Vernon Bonarjee

Plasma brain natriuretic peptide as an indicator of left ventricular systolic function and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction. Comparison with plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide.

BACKGROUND Elevated plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and the N-terminal fragment of the ANP prohormone (N-ANP) are associated with decreased left ventricular function and decreased long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Previous data suggest that plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) may increase proportionally more than plasma ANP after AMI and in chronic heart failure. The diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma BNP as an indicator of left ventricular dysfunction and long-term survival after AMI, relative to that of ANP and N-ANP, remain to be established. METHODS AND RESULTS Venous blood samples for analysis of ANP, N-ANP, and BNP were obtained on day 3 after symptom onset from 131 patients with documented AMI. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by echocardiography in a subsample of 79 patients. Twenty-eight cardiovascular and 3 noncardiovascular deaths occurred during the follow-up period (median, 1293 days). All three peptides proved to be powerful predictors of cardiovascular mortality by univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses (ANP: P < .0001; N-ANP: P = .0002; BNP: P < .0001). In a multivariate model, plasma BNP (P = .021) but not ANP (P = .638) or N-ANP (P = .782) provided additional prognostic information beyond left ventricular ejection fraction. Logistic regression analysis showed that ANP (P = .003) and N-ANP (P = .027) but not BNP (P = .14) were significantly associated with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 45%. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that plasma BNP determination provides important, independent prognostic information after AMI. Although plasma ANP appears to be a better predictor of left ventricular dysfunction, plasma BNP may have greater potential to complement standard prognostic indicators used in risk stratification after AMI because of its strong, independent association with long-term survival, enhanced in vitro stability, and simplicity of analysis.

Plasma proatrial natriuretic factor is predictive of clinical status in patients with congestive heart failure

Atrial stretch results in myocyte release of the prohormone atrial natriuretic factor (1-126). The N-terminal (1-98) fragment, proatrial natriuretic factor (proANF) is released on an equimolar basis with the C-terminal (99-126) active hormone and may be assayed simply due to in vitro stability. This study was undertaken to evaluate the relation between proANF and routinely available measures of clinical status. ProANF was sampled from 202 patients (median age 68 years [range 15 to 85], 77% men) recruited from an active outpatient heart failure clinic. Patients were subgrouped according to New York Heart Association functional class, radionuclide ejection fraction (EF), echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter, and Doppler-determined systolic pulmonary arterial pressure. The median proANF (pmol/L) values for patients in New York Heart Association classes I, II, III, IV were 725, 1,527, 1,750, and 5,172, respectively. The proANF value for the group with EF > 40% was 1,534 versus 1,993 for EF < or = 40% (p < 0.05). The value for the group with LV diameter < 60 mm ws 838 versus 1,751 for LV diameter > or = 60 mm (p < 0.01). The value for the group with systolic pulmonary artery pressure < 45 mm Hg was 1,241 versus 2,660 for systolic pulmonary artery pressure > or = 45 mm Hg (p < 0.01). ProANF correlated better than the other variables with New York Heart Association functional class and was more closely associated with noninvasive measurements than New York Heart Association functional class.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Attenuation of left ventricular dilatation after acute myocardial infarction by early initiation of Enalapril therapy

This trial investigated the effect of enalapril, administered early, on left ventricular (LV) volumes after myocardial infarction. Four hundred twenty-eight patients included in the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS II) were examined with echocardiography within 5 days, at 1 month and at 6 months after myocardial infarction. Enalaprilat (1 mg) or placebo infusion was initiated within 24 hours after infarction, followed by oral treatment to a target dose of 20 mg/day. A significant attenuation of LV dilatation was noted at 1 month in patients treated with enalapril compared with those receiving placebo. Changes in LV end-diastolic volume indexes during the first month were (mean +/- SEM) 5.7 +/- 1.0 ml/m2 for the placebo group and 1.9 +/- 0.8 ml/m2 for the enalapril group (p < 0.02). Changes in LV end-systolic volume indexes were 3.1 +/- 0.8 and 0.5 +/- 0.6 ml/m2, respectively (p < 0.02). The between-group difference was most marked in patients with anterior wall infarction (p < 0.005). Volume changes beyond the first month were similar in both groups but the differences observed at 1 month were maintained. The larger volumes in the placebo versus enalapril group were significant or borderline significant at 1 and 6 months. Thus, enalapril treatment initiated early after myocardial infarction and continued for 6 months can attenuate LV dilatation during the first month resulting in smaller LV volumes after 1 and 6 months.

Prognostic significance of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98) in acute myocardial infarction: comparison with atrial natriuretic factor (99-126) and clinical evaluation.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the prognostic significance of plasma N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98) concentrations measured in the subacute phase after acute myocardial infarction, and to compare the predictive value of measurement of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98) with the measurement of atrial natriuretic factor (99-126) and with clinical assessment of the degree of heart failure. DESIGN--Prospective observational. SETTING--Norwegian central hospital. PATIENTS--139 patients (mean (SD) age 66.9 (11.1) years, 71.2% males) with acute myocardial infarction. Patients in cardiogenic shock or with severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class IV) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Cardiovascular death within 12 months. RESULTS--During the follow up period 15 patients died. In a univariate Cox proportional hazards model N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98) was significantly related to mortality (p = 0.0003). In a multivariate model the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98) was better than that of atrial natriuretic factor (99-126) and clinical assessment of heart failure (N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98), p = 0.0003; atrial natriuretic factor (99-126), p = 0.4513; heart failure, p = 0.0719). The odds ratio estimate of patients in whom plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98) were greater than 2000 pmol/l was 25 (95% confidence interval 2.8-225.0) compared with patients with plasma concentrations less than 1000 pmol/l. CONCLUSIONS--These results suggest that determination of plasma N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic factor (1-98) in the subacute phase of myocardial infarction may provide clinically relevant prognostic information that is superior to that obtained from atrial natriuretic factor (99-126) measurements and clinical evaluation.

Plasma proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) concentration after myocardial infarction: relation to indices of cardiac and renal function.

OBJECTIVES--(a) To assess the relation between plasma concentrations of proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) and non-invasively derived indices of left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance and (b) to assess the potential confounding effect of renal function and age on this relation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN--Cross sectional comparison of biochemical and echocardiographic indices of cardiac function. SETTING--Norwegian central hospital. PATIENTS--Sixty four patients with acute myocardial infarction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Relation between plasma proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) concentrations and echocardiographic indices of left ventricular systolic function as assessed by univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of plasma proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) concentration as a measure of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. RESULTS--Plasma proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) concentrations were significantly related to left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.33; P = 0.008), age (r = 0.43; P < 0.001), and creatinine clearance (r = - 0.53; P < 0.001). In a multivariate model left ventricular ejection fraction and creatinine clearance were both independently related to plasma values. The mean concentration of proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) was significantly higher in patients with an ejection fraction of < 40% than in those with an ejection fraction of > or = 40% (1876 (1151) v 1174 (530) pmol/l; P = 0.03) and in patients with an abnormal transmitral E/A ratio ( < 0.65 or > 1.65, where E/A is ratio of peak early filling velocity to peak atrial component) compared with those with a normal ratio (1572 (895) v 1137 (523) pmol/l, respectively; P = 0.02). When patients were subdivided according to the median concentration of proatrial natriuretic factor (1192 pmol/l) the sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 56% respectively for detecting a left ventricular ejection fraction of < 40% and 75% and 61% respectively for detecting an abnormal E/A ratio. Concentrations below the median had a negative predictive value of 97% in excluding an ejection fraction of < 40% and of 84% in excluding an abnormal E/A ratio. CONCLUSION--These results suggest that soon after myocardial infarction left ventricular ejection fraction and indices of renal function are independently related to plasma concentrations of proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98). Plasma concentrations of proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) seem to reflect renal and cardiac performance rather than specific haemodynamic variables assessed by noninvasive methods. Plasma proatrial natriuretic factor (1-98) measurements may be a useful screening tool to identify patients with normal cardiac function soon after myocardial infarction.

New Ischemic Stroke and Outcomes With Vorapaxar Versus Placebo : Results From the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Trial

BACKGROUND Vorapaxar, a novel antiplatelet therapy, reduces thrombotic events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or peripheral artery disease (PAD); however, because of an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, it is contraindicated in patients with a history of stroke. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of new ischemic stroke and subsequent death or intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with MI or PAD and no cerebrovascular disease (CVD) treated with vorapaxar. METHODS The TRA 2 °P-TIMI 50 (Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 50) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vorapaxar 2.5 mg daily in 26,449 patients with atherosclerosis, stratified by qualifying disease (MI, PAD, or CVD). A total of 20,170 patients with MI/PAD, but no CVD, were enrolled. RESULTS In patients with MI/PAD and no prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, vorapaxar reduced first ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 0.75; p < 0.001). The risk of hemorrhagic conversion after stroke (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.49 to 2.91; p = 0.70) or death (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.57 to 2.07; p = 0.79) during follow-up was not significantly increased with vorapaxar in patients who had a new ischemic stroke (n = 204). Although hemorrhagic stroke was increased (HR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.00 to 7.73; p = 0.049), overall stroke was significantly reduced (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52 to 0.87; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Vorapaxar reduces ischemic stroke in patients with MI or PAD and no known CVD. There does not appear to be a significant increase in the risk of hemorrhagic conversion or death in patients who experienced a first ischemic stroke on vorapaxar. Although primary hemorrhagic stroke is increased, vorapaxar reduces the total incidence of stroke. (Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar (SCH 530348; MK-5348) in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis [TRA 2 °P-TIMI 50]; NCT00526474).

Intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: the BOOST-2 randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

Aims Intracoronary infusion of autologous nucleated bone marrow cells (BMCs) enhanced the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the randomised-controlled, open-label BOOST trial. We reassessed the therapeutic potential of nucleated BMCs in the randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind BOOST-2 trial conducted in 10 centres in Germany and Norway. Methods and results Using a multiple arm design, we investigated the dose-response relationship and explored whether γ-irradiation which eliminates the clonogenic potential of stem and progenitor cells has an impact on BMC efficacy. Between 9 March 2006 and 16 July 2013, 153 patients with large STEMI were randomly assigned to receive a single intracoronary infusion of placebo (control group), high-dose (hi)BMCs, low-dose (lo)BMCs, irradiated hiBMCs, or irradiated loBMCs 8.1 ± 2.6 days after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to guideline-recommended medical treatment. Change in LVEF from baseline (before cell infusion) to 6 months as determined by MRI was the primary endpoint. The trial is registered at Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN17457407). Baseline LVEF was 45.0 ± 8.5% in the overall population. At 6 months, LVEF had increased by 3.3 percentage points in the control group and 4.3 percentage points in the hiBMC group. The estimated treatment effect was 1.0 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.6 to 4.7; P = 0.57). The treatment effect of loBMCs was 0.5 percentage points (-3.0 to 4.1; P = 0.76). Likewise, irradiated BMCs did not have significant treatment effects. BMC transfer was safe and not associated with adverse clinical events. Conclusion The BOOST-2 trial does not support the use of nucleated BMCs in patients with STEMI and moderately reduced LVEF treated according to current standards of early PCI and drug therapy.

Novel drugs and current therapeutic approaches in the treatment of heart failure

SummaryTreatment of heart failure attempts to reduce symptoms, increase functional capacity and prolong survival. Optimal therapy usually requires a combination of several drugs. At present, ACE inhibitors are the drugs of first choice, but must be combined with diuretics in symptomatic patients. Digitalis glycosides are still an important supplement to diuretics and ACE inhibitors. Specific angiotensin receptor antagonists such as losartan have an effect comparable with that of ACE inhibitors and may possess certain advantages because of their direct effect at the receptor level.Extensive research has been conducted in the treatment of heart failure. Newer direct acting vasodilators such as flosequinan and epoprostenol have demonstrated improved exercise tolerance but have an adverse effect on mortality. Positive inotropic agents consisting of a heterogeneous group of drugs have been evaluated. Although novel agents such as xamoterol, milrinone, pimobendan and vesnarinone have demonstrated improved haemodynamics and improved symptoms, they are not advisable at present due to increased mortality related to treatment or a high incidence of adverse events.β-Blockers, used judiciously, may improve functional capacity as well as mortality and may be an important supplement to current conventional treatment. The new generation of β-blockers with vasodilating properties such as Carvedilol and bucindolol appear promising.

Benefit of converting enzyme inhibition on left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients receiving β-blockade after myocardial infarction

β-blockers reduce infarct size and improve survival after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Post-MI angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition also improves survival and may attenuate left ventricular (LV) dilatation. We evaluated the effect of early enalapril treatment on LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in patients on concomitant β-blockade after MI. Intravenous enalaprilat or placebo was administered <24 hours after MI and was continued orally for 6 months. LV volumes were assessed by echocardiography 3 ± 2 days, 1 and 6 months after MI. Change in LV diastolic volume during the first month was attenuated with enalapril (2.7 vs placebo 6.5 ml/m2 change; p < 0.05), and significantly lower LV diastolic and systolic volumes were observed with enalapril treatment compared with placebo at 1 month (enalapril 47.223.9 vs placebo 53.129.2 ml/m2; p < 0.05) and at 6 months (enalapril 47.924.8 vs placebo 53.829.6 ml/m2; p < 0.05). EF was also significantly higher 1 month after MI in these patients (enalapril 50.4% vs placebo 46.4%; p < 0.05). Our data demonstrate that early enalapril treatment attenuates LV volume expansion and maintains lower LV volumes and higher EF in patients receiving concurrent β-blockade after MI. A possible additive effect of combined therapy should be evaluated prospectively.

Effects of early enalapril treatment on global and regional wall motion in acute myocardial infarction

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor therapy can preserve left ventricular (LV) function and geometric features and improve survival in subsets of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We investigated the effect of enalapril treatment initiated < 24 hours after AMI on global and regional echocardiographic wall motion indexes obtained at 2 to 5 days and at 1 and 6 months in 428 consecutive patients enrolled in the randomized, placebo-controlled Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II. In anterior AMIs, the non-infarct-zone index deteriorated in the placebo group but remained unchanged in the enalapril-treated group (0.18 vs 0.02; p < or = 0.05), an effect related to attenuated LV volume expansion. No treatment effects were observed in nonanterior AMIs or in the entire unselected population. Thus in an unselected population with AMI, early enalapril treatment had no effect on LV function; yet in patients with anterior infarcts, LV function was maintained through preservation of function in the noninfarcted myocardium.