Vardan T. Karamyan

Animal models of BMAA neurotoxicity: A critical review

Of all the molecules reported to have toxicological effects, BMAA (beta-methylamino alanine) stands out as having the most checkered past. In the late 1960s it was reported to be a toxic component of the cycad flour consumed by Chamorros on Guam which caused the high incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in Guam, that was associated with a Parkinsons disease-like dementia complex (ALS-PDC). However, because ALS-PDC is a slow onset disease, manifesting itself as long as 30 years following exposure to the putative neurotoxin, and only acute toxic effects of BMAA were observed in animal studies, interest in BMAA waned. A seminal study by Spencer et al., in 1987 showing neurological impairments with long-term BMAA-fed monkeys revived the hypothesis that BMAA could cause ALS-PDC. However, the amounts of BMAA used in that study were viewed as being the equivalent of a person consuming their body weight of cycad flour every day. Again, the BMAA hypothesis was discarded. Recently a third iteration of the BMAA hypothesis has been proposed. It is based on the discovery of a novel dietary source of BMAA via biomagnification of BMAA in flying foxes, once consumed in great amounts by Chamorros. Also, reports that BMAA can be incorporated into plant and animal proteins, a heretofore unrecognized dietary source of BMAA, further solidified this new hypothesis. However, once again this hypothesis has its detractors and it remains controversial. This manuscript critically evaluates in vivo studies directed at establishing an animal model of BMAA-induced ALS-PDC and their implications for this hypothesis.

Enzymatic pathways of the brain renin-angiotensin system: unsolved problems and continuing challenges.

n Abstractn n The brain renin–angiotensin system continues to be enigmatic more than 40xa0years after the brain was first recognized to be a site of action of angiotensin II. This review focuses on the enzymatic pathways for the formation and degradation of the growing number of active angiotensins in the brain. A brief description and nomenclature of the peptidases involved in the processing of angiotensin peptides in the brain is given. Of primary interest is the array of enzymes that degrade radiolabeled angiotensins in receptor binding assays. This poses major challenges to studies of brain angiotensin receptors and it is debatable whether an accurate determination of brain angiotensin receptor binding kinetics has yet been made. The quandary facing the investigator of brain angiotensin receptors is the need to protect the radioligand from metabolic alteration while maintaining the characteristics of the receptors in situ. It is the tenet of this review that we have yet to fully understand the binding characteristics of brain angiotensin receptors and the extent of their distribution in the brain because of our inability to fully protect the angiotensins from metabolic alteration until equilibrium binding conditions can be attained.n n

The significance of brain aminopeptidases in the regulation of the actions of angiotensin peptides in the brain

From the outset, the concept of a brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been controversial and this controversy continues to this day. In addition to the unresolved questions as to the means by which, and location(s) where brain Ang II is synthesized, and the uncertainties regarding the functionality of the different subtypes of Ang II receptors in the brain, a new controversy has arisen with respect to the identity of the angiotensin peptide(s) that activate brain AT1 receptors. While it has been known for some time that Ang III can activate Ang II receptors with equivalent or near-equivalent efficacy to Ang II, it has been proposed that in the brain, only Ang III is active. This proposal, which we have named “The Angiotensin III Hypothesis” states that Ang II must be converted to Ang III in order to activate brain AT1 receptors. This review examines several aspects of the controversies regarding the brain RAS with a special focus on brain aminopeptidases, studies that either support or refute The Angiotensin III Hypothesis, and the implications of The Angiotensin III Hypothesis for the activity of the brain RAS. It also addresses the need for further research that can test The Angiotensin III Hypothesis and definitively identify the angiotensin peptide(s) that activate brain AT1 receptor-mediated effects.

Identification of a novel non-AT1, non-AT2 angiotensin binding site in the rat brain.

Efforts to protect radiolabeled angiotensins from metabolism during receptor binding assays date back more than 30 years. However, this continues to be a problem. This study focused on the effects of a protease inhibitor, p-chloromercuribenzoate (PCMB), on the binding of (125)I-Ang II to rat brain membranes. Addition of PCMB to the incubation medium revealed a high affinity binding site for (125)I-Ang II in brain membranes (K(d)=1-4 nM) with a greater amount of binding than revealed in previous studies of brain Ang II receptors. Further characterization of this binding, revealed it to be insensitive to inhibition by losartan (an AT(1) receptor antagonist) and PD123319 (an AT(2) receptor antagonist). This non-AT1, non-AT2 binding site was not present in liver or adrenal membranes. It was activated by a limited range of concentrations of PCMB, with maximal activation at 0.3-1 mM. This binding site was equally abundant in cerebral cortex (a brain region with few Ang II receptors) and the hypothalamus (a brain region with abundant Ang II receptors). The binding site was also present in mouse brain, but not mouse liver. The binding site shows high affinity for Ang I, Ang II and Ang III (K(i) approximately 40-100 nM), but lesser affinity for smaller angiotensin fragments and other neuropeptides. This binding site shares some characteristics with the liver cytosolic Ang II binding proteins, later identified as endopeptidases EC 3.4.24.15 and/or EC 3.4.24.16. However, some unique characteristics of this non-AT1, non-AT2 binding site suggest that it may be a novel angiotensin binding substance.

Distribution of the Non-AT1, Non-AT2 Angiotensin-Binding Site in the Rat Brain: Preliminary Characterization

The discovery of a novel, non-AT1, non-AT2 binding site for angiotensin II (Ang II) in the brain adds a new dimension to the brain angiotensin system. The distribution of the non-AT1, non-AT2 binding site in the rat brain was determined using radioligand-binding assays and in vitro receptor autoradiography. There is a marked rostral to caudal gradient of the density of this binding site from the olfactory bulbs to the cervical spinal cord, with a consistent binding affinity, Kd ∼ 1–3 nM. Binding is widespread throughout the brain, however, areas of very intense binding are present in a large number of brain regions. The olfactory nerve layer of the olfactory bulb has the highest binding site density. Very high binding site density is also seen in the cerebral cortex with highest binding density in pyriform, insular and entorhinal cortex. Very high binding occurs in brain regions associated with dopaminergic reward (nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area) and motor (substantia nigra, caudate/putamen) systems. Very high to high binding also occurs in brain regions associated with the development of Alzheimer’s disease (nucleus basalis of Meynert, substantia innominata). Very high to high binding is also seen in brain regions associated with cardiovascular regulation (subfornical organ, median, medial and anteroventral preoptic nucleus, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, solitary tract nucleus), areas that harbor high densities of the AT1 Ang II receptor subtype. High non-AT1, non-AT2 binding site density is present in brain regions containing high levels of the AT2 Ang II receptor subtype (amygdala, several thalamic nuclei, superior colliculus). Very high binding is also present in the choroid plexus, peri-third ventricular ependyma, and the subcommissural organ. The widespread, yet discrete distribution of high levels of this binding site suggests that it could function as a component of the blood-brain barrier, as a highly specific angiotensinase, or as a receptor for Ang II that mediates known and novel functions of this peptide, or that it serves as a clearance receptor for Ang II.

Characterization of neuroprotective effects of biphalin, an opioid receptor agonist, in a model of focal brain ischemia.

Approximately 795,000 people experience a new or recurrent stroke in the United States annually. The purpose of this study was to assess the protective effect of a nonselective opioid receptor agonist, biphalin, in brain edema and infarct damage by using both in vitro and in vivo models of stroke. In an in vivo model of ischemia, biphalin significantly decreased edema (66.6 and 58.3%) and infarct (52.2 and 56.4%) ratios in mouse transient (60-min occlusion/24-h reperfusion) and permanent (6 h) middle cerebral artery occlusion models, respectively. Biphalin administration also showed decreased neurodegeneration in hippocampal, cortical, and striatal brain tissue after ischemia, evidenced by reduced Fluoro-Jade C staining. In addition, biphalin improved neurological function after stroke injury evidenced by neurological score and locomotor activity evaluation. Biphalin significantly decreased penumbral expression of Na+, K+, 2Cl− cotransporter (NKCC) and the translocation of the conventional isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC). It also reversed the activation of PKC-induced cell volume increase during ischemia in primary neuronal cell cultures exposed to 1 h of oxygen glucose deprivation. These data suggest that opioid receptor activation provides neuroprotection during stroke, and a possible explanation of this mechanism could be the inhibition of NKCC function via the regulation of PKC-dependent cell signaling.

Central Pressor Actions of Aminopeptidase-Resistant Angiotensin II Analogs: Challenging the Angiotensin III Hypothesis

Intracerebroventricular administration of angiotensins causes pronounced pressor and dipsogenic responses. The suggestion that angiotensin III rather than angiotensin II is the active peptide in the brain spawned what we call The Angiotensin III Hypothesis. To test this hypothesis, 5 angiotensin II analogs containing zero or one position substitutions conferring resistance to aminopeptidases were administered intracerebroventricularly to determine their pressor and dipsogenic efficacies. Two aminopeptidase-resistant analogs caused significantly greater pressor responses than angiotensin II, whereas 3 analogs caused pressor responses similar to angiotensin II. Latency to cause a pressor response for 4 of the 5 aminopeptidase-resistant angiotensin II analogs was the same as for angiotensin II. There was no detectable formation of 125I-angiotensin III from 1 of the intracerebroventricularly administered analogs, 125I- N-Methyl-l-Asp1-angiotensin II, indicating its aminopeptidase resistance. Latency to drink also did not differ between the angiotensins. After the initial dipsogenic response, water was removed until 25 minutes after angiotensin administration to avoid interfering with the pressor response. The dipsogenic stimulus was sustained 25 minutes after intracerebroventricular injection of angiotensin II and its aminopeptidase-resistant analogs. Comparison of angiotensin III and angiotensin II showed equivalent pressor responses with similar latencies and durations. The latency to drink was similar for angiotensin III and angiotensin II. However, there was no dipsogenic response to angiotensin III 25 minutes after intracerebroventricular injection. These data do not support The Angiotensin III Hypothesis and suggest that conversion of exogenously applied angiotensin II to angiotensin III is not necessary to cause brain-mediated pressor or dipsogenic responses.

Design, Synthesis, and Docking Studies of Novel Benzimidazoles for the Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome

In addition to lowering blood pressure, telmisartan, an angiotensin (AT(1)) receptor blocker, has recently been shown to exert pleiotropic effects as a partial agonist of nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma). On the basis of these findings and docking pose similarity between telmisartan and rosiglitazone in PPAR gamma active site, two classes of benzimidazole derivatives were designed and synthesized as dual PPAR gamma agonist/angiotensin II antagonists for the possible treatment of metabolic syndrome. Compound 4, a bisbenzimidazole derivative showed the best affinity for the AT(1) receptor with a K(i) = 13.4 nM, but it was devoid of PPAR gamma activity. On the other hand 9, a monobenzimidazole derivative, showed the highest activity in PPAR gamma transactivation assay (69% activation) with no affinity for the AT(1) receptor. Docking studies lead to the designing of a molecule with dual activity, 10, with moderate PPARgamma activity (29%) and affinity for the AT(1) receptor (K(i) = 2.5 microM).

Characterization of the brain-specific non-AT1, non-AT2 angiotensin binding site in the mouse

In the present study the existence of a non-AT(1), non-AT(2) angiotensin (Ang) binding site unmasked by the organomercurial protease inhibitor p-chloromercuribenzoate (PCMB) was demonstrated in mouse brain membranes, consistent with observations previously reported in the rat (Karamyan and Speth, 2007b). The pharmacological specificity of the non-AT(1), non-AT(2) angiotensin binding site was similar to the rat brain: Sar(1)-Ile(8)-Ang II > Ang III >or= Ang II > Ang I> p-aminophenylalanine(6) Ang II> CGP42112 >> Ang IV > Ang 1-7 congruent with shorter angiotensin fragments. Neurotensin, bradykinin, and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone showed K(i) values >10 microM, while substance P and VIP had K(i) values of approximately 2 microM. The non-AT(1), non-AT(2) angiotensin binding site was not present in adrenal, liver or kidney. Subcellular fractionation showed a higher density of [(125)I]Ang II binding in plasma membrane (P2) fractions of cerebral cortex and hypothalamus relative to debris (P1) fractions. The binding site is present in the brains of mice in which the AT(1a), AT(1b), AT(2), Mas, and neprilysin (EC 3.4.24.11, neutral endopeptidase) was knocked out confirming that the binding site is not a heretofore described angiotensin receptor or neprilysin. These observations confirm that this novel Ang binding site is distinct from classical AT(1), AT(2), AT(4) and Ang 1-7 receptors while retaining a high specificity for angiotensins that act on the known angiotensin receptors. Whether this binding site functions as a novel receptor for angiotensins or a specific angiotensinase with variable functionality at different redox states will require further study.

Identification of Membrane-bound Variant of Metalloendopeptidase Neurolysin (EC 3.4.24.16) as the Non-angiotensin Type 1 (Non-AT1), Non-AT2 Angiotensin Binding Site

Background: Angiotensin II, the renin-angiotensin system effector peptide, interacts with a recently discovered binding site that is distinctly different from its classic receptors. Results: A radioiodinated angiotensin II photoprobe bound to a ∼75-kDa membrane protein, enabling its isolation and identification. Conclusion: Membrane-bound metalloendopeptidase neurolysin (EC 3.4.24.16) is the novel angiotensin-binding protein. Significance: This metalloendopeptidase may be a crucial component of the renin-angiotensin system. Recently, we discovered a novel non-angiotensin type 1 (non-AT1), non-AT2 angiotensin binding site in rodent and human brain membranes, which is distinctly different from angiotensin receptors and key proteases processing angiotensins. It is hypothesized to be a new member of the renin-angiotensin system. This study was designed to isolate and identify this novel angiotensin binding site. An angiotensin analog, photoaffinity probe 125I-SBpa-Ang II, was used to specifically label the non-AT1, non-AT2 angiotensin binding site in mouse forebrain membranes, followed by a two-step purification procedure based on the molecular size and isoelectric point of the photoradiolabeled binding protein. Purified samples were subjected to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by mass spectrometry identification of proteins in the two-dimensional gel sections containing radioactivity. LC-MS/MS analysis revealed eight protein candidates, of which the four most abundant were immunoprecipitated after photoradiolabeling. Immunoprecipitation studies indicated that the angiotensin binding site might be the membrane-bound variant of metalloendopeptidase neurolysin (EC 3.4.24.16). To verify these observations, radioligand binding and photoradiolabeling experiments were conducted in membrane preparations of HEK293 cells overexpressing mouse neurolysin or thimet oligopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.15), a closely related metalloendopeptidase of the same family. These experiments also identified neurolysin as the non-AT1, non-AT2 angiotensin binding site. Finally, brain membranes of mice lacking neurolysin were nearly devoid of the non-AT1, non-AT2 angiotensin binding site, further establishing membrane-bound neurolysin as the binding site. Future studies will focus on the functional significance of this highly specific, high affinity interaction between neurolysin and angiotensins.