Victor E. Reyes

Hydrophobic strip-of-helix algorithm for selection of T cell-presented peptides

In extension of the hypothesis that an amphipathic alpha helix of Ii (Phe146-Val164) bound to the foreign antigen-presenting site (desetope) of class II MHC molecules through hydrophobic amino acid residues (Phe146, Leu150, Leu153, Met157, Ile160, Val164) which were present in an axial strip along one side of the Ii helix, we developed an algorithm to search for T cell-presented peptides showing a similar hydrophobic strip-of-helix. Such peptides might bind to the class II MHC molecule site which was complementary to the Ii hydrophobic strip-of-helix. The strip-of-helix hydrophobicity index was the mean hydrophobicity (from Kyte-Doolittle values) of sets of amino acids in axial strips down sides of helices for 3-6 turns, at positions, n, n + 4, N + 7, n + 11, n + 14, and n + 18. Peptides correlating well with T cell responsiveness had: (1) 12-19 amino acids (3-5 cycles or 4-6 turns of an alpha helix), (2) a strip with highly hydrophobic residues, (3) adjacent, moderately hydrophilic strips, and (4) no prolines. The degree of hydrophilicity of the remainder of a putative antigenic helix above a threshold value did not count in this index. That is, the magnitude of amphipathicity was not judged to be the principal selecting factor for T cell-presented peptides. This simple algorithm to quantitate strip-of-helix hydrophobicity in a putative amphipathic alpha helix, allowing otherwise generally hydrophilic residues, predicted 10 of 12 T cell-presented peptides in seven well-studied proteins. The derivation and application of this algorithm were analyzed.

Recognition of disparate HA and NS1 peptides by an H-2Kd-restricted, influenza specific CTL clone

CTLs (CD8+) are known to recognize exogenous peptide in the context of class I MHC molecules. We observed that an influenza subtype H1 and H2 cross-reactive CTL clone B7, which was stimulated by a fusion protein containing a portion of HA2 subunit of A/PR/8 virus HA, recognized a synthetic peptide (residues 515-526) of the HA2 subunit of A/PR/8 virus strain. This CTL clone also recognized a structurally disparate NS1 peptide 50-68 of the same A/PR/8 virus. We examined the recognition of the NS1 peptide 50-68 and the HA peptide 515-526 by the subcloned CTL clone, B7-B7. Cold target inhibition experiments showed that the recognition of the HA peptide by the CTL clone B7-B7 could be competed by NS1 peptide-treated target cells and vice versa. The recognition of both NS1 peptide and HA peptide by the CTL clone B7-B7 was restricted by the same allele, H2Kd. In addition, this NS1 peptide requires approximately a 600-fold higher concn for optimal CTL recognition than did the HA peptide. We conclude that the TCR on clone B7-B7 recognizes the HA peptide or the NS1 peptide as comparable complexes with the same class I MHC molecules, although there is no obvious homology in the primary sequences of HA 515-526 and NS1 50-68 peptides. CTLs elicited with certain antigens appear to recognize distinctively different antigens complexed to the same presenting MHC molecule.

Selection of class I MHC-restricted peptides with the strip-of-helix hydrophobicity algorithm

A strip-of-helix hydrophobicity algorithm to predict class II MHC-restricted peptides, on the basis of their structural similarity to an amphipathic, alpha-helix in Ii, also predicted peptides which were presented to cytotoxic T-cells by class I MHC molecules. This algorithm ranked peptides according to mean Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobicity values of amino acids at positions n, n + 4, n + 7, n + 11, n + 14 and n + 18 in a sequence which when coiled as a putative alpha-helix, had the indicated residues in an axial strip along one side of the helix. Sequences selected for highly scoring, hydrophobic strips were required to have at least 1 of the 4 adjacent strips scoring more negatively than -1 in the strip-of-helix hydrophobicity index and the entire sequence could contain no prolines. This algorithm predicted the class I MHC-restricted, T-cell-presented peptides in sequences of 4 proteins from which some class I MHC-restricted, T-cell-presented sequences had been experimentally determined. Since both class I and class II MHC-restricted peptides could be identified with this algorithm, one can propose that: (1) foreign peptide-binding sites (desetopes) of the class I and class II MHC molecules are structurally similar; and (2) any one T-cell-presented peptide can be presented by some specific allele of both a class I and a class II MHC antigen.

Comparison of three related methods to select T cell-presented sequences of protein antigens

A comparison of three methods to predict T cell-presented sequences within antigenic proteins led to the view that recurrent hydrophobic residues might nucleate excised peptides as alpha-helices against hydrophobic surfaces. Such helices could be protease-protected structures on their way to desetope binding. The compared methods were: the amphipathicity algorithm of DeLisi and Berzofsky [Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 7048-7052. (1985)] as modified by Margalit et al. [J. Immun. 138, 2213-2229. (1987)] the strip of-helix hydrophobicity algorithm (SOHHA) of Stille et al. [Molec. Immun. 24, 1021-1027. (1987)] and the motifs algorithm of Rothbard and Taylor [EMBO J. 7, 93-100. (1988)]. Correct prediction was defined at two levels of stringency: (1) the predicted sequence overlapped the experimentally reported sequence when the ratio of the intersection of both to the union of both greater than or equal to 0.5 or (2) the sequences touched when there was a non-empty intersection of both sequences. We determined the sensitivity (correct predictions/number of reported T cell-presented sequences) and efficiency (correct predictions/number of predictions) at each level of stringency. In terms of overlap, the SOHHA was more sensitive (0.43) than the amphipathicity (0.29) (not significant) and motifs (0.0, 0.0) (p less than 0.05) predictions and more efficient (0.35) than the amphipathicity (0.14) and motifs (0.0, 0.0) predictions. At the less stringent criterion touching, the amphipathicity method (0.71) was as sensitive as motif Rothbard-4 (0.79) and more sensitive than SOHHA (0.57) and motif Rothbard-5 (0.43). At that criterion, the SOHHA was more efficient (0.47) than the amphipathicity (0.36) and motifs (0.25, 0.40) methods. We hypothesize that the comparability of these approaches reflected the common, predominant influence of recurrent hydrophobicity in their predictions.

Binding of radioiodinated influenza virus peptides to class I MHC molecules and to other cellular proteins as analyzed by gel filtration and photoaffinity labeling

In order to determine how T cell-presented peptides associate with the antigen binding sites (desetopes) of class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and how they might be scavenged from an endogenous processing pathway for transfer to those molecules, we characterized the binding of two synthetic peptides restricted by HLA-B37 or HLA-A2 to class I MHC molecules and to cellular proteins of histotyped cell lines, by gel filtration and photo-affinity labeling techniques. In gel filtration binding studies, each peptide associated with immunopurified class I MHC molecules from cells with its restricting, histotype, but little was bound to class I MHC molecules from cells without the restricting histotype and none was bound to bovine serum albumin. After crosslinkage of a radioiodinated photoreactive derivative of influenza virus nucleoprotein peptide NP(336-355Y) and immunoprecipitations with antibodies to class I MHC molecules, that peptide was found to bind to immunopurified class I MHC molecules from HLA-B37+ but not HLA-B37- cells. Binding of the [125I]NP peptide increased from 6 to 12 hr of incubation and was competed by unlabeled, NP peptide but not by HLA-A2-restricted, influenza virus matrix MA(57-73). The principal microsomal membrane proteins binding [125I]NP were about 65, 45 and 33 kD.

Common principles in protein folding and antigen presentation

The regular recurrence of hydrophobic amino acid residues along a peptide sequence determines the formation of a longitudinal hydrophobic strip when the peptide forms an alpha-helix. An understanding of the ways this may affect both folding of nascent proteins and antigen presentation should facilitate vaccine and therapeutics design.

Roles of Accessory Molecules in Processing and Presentation of Foreign Antigens

The Ii sequence Phe146-Val164 was hypothesized to coil as an amphipathic, α helix in the desetope of class II MHC antigens until release in an acidic, foreign antigen-containing endosome to catalyze charging of the desetope with a structurally similar foreign peptide (1). A serum from one of four rabbits injected with a KLH-conjugated, synthetic peptide of Ii sequence 146–169, substituting Tyr for Phe146, immunoprecipitated a 67-kD protein from Raji cells after 3 hours [35S]methionine labeling and 69- and 67 kD-proteins after 5 or 10 hours of labeling, respectively. The 67-kD protein was not sensitive to endoglycosidase F treatment or tunicamycin and had a pI about 5.5. p67 was not surface expressed as judged by immunofluorescence analyses with the antiserum and by immunoprecipitation of surfacebiotinylated proteins. These human molecules might correspond to the murine proteins p72/74, described by Lakey et al. (2) to have a potential role in antigen presentation.

Class I-Presented Influenza Peptides Predicted by an Algorithm that Selects Class II-Presented Peptides

Class II MHC-restricted, CD4+ T cells recognize processed foreign peptides that form amphipathic helices. It also has been shown that class I MHC-restricted, CD8+ T cells recognize foreign peptide fragments rather than entire proteins. In light of this knowledge and the facts that 1) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells use the same gene families to generate their receptors, and 2) class I and class II MHC products hold many structural similarities, we hypothesized that peptides recognized by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells might have some structural homologies. To test this hypothesis, we screened a series of proteins, which contain CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)recognized epitopes, using a strip-of-helix algorithm that has been shown to predict well class II MHC-restricted peptides (1). This algorithm searched for amphipathic a helices by calculating the average hydrophobicity of amino acids at positions n, n+4, n+7, n+ll, n+14, and n+18 in a linear sequence, and could also be adapted to analyze 310 helices or β-pleated sheets.