Veronika Fedirko
International Agency for Research on Cancer
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Veronika Fedirko.
Annals of Oncology | 2011
Veronika Fedirko; I. Tramacere; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Matteo Rota; Lorenza Scotti; Farhad Islami; E. Negri; Kurt Straif; Isabelle Romieu; C. La Vecchia; Paolo Boffetta; Mazda Jenab
BACKGROUNDnThe International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that alcohol consumption is related to colorectal cancer (CRC). However, several issues remain unresolved, including quantification of the association for light (≤1 drink/day) and moderate (2-3 drinks/day) alcohol drinking, investigation of the dose-response relationship, and potential heterogeneity of effects by sex, colorectal site, and geographical region.nnnMETHODSnTwenty-seven cohort and 34 case-control studies presenting results for at least three categories of alcohol intake were identified from a PubMed search of articles published before May 2010. The summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated by the random effects model. Second-order fractional polynomials and random effects meta-regression models were used for modeling the dose-risk relation.nnnRESULTSnThe RRs were 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.28] for moderate and 1.52 (95% CI 1.27-1.81) for heavy (≥4 drinks/day) alcohol drinking. The RR for moderate drinkers, compared with non-/occasional drinkers, was stronger for men (RR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.13-1.37) than for women (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13; P(heterogeneity) = 0.02). For heavy drinkers, the association was stronger in Asian studies (RR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.33-2.46; P(heterogeneity) = 0.04). The dose-risk analysis estimated RRs of 1.07 (95% CI 1.04-1.10), 1.38 (95% CI 1.28-1.50), and 1.82 (95% CI 1.41-2.35) for 10, 50, and 100 g/day of alcohol, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThis meta-analysis provides strong evidence for an association between alcohol drinking of >1 drink/day and colorectal cancer risk.
BMC Medicine | 2013
Sabine Rohrmann; Kim Overvad; H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Rikke Egeberg; Anne Tjønneland; Laura Nailler; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Vittorio Krogh; Domenico Palli; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Fulvio Ricceri; Manuela M. Bergmann; Heiner Boeing; Kuanrong Li; Rudolf Kaaks; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J. Wareham; Francesca L. Crowe; Timothy J. Key; Androniki Naska; Antonia Trichopoulou; Dimitirios Trichopoulos; Max Leenders; Petra H. Peeters; Dagrun Engeset; Christine L. Parr; Guri Skeie
BackgroundRecently, some US cohorts have shown a moderate association between red and processed meat consumption and mortality supporting the results of previous studies among vegetarians. The aim of this study was to examine the association of red meat, processed meat, and poultry consumption with the risk of early death in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).MethodsIncluded in the analysis were 448,568 men and women without prevalent cancer, stroke, or myocardial infarction, and with complete information on diet, smoking, physical activity and body mass index, who were between 35 and 69 years old at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association of meat consumption with all-cause and cause-specific mortality.ResultsAs of June 2009, 26,344 deaths were observed. After multivariate adjustment, a high consumption of red meat was related to higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.28, 160+ versus 10 to 19.9 g/day), and the association was stronger for processed meat (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.66, 160+ versus 10 to 19.9 g/day). After correction for measurement error, higher all-cause mortality remained significant only for processed meat (HR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.25, per 50 g/d). We estimated that 3.3% (95% CI 1.5% to 5.0%) of deaths could be prevented if all participants had a processed meat consumption of less than 20 g/day. Significant associations with processed meat intake were observed for cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and other causes of death. The consumption of poultry was not related to all-cause mortality.ConclusionsThe results of our analysis support a moderate positive association between processed meat consumption and mortality, in particular due to cardiovascular diseases, but also to cancer.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2011
Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Christina Bamia; Pagona Lagiou; Veronika Fedirko; Elisabeth Trepo; Mazda Jenab; Tobias Pischon; Ute Nöthlings; Kim Overved; Anne Tjønneland; Malene Outzen; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Rudolf Kaaks; Annekatrin Lukanova; Heiner Boeing; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Vassiliki Benetou; Dimosthenis Zylis; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Henk van Kranen; Petra H.M. Peeters; Eiliv Lund; J. Ramón Quirós; Carlos A. González; Maria Pérez
BACKGROUNDnTo date, no attempt has been made to systematically determine the apportionment of the hepatocellular carcinoma burden in Europe or North America among established risk factors.nnnMETHODSnUsing data collected from 1992 to 2006, which included 4,409,809 person-years in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC), we identified 125 case patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, of whom 115 were matched to 229 control subjects. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of documented risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma with incidence of this disease and estimated their importance in this European cohort.nnnRESULTSnChronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (OR = 9.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.10 to 39.50 and OR = 13.36, 95% CI = 4.11 to 43.45, respectively), obesity (OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.06 to 4.29), former or current smoking (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 0.90 to 4.39 and OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 1.90 to 10.91, respectively), and heavy alcohol intake (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 0.73 to 4.27) were associated with hepatocellular carcinoma. Smoking contributed to almost half of all hepatocellular carcinomas (47.6%), whereas 13.2% and 20.9% were attributable to chronic HBV and HCV infection, respectively. Obesity and heavy alcohol intake contributed 16.1% and 10.2%, respectively. Almost two-thirds (65.7%, 95% CI = 50.6% to 79.3%) of hepatocellular carcinomas can be accounted for by exposure to at least one of these documented risk factors.nnnCONCLUSIONSnSmoking contributed to more hepatocellular carcinomas in this Europe-wide cohort than chronic HBV and HCV infections. Heavy alcohol consumption and obesity also contributed to sizeable fractions of this disease burden. These contributions may be underestimates because EPIC volunteers are likely to be more health conscious than the general population.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Neil Murphy; Teresa Norat; Pietro Ferrari; Mazda Jenab; H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Guri Skeie; Christina C. Dahm; Kim Overvad; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Antoine Racine; Rudolf Kaaks; Birgit Teucher; Heiner Boeing; Manuela M. Bergmann; Antonia Trichopoulou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Pagona Lagiou; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Paolo Vineis; Peter D. Siersema; Fränzel J.B. Van Duijnhoven; Petra H.M. Peeters; Anette Hjartåker; Dagrun Engeset
Background Earlier analyses within the EPIC study showed that dietary fibre intake was inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk, but results from some large cohort studies do not support this finding. We explored whether the association remained after longer follow-up with a near threefold increase in colorectal cancer cases, and if the association varied by gender and tumour location. Methodology/Principal Findings After a mean follow-up of 11.0 years, 4,517 incident cases of colorectal cancer were documented. Total, cereal, fruit, and vegetable fibre intakes were estimated from dietary questionnaires at baseline. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by age, sex, and centre, and adjusted for total energy intake, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, education, menopausal status, hormone replacement therapy, oral contraceptive use, and intakes of alcohol, folate, red and processed meats, and calcium. After multivariable adjustments, total dietary fibre was inversely associated with colorectal cancer (HR per 10 g/day increase in fibre 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79–0.96). Similar linear associations were observed for colon and rectal cancers. The association between total dietary fibre and risk of colorectal cancer risk did not differ by age, sex, or anthropometric, lifestyle, and dietary variables. Fibre from cereals and fibre from fruit and vegetables were similarly associated with colon cancer; but for rectal cancer, the inverse association was only evident for fibre from cereals. Conclusions/Significance Our results strengthen the evidence for the role of high dietary fibre intake in colorectal cancer prevention.
Gut | 2011
Fränzel J.B. Van Duijnhoven; H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Miriam Calligaro; Mazda Jenab; Tobias Pischon; Eugene Jansen; Jiri Frohlich; Amir F. Ayyobi; Kim Overvad; Anne Pernille Toft-Petersen; Anne Tjønneland; Louise Hansen; Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Vanessa Cottet; Domenico Palli; Giovanna Tagliabue; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Paolo Vineis; Rudolf Kaaks; Birgit Teucher; Heiner Boeing; Dagmar Drogan; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Vardis Dilis; Petra H.M. Peeters; Peter D. Siersema; Laudina Rodríguez
Objective To examine the association between serum concentrations of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA), apolipoprotein B and the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). Design Nested case–control study. Setting The study was conducted within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), a cohort of more than 520u2008000 participants from 10 western European countries. Participants 1238 cases of incident CRC, which developed after enrolment into the cohort, were matched with 1238 controls for age, sex, centre, follow-up time, time of blood collection and fasting status. Main outcome measures Serum concentrations were quantitatively determined by colorimetric and turbidimetric methods. Dietary and lifestyle data were obtained from questionnaires. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs which were adjusted for height, weight, smoking habits, physical activity, education, consumption of fruit, vegetables, meat, fish, alcohol, fibre and energy. Results After adjustments, the concentrations of HDL and apoA were inversely associated with the risk of colon cancer (RR for 1u2005SD increase of 16.6u2005mg/dl in HDL and 32.0u2005mg/dl in apoA of 0.78 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.89) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.94), respectively). No association was observed with the risk of rectal cancer. Additional adjustment for biomarkers of systemic inflammation, insulin resistance and oxidative stress or exclusion of the first 2u2005years of follow-up did not influence the association between HDL and risk of colon cancer. Conclusions These findings show that high concentrations of serum HDL are associated with a decreased risk of colon cancer. The mechanism behind this association needs further elucidation.
International Journal of Cancer | 2013
Sabrina Schlesinger; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Tobias Pischon; Veronika Fedirko; Mazda Jenab; Elisabeth Trepo; Paolo Boffetta; Christina C. Dahm; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjønneland; Jytte Halkjær; Guy Fagherazzi; Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault; Franck Carbonnel; Rudolf Kaaks; Annekatrin Lukanova; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Christina Bamia; Pagona Lagiou; Domenico Palli; Sara Grioni; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Paolo Vineis; H. B. Bueno-de-Mesquita; Saskia W. van den Berg; Petra H. Peeters; Tonje Braaten; Elisabete Weiderpass
General obesity has been positively associated with risk of liver and probably with biliary tract cancer, but little is known about abdominal obesity or weight gain during adulthood. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to investigate associations between weight, body mass index, waist and hip circumference, waist‐to‐hip and waist‐to‐height ratio (WHtR), weight change during adulthood and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic (IBDC) and extrahepatic bile duct system cancer [EBDSC including gallbladder cancer (GBC)] among 359,525 men and women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Hepatitis B and C virus status was measured in a nested case–control subset. During a mean follow‐up of 8.6 years, 177 cases of HCC, 58 cases of IBDC and 210 cases of EBDSC, including 76 cases of GBC, occurred. All anthropometric measures were positively associated with risk of HCC and GBC. WHtR showed the strongest association with HCC [relative risk (RR) comparing extreme tertiles 3.51, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.09–5.87; ptrend < 0.0001] and with GBC (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.12–2.16 for an increment of one unit in WHtR). Weight gain during adulthood was also positively associated with HCC when comparing extreme tertiles (RR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.49–4.13; <0.001). No statistically significant association was observed between obesity and risk of IBDC and EBDSC. Our results provide evidence of an association between obesity, particularly abdominal obesity, and risk of HCC and GBC. Our findings support public health recommendations to reduce the prevalence of obesity and weight gain in adulthood for HCC and GBC prevention in Western populations.
British Journal of Cancer | 2011
Konstantinos K. Tsilidis; Naomi E. Allen; Timothy J. Key; Laure Dossus; A Lukanova; Kjersti Bakken; Eiliv Lund; Agnès Fournier; Kim Overvad; Louise Hansen; Anne Tjønneland; Veronika Fedirko; S. Rinaldi; Isabelle Romieu; F. Clavel-Chapelon; Pierre Engel; R. Kaaks; Madlen Schütze; Annika Steffen; Christina Bamia; Antonia Trichopoulou; Dimosthenis Zylis; Giovanna Masala; Valeria Pala; Rocco Galasso; R. Tumino; C. Sacerdote; H. B. Bueno-De-Mesquita; van Duijnhoven Fjb.; Braem Mgm.
Background:It is well established that parity and use of oral contraceptives reduce the risk of ovarian cancer, but the associations with other reproductive variables are less clear.Methods:We examined the associations of oral contraceptive use and reproductive factors with ovarian cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Among 327u2009396 eligible women, 878 developed ovarian cancer over an average of 9 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models stratified by centre and age, and adjusted for smoking status, body mass index, unilateral ovariectomy, simple hysterectomy, menopausal hormone therapy, and mutually adjusted for age at menarche, age at menopause, number of full-term pregnancies and duration of oral contraceptive use.Results:Women who used oral contraceptives for 10 or more years had a significant 45% (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41–0.75) lower risk compared with users of 1 year or less (P-trend, <0.01). Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had a 29% (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59–0.87) lower risk, with an 8% reduction in risk for each additional pregnancy. A high age at menopause was associated with a higher risk of ovarian cancer (>52 vs ⩽45 years: HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.06–1.99; P-trend, 0.02). Age at menarche, age at first full-term pregnancy, incomplete pregnancies and breastfeeding were not associated with risk.Conclusion:This study shows a strong protective association of oral contraceptives and parity with ovarian cancer risk, a higher risk with a late age at menopause, and no association with other reproductive factors.
Gut | 2013
Dominique S. Michaud; Jacques Izard; Charlotte Wilhelm-Benartzi; Doo Ho You; Verena Grote; Anne Tjønneland; Christina C. Dahm; Kim Overvad; Mazda Jenab; Veronika Fedirko; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Antoine Racine; Rudolf Kaaks; Heiner Boeing; Jana Foerster; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Carlotta Sacerdote; Sabina Sieri; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Salvatore Panico; Peter D. Siersema; Petra H.M. Peeters; Eiliv Lund; Aurelio Barricarte; José María Huerta; Esther Molina-Montes
Objective Examine the relationship between antibodies to 25 oral bacteria and pancreatic cancer risk in a prospective cohort study. Design We measured antibodies to oral bacteria in prediagnosis blood samples from 405 pancreatic cancer cases and 416 matched controls, nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Analyses were conducted using conditional logistic regression and additionally adjusted for smoking status and body mass index. Results Individuals with high levels of antibodies against Porphyromonas gingivalis ATTC 53978, a pathogenic periodontal bacteria, had a twofold higher risk of pancreatic cancer than individuals with lower levels of these antibodies (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.05 to 4.36; >200u2005ng/ml vs ≤200u2005ng/ml). To explore the association with commensal (non-pathogenic) oral bacteria, we performed a cluster analysis and identified two groups of individuals, based on their antibody profiles. A cluster with overall higher levels of antibodies had a 45% lower risk of pancreatic cancer than a cluster with overall lower levels of antibodies (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.83). Conclusions Periodontal disease might increase the risk for pancreatic cancer. Moreover, increased levels of antibodies against specific commensal oral bacteria, which can inhibit growth of pathogenic bacteria, might reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer. Studies are needed to determine whether oral bacteria have direct effects on pancreatic cancer pathogenesis or serve as markers of the immune response.
European Journal of Epidemiology | 2013
Christina Bamia; Pagona Lagiou; Genevieve Buckland; Sara Grioni; Claudia Agnoli; Aliki Taylor; Christina C. Dahm; Kim Overvad; Anja Olsen; Anne Tjønneland; Vanessa Cottet; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Sophie Morois; Verena Grote; Birgit Teucher; Heiner Boeing; Brian Buijsse; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; George Adarakis; Rosario Tumino; Alessio Naccarati; Salvatore Panico; Domenico Palli; H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Fränzel J.B. Van Duijnhoven; Petra H. Peeters; Dagrun Engeset; Guri Skeie; Eiliv Lund; María José Sánchez
The authors investigated the association of adherence to Mediterranean diet with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition study. Adherence to Mediterranean diet was expressed through two 10-unit scales, the Modified Mediterranean diet score (MMDS) and the Centre-Specific MMDS (CSMMDS). Both scales share the same dietary components but differ in the cut-off values that were used for these components in the construction of the scales. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for the associations of these scales with CRC incidence were estimated. After 5,296,617 person-years of follow-up, 4,355 incident CRC cases were identified. A decreased risk of CRC, of 8 and 11xa0% was estimated when comparing the highest (scores 6–9) with the lowest (scores 0–3) adherence to CSMMDS and MMDS respectively. For MMDS the HR was 0.89 (95xa0% confidence interval (CI): 0.80, 0.99). A 2-unit increment in either Mediterranean scale was associated with a borderline statistically significant 3 to 4xa0% reduction in CRC risk (HR for MMDS: 0.96; 95xa0% CI: 0.92, 1.00). These associations were somewhat more evident, among women, were mainly manifested for colon cancer risk and their magnitude was not altered when alcohol was excluded from MMDS. These findings suggest that following a Mediterranean diet may have a modest beneficial effect on CRC risk.
International Journal of Cancer | 2011
Farhad Islami; Veronika Fedirko; Irene Tramacere; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Mazda Jenab; Lorenza Scotti; Matteo Rota; Giovanni Corrao; Werner Garavello; Joachim Schüz; Kurt Straif; Eva Negri; Paolo Boffetta; Carlo La Vecchia
Quantification of the association between alcohol drinking and risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is an open issue, particularly among light alcohol drinkers, never‐smokers, and Asian populations, in which some high‐risk polymorphisms in alcohol metabolizing genes are more prevalent. To address these issues, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis using 40 case‐control and 13 cohort studies that reported on the risk associated with alcohol drinking for at least three levels of consumption. In studies adjusted for age, sex, and tobacco smoking, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between light alcohol drinking (≤12.5 g/d) and risk of ESCC was 1.38 (1.14–1.67). The association was slightly stronger in Asian countries than in other populations. The adjusted RRs (95% CIs) were 2.62 (2.07–3.31) for moderate drinking (>12.5–<50 g/d) and 5.54 (3.92–7.28) for high alcohol intake (≥50 g/d); the RRs were slightly higher in non‐Asian populations. In prospective studies, the RR (95% CI) was 1.35 (0.92–1.98) for light, 2.15 (1.55–2.98) for moderate, and 3.35 (2.06–5.46) for high alcohol intakes; light drinking showed an association with ESCC in Asia (five studies) but not in other regions (three studies). Among never‐smokers (nine studies), the RR (95% CI) was 0.74 (0.47–1.16) for light, 1.54 (1.09–2.17) for moderate, and 3.09 (1.75–5.46) for high intakes. This meta‐analysis further corroborates the association of moderate and high alcohol intake with risk of ESCC and provides risk estimates based on multiple prospective studies. Light alcohol intake appears to be associated to ESCC mainly in studies in Asia, which suggests a possible role of genetic susceptibility factors.