Veronica White

Effectiveness and safety of meropenem/ clavulanate-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB

No large study has ever evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of meropenem/clavulanate to treat multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR- and XDR-TB). The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the therapeutic contribution, effectiveness, safety and tolerability profile of meropenem/clavulanate added to a background regimen when treating MDR- and XDR-TB cases. Patients treated with a meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimen (n=96) showed a greater drug resistance profile than those exposed to a meropenem/clavulanate-sparing regimen (n=168): in the former group XDR-TB was more frequent (49% versus 6.0%, p<0.0001) and the median (interquartile range (IQR)) number of antibiotic resistances was higher (8 (6–9) versus 5 (4–6)). Patients were treated with a meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimen for a median (IQR) of 85 (49–156) days. No statistically significant differences were observed in the overall MDR-TB cohort and in the subgroups with and without the XDR-TB patients; in particular, sputum smear and culture conversion rates were similar in XDR-TB patients exposed to meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens (88.0% versus 100.0%, p=1.00 and 88.0% versus 100.0%, p=1.00, respectively). Only six cases reported adverse events attributable to meropenem/clavulanate (four of them then restarting treatment). The nondifferent outcomes and bacteriological conversion rate observed in cases who were more severe than controls might imply that meropenem/clavulanate could be active in treating MDR- and XDR-TB cases. Meropenem/clavulanate is effective and safe to treat MDR- and XDR-TB in comparison with controls http://ow.ly/XG75j

Effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB: A multicentre study

Large studies on bedaquiline used to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR-) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bedaquiline-containing regimens in a large, retrospective, observational study conducted in 25 centres and 15 countries in five continents. 428 culture-confirmed MDR-TB cases were analysed (61.5% male; 22.1% HIV-positive, 45.6% XDR-TB). MDR-TB cases were admitted to hospital for a median (interquartile range (IQR)) 179 (92–280) days and exposed to bedaquiline for 168 (86–180) days. Treatment regimens included, among others, linezolid, moxifloxacin, clofazimine and carbapenems (82.0%, 58.4%, 52.6% and 15.3% of cases, respectively). Sputum smear and culture conversion rates in MDR-TB cases were 63.6% and 30.1%, respectively at 30 days, 81.1% and 56.7%, respectively at 60 days; 85.5% and 80.5%, respectively at 90 days and 88.7% and 91.2%, respectively at the end of treatment. The median (IQR) time to smear and culture conversion was 34 (30–60) days and 60 (33–90) days. Out of 247 culture-confirmed MDR-TB cases completing treatment, 71.3% achieved success (62.4% cured; 8.9% completed treatment), 13.4% died, 7.3% defaulted and 7.7% failed. Bedaquiline was interrupted due to adverse events in 5.8% of cases. A single case died, having electrocardiographic abnormalities that were probably non-bedaquiline related. Bedaquiline-containing regimens achieved high conversion and success rates under different nonexperimental conditions. Bedaquiline is safe and effective in treating MDR- and XDR-TB patients http://ow.ly/6MWK30adHkw

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of imipenem/clavulanate- versus meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB

No large study to date has ever evaluated the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of imipenem/clavulanate versus meropenem/clavulanate to treat multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR- and XDR-TB). The aim of this observational study was to compare the therapeutic contribution of imipenem/clavulanate versus meropenem/clavulanate added to background regimens to treat MDR- and XDR-TB cases. 84 patients treated with imipenem/clavulanate-containing regimens showed a similar median number of antibiotic resistances (8 versus 8) but more fluoroquinolone resistance (79.0% versus 48.9%, p<0.0001) and higher XDR-TB prevalence (67.9% versus 49.0%, p=0.01) in comparison with 96 patients exposed to meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens. Patients were treated with imipenem/clavulanate- and meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens for a median (interquartile range) of 187 (60–428) versus 85 (49–156) days, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed on sputum smear and culture conversion rates (79.7% versus 94.8%, p=0.02 and 71.9% versus 94.8%, p<0.0001, respectively) and on success rates (59.7% versus 77.5%, p=0.03). Adverse events to imipenem/clavulanate and meropenem/clavulanate were reported in 5.4% and 6.5% of cases only. Our study suggests that meropenem/clavulanate is more effective than imipenem/clavulanate in treating MDR/XDR-TB patients. Meropenem/clavulanate is safe and more effective than imipenem/clavulanate in treating MDR and XDR-TB patients http://ow.ly/Z4S2o

Effectiveness and Safety of Imipenem-Clavulanate Added to an Optimized Background Regimen (OBR) Versus OBR Control Regimens in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Simon Tiberi, Giovanni Sotgiu, Lia D’Ambrosio, Rosella Centis, Marcos Abdo Arbex, Edith Alarcon Arrascue, Jan Willem Alffenaar, Jose A. Caminero, Mina Gaga, Gina Gualano, Alena Skrahina, Ivan Solovic, Giorgia Sulis, Marina Tadolini, Valentina Alarcon Guizado, Saverio De Lorenzo, Aurora Jazmin Roby Arias, Anna Scardigli, Onno W. Akkerman, Alena Aleksa, Janina Artsukevich, Vera Avchinko, Eduardo Henrique Bonini, Felix Antonio Chong Marin, Lorena Collahuazo Lopez, Gerard de Vries, Simone Dore, Heinke Kunst, Alberto Matteelli, Charalampos Moschos, Fabrizio Palmieri, Apostolos Papavasileiou, Marie-Christine Payen, Andrea Piana, Antonio Spanevello, Dante Vargas Vasquez, Pietro Viggiani, Veronica White, Alimuddin Zumla and Giovanni Battista Migliori

Moxifloxacin: An Alternative to Ethambutol for the Treatment of Presumed Ocular Tuberculosis.

Abstract Objective: To present moxifloxacin as an alternative treatment option to ethambutol in an anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) regime in patients with presumed ocular tuberculosis (TB). Methods: We identified all cases in our hospital referred for treatment of presumed ocular TB between 2009 and 2013. Age, gender, ophthalmic examination, blood tests, treatment regimens, adverse drug reactions, and outcomes were collected and analyzed for the patients who had moxifloxacin as part of their ATT. Results: Forty-three cases of presumed ocular TB were treated with moxifloxacin as a part of ATT. Mean age was 44.18 ± 12.47 years; 62.8% were male. A response to treatment, with no evidence of disease recurrence, was seen in 72.1% of cases. Shortened ATT duration was associated with increased risk of treatment failure (p = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.77 to −0.00). Conclusions: Moxifloxacin can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to ethambutol for the treatment of presumed ocular TB.

An unusual presentation of miliary tuberculosis

A young Bangladeshi woman presented to the emergency department with vaginal discharge on a history of fevers and rigours. Although initially treated for pelvic inflammatory disease, the patient rapidly developed respiratory failure with acute respiratory distress syndrome. An axillary biopsy and a high-resolution CT of the chest confirmed miliary tuberculosis (TB). She was initiated on anti-TB medication and made a rapid recovery.

Tuberculous tales: an East London experience

Tuberculous meningitis presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, and considering its long history and increasing global incidence, the evidence base for its treatment is relatively scanty. Many UK neurologists will have little first-hand experience of this deadly condition, and if faced with a patient with possible tuberculous meningitis will find decision making less than straightforward. In parts of East London (UK) the rates of tuberculosis and tuberculous meningitis are among the highest in Western Europe, and so the neurologists and respiratory physicians at the Royal London Hospital have encountered many such patients over the years. We have found experience to be a valuable teacher and so would like to share five cases that illustrate the complexities of diagnosis and management of the disease, and complications of its treatment.