Vicki Whitehall

BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum

Background and aims: Mutations in BRAF have been linked with colorectal cancers (CRC) showing high level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). However, the distribution of BRAF mutations in MSI-H cancers remains to be clarified with respect to precursor lesions and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Methods: Forty three hyperplastic polyps (HP), nine mixed polyps (MP), five serrated adenomas (SA), 28 conventional adenomas (AD), 18 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCC), and 127 sporadic CRC (46 MSI-H and 81 non-MSI-H) were collected from patients undergoing colectomy for either CRC or hyperplastic polyposis. Twenty five of 57 serrated lesions were derived from four patients with hyperplastic polyposis. HP were further subdivided according to recently documented morphological criteria into 27 classical HP and 16 variant lesions described as “sessile serrated adenoma” (SSA). All tumours were screened for BRAF activating mutations. Results: The BRAF mutation was more frequent in SSA (75%) and MP (89%) than in classical HP (19%), SA (20%), and AD (0%) (p<0.0001), and also in sporadic MSI-H cancers (76%) compared with HNPCC (0%) and sporadic non-MSI-H cancers (9%) (p<0.0001). The BRAF mutation was identified more often in CIMP-high serrated polyps (72%) and CIMP-high CRC (77%) than in CIMP-low (30%) and CIMP-negative (13%) polyps (p = 0.002) as well as CIMP-low (18%) and CIMP-negative (0%) CRC (p<0.0001). Conclusions: The BRAF mutation was frequently seen in SSA and in sporadic MSI-H CRC, both of which were associated with DNA methylation. Sporadic MSI-H cancers may originate in SSA and not adenomas, and BRAF mutation and DNA methylation are early events in this “serrated” pathway.

Features of Colorectal Cancers with High-Level Microsatellite Instability Occurring in Familial and Sporadic Settings : Parallel Pathways of Tumorigenesis

High-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is demonstrated in 10 to 15% of sporadic colorectal cancers and in most cancers presenting in the inherited condition hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Distinction between these categories of MSI-H cancer is of clinical importance and the aim of this study was to assess clinical, pathological, and molecular features that might be discriminatory. One hundred and twelve MSI-H colorectal cancers from families fulfilling the Bethesda criteria were compared with 57 sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancers. HNPCC cancers presented at a lower age (P < 0.001) with no sporadic MSI-H cancer being diagnosed before the age of 57 years. MSI was less extensive in HNPCC cancers with 72% microsatellite markers showing band shifts compared with 87% in sporadic tumors (P < 0.001). Absent immunostaining for hMSH2 was only found in HNPCC tumors. Methylation of hMLH1 was observed in 87% of sporadic cancers but also in 55% of HNPCC tumors that showed loss of expression of hMLH1 (P = 0.02). HNPCC cancers were more frequently characterized by aberrant beta-catenin immunostaining as evidenced by nuclear positivity (P < 0.001). Aberrant p53 immunostaining was infrequent in both groups. There were no differences with respect to 5q loss of heterozygosity or codon 12 K-ras mutation, which were infrequent in both groups. Sporadic MSI-H cancers were more frequently heterogeneous (P < 0.001), poorly differentiated (P = 0.02), mucinous (P = 0.02), and proximally located (P = 0.04) than HNPCC tumors. In sporadic MSI-H cancers, contiguous adenomas were likely to be serrated whereas traditional adenomas were dominant in HNPCC. Lymphocytic infiltration was more pronounced in HNPCC but the results did not reach statistical significance. Overall, HNPCC cancers were more like common colorectal cancer in terms of morphology and expression of beta-catenin whereas sporadic MSI-H cancers displayed features consistent with a different morphogenesis. No individual feature was discriminatory for all HNPCC cancers. However, a model based on four features was able to classify 94.5% of tumors as sporadic or HNPCC. The finding of multiple differences between sporadic and familial MSI-H colorectal cancer with respect to both genotype and phenotype is consistent with tumorigenesis through parallel evolutionary pathways and emphasizes the importance of studying the two groups separately.

The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges

Approximately 30% of colorectal carcinomas develop via a serrated neoplasia pathway, named for the pattern of crypts in the precursor polyps. Molecular abnormalities consistently involve methylation of CpG islands [CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)] of low degree (CIMP‐L) or high degree (CIMP‐H), and activating mutations of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase pathway components BRAF or KRAS. Microsatellite instability (MSI) of a high level (MSI‐H) is often present, allowing for a molecular classification of serrated pathway carcinoma as: (i) BRAF mutant/CIMP‐H with either a) MSI‐H or b) microsatellite stable (MSS); and (ii) KRAS mutant/CIMP‐L/MSS. Precursor polyps include sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), characterized by proximal location, crypt architectural disturbance, and BRAF mutation. Microvesicular hyperplasic polyp (MVHP) probably precedes the development of SSA, and borderline lesions between MVHP and SSA occur. Cytological dysplasia in SSA portends advanced genetic abnormality and a high risk of progression to carcinoma. The traditional serrated adenoma has a predilection for the left colon, tubulovillous architecture, eosinophilic cytoplasm, and frequent KRAS mutation. Serrated morphology carcinoma is a new World Health Organization subtype with well‐differentiated, mucinous or trabecular patterns. It has frequent KRAS or BRAF mutations and a poor prognosis. This review provides an insight into the histology and molecular mechanisms driving these serrated pathway lesions.

Promoter hypermethylation frequency and BRAF mutations distinguish hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer from sporadic MSI-H colon cancer.

Background: Colorectal cancers resulting from defective DNA mismatch repair can occur in both hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) and in the sporadic setting. They are characterised by a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and superficially resemble each other in that they are frequently located in the proximal colon and share features such as circumscribed tumour margins and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. However, significant differences can be demonstrated at the molecular level including widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF-activating mutations which occur significantly less often in HNPCC. Aims: In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence of widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF mutations would exclude HNPCC. Materials and methods: We investigated the methylation status of four methylated in tumour markers (MINTs 1,2,12 and 31), and the promoter regions of 5 genes hMLH1, HPP1, MGMT, p16INK4A and p14ARF, in 21 sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancers and compared these with 18 cancers from HNPCC patients. The methylation status of CpG islands were determined by either methylation specific PCR (MSP) or combined bisulfite restricton analysis (COBRA). In addition we considered the BRAF mutation status of 18 HNPCC tumours and 19 sporadic MSI-H cancers which had been previously determined by RFLP analysis and confirmatory sequencing. Results: Methylation of the promoter regions in target genes occurred less frequently within the HNPCC tumours (27% of analyses), compared with the sporadic MSI-H tumours (59% of analyses)(P < 0.001). Methylation of MINTs 1, 2, 12 and 31 occurred in 4% of analyses for HNPCC tumours contrasted with 73% for sporadic MSI-H tumours (P < 0.001). BRAF mutations were detected in 74% of sporadic tumours but none of the HNPCC cancers tested. Conclusions: The total number of genes and MINTs methylated in HNPCC was lower than in MSI-H colorectal tumours. No HNPCC tumour showed evidence of widespread promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation suggesting this feature could be used as a discriminator between familial and sporadic cases.

A Multicenter Blinded Study to Evaluate KRAS Mutation Testing Methodologies in the Clinical Setting

Evidence that activating mutations of the KRAS oncogene abolish the response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. This has resulted in the urgent demand for KRAS mutation testing in the clinical setting to aid choice of therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate six different KRAS mutation detection methodologies on two series of primary colorectal cancer samples. Two series of 80 frozen and 74 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were sourced and DNA was extracted at a central site before distribution to seven different testing sites. KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 were assessed by using single strand conformation polymorphism analysis, pyrosequencing, high resolution melting analysis, dideoxy sequencing, or the commercially available TIB Molbiol (Berlin, Germany) or DxS Diagnostic Innovations (Manchester, UK) kits. In frozen tissue samples, concordance in KRAS status (defined as consensus in at least five assays) was observed in 66/80 (83%) cases. In paraffin tissue, concordance was 46/74 (63%) if all assays were considered or 71/74 (96%) using the five best performing assays. These results demonstrate that a variety of detection methodologies are suitable and provide comparable results for KRAS mutation analysis of clinical samples.

Evidence for BRAF Mutation and Variable Levels of Microsatellite Instability in a Syndrome of Familial Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recently, an alternative pathway of tumorigenesis has been identified in the colorectum associated with serrated precursor lesions, variable levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-V), and driven in part by activating mutations in the BRAF proto-oncogene (V599E). Somatic BRAF mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) are rarely observed. Here, we discuss their role in the development of other familial colorectal cancers (CRC). We studied non-FAP, non-HNPCC CRC families characterized by tumors that varied in their level of MSI between individual members. METHODS A subset of tumors from a total of 55 collected (25 polyps and 30 cancers) from 43 individuals across 11 families underwent pathology review, examination for V599E using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, and for methylation of the MINT31 CpG island. RESULTS All MSI-V families met the current revised Bethesda Guidelines and 6 of 11 (55%) met the Amsterdam I criteria. V599E was observed in 12 of 19 (63%) polyps and 14 of 20 (70%) cancers (4 of 4 high MSI, 2 of 4 low MSI, and 8 of 12 stable MSI), a significant increase over HNPCC (0 of 15 or 0%), and unselected CRC (30 of 197 or 15.2%) ( P < .05). Eight of the 10 (80%) cancers that underwent analysis showed hypermethylation of MINT31. CRCs showed early age at onset and were more likely to show a serrated architecture than unselected CRCs ( P < .05). CONCLUSION These data provide evidence that the families described here represent a syndrome of familial CRC that is distinct from HNPCC. High levels of BRAF mutation and MINT31 hypermethylation suggest an origin in the serrated pathway of CRC development.

Analysis of the Association between CIMP and BRAFV600E in Colorectal Cancer by DNA Methylation Profiling

A CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) is displayed by a distinct subset of colorectal cancers with a high frequency of DNA hypermethylation in a specific group of CpG islands. Recent studies have shown that an activating mutation of BRAF (BRAFV600E) is tightly associated with CIMP, raising the question of whether BRAFV600E plays a causal role in the development of CIMP or whether CIMP provides a favorable environment for the acquisition of BRAFV600E. We employed Illumina GoldenGate DNA methylation technology, which interrogates 1,505 CpG sites in 807 different genes, to further study this association. We first examined whether expression of BRAFV600E causes DNA hypermethylation by stably expressing BRAFV600E in the CIMP-negative, BRAF wild-type COLO 320DM colorectal cancer cell line. We determined 100 CIMP-associated CpG sites and examined changes in DNA methylation in eight stably transfected clones over multiple passages. We found that BRAFV600E is not sufficient to induce CIMP in our system. Secondly, considering the alternative possibility, we identified genes whose DNA hypermethylation was closely linked to BRAFV600E and CIMP in 235 primary colorectal tumors. Interestingly, genes that showed the most significant link include those that mediate various signaling pathways implicated in colorectal tumorigenesis, such as BMP3 and BMP6 (BMP signaling), EPHA3, KIT, and FLT1 (receptor tyrosine kinases) and SMO (Hedgehog signaling). Furthermore, we identified CIMP-dependent DNA hypermethylation of IGFBP7, which has been shown to mediate BRAFV600E-induced cellular senescence and apoptosis. Promoter DNA hypermethylation of IGFBP7 was associated with silencing of the gene. CIMP-specific inactivation of BRAFV600E-induced senescence and apoptosis pathways by IGFBP7 DNA hypermethylation might create a favorable context for the acquisition of BRAFV600E in CIMP+ colorectal cancer. Our data will be useful for future investigations toward understanding CIMP in colorectal cancer and gaining insights into the role of aberrant DNA hypermethylation in colorectal tumorigenesis.

DNA methylation within the normal colorectal mucosa is associated with pathway-specific predisposition to cancer

There are two major molecular pathways to sporadic colorectal cancer, the chromosomal instability (CIN) and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) pathways. This study recruited 166 patients undergoing colonoscopy. Biopsy samples were collected from the cecum, transverse colon, sigmoid colon and rectum. DNA methylation was quantified at ‘type A’ (ESR1, GATA5, HIC1, HPP1, SFRP1) and ‘type C’ markers (MGMT, MLH1, CDKN2A, MINT2, MINT31, IGF2, CACNA1G, NEUROG1, SOCS1, RUNX3), and LINE-1. ‘Type A’ genes are frequently methylated in normal and neoplastic tissues, proportional to tissue age. ‘Type C’ methylation is more specific for neoplasia. The last five ‘type C’ markers comprise a CIMP panel. The mean ‘type A’ and CIMP-panel methylation Z-scores were calculated. In all, 88 patients had adenomatous lesions, 32 had proximal serrated polyps (PSPs) and 50 were normal. Most ‘type A’ genes showed direct correlations between methylation and age (ESR1, ρ=0.66, P<0.0001), with higher methylation distally (ESR1, P<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, ‘type A’ methylation was inversely associated with colorectal adenomas (odds ratio=0.23, P<0.001), the precursor to CIN cancers. CIMP-panel methylation was significantly associated with advanced PSPs (odds ratio=5.1, P=0.009), the precursor to CIMP cancers. DNA methylation in normal mucosa varied with age and region and was associated with pathway-specific pathology. In the future, the colorectal field could yield important information and potentially inform clinical practice.

A human, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic supplementation: effects on luminal, inflammatory, epigenetic, and epithelial biomarkers of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND Diet is an important factor in colorectal carcinogenesis; thus, dietary supplements may have a role in colorectal cancer prevention. OBJECTIVE The objective was to establish the relative luminal, epithelial, and epigenetic consequences of prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic dietary supplementation in humans. DESIGN This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-wk crossover trial of resistant starch and Bifidobacterium lactis, either alone or as a combined synbiotic preparation, in 20 human volunteers. Rectal biopsy, feces, and serum samples were collected. The rectal mucosal endpoints were DNA methylation at 16 CpG island loci and LINE-1, epithelial proliferation (Ki67 immunohistochemistry), and crypt cellularity. The fecal endpoints were short-chain fatty acid concentrations, pH, ammonia, and microbiological profiles (by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing). Serum endpoints were a panel of cytokines and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. RESULTS Seventeen subjects completed the entire study. The synbiotic intervention fostered a significantly different fecal stream bacterial community than did either the prebiotic (P = 0.032) or the probiotic (P = 0.001) intervention alone, in part because of a greater proportion of patients harboring fecal Lachnospiraceae spp. These changes developed in the absence of any significant differences in fecal chemistry. There were no differences in epithelial kinetics. CONCLUSIONS This synbiotic supplementation with B. lactis and resistant starch, in the doses used, induced unique changes in fecal microflora but did not significantly alter any other fecal, serum, or epithelial variables. This trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry at www.anzctr.org.au as ACTRN012606000115538.

Role of inherited defects of MYH in the development of sporadic colorectal cancer

Biallelic germ‐line variants of the 8‐hydroxyguanine repair gene MYH have been associated with multiple colorectal adenomas that display somatic G:C→T:A transversions in APC. However, the effect of single germ‐line variants has not been widely studied. To examine the relationship between monoallelic MYH variants and susceptibility to sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), 92 cases of sporadic CRC, 19 cases of familial CRC not meeting the Bethesda guidelines, 17 cases with multiple adenomas, and 53 normal blood donors were screened for 8 potentially pathogenic germ‐line MYH variants. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at 1p adjacent to the MYH locus, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and somatic mutations in KRAS2 and APC were analyzed in sporadic cancers. Neither homozygote nor compound heterozygote MYH variants were observed in the germ‐line of any subjects with sporadic CRC. There was no difference in the incidence of monoallelic variants between this group (20 of 92, 22%) and cancer‐free controls (14 of 53, 26%). However, the presence of monoallelic germ‐line MYH variants was negatively associated with an MSI‐high (MSI‐H) tumor phenotype, with an incidence of only 1 of 23 (4%) MSI‐H CRCs as contrasted with 19 of 69 (28%) non‐MSI‐H (P = 0.02). Further, 4 of 5 tumors with 1p LOH contained monoallelic MYH variants compared with 15 of 53 without 1p LOH (P = 0.04) and the normal population (P = 0.03). The presence of G:C→T:A transversions in KRAS2 or APC was significantly more common in single MYH variant tumors (9 of 12) than in MYH wild‐type tumors (11 of 33; P = 0.02). These results suggest that single germ‐line variants of MYH may influence genetic pathways in CRC.