Vânia Gonçalves

Antagonistic SR proteins regulate alternative splicing of tumor-related Rac1b downstream of the PI3-kinase and Wnt pathways

The small GTPase Rac1 regulates signaling pathways controlling actin-dependent cell motility as well as gene transcription. An alternative splicing variant Rac1b is overexpressed in a subset of colorectal tumors and is required to sustain tumor cell viability. Thus, it is of therapeutic interest to understand the molecular mechanism behind the overexpression of Rac1b through alternative splicing. Here we describe that ASF/SF2 and SRp20 are two antagonistic splicing factors regulating Rac1b expression in colorectal tumor cells. Using an Rac1 minigene, we identified that SRp20 increased skipping of alternative exon 3b in HT29 colorectal cells, whereas ASF/SF2 increased its inclusion. The depletion of the endogenous expression of these splicing factors by specific small interfering RNA confirmed that ASF/SF2 acts as an enhancer of endogenous Rac1b splicing, whereas SRp20 acts as a silencer. Point mutations in exon 3b defined two adjacent regulatory regions required for skipping or inclusion of exon 3b, which are recognized in vitro by SRp20 and ASF/SF2, respectively. Both splicing factors were found to be regulated by upstream signaling pathways: the inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway increased protein levels of ASF/SF2 and promoted Rac1b, whereas activation of beta-catenin/TCF4 increased expression of SRp20 and inhibited that of Rac1b. Together, these data reveal that signaling pathways act in concert to target independent splicing factors and achieve the correct combinatorial code to regulate alternative splicing of the small GTPase Rac1.

B-RafV600E Cooperates With Alternative Spliced Rac1b to Sustain Colorectal Cancer Cell Survival

BACKGROUND & AIMS In colorectal tumors, activating BRAF mutations occur alternative to KRAS oncogenic mutations, but in cell culture possess a much lower transforming capacity. Rac1b, a hyperactive Rac1 spliced variant, is over expressed in some colorectal tumors and activates the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB, which initiates a transcriptional response that promotes cell cycle progression and inhibits apoptosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether Rac1b overexpression is associated with B-Raf(V600E) in primary colorectal tumors and whether a functional cooperation between these 2 proteins exists in colorectal cells with a wild-type KRAS genotype. METHODS Screening of BRAF and KRAS mutations by direct sequencing and Rac1b mRNA expression analysis by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were conducted in 74 samples (13 normal colonic mucosa, 45 primary colorectal tumors, and 16 colorectal cancer [CRC] cell lines). RNA interference and focus formation assays were used to assess the cooperation between Rac1b and B-Raf(V600E) in cancer cell viability. RESULTS Rac1b overexpression and B-Raf(V600E) are significantly associated in primary colorectal tumors (P = .008) and colorectal cell lines. The simultaneous suppression of both proteins dramatically decreased CRC cell viability through impaired cell-cycle progression and increased apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate that Rac1b and B-Raf(V600E) functionally cooperate to sustain colorectal cell viability and suggest they constitute an alternative survival pathway to oncogenic K-Ras. These results reveal a novel molecular characteristic of colon tumors containing B-Raf mutations and should help in defining novel targets for cancer therapy.

The β-catenin/TCF4 pathway modifies alternative splicing through modulation of SRp20 expression

Gene expression programs can become activated in response to extracellular signals. One evolutionarily conserved example is binding of Wnt glycoproteins to their receptor, which triggers a signal transduction cascade that stabilizes cytoplasmic beta-catenin protein, allowing it to translocate into the nucleus. There, beta-catenin binds to TCF/Lef family transcription factors and promotes the expression of target genes. Mutations in either the beta-catenin gene itself or its partner protein APC are responsible for the oncogenic activation of this pathway in colorectal tumors. Here we report the splicing factor SRp20 as a novel target gene of beta-catenin/TCF4 signaling. Transfection of activated beta-catenin mutants into colorectal cells increased expression of endogenous SRp20 transcript and protein and also stimulated a luciferase reporter construct containing the SRp20 gene promoter. In contrast, inhibition of endogenous beta-catenin signaling by a dominant-negative TCF4 construct down-regulated both luciferase reporter and SRp20 expression. We further demonstrate that the beta-catenin/TCF4-mediated increase in SRp20 protein levels is sufficient to modulate alternative splicing decisions in the cells. In particular, we observed a change in the alternative splicing pattern in a control minigene reporter as well as in the endogenous SRp20-regulated CD44 cell adhesion protein. These results demonstrate that the beta-catenin/TCF4 pathway not only stimulates gene transcription, but also promotes the generation of transcript variants through alternative splicing. Our data support the recent notion that transcription and alternative splicing represent two different layers of gene expression and that signaling pathways act upon a coordinated network of transcripts in each layer.

A missense mutation in the APC tumor suppressor gene disrupts an ASF/SF2 splicing enhancer motif and causes pathogenic skipping of exon 14

A missense mutation at codon 640 in the APC gene was identified in a familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patient, however, its pathological consequence remained unclear. Here we found that this missense mutation interferes at the nucleotide level with an exonic splicing regulatory element and leads to aberrant splicing of the mutant APC transcript rather than exerting its effect through the observed amino acid change. Analysis of the patient RNA revealed complete skipping of exon 14 in transcripts from the mutant APC allele, leading to a frameshift and a premature stop codon. When cloned into a splicing reporter minigene and transfected into colorectal cell lines, the exon 14 point mutation c.1918C>G (pR640G) was found sufficient to cause the observed exon skipping. Bioinformatic analysis predicted the mutation to change SRp55, hnRNP A1 or ASF/SF2 splicing factor binding sites. Using RNA interference methodology these predictions were experimentally validated and revealed that only ASF/SF2 was required for exon 14 inclusion. These research data identify APC mutation c.1918C>G (pR640G) as pathogenic and indicate a mechanism involving disruption of an ASF/SF2 exonic splicing enhancer element. The results allow genetic diagnosis of a hereditary tumour predisposition but also illustrate the need to complement in silico prediction by splicing reporter assays.

Posttranscriptional Regulation of Splicing Factor SRSF1 and Its Role in Cancer Cell Biology

Over the past decade, alternative splicing has been progressively recognized as a major mechanism regulating gene expression patterns in different tissues and disease states through the generation of multiple mRNAs from the same gene transcript. This process requires the joining of selected exons or usage of different pairs of splice sites and is regulated by gene-specific combinations of RNA-binding proteins. One archetypical splicing regulator is SRSF1, for which we review the molecular mechanisms and posttranscriptional modifications involved in its life cycle. These include alternative splicing of SRSF1 itself, regulatory protein phosphorylation events, and the role of nuclear versus cytoplasmic SRSF1 localization. In addition, we resume current knowledge on deregulated SRSF1 expression in tumors and describe SRSF1-regulated alternative transcripts with functional consequences for cancer cell biology at different stages of tumor development.

Signaling Pathways Driving Aberrant Splicing in Cancer Cells

Aberrant profiles of pre-mRNA splicing are frequently observed in cancer. At the molecular level, an altered profile results from a complex interplay between chromatin modifications, the transcriptional elongation rate of RNA polymerase, and effective binding of the spliceosome to the generated transcripts. Key players in this interplay are regulatory splicing factors (SFs) that bind to gene-specific splice-regulatory sequence elements. Although mutations in genes of some SFs were described, a major driver of aberrant splicing profiles is oncogenic signal transduction pathways. Signaling can affect either the transcriptional expression levels of SFs or the post-translational modification of SF proteins, and both modulate the ratio of nuclear versus cytoplasmic SFs in a given cell. Here, we will review currently known mechanisms by which cancer cell signaling, including the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3)-kinase pathway (PI3K) and wingless (Wnt) pathways but also signals from the tumor microenvironment, modulate the activity or subcellular localization of the Ser/Arg rich (SR) proteins and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) families of SFs.

Targeting the serrated pathway of colorectal cancer with mutation in BRAF

A recently acknowledged morphological pathway to colorectal cancer originates from precursor polyps with a serrated appearance due to branching and folding of the colon epithelium. This serrated origin accounts for up to 30% of all colorectal tumors but these are heterogeneous regarding molecular characteristics and patient outcome. Here we review the current knowledge about the classification of this tumor subtype and its association with five key features: mutation status of the BRAF or KRAS genes, the CpG island methylation phenotype, microsatellite instability, immune cell infiltration, and overexpression of GTPase RAC1b. Subsequently, available therapeutic approaches for targeting these molecular characteristics are presented and critically discussed.

Data in support of a functional analysis of splicing mutations in the IDS gene and the use of antisense oligonucleotides to exploit an alternative therapy for MPS II

This data article contains insights into the methodology used for the analysis of three exonic mutations altering the splicing of the IDS gene: c.241C>T, c.257C>T and c.1122C>T. We have performed splicing assays for the wild-type and mutant minigenes corresponding to these substitutions. In addition, bioinformatic predictions of splicing regulatory sequence elements as well as RNA interference and overexpression experiments were conducted. The interpretation of these data and further extensive experiments into the analysis of these three mutations and also into the methodology applied to correct one of them can be found in “Functional analysis of splicing mutations in the IDS gene and the use of antisense oligonucleotides to exploit an alternative therapy for MPS II” Matos et al. (2015) [1].

Genetics of personalized medicine: cancer and rare diseases

The 21st annual meeting of the Portuguese Society of Human Genetics (SPGH), organized by Luísa Romão, Ana Sousa and Rosário Pinto Leite, was held in Caparica, Portugal, from the 16th to the 18th of November 2017. Having entered an era in which personalized medicine is emerging as a paradigm for disease diagnosis, treatment and prevention, the program of this meeting intended to include lectures by leading national and international scientists presenting exceptional findings on the genetics of personalized medicine. Various topics were discussed, including cancer genetics, transcriptome dynamics and novel therapeutics for cancers and rare disorders that are designed to specifically target molecular alterations in individual patients. Several panel discussions were held to emphasize (ethical) issues associated with personalized medicine, including genetic cancer counseling.

Corrigendum: Phosphorylation of SRSF1 by SRPK1 regulates alternative splicing of tumor-related Rac1b in colorectal cells.

RNA 20: 474–484 (2014) In this article published in the April 2014 issue of RNA, two of the coauthors’ names were incompletely spelled as Andreia Henriques and Joana Pereira but should read Andreia F.A. Henriques and Joana F.S. Pereira. The authors regret any inconvenience that this has caused. doi: 10.1261/rna.055020.115