Victor A. Marcial

Second malignancies in patients who have head and neck cancer: incidence, effect on survival and implications based on the RTOG experience.

The development of second malignant tumors (SMTs), in patients who have had their first tumor treated successfully, represents a serious limitation of current therapeutic strategies for head and neck cancers. To improve our understanding of the current magnitude of the problem and the various factors that might influence its importance, we reviewed the Radiation Therapy Oncology Groups (RTOG) prospectively collected registry of all head and neck patients seen in participating member institutions between February 1977 and April 1980. A total of 928 patients were identified who had squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region, no prior or coincident history of another malignant tumor, and whose planned treatment consisted of radiation therapy only. A total of 110 second, independent, malignant tumors occurred in these patients. Overall, the estimated risk of developing a second tumor within 3 years of radiotherapy was 10%, within 5 years 15%, and within 8 years 23%. Minor differences in frequency were observed for different primary sites. These SMTs unquestionably influenced subsequent survival adversely. Analysis of the database also revealed that the extent of the primary tumor influenced the risk of a second; most occurred in patients who presented with the smallest primary tumors because of their better survival. Our data indicate that preventive medicine should have its greatest impact in those patients who are treated for an early stage primary tumor.

Original contributionSecond malignancies in patients who have head and neck cancer: Incidence, effect on survival and implications based on the RTOG experience

The development of second malignant tumors (SMTs), in patients who have had their first tumor treated successfully, represents a serious limitation of current therapeutic strategies for head and neck cancers. To improve our understanding of the current magnitude of the problem and the various factors that might influence its importance, we reviewed the Radiation Therapy Oncology Groups (RTOG) prospectively collected registry of all head and neck patients seen in participating member institutions between February 1977 and April 1980. A total of 928 patients were identified who had squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region, no prior or coincident history of another malignant tumor, and whose planned treatment consisted of radiation therapy only. A total of 110 second, independent, malignant tumors occurred in these patients. Overall, the estimated risk of developing a second tumor within 3 years of radiotherapy was 10%, within 5 years 15%, and within 8 years 23%. Minor differences in frequency were observed for different primary sites. These SMTs unquestionably influenced subsequent survival adversely. Analysis of the database also revealed that the extent of the primary tumor influenced the risk of a second; most occurred in patients who presented with the smallest primary tumors because of their better survival. Our data indicate that preventive medicine should have its greatest impact in those patients who are treated for an early stage primary tumor.

The effect of local-regional control on distant metastatic dissemination in carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of an analysis from the RTOG head and neck database☆

A retrospective analysis of the effect of local control on the development of distant metastases was performed in 2648 patients with carcinoma of the head and neck selected from the RTOG database. The 5-year time-adjusted incidence of distant metastases was 21% for patients who were in local-regional control at 6 months after the start of treatment, compared to 38% for local-regional failure patients (p less than 0.001). The incidence of distant metastases detected between the interval of 6 months to 2.5 years after treatment was significantly increased in patients with tumors of the oral cavity, oropharynx, supraglottic larynx, and glottis who developed local-regional failure within this time period, compared to those who remained locally controlled (19% distant metastases for local-regional failure vs 7% for local-regional control (p less than 0.001)). In contrast, there as no difference in the incidence of distant metastases in patients with carcinoma of the nasopharynx or hypopharynx regardless of the local-regional disease status. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that local-regional control was the most significant variable affecting the development of distant metastases, followed by tumor site, N-stage, and T-stage. For all tumor sites, except for the hypopharynx and nasopharynx, improvements in local-regional control are likely to improve survival. Tumors of the hypopharynx and nasopharynx have a higher probability of micro-metastatic dissemination at the time of initial diagnosis, and until effective methods to treat disseminated disease are developed, the effect of local control on survival will not be readily discerned.

Anemia is associated with decreased survival and increased locoregional failure in patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinoma : A secondary analysis of RTOG 85-27

PURPOSE The purpose of the present study is to investigate the strength of association between anemia and overall survival, locoregional failure, and late radiation therapy (RT) complications in a large prospective study of patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with conventional radiotherapy with or without a hypoxic cell sensitizer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between March 1988 and September 1991, 521 patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were entered into a randomized trial examining the addition of etanidazole (SR 2508) to conventional radiation therapy (RT) (66-74 Gy in 33-37 fractions, 5 days a week). Patients with hemoglobin (Hgb) levels measured and recorded prior to the second week of RT were included in this secondary analysis. Hemoglobin levels were stratified as normal (> or = 14.5 gm% for men, > or = 13 gm% for women) or anemic (< 14.5 gm% for men, < 13 gm% for women). Locoregional failure rates were calculated using the cumulative incidence approach. Overall survival was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Late RT toxicity was scored according to the RTOG morbidity scale. Differences in rates of overall survival, locoregional failure, and late complications were tested by the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Of 504 eligible patients, 451 had a Hgb level measured and recorded prior to the second week of RT. One hundred sixty-two patients (35.9%) were considered to have a normal Hgb level and 289 patients (64.1%) were considered to be anemic. The estimated survival rate is 35.7% at 5 years in patients with a normal Hgb, versus 21.7% in anemic patients (p = 0.0016). The estimated locoregional failure rate is 51.6% at 5 years in patients with a normal Hgb, versus 67.8% in anemic patients (p = 0.00028). The estimated rate of grade 3 or greater toxicity is 19.8% at 5 years in patients with a normal Hgb, versus 12.7% in anemic patients (p = 0.063). On multivariate analysis, several variables were found to be independent predictors of survival including: T stage, Karnofsky performance status, N stage, age, total radiation dose to the primary, and Hgb level. Independent predictors of locoregional control included T stage, Karnofsky performance status, N stage, radiation dose, and Hgb level. The only variables which predicted for the development of late RT complications were gender (p = 0.0109) and age (p = 0.0167). These findings were consistent regardless of whether Hgb level was considered a dichotomous or continuous variable. CONCLUSION Low Hgb levels are associated with a statistically significant reduction in survival and an increase in locoregional failure in this large prospective study of patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Hgb level should be considered as a stratification variable in subsequent studies of head and neck cancer. Strategies to increase Hgb prior to RT in patients with head and neck cancer may lead to improved survival and loco-regional control.

Randomized study of preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy in advanced head and neck carcinoma: Long-term follow-up of RTOG study 73-03

This is a report of a 10-year median follow-up of a randomized, prospective study investigating the optimal sequencing of radiation therapy (RT) in relation to surgery for operable advanced head and neck cancer. In May 1973, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) began a Phase III study of preoperative radiation therapy (50.0 Gy) versus postoperative radiation therapy (60.0 Gy) for supraglottic larynx and hypopharynx primaries. Of 277 evaluable patients, duration of follow-up is 9-15 years, with 7.6% patients lost to follow-up before 7 years. Loco-regional control was significantly better for 141 postoperative radiation therapy patients than for 136 preoperative radiation therapy patients (p = 0.04), but absolute survival was not affected (p = 0.15). When the analysis was restricted to supraglottic larynx primaries (60 postoperative radiation therapy patients versus 58 preoperative radiation therapy patients), the difference for loco-regional control was highly significant (p = .007), but not for survival (p = 0.18). In considering only supraglottic larynx, 78% of loco-regional failures occurred in the first 2 years. Thirty-one percent (18/58) of preoperative patients failed locally within 2 years versus 18% (11/60) of postoperative patients. After 2 years, distant metastases and second primaries became the predominant failure pattern, especially in postoperative radiation therapy patients. This shift in the late failure pattern along with the increased number of unrelated deaths negated any advantage in absolute survival for postoperative radiation therapy patients. The rates of severe surgical and radiation therapy complications were similar between the two arms. Because of an increased incidence of late distant metastases and secondary primaries, additional therapeutic intervention is required beyond surgery and postoperative irradiation to impact significantly upon survival.

Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin in inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. An RTOG study

In patients who have locally advanced and inoperable head and neck cancer, the achievement of initial local control (complete response) of the disease with initial definitive treatment with radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy, is an important prognostic factor for overall survival. Cisplatin 100 mg/M2‐intravenously (IV) with hydration and mannitol diuresis was given every 3 weeks for three doses concurrently with definitive radiotherapy (followed by salvage surgery [if possible] for persistent disease) was activated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) in 1981. One hundred thirty‐four patients were initially registered and 124 were eligible and analyzed for this report. Eighty‐two percent of the patients had Stage IV disease and greater than 50% of the primary sites were in oropharynx (39%), nasopharynx (22%), and oral cavity (18%). Eight‐seven percent of the patients are known to have finished the planned RT > 6450 cGy and 60% received three courses of cisplatin. Overall, 60% finished the planned combined treatment. Complete response to initial treatment occurred in 69% and an additional one patient (1%) was rendered disease‐free after radical node dissection. Severe toxicities were as follows: leukopenia, 11%; anemia, 8%; nausea and vomiting, 6%; stomatitis, 31%; and renal, 6%. One toxic death occurred when a nephrotoxic antibiotic was administered at the same time. All patients were evaluated for total disease and survival regardless of compliance to the treatment or the cause of death. At 1 year, an estimated 51% of the patients had their disease totally controlled and an estimated 66% were alive. Incidence of initial complete response by various patient characteristics also were analyzed. The authors concluded that the combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy is an effective and safe treatment in patients with advanced head and neck cancer and needs to be tested against radiotherapy alone. Cancer 59:259–265, 1987.

The patterns of care outcome study for cancer of the uterine cervix results of the second national practice survey

This report summarizes the outcome results of the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) of cancer of the uterine cervix from 565 patients treated in 1978. the 5‐year survival with no evidence of disease was: Stage I, 74%; Stage II, 56%; and Stage III, 33%. the 5‐year local in‐field failure rate was: Stage I, 12%; Stage II, 27%; and Stage III, 51%. Extent of parametrial involvement, unilateral versus bilateral, may be important in determining survival and local failure. the four‐year actuarial survival was 58% for unilateral involvement versus 47% for bilateral (P = 0.06), and the local failure rate was 32% for unilateral versus 45% for bilateral (P < 0.05). When analyzed by stage, patients with Stage IIb disease with unilateral parametrial involvement showed a trend toward improved survival and decreased local failure compared with those with bilateral Stage IIb cancers (P = 0.1). the use of intracavitary irradiation significantly improved survival and reduced local failures. Furthermore, the number of intracavitary applications was important. When two or more intracavitary applications were used compared with one application, local in‐field failure was significantly reduced, 29% versus 17% at 4 years (P < 0.001), and four‐year survival was improved, 60% versus 73% (P = 0.01). the four‐year actuarial rate of major complications depended on the stage: Stage I, 8%; Stage II, 15%; and Stage III, 13%. There was a statistically significant increase in major complications in patients undergoing laparotomy for staging versus no laparotomy 23% versus 11% at 4 years (P < 0.01) and a trend toward increased major complications in patients who were thin or had prior abdominal surgery. This study confirmed the stage‐dependent outcome of treatment of cancer of the uterine cervix with radiation and indicated that further division of Stage IIb to indicate prognostic significance of unilateral or bilateral parametrial involvement may be warranted. This study also confirmed the importance of intracavitary radiation in optimizing control established by the 1973 PCS. It further suggests that where possible, two intracavitary insertions may yield better results than one insertion.

Results of an RTOG phase III trial (RTOG 85-27) comparing radiotherapy plus etanidazole with radiotherapy alone for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas

PURPOSE The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy and toxicity of Etanidazole (ETA), a hypoxic cell sensitizer, when combined with conventional radiotherapy (RT) in the management of advanced head and neck carcinomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS From March 1988 to September 1991, 521 patients who had Stage III or IV head and neck carcinomas were randomized to receive conventional RT alone (66 Gy in 33 fractions to 74 Gy in 37 fractions, 5 fractions per week) or RT+ETA (2.0 g/m2 thrice weekly for 17 doses), of whom 504 were eligible and analyzable. Treatment assignments were stratified before randomization according to the primary site (oral cavity + hypopharynx vs. supraglottic larynx + oropharynx + nasopharynx), T-stage (T1-3 vs. T4), and N-stage (N0-2 vs. N3). Pretreatment characteristics were balanced. In the RT-alone arm, 39% of patients had T3 and 34% had T4 disease, whereas in the RT+ETA arm, 42% of patients had T3 and 33% had T4 disease. Thirty-eight percent of the RT-alone patients and 37% of the RT+ETA patients had N3 disease. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 3.38 years, with a range between 0.96 and 5.63 years. RESULTS One hundred and ninety-four of the 252 (77%) RT+ETA patients received at least 14 doses of the drug. Overall RT protocol compliance rate was 82% in the RT-alone arm and 86% in the RT+ETA arm. No Grade 3 or 4 central nervous system or peripheral neuropathy was observed in the RT+ETA arm. Eighteen percent of the patients developed Grade 1 and 5% developed Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. Other drug related toxicities included nausea/vomiting (27%), low blood counts (15%), and allergy (9%). Most of these toxicities were Grade 1 and 2. The incidence of severe acute and late radiation effects were similar between the two arms. The 2-year actuarial local-regional control rate (LCR) was 40% for the RT-alone arm and 40% for the RT+ETA arm. Two-year actuarial survival was 41% for the RT-alone arm and 43% for the RT+ETA arm (p = 0.65). Multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the influence of covariates on treatment effects. A strong treatment interaction with N-stage was revealed: LCR (50% vs. 40% at 2 years), RT+ETA improved for patients with N0-2 disease but not for N3 patients (22% for RT+ETA and 40% for RT). Further analyses showed that RT+ETA was more advantageous in N0-1 patients, with a 2-year LCR of 55% for RT+ETA vs. 37% for RT only (p = 0.03). A similar phenomenon was observed when using survival as the end point. CONCLUSION The results showed that adding Etanidazole to conventional RT produced no global benefit for patients who had advanced head and neck carcinomas. There was a suggested benefit for patients who had N0-1 disease, and that needs to be confirmed by another study.

Concomitant Cisplatin Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Advanced Mucosal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Long-Term Results of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 81-17

One hundred twenty‐four eligible patients with advanced mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were entered into a pilot study of concomitant cisplatin (100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks for three doses) and standard irradiation. The initial complete response (CR) was 71% with an additional two cases salvaged by surgery for an overall 73% CR. When no keratin was identified in the histologic specimen (41 patients) the CR was 90%. The nasopharynx showed the best CR (89%) among the sites. At 4 years after treatment, the estimated locoregional tumor control rate was 43% and the survival, 34%. When no keratin was present in the specimen, the estimated locoregional control of tumor was superior (56% versus 38% with keratin identified, P = 0.02) and the estimated survival was also superior (48% versus 26%, P = 0.008). Acute treatment‐related toxicities included one death due to renal damage and two patients with life‐threatening renal damage. The delivery of radiotherapy was not altered. Late toxicity included necrosis −3%, fibrosis −4%, and one fistula. The results of this study justify a randomized trial for the comparison of this combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in advanced mucosal carcinomas of the head and neck.

Hyperfractionated photon radiation therapy in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and sinuses, using radiation therapy as the only planned modality: (Preliminary report) by the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG)

From August 1979 to June 1983, the RTOG conducted a prospective Phase III study that compared a standard schedule with five fractions per week of 180 to 200 cGy per day to a total dose of 6600-7380 cGy, with a hyperfractionation regimen consisting of two fractions of 120 cGy per day, separated by a rest period of 3 to 6 hours for a total of 6000 cGy. A total of 210 patients were entered, of which 187 are analyzed. Complete initial tumor clearance in the head and neck was achieved by radiotherapy in 61% of the patients assigned to the standard schedules and in 59% of those assigned to the continuous hyperfractionation schedule; surgical salvage contributed towards achieving complete response in 5% and 7% of patients, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for loco-regional control of tumor at 1 and 2 years was 39% and 29% for the standard schedules, and 43% and 30% for the hyperfractionation schedule. The endpoints examined to evaluate therapeutic effects do not indicate that the stated hyperfractionation schedule is different than the standard RTOG treatment schedule for head and neck cancer. Acute normal tissue reactions appear to be more severe with the hyperfractionation schedule but the incidence of late reactions is similar in both groups. There is a tendency toward more severe acute reactions when the interval between the two fractions per day is 4.5 hrs or less in comparison to intervals longer than 4.5 hrs.