Veronica Miorelli

Cochlear Implantation at under 12 months: Report on 10 Patients†

Objectives: There is growing evidence that early application of a cochlear implant in children affected by profound congenital hearing loss is of paramount importance for the development of an adequate auditory performance and language skills. For these reasons and as a result of advances in audiologic diagnosis and an enhanced awareness of the safety of cochlear implants, the age of implantation has substantially decreased over recent years. Children aged as little as 12 months are now being implanted in some centers. On the basis of our experience with very young children, we believe that the date of implantation may be further reduced to only 4 to 6 months of age.

Auditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and children.

Previous studies have considered only patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) older than 12 years as candidates for an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Our study expands the potential criteria to include both children and adult subjects with other cochlear or cochlear nerve malfunctions who either would not benefit at all from a cochlear implant (eg, cochlear nerve aplasia or avulsion) or whose benefit was or would be severely compromised (eg, cochlear ossification, cochlear fracture). STUDY DESIGN: In our department, over the period from April 1997 to September 2002, 29 patients, 20 adults and 9 children, were fitted with ABIs. Their ages ranged from 14 months to 70 years. Thirteen subjects had tumors, 10 NF2 and 3 solitary vestibular schwannoma, and 16 patients had a variety of nontumor (NT) cochlear or cochlear nerve diseases. A retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach was used in T and a retrosigmoid approach in NT patients. The electrode array was inserted into the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and correct electrode positioning was monitored with the aid of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). RESULTS: Correct implantation was achieved in all patients. No complications were observed due to implantation surgery or related to ABI activation or long-term use. Auditory sensations were induced in all patients with various numbers of electrodes (from 5 to 15). Different pitch sensations were identifiable with different electrode stimulation. Closed-set word recognition, open-set sentence recognition, and speech tracking scores achieved by the patients are reported in detail. The auditory performance of the patients showed significantly better outcomes than controls (Multicentric European clinical investigations on ABI with NF2). CONCLUSION: We have shown that the indications for the ABI can be extended to include NT patients with severe cochlear and/or cochlear nerve abnormalities. The degree of auditory benefit varies as a function of the underlying pathological conditions, with NT subjects exhibiting significantly better outcomes than the T patients.

Hearing restoration with auditory brainstem implant in three children with cochlear nerve aplasia.

Objective To verify the possibility of auditory habilitation in children with aplasia and hypoplasia of the cochlear nerve by direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nuclei with an auditory brainstem implant. Study Design Retrospective case review. Setting Study conducted at the Ear, Nose, and Throat Department of the University of Verona, Italy. Patients Three children, aged 4, 3, and 2 years, respectively, with severe bilateral cochlear malformations and cochlear nerve aplasia have received an auditory brainstem implant at this institution in the past 2 years. Intervention The classic retrosigmoid approach was used. Correct positioning of the electrodes was evaluated using electric auditory brainstem responses and neural response telemetry. Before the patients were discharged, high-resolution computed tomography with a bone algorithm reconstruction technique was performed to evaluate electrode placement. The auditory brainstem implant was activated 30 to 60 days after implantation. Results No postoperative complications were observed. To date, 21, 18, and 8 electrodes, respectively, have been activated in the three children. The first patient, 12 months after activation, had achieved good environmental sound awareness, good speech detection, and some speech recognition. The second child, 8 months after activation, had achieved good environmental sound awareness and moderate speech detection. The third patient, 1 month after activation, had obtained good environmental sound awareness. Conclusion This study indicates that auditory brainstem implantation is technically feasible in children with cochlear nerve aplasia. The early results suggest the possibility of achieving auditory habilitation with auditory brainstem implantation in this population.

Auditory Brainstem Implant in Posttraumatic Cochlear Nerve Avulsion

Patients aged over 12 years with neurofibromatosis type 2 are considered candidates for an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). This study extends the indication criteria of ABI to subjects with profound hearing loss due to damaged cochleas and/or cochlear nerves (CNs) following head injuries. In our department, over the period from April 1997 to November 2002, 32 patients, 23 adults and 9 children, were fitted with ABIs. Their ages ranged from 14 months to 70 years. These patients were suffering from a variety of tumor (13 subjects) and nontumor CN or cochlear diseases (19 subjects). Six patients, 5 adults and 1 child, had profound hearing loss following head injury. Their mean age was 25 years (range: 16–48 years). Five were male and 1 female. The retrosigmoid approach was used in all 6 patients. The electrode array was inserted into the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and correct electrode positioning was monitored with the aid of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and neural response telemetry. Correct implantation was achieved in all patients. No complications were observed due to implantation surgery or related to ABI activation and stimulation of the cochlear nuclei. At activation, an average of 9.8 electrodes (range 5–13) were switched on without side effects. One to 6 electrodes were activated in the following sessions after time periods ranging from 2 to 16 months. All patients achieved auditory-alone-mode closed-set word recognition scores ranging from 40 to 100%; 3 had auditory-alone-mode open-set sentence recognition scores of 60–100%; 2 of these even had speech-tracking performance scores of 38 and 43 words, respectively, showing an ability to engage in normal conversation and converse over the phone. The present study demonstrates that the ABI is a useful rehabilitation instrument in subjects with damaged cochleas and/or CN avulsion following head injury who are unamenable or poorly responsive to auditory rehabilitation using cochlear implants.

Hearing habilitation with auditory brainstem implantation in two children with cochlear nerve aplasia.

Patients with aplasia and hypoplasia of the cochlear nerve have no chance of having their hearing restored by stimulating the periphery of the auditory system using the traditional cochlear implant. A possible approach to auditory rehabilitation may be direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nuclei with an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Recently, two children, aged 4 and 3 years, respectively, with bilateral severe cochlear malformations and cochlear nerve aplasia received an ABI. The present paper reports the technique and the preliminary results of this experience. The classic retrosigmoid approach was used. The correct position of the electrodes was estimated with the aid of EABRs and neural response telemetry (NRT). No postoperative complications were observed. High-resolution CT scans with a bone algorithm reconstruction technique were taken postoperatively to evaluate electrode placement before discharge. The ABI was activated 30 days after implantation in both patients. To date 16 and 13 electrodes, respectively, have been activated in the two children. Three months after activation the first patient had achieved good environmental sound awareness, good speech detection and some speech discrimination. The second child, 1 month after activation, had achieved good environmental sound awareness and moderate speech detection. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of patients with hypoplasia of the cochlea and aplasia of the cochlear nerve, aged below 5 years and treated with an ABI.

Auditory brainstem implantation: the University of Verona experience.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the advantages of the retrosigmoid-transmeatal (RS-TM) approach in the application of auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) in adults with monolateral and bilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) and in children with cochlear nerve aplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective case review. SETTING: The study was conducted at the ENT Department of the University of Verona, Italy. PATIENTS: Six adult patients (5 men and 1 woman) with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) were operated on for VS removal with ABI. An additional patient had a unilateral VS in the only hearing ear. Tumor size ranged from 12 to 40 mm. In addition, 2 children received ABIs for bilateral cochlear nerve aplasia. INTERVENTION: An RS-TM approach was used in all VS patients, and an RS approach was used in the subjects with cochlear nerve aplasia. After tumor excision, landmarks (VII, VIII and IX cranial nerves, choroid plexus) for the foramen of Luschka were carefully identified. The choroid plexus was then partially removed and the tela choroidea divided and bent back; the floor of the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and the convolution of the dorsal cochlear nucleus became visible. In the 2 subjects with no cochlear nerve, the choroid plexus and VII and IX cranial nerves were used as landmarks. The electrode array was then inserted into the lateral recess and the correct position was monitored with the aid of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR) and neural response telemetry (NRT). RESULTS: Correct implantation was possible in all patients. Auditory sensations were induced in all patients with various numbers of electrodes. Different pitch sensations could be identified with different electrode stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the RS approach is the route of choice for patients who are candidates for ABI due to the easy and clear access to the cochlear nucleus area. This route avoids some of the drawbacks of the translabyrinthine approach, such as mastoidectomy, labyrinthectomy, sealing of the cavity and posterior fossa with abdominal fat, and contamination from the middle ear. For this reason, it is the route of choice in children with cochlear nerve aplasia or severe cochlear malformation and in adults with complete ossification of the cochlea or cochlear nerve disruption due to cranial trauma.

Cochlear implant failure: is an auditory brainstem implant the answer?

Objective To investigate the auditory rehabilitative results achieved in five patients with cochlear implants (CIs) who subsequently received, due to poor results, auditory brainstem implants (ABIs). Material and Methods Between April 1997 and March 2003, 37 patients (age range 14 months to 70 years) were fitted with ABIs in our ENT Department. Fourteen subjects had neurofibromatosis type 2 and 23 were non-tumor patients who had cochlea or cochlear nerve disease. Five subjects had previously been treated with a CI and received an ABI owing to the poor results achieved. One child had bilateral undiagnosed cochlear nerve aplasia and one was suffering from auditory neuropathy; three adults had total cochlear ossification. Results The open-set sentence recognition score (auditory-only mode) 6–8 months after ABI activation ranged from 0% to 100% in adults. In 1 subject the speech-tracking score was 56 words/min with the ABI. The two children who had achieved no hearing ability with their CI were able to detect sounds and words as early as 3 months after activation of the ABI. Conclusion CI failure as a result of anatomical abnormalities can be remedied by an ABI.

Deafness and the Bionic Ear

Deafness is a by no means negligible social problem. The subject suffering from profound deafness in Italy amount approximately 120,000 and, according to the ISTAT data, the proportion of deaf subjects aged over 50 is steadily increasing and will have reached as much as 10% of the population by the year 2001. It is estimated that 150 to 200 children a year are born with profound congenital bilateral neurosensory hearing loss; if we consider the pre and periverbal forms acquired in preschool infancy, the number rises to some 1000 cases a year and, if we go on to consider the forms acquired in children of school-going age, the number of cases per year rises to as many as 2000–3000. Approximately 47% of the population present hearing problems and 18,000 adult subjects suffer from profound bilateral deafness. These figures necessarily bring us to the concept of the socio-economic analysis of the problem of deafness. The presence of severe or profound loss of hearing reduces the ability to perceive spoken language and this, in turn, leads, in the deaf child, to the development of models of articulation which differ significantly from those