Vanessa Cox

Delineating the impact of obesity and its relationship on recovery after total joint arthroplasties

OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study was to determine the impact of obesity in predicting short and long-term pain relief and functional recovery in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) either as an independent risk factor or a factor mediated by two chronic conditions associated with obesity-cardiac disease and diabetes mellitus. METHOD A prospective observational study of 520 patients with primary joint arthroplasties. Pain and functional outcomes were evaluated with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index within a month of surgery and then 6 months and 3 years post-operatively. Obesity, cardiac disease and diabetes mellitus were examined as potential risk factors for poor recovery. Patients were classified into four groups based on body mass index (BMI): (normal<25.0 kg/m(2); overweight 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2); obese Class 1 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2); severe obese Class 2&3 35.0 ≥ kg/m(2)). Linear mixed models for each joint type (hip and knee arthroplasty) were developed to examine the pattern of recovery and the effect of obesity. RESULTS Ninety-nine (19%) patients were severely obese, 127 (24%) had cardiac disease and 58 (11%) had diabetes mellitus. Baseline pain and functional scores were similar regardless of BMI classification. Severe obesity was a significant risk factor for worse pain and functional recovery at 6 months but no longer at 3 years following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Cardiac disease predicted a slower recovery after hip arthroplasty. No significant interactions existed between obesity and cardiac disease or diabetes mellitus. DISCUSSION Severe obesity is an independent risk factor for slow recovery over 3 years for both hip and knee arthroplasties.

Electronic Monitoring of Oral Therapies in Ethnically Diverse and Economically Disadvantaged Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Consequences of Low Adherence

OBJECTIVE To quantify adherence to oral therapies in ethnically diverse and economically disadvantaged patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using electronic medication monitoring, and to evaluate the clinical consequences of low adherence. METHODS A total of 107 patients with RA enrolled in a 2-year prospective cohort study agreed to have their oral RA drug therapy intake electronically monitored using the Medication Event Monitoring System. Adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and prednisone was determined as the percentage of days (or weeks for methotrexate) on which the patient took the correct dose as prescribed by the physician. Patient outcomes were assessed, including function measured by the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire, disease activity measured by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), health-related quality of life, and radiographic damage measured using the modified Sharp/van der Heijde scoring method. RESULTS Adherence to the treatment regimen as determined by the percentage of correct doses was 64% for DMARDs and 70% for prednisone. Patients who had better mental health were statistically more likely to be adherent. Only 23 of the patients (21%) had an average adherence to DMARDs ≥80%. These patients showed significantly better mean DAS28 values across 2 years of followup than those who were less adherent (3.28 versus 4.09; P = 0.02). Radiographic scores were also worse in nonadherent patients at baseline and at 12 months. CONCLUSION Only one-fifth of RA patients had an overall adherence to DMARDs of at least 80%. Less than two-thirds of the prescribed DMARD doses were correctly taken. Adherent patients had lower disease activity across the 2 years of followup.

Impact of Educational and Patient Decision Aids on Decisional Conflict Associated with Total Knee Arthroplasty

To examine the impact of a videobooklet patient decision aid supplemented by an interactive values clarification exercise on decisional conflict in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) considering total knee arthroplasty.

The symptom burden index: Development and initial findings from use with patients with systemic sclerosis

Objective. Our study had 3 aims: (1) to evaluate the functioning of the Symptom Burden Index (SBI) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc); (2) to determine the amount of burden per problem experienced by patients as well as the number of patients experiencing each measured problem area, and the number of SSc problems per patient; and (3) to characterize the burden profiles of problem area-specific subgroups of patients. Methods. We developed the SBI to determine the effect of problems in 8 major symptomatic areas of importance to patients (skin, hand mobility, calcinosis, shortness of breath, eating, bowel, sleep, and pain). Results. Sixty-two patients with SSc completed questionnaires on current disease-related problems, physical functioning, and health status. On average, patients were 53.4 years old and had had SSc for 8 years. Patients were mainly women (87%), English-speaking (87%), with diffuse SSc (63%), white (69%), married (61%), and lived with 1 or more additional household members (84%). Only 26% were employed full-time. The 3 most widely reported problem areas were pain, hand, and skin, experienced by 92%, 89%, and 88%, respectively. About one-third reported experiencing 0–5 problems and one-third 7–8 problems; individual patients experienced, on average, 5.7 problems. Conclusion. Psychometric evaluation determined that (1) summarizing SBI problem area item sets to report burden scores per problem measured is justified; (2) the 8 proposed problem areas are independent and deserve separate evaluation; and (3) burden scores correlate as expected with the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 questionnaire. The number of problems experienced and the degree of problem-associated burden that patients with SSc bear are substantial. Use of the SBI’s patient-focused measurements may aid physicians in resolving problems most directly affecting patients’ quality of life. This approach to measuring symptomatic burden in patients with chronic disease could be extended to other conditions.

Doctor-Patient Interactions in Mexican Patients With Rheumatic Disease

Objective:To evaluate the characteristics of physician-patient communications in Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods:We prospectively recruited 200 consecutive patients with chronic rheumatic diseases from a rheumatology clinic affiliated with a secondary care hospital in Mexico. All participants completed face-to-face interviews and surveys to determine their perceptions of the medical interaction with the physician at the clinic. Patients were assessed immediately before and after their visits. The Perceptions of Involvement in Care Scale was used to examine 3 factors: the doctors facilitation of involvement, the level of information exchange, and the patients participation in decision making. The Medical Outcomes Study scale was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction with the visit. A Patients’ Trust in Physicians instrument was also administered. Results:No differences in communication, satisfaction, or trust were observed across diseases. Most patients indicated they wanted to play a passive role, with the physicians making the decisions. However, concordance between preferred and actual roles was small (weighted &kgr; = 0.3), suggesting that not all patients played their preferred role. Conclusion:This is the first study to evaluate doctor-patient communication in Mexican patients with rheumatic diseases. In general, patients preferred to play a passive role in their medical interaction. In addition, they often did not attain their preferred communication style when interacting with their physicians. The effect of these findings in subsequent health outcomes is unknown but deserves further investigation.