Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Vanessa Merton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Vanessa Merton.


Evaluation Review | 1990

Community-Based AIDS Research

Vanessa Merton

Institutional review boards (IRBs) that review community-based AIDS research, like their counterparts in hospital-based or academic settings, are charged with protecting the rights and welfare of subjects. Fulfilling this charge presents all the challenges that face other IRBs, but with the added urgency of issues particular to the disease and the community setting. Investigators in community-based AIDS research are often primary care providers who have close relationships with their patients; they are not, by and large, trained as clinical investigators. A patient-centered medical ethic may differ in significant ways from knowledge-oriented research ethics. Furthermore, patients with AIDS, living with a disease with no cure or effective long-term treatment, urgently need access to promising drugs and therapies. Community research IRBs thus must grapple with generic research design and ethical issues that assume special salience under these conditions. One can characterize these issues as questions of scientific validity, not ethics, but they are both. The challenge to the IRB is to balance the values of scientific credibility with the moral principles of respect for persons, including autonomy, beneficence, and justice. The experience of the IRB of New York Citys Community Research Initiative (CRI) in dealing with this tension may be instructive for others examining the community-based research model. In the process of reviewing protocols, the IRB has developed policies that address issues of research design, subject selection, and confounding variables.


Hastings Center Report | 1983

Ethics tests in the legal profession.

Vanessa Merton

ethical opinion, widely accepted in the critical literature, would dictate a certain course of action. It calls for a working understanding of the ethical problems rather than a knowledge of the philosophers arguments. It is aimed at clinical application rather than speculation. Thus, while the most interesting questions of medical ethics-namely, those about which genuine debate can be encouraged-are excluded, the fundamental, practical positions are highlighted.


American Journal of Law & Medicine | 1993

The Exclusion of Pregnant, Pregnable, and Once-Pregnable People (a.k.a. Women) from Biomedical Research

Vanessa Merton


Emory law journal | 1982

Confidentiality and the 'Dangerous' Patient: Implications of Tarasoff for Psychiatrists and Lawyers

Vanessa Merton


Pace law review | 2000

Current Issues in the Psychiatrist-Patient Relationship: Outpatient Civil Commitment, Psychiatric Abandonment and the Duty to Continue Treatment of Potentially Dangerous Patients – Balancing Duties to Patients and the Public

Vanessa Merton; Linda Christine Fentiman; Howard V. Zonana; Gaileen Kaufman; Ernest F. Teitell


Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics | 1994

Review Essay: Women and Health Research

Vanessa Merton


Archive | 2016

Table of Accrediting Organizations

Irene Scharf; Vanessa Merton


Archive | 2016

Table of Law School Mission Statements

Irene Scharf; Vanessa Merton


Archive | 2015

Creating an Effective Law School Mission

Judith Welch Wegner; Vanessa Merton; Irene Scharf


Archive | 2012

How Derrick Bell Helped Me Decide to Become an Educator, Not Just a Faculty Member

Vanessa Merton

Collaboration


Dive into the Vanessa Merton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Irene Scharf

University of Massachusetts Dartmouth

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Judith Welch Wegner

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge