Verena Gartner
Medical University of Vienna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Verena Gartner.
European Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2010
Barbara Lubsczyk; Marietta Kollars; Gregor Hron; Paul A. Kyrle; Ansgar Weltermann; Verena Gartner
Eur J Clin Invest 2010; 40 (6): 477–482
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine | 2008
Katharina A. Kierner; Verena Gartner; Maria Schwarz; Herbert H. Watzke
Study-based guidelines on thromboprophylaxis are not available for palliative care patients. The authors asked a panel of academic medical experts in palliative care, oncology, blood coagulation, and intensive care to select a prophylactic regimen out of 5 predefined options for a virtual patient with advanced bronchial cancer in different clinical settings. Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism was withdrawn by all physicians when the patient had a Karnovskys index of 10 and was described as dying. It was given by 25% of physicians when the patient had a Karnovskys index of 20 and by 85% when Karnovskys index 40 was still 40. Similar results were obtained in the situation of secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism and when the patient was described as having a history of chronic atrial fibrillation. This data clearly show that thromboprophylaxis is delivered according to a compound estimate of risks and benefits of such prophylaxis in a specific palliative care situation.
Contraception | 2008
Verena Gartner; Michael Weber; Sabine Eichinger
BACKGROUND Oral contraceptives increase the thrombotic risk in women with factor V Leiden. Emotional aspects of genetic testing prior to the prescription of oral contraceptives (OC), aspects of counseling and referral patterns are widely unknown. STUDY DESIGN Two hundred forty-seven women with and 132 women without factor V Leiden were interviewed by questionnaire. RESULTS One hundred sixty-one women (65%) with factor V Leiden and 63 (48%) with wild-type factor V responded. One hundred seventy-one women (76%) reported being emotionally disturbed by genetic testing. Eighty percent of women with factor V Leiden and 16% of women with wild-type factor V were discouraged from OC use. Three percent of women with factor V Leiden were encouraged to take OC. Forty-one percent of women with factor V Leiden used at least one hormone contraceptive method after diagnosis. Only 46 women (29%) with factor V Leiden were counseled about the relevance of the mutation in case of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Testing for factor V Leiden has considerable emotional impact. Recommendations after testing are not consistently driven by the test result.
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2012
Verena Gartner; Katharina A. Kierner; Astrid Namjesky; Birgit Kum-Taucher; Bernhard Hammerl-Ferrari; Herbert H. Watzke; Cornelia Stabel
BackgroundThere is limited data on the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients with advanced cancer. We therefore aimed to study the practice of thromboprophylaxis in palliative care units in Austria.MethodsWe monitored use, indication, and contraindications to thromboprophylaxis in 134 patients hospitalized in 21 palliative care units in a prospective, cross-sectional study.ResultsForty-seven percent of patients were on low molecular weight heparin on the day of the study for primary or secondary thromboembolism. Thromboprophylaxis had been withdrawn in 18% of the patients upon admission to the palliative care unit. Contraindications for thromboprophylaxis were present in 27% of all patients. Cancer was present in 86% of the patients. The use of thromboprophylaxis was similar in cancer patients and in non-cancer patients (49% vs. 42%). Contraindications for thromboprophylaxis were present in 24% of all cancer patients. Significantly more bedridden cancer patients had contraindications for prophylaxis when compared with mobile cancer patients (35% vs. 16%; p = 0.03). Low performance status was by far the most frequent contraindication among these patients (89%). Seventy-one percent of all bedridden cancer patients were treated in accordance with common guidelines for thromboprophylaxis when contraindications were taken into account. Eighty-seven percent of patients who had been involved in decision making opted for getting prophylaxis.ConclusionsOur data reveal that about half of all cancer patients in palliative care units are treated with thromboprophylaxis. Low performance status was the most frequent contraindication for thromboprophylaxis.
The American Journal of Medicine | 2006
Gregor Hron; Sabine Eichinger; Ansgar Weltermann; Erich Minar; Christine Bialonczyk; Mirko Hirschl; Milena Stain; Verena Gartner; Paul A. Kyrle
Annals of Hematology | 2009
Lisbeth Eischer; Verena Gartner; Sam Schulman; Paul A. Kyrle; Sabine Eichinger
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2010
Katharina A. Kierner; Birgit Hladschik-Kermer; Verena Gartner; Herbert H. Watzke
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2016
Katharina A. Kierner; Dietmar Weixler; Eva K. Masel; Verena Gartner; Herbert H. Watzke
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift | 2010
Katharina A. Kierner; Verena Gartner; Rupert Bartsch; Birgit Hladschik-Kermer; Anna Gruber; Marco Hassler; Herbert H. Watzke
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Education | 2006
Verena Gartner; Herbert H. Watzke