2012
Maria X. Sosa; I.K. Ashok Sivakumar; Samantha Maragh; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Ramesh Hariharan; Minothi Parulekar; Karin M. Fredrikson; Timothy T. Harkins; Jeffrey S. Lin; Andrew B. Feldman; Pramila Tata; Georg B. Ehret; Aravinda Chakravarti
We describe methods for rapid sequencing of the entire human mitochondrial genome (mtgenome), which involve long-range PCR for specific amplification of the mtgenome, pyrosequencing, quantitative mapping of sequence reads to identify sequence variants and heteroplasmy, as well as de novo sequence assembly. These methods have been used to study 40 publicly available HapMap samples of European (CEU) and African (YRI) ancestry to demonstrate a sequencing error rate <5.63×10−4, nucleotide diversity of 1.6×10−3 for CEU and 3.7×10−3 for YRI, patterns of sequence variation consistent with earlier studies, but a higher rate of heteroplasmy varying between 10% and 50%. These results demonstrate that next-generation sequencing technologies allow interrogation of the mitochondrial genome in greater depth than previously possible which may be of value in biology and medicine.
Journal of Human Genetics | 2016
Ashraf U. Mannan; Jaya Singh; Ravikiran Lakshmikeshava; Nishita Thota; Suhasini Singh; T S Sowmya; Avshesh Mishra; Aditi Sinha; Shivani Deshwal; Megha R Soni; Anbukayalvizhi Chandrasekar; Bhargavi Ramesh; Bharat Ramamurthy; Shila Padhi; Payal Manek; Ravi Ramalingam; Suman Kapoor; Mithua Ghosh; Satish Sankaran; Arunabha Ghosh; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Preveen Ramamoorthy; Ramesh Hariharan; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian
Breast and/or ovarian cancer (BOC) are among the most frequently diagnosed forms of hereditary cancers and leading cause of death in India. This emphasizes on the need for a cost-effective method for early detection of these cancers. We sequenced 141 unrelated patients and families with BOC using the TruSight Cancer panel, which includes 13 genes strongly associated with risk of inherited BOC. Multi-gene sequencing was done on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Genetic variations were identified using the Strand NGS software and interpreted using the StrandOmics platform. We were able to detect pathogenic mutations in 51 (36.2%) cases, out of which 19 were novel mutations. When we considered familial breast cancer cases only, the detection rate increased to 52%. When cases were stratified based on age of diagnosis into three categories, ⩽40 years, 40–50 years and >50 years, the detection rates were higher in the first two categories (44.4% and 53.4%, respectively) as compared with the third category, in which it was 26.9%. Our study suggests that next-generation sequencing-based multi-gene panels increase the sensitivity of mutation detection and help in identifying patients with a high risk of developing cancer as compared with sequential tests of individual genes.
Cancer Medicine | 2017
Manimala Sen; Shanmukh Katragadda; Aarthi Ravichandran; Gouri Deshpande; Minothi Parulekar; Swetha Nayanala; Vikram Vittal; Weiming Shen; Melanie Phooi Nee Yong; Jemima Jacob; Sravanthi Parchuru; Kalpana Dhanuskodi; Kenneth Eyring; Pooja Agrawal; Smita Agarwal; Ashwini Shanmugam; Satish Gupta; Divya Vishwanath; Kiran Kumari; Arun K. Hariharan; Sai A. Balaji; Qiaoling Liang; Belen Robolledo; Vijayashree Gauribidanur Raghavendrachar; Mohammed Oomer Farooque; Cary J. Buresh; Preveen Ramamoorthy; Urvashi Bahadur; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian; Ramesh Hariharan
Comprehensive genetic profiling of tumors using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) is gaining acceptance for guiding treatment decisions in cancer care. We designed a cancer profiling test combining both deep sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of relevant cancer targets to aid therapy choices in both standard‐of‐care (SOC) and advanced‐stage treatments for solid tumors. The SOC report is provided in a short turnaround time for four tumors, namely lung, breast, colon, and melanoma, followed by an investigational report. For other tumor types, an investigational report is provided. The NGS assay reports single‐nucleotide variants (SNVs), copy number variations (CNVs), and translocations in 152 cancer‐related genes. The tissue‐specific IHC tests include routine and less common markers associated with drugs used in SOC settings. We describe the standardization, validation, and clinical utility of the StrandAdvantage test (SA test) using more than 250 solid tumor formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) samples and control cell line samples. The NGS test showed high reproducibility and accuracy of >99%. The test provided relevant clinical information for SOC treatment as well as more information related to investigational options and clinical trials for >95% of advanced‐stage patients. In conclusion, the SA test comprising a robust and accurate NGS assay combined with clinically relevant IHC tests can detect somatic changes of clinical significance for strategic cancer management in all the stages.
Cancer Medicine | 2018
Sai A. Balaji; Ashwini Shanmugam; Anuradha Chougule; Srikant Sridharan; Kumar Prabhash; Anuradha D Arya; Aditya Chaubey; Arun K. Hariharan; Pandurang Kolekar; Manimala Sen; Aarthi Ravichandran; Shanmukh Katragadda; Satish Sankaran; Saurabh Bhargava; Prashanth Kulkarni; Suchitra Rao; Chinnababu Sunkavalli; Shripad Banavali; Amit Joshi; Vanita Noronha; Amit Dutt; Urvashi Bahadur; Ramesh Hariharan; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Vaijayanti Gupta
Liquid biopsy is increasingly gaining traction as an alternative to invasive solid tumor biopsies for prognosis, treatment decisions, and disease monitoring. Matched tumor‐plasma samples were collected from 180 patients across different cancers with >90% of the samples below Stage IIIB. Tumors were profiled using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) or quantitative PCR (qPCR), and the mutation status was queried in the matched plasma using digital platforms such as droplet digital PCR (ddCPR) or NGS for concordance. Tumor‐plasma concordance of 82% and 32% was observed in advanced (Stage IIB and above) and early (Stage I to Stage IIA) stage samples, respectively. Interestingly, the overall survival outcomes correlated to presurgical/at‐biopsy ctDNA levels. Baseline ctDNA stratified patients into three categories: (a) high ctDNA correlated with poor survival outcome, (b) undetectable ctDNA with good outcome, and (c) low ctDNA whose outcome was ambiguous. ctDNA could be a powerful tool for therapy decisions and patient management in a large number of cancers across a variety of stages.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2018
Jaya Singh; Nishita Thota; Suhasini Singh; Shila Padhi; P. S. Mohan; Shivani Deshwal; Soumit Sur; Mithua Ghosh; Amit Agarwal; Ramesh Sarin; Rosina Ahmed; Sachin Almel; Basumita Chakraborti; Vinod Raina; Praveen K. DadiReddy; B. K. Smruti; Senthil Rajappa; Chandragouda Dodagoudar; S Aggarwal; Manish Singhal; Ashish Joshi; Rajeev Kumar; A. Kumar; Deepak Mishra; Neeraj Arora; Aarati Karaba; Satish Sankaran; Shanmukh Katragadda; Arunabha Ghosh; Vamsi Veeramachaneni
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Urvashi Bahadur; Mithua Ghosh; Vaijayanti Gupta; Soumya Rao; Manimala Sen; Satish Sankaran; Smita Agarwal; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Gouri Deshpande; B P Manasa; Jamuna Yadhav; Suman Kapoor; Ramesh Hariharan; Basavalinga S. Ajaikumar; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian
Archive | 2016
Vaijayanti Gupta; Manimala Sen; Satish Sankaran; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian; Ramesh Hariharan; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Shanmukh Katragadda; Rohit Gupta; Radhakrishna Bettadapura; Anand Janakiraman; Arunabha Ghosh; Smita Agrawal; Sujaya Srinivasan; Bhupender Singh; Urvashi Bahadur; Shuba Krishna; Mahesh Nagarajan; Preveen Rammoorthy; Rajashimha, Harsha, K.; Nimisha Gupta; Sudhir Borgonha
Molecular Vision | 2016
Jaya Singh; Avshesh Mishra; Arunachalam Jayamuruga Pandian; Ashwin C. Mallipatna; Vikas Khetan; Sarangapani Sripriya; Suman Kapoor; Smita Agarwal; Satish Sankaran; Shanmukh Katragadda; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Ramesh Hariharan; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian; Ashraf U. Mannan
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Shanmukh Katragadda; Minothi Parulekar; Satish Sankaran; Vaijayanti Gupta; Manimala Sen; Manasa B.P.; N.S.N Swetha; Smita Agarwal; Goutham Hv; Jamuna Yadhav; Suman Kapoor; Gouri Deshpande; Vikram Vitthal; Weiming Shen; Melanie Phooi Nee Yong; Urvashi Bahadur; Preveen Ramamoorthy; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian; Ramesh Hariharan
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Ashraf U. Mannan; Jaya Singh; Rupali Gadkari; Ravikiran Lakshmikeshava; Payal Manek; Ravi Ramalingam; Manasa B.P.; Suman Kapoor; Jamuna Yadhav; Satish Sankaran; Shanmukh Katragadda; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Preveen Ramamoorthy; Ramesh Hariharan; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian