Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Veena M. Singh is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Veena M. Singh.


Journal of Immunology | 2001

An Essential Role of the NF-κB/Toll-Like Receptor Pathway in Induction of Inflammatory and Tissue-Repair Gene Expression by Necrotic Cells

Ming Li; David F. Carpio; Ye Zheng; Peter Bruzzo; Veena M. Singh; Fateh Ouaaz; Ruslan Medzhitov; Amer A. Beg

Tissue damage induced by infection or injury can result in necrosis, a mode of cell death characterized by induction of an inflammatory response. In contrast, cells dying by apoptosis do not induce inflammation. However, the reasons for underlying differences between these two modes of cell death in inducing inflammation are not known. Here we show that necrotic cells, but not apoptotic cells, activate NF-κB and induce expression of genes involved in inflammatory and tissue-repair responses, including neutrophil-specific chemokine genes KC and macrophage-inflammatory protein-2, in viable fibroblasts and macrophages. Intriguingly, NF-κB activation by necrotic cells was dependent on Toll-like receptor 2, a signaling pathway that induces inflammation in response to microbial agents. These results have identified a novel mechanism by which cell necrosis, but not apoptosis, can induce expression of genes involved in inflammation and tissue-repair responses. Furthermore, these results also demonstrate that the NF-κB/Toll-like receptor 2 pathway can be activated both by exogenous microbial agents and endogenous inflammatory stimuli.


Journal of Immunology | 2001

NF-κB RelA (p65) Is Essential for TNF-α-Induced Fas Expression but Dispensable for Both TCR-Induced Expression and Activation-Induced Cell Death

Ye Zheng; Fateh Ouaaz; Peter Bruzzo; Veena M. Singh; Steve Gerondakis; Amer A. Beg

The Fas death receptor plays a key role in the killing of target cells by NK cells and CTLs and in activation-induced cell death of mature T lymphocytes. These cytotoxic pathways are dependent on induction of Fas expression by cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ or by signals generated after TCR engagement. Although much of our knowledge of the Fas death pathway has been generated from murine studies, little is known about regulatory mechanisms important for murine Fas expression. To this end, we have molecularly cloned a region of the murine Fas promoter that is responsible for mediating TNF-α and PMA/PHA-induced expression. We demonstrate here that induction of Fas expression by both stimuli is critically dependent on two sites that associate with RelA-containing NF-κB complexes. To determine whether RelA and/or other NF-κB subunits are also important for regulating Fas expression in primary T cells, we used CD4 T cells from RelA−/−, c-Rel−/−, and p50−/− mice. Although proliferative responses were significantly impaired, expression of Fas and activation-induced cell death was unaffected in T cells obtained from these different mice. Importantly, we show that unlike fibroblasts, which consist primarily of RelA-containing NF-κB complexes, T cells have high levels of both RelA and c-Rel complexes, suggesting that Fas expression in T cells may be dependent on redundant functions of these NF-κB subunits.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: Guideline from The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Antonia R. Sepulveda; Stanley R. Hamilton; Carmen J. Allegra; Wayne W. Grody; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun; William K. Funkhouser; Scott Kopetz; Christopher Hanyoung Lieu; Noralane M. Lindor; Bruce D. Minsky; Federico A. Monzon; Daniel J. Sargent; Veena M. Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R. Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B. Ventura; Jan A. Nowak

Purpose Molecular testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to improve patient care and outcomes of targeted and conventional therapies has been the center of many recent studies, including clinical trials. Evidence-based recommendations for the molecular testing of CRC tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -targeted therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens are warranted in clinical practice. The purpose of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing for CRC through a systematic review of the literature. Methods The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing, guide targeted therapies, and advance personalized care for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included over 4,000 articles was conducted to gather data to inform this guideline. Results Twenty-one guideline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established. Recommendations Evidence supports mutational testing for genes in the EGFR signaling pathway, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize molecular testing for predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers involve selection of assays, type of specimens to be tested, timing of ordering of tests and turnaround time for testing results. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/CRC-markers-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.


Annals of Diagnostic Pathology | 2013

Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies

Veena M. Singh; Ranelle Salunga; Vivian J. Huang; Yen Tran; Mark G. Erlander; Pam Plumlee; Michael R. Peterson

Molecular studies are part of standard care for cancer patients. Bone, a common and sometimes sole site of metastasis, requires decalcification for morphological examination. Many commonly used decalcification agents contain strong acids that degrade nucleic acids. The paradigm shift in oncology, with biomarker targeted therapy and gene expression profiling analysis, requires sufficient nucleic acid recovery from bone biopsy specimens. We systematically studied the effects of a spectrum of decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of RNA and DNA recovered from bone biopsies. Multiple bone biopsies of similar size and cellularity were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, randomized to various decalcification agents for 2 hours then processed, and embedded. Tissue lysates were obtained from unstained sections and nucleic acid isolated. DNA and RNA were quantified. Assessment of DNA and RNA integrity was accomplished by comparison of the average cycle threshold by polymerase chain reaction of selected housekeeping genes for each agent. Results were then analyzed by 2-sample t test. There was a significant decrease in both DNA and RNA yield and integrity with strong acids (hydrochloric, nitric) vs 14% EDTA and formic acid. DNA yield was (mean nanograms) 6.15 vs 68.68 (P<.001) and RNA was (mean nanograms) 121.53 vs 288.89 (P=.003), respectively. DNA integrity (mean cycle threshold) was 35.79 vs 30.16 (P<.001), and RNA was 33.03 vs 26.5 (P<.001), respectively. Decalcification of bone biopsies with EDTA or formic acid agents was associated with a significant improvement in recovered nucleic acid quantity and quality.


The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics | 2013

Blinded Comparator Study of Immunohistochemical Analysis versus a 92-Gene Cancer Classifier in the Diagnosis of the Primary Site in Metastatic Tumors

Lawrence M. Weiss; Peiguo Chu; Brock Schroeder; Veena M. Singh; Yi Zhang; Mark G. Erlander; Catherine A. Schnabel

Accurate tumor classification is fundamental to inform predictive biomarker testing and optimize therapy. Gene expression-based tests are proposed as diagnostic aids in cases with uncertain diagnoses. This study directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of IHC analysis versus molecular classification using a 92-gene RT-PCR assay for determination of the primary tumor site. This prospectively defined blinded study of diagnostically challenging cases included 131 high-grade, primarily metastatic tumors. Cases were reviewed and reference diagnoses established through clinical correlation. Blinded FFPE sections were evaluated by either IHC/morphology analysis or the 92-gene assay. The final analysis included 122 cases. The 92-gene assay demonstrated overall accuracy of 79% (95% CI, 71% to 85%) for tumor classification versus 69% (95% CI, 60% to 76%) for IHC/morphology analysis (P = 0.019). Mean IHC use was 7.9 stains per case (median, 8; range, 2 to 15). IHC/morphology analysis accuracy was 79%, 80%, and 46% when 1 to 6 (n = 42), 7 to 9 (n = 41), and >9 (n = 39) IHC stains were used, respectively, versus 81%, 85%, and 69%, respectively, with the 92-gene assay. Results from this blinded series of high-grade metastatic cases demonstrate superior accuracy with the 92-gene assay versus standard-of-care IHC analysis and strongly support the diagnostic utility of molecular classification in difficult-to-diagnose metastatic cancer.


Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | 2017

Molecular biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer: Guideline from the American society for clinical pathology, college of American pathologists, association for molecular pathology, and American society of clinical oncology

Antonia R. Sepulveda; Stanley R. Hamilton; Carmen J. Allegra; Wayne W. Grody; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun; William K. Funkhouser; Scott Kopetz; Christopher Hanyoung Lieu; Noralane M. Lindor; Bruce D. Minsky; Federico A. Monzon; Daniel J. Sargent; Veena M. Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R. Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B. Ventura; Jan A. Nowak

OBJECTIVES - To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. METHODS - The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. RESULTS - Twenty-one guideline statements were established. CONCLUSIONS - Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.


American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2017

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer

Antonia R. Sepulveda; Stanley R. Hamilton; Carmen J. Allegra; Wayne W. Grody; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun; William K. Funkhouser; Scott Kopetz; Christopher Hanyoung Lieu; Noralane M. Lindor; Bruce D. Minsky; Federico A. Monzon; Daniel J. Sargent; Veena M. Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R. Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B. Ventura; Jan A. Nowak

Abstract Objectives: To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. Methods: The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. Results: Twenty-one guideline statements were established. Conclusions: Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2018

ROS-1 Rearrangements in Circulating Tumor Cells

Luis E. Raez; Paolo Manca; Christian Rolfo; Veena M. Singh

Figure 1. ROS 1 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) break -apart. To the Editor: ROS1 is a receptor tyrosine kinase of the insulin receptor family, and ROS1 gene fusions are uncommon oncogenic drivers of NSCLC. Liquid biopsy represents a valuable alternative for molecular analyses when a traditional biopsy of the primary tumor yields insufficient tissue. Moreover, liquid biopsies can detect aberrations missed in tissue testing of heterogeneous tumors. Here, we report the pioneering detection of ROS1 rearrangements in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in cases in which next-generation sequencing (NGS) of plasma failed to identify a genetic alteration. Lung adenocarcinoma in a right pleural effusion was diagnosed a 44-year-old male Hispanic nonsmoker. Molecular testing of collected fluid failed to reveal a genetic aberration. Palliative chemotherapy was initiated; it consisted of carboplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab for six cycles, followed by maintenance chemotherapy with pemetrexed/bevacizumab for 23 cycles. At the time of disease progression, the patient’s tumor was insufficient for further molecular tests. Blood analysis was performed using the VeriStrat test (Biodesix, Boulder, CO). The patient began second-line erlotinib therapy, which was continued for 22 months until disease progression with peritoneal carcinomatosis. NGS done on plasma failed to reveal actionable gene aberrations; a biopsy was done, and a ROS1 gene translocation was identified in tissue and concordant with the results of subsequent fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of blood CTCs (Fig. 1). The patient began crizotinib therapy with disease stabilization. Brain metastases were detected 21 and 34 months later, and both were treated with


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Sensitivity of TargetSelector in clinical experience in ctDNA profiling of NSCLC 2000 cases.

Veena M. Singh; Anthony J. Daher; Jeffery J. Chen; Lyle Arnold; Cecile Rose T. Vibat

e23033Background: Targeted cancer therapy relies on identifying specific DNA mutations from a patient’s tumor. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) tend to be effective for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations, of which exon 19 deletions (Del19) and L858R are most common. Acquired resistance to TKI therapy is associated with a T790M mutation. Standard biomarker analyses may not reflect tumor heterogeneity; they entail tissue biopsies often with surgical complications. To address these limitations, Biocept developed a minimally invasive method to characterize cancer biomarkers in blood. Biocepts proprietary TargetSelector assays selectively amplify relevant mutations from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Clinical validations demonstrated high concordances between molecular tests in blood vs tissue. As further validation, EGFR mutation detection frequencies were compared to US averages (mycancergenome.org). Here we analyze 2000 blood samples receiv...


The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics | 2017

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology

Antonia R. Sepulveda; Stanley R. Hamilton; Carmen J. Allegra; Wayne W. Grody; Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun; William K. Funkhouser; Scott Kopetz; Christopher Hanyoung Lieu; Noralane M. Lindor; Bruce D. Minsky; Federico A. Monzon; Daniel J. Sargent; Veena M. Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R. Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B. Ventura; Jan A. Nowak

Collaboration


Dive into the Veena M. Singh's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun

University of Nebraska Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce D. Minsky

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carol Colasacco

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christina B. Ventura

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan A. Nowak

NorthShore University HealthSystem

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer Clark

American Society for Clinical Pathology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge